Creep-rupture tests were performed in the combustion environment on double-edge notch and centre hole oxide/oxide ceramic matrix composite specimens. The specimens were exposed to the maximum temperature of 1250 ± 50°C in the notch region where the combustion flame directly impinged. Specimens were loaded to the desired creep load levels and the loads were sustained till either the specimens ruptured or a run-out time of 25 h was achieved. Optical and scanning electron microscopes were used to characterise specimen damage. The test results were compared to its counterparts in 1200°C (isothermal) laboratory air environment. At a given creep life, the applied creep stress for both the notch types was generally lower in the combustion environment than the laboratory air environment. Finite element simulations attributed lower applied creep stress in the combustion environment to the presence of thermal gradient stresses, which were not present in the isothermal laboratory air environment.
AnsonD, RichersonDW.The benefits and challenges of the use of ceramics in gas turbines. In: van RoodeM, FerberMK, RichersonDW, editors. Ceramic gas turbine component development and characterization. New York (NY): ASME Press; 2002. p. 1–10.
2.
SchafrikR, SpragueR.Saga of gas turbine materials: part III. Adv Mater Process. 2004;162:27–30.
LangeFF, TuWC, EvansAG.Processing of damage-tolerant, oxidation-resistant ceramic matrix composites by a precursor infiltration and pyrolysis method. Mater Sci Eng A. 1995;195:145–150.
5.
LunderbergR, EckerbomL.Design and processing of all-oxide composites. In: EvansAG, NaslainRG, editors. High-temperature ceramic–matrix composites II: manufacturing and materials development. Westerville, OH: American Ceramic Society; 1995. p. 95–104.
MorganPED, MarshallDB.Ceramic composites of monazite and alumina. J Am Ceram Soc. 1995;78(6):1553–1563.
8.
HaslamJJ, BerrothKE, LangeFF.Processing and properties of an all-oxide composite with a porous matrix. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2000;20(5):607–618.
9.
StaehlerJM, ZawadaLP.Performances of four ceramic–matrix composite divergent flap inserts following ground testing on an F110 turbofan engine. J Am Ceram Soc. 2000;83:1727–1738.
10.
ZawadaLP, HayRS, LeeSS, Characterization and high-temperature mechanical behavior of an oxide/oxide composite. J Am Ceram Soc. 2003;86:981–990.
11.
SteelSG, ZawadaLP, MallS.Fatigue behavior of a Nextel 720/alumina (N720/A) composite at room and elevated temperature. Ceram Eng Sci Proc. 2001;22:695–702.
12.
Ruggles-WrennMB, MallS, EberCA, Effects of steam environment on high-temperature mechanical behavior of Nextel™ 720/Alumina (N720/A) continuous fiber ceramic matrix composite. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2006;37(11):2029–2040.
13.
MallS, BoyerBH.Cyclic and sustained loading behaviors of oxide/oxide Nextel™ 720/alumina composite with double edge sharp notch. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2012;43(7):1153–1159.
14.
MallS, SullivanM.Creep rupture and fatigue behavior of a notched oxide/oxide ceramic matrix composite at an elevated temperature. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 2011;8(2):251–260.
15.
SinghAK, SabelkinV, MallS.Fatigue behavior of double-edge notched oxide/oxide ceramic matrix composite in a combustion environment. J Compos Mater. 2017[cited 2017 Feb 13]. doi:10.1177/0021998317692655.
16.
AskarinejadS, RahbarN, SabelkinV, Mechanical behavior of a notched oxide/oxide ceramic matrix composite in combustion environment: experiments and simulations. Compos Struct. 2015;127:77–86.
17.
MallS, NyeAR, JeffersonG.Tension-tension fatigue behavior of Nextel™ 720/Alumina under combustion environment. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 2012;9(1):159–171.
18.
SabelkinV, ZawadaL, MallS.Effects of combustion and salt-fog exposure on fatigue behavior of two ceramic matrix composites and a superalloy. J Mater Sci. 2015;50:5204–5213.
19.
KimTT, MallS, ZawadaLP, Simultaneous fatigue and combustion exposure of a SiC/SiC ceramic matrix composite. J Compos Mater. 2010;44(25):2991–3016.
20.
SabelkinV, JoshiG, MallS, Monotonic tension and creep behavior of single crystal CMSX-486 under combustion environment. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;569:106–116.
21.
SabelkinV, MallS, CookTS, Fatigue and creep behaviors of a SiC/SiC composite under combustion and laboratory environments. J Compos Mater. 2016;50(16):2145–2153.
22.
LuthraKL.Simulation of gas turbine environments in small burner rigs. High Temp Technol. 1989;7(4):187–192.
23.
RichardsonG, LeiCS, SinghRN.Mechanical properties of ceramic matrix composites exposed to rig tests. Ceram Eng Sci Proc. 2004;25(4):153–159.
24.
CormanGS, DeanAJ, BrabetzS, Rig and engine testing of melt infiltrated ceramic composites for combustor and shroud applications. J Eng Gas Turbines Power. 2002;124:459–464.
25.
KeithWP, KedwardKT.Notched strength of ceramic-matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol. 1997;57(6):631–635.
26.
HaqueA, AhmedL, RamasettyA.Stress concentrations and notch sensitivity in woven ceramic matrix composites containing a circular hole – an experimental, analytical, and finite element study. J Am Ceram Soc. 2005;88(8):2195–2201.
27.
KanuryAM.Introduction to combustion phenomena. New York (NY): Gordon and Breach; 1995.
28.
MontgomeryCJ, CannonSM, MawidMA, Reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms for JP-8 combustion. Proceedings of the 40th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting; 2002; Reno, NV.
29.
JachimowskiCJ.Chemical kinetic reaction mechanism for the combustion of propane. Combust Flame. 1984;55:213–224.
30.
MawidMA, ParkTW, SekarB, Application of pulse detonation combustion to turbofan engines. J Eng Gas Turbines Power. 2003;125:270–283.
31.
GlassmanI.Combustion. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1996.
32.
SmithVKIII, AlbroJR, MoreM.New aeropropulsion ground test tools for accelerated engine life assessment. Proceedings of the 37th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit; 2001 July 8–11; Salt Lake City, UT. Reston, VA: AIAA; 2002.
