Tricalcium phosphate scaffolds reinforced with bioglass were characterised morphologically, physically, and mechanically. The scaffolds were fabricated through powder technology and the polymer foaming technique using 80 wt-% of β-TCP and 20 wt-% of phosphate-based bioglass doped with zirconia in various amounts (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 wt-%). The foaming agent was varied (1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3 wt-%) to determine the optimal amount that ensured an interconnected porosity and pore size suitable for increasing osteoconduction and cell attachment. Promising samples for tissue engineering applications showed a pore size ranging from 1.41 to 303 μm, total porosity of 50–53%, compressive strength values between 0.6 and 1 MPa, Young's modulus from 357 to 574 MPa, and excellent interconnectivity.
CrivellaroVR, ZielakJC, DeliberadorTM, Pneumatization within a maxillary sinus graft: a case report. Int J Implant Dent. 2016;2(3):1–5.
3.
DorozhkinSV.Functional biomaterials calcium orthophosphates as bioceramics: state of the art. J Funct Biomater. 2010;1(1):22–107. doi: 10.3390/jfb1010022
4.
FurusawaT, MinatoyaT, OkuderaT, Enhancement of mechanical strength and in vivo cytocompatibility of porous β-tricalcium phosphate ceramics by gelatin coating. Int J Implant Dent. 2016;2(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/s40729-016-0037-3
5.
DorozhkinSV.Calcium orthophosphate deposits: preparation, properties and biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2015;55(1):272–326. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.05.033
6.
AyadiI, Ben AyedF.Sintering and the mechanical properties of the tricalcium phosphate-titania composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;49(1):129–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.001
7.
CãlinC, PãtraşcuI.Growth factors and beta-tricalcium phosphate in the treatment of periodontal intraosseous defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;66(1):44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.02.007
8.
LiBO, LiuZ, YangJ, Preparation of bioactive β-tricalcium phosphate microspheres as bone graft substitute materials. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;70(1):1200–1205.
NavarroM, MichiardiA, CastañoO, Biomaterials in orthopaedics. J R Soc Interface. 2008;5(27):1137–1158. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0151
11.
FranksK, SalihV, KnowlesJC, The effect of MgO on the solubility behavior and cell proliferation in a quaternary soluble phosphate based glass system. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2002;13(1):549–556. doi: 10.1023/A:1015122709576
López MachadoMM, FauréJ, Espitia CabreraMI, Structural characterization and electrochemical behavior of 45S5 bioglass coating on Ti6Al4V alloy for dental applications. Mater Sci Eng B. 2016;206(1):30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2015.09.003
14.
SharminN, HasanMS, ParsonsAJ, Cytocompatibility, mechanical and dissolution properties of high strength boron and iron oxide phosphate glass fibre reinforced bioresorbable composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;59(1):41–56.
15.
NeelA, EnsanyaA, PickupDM, Bioactive functional materials: a perspective on phosphate based glasses. J Mater Chem. 2009;19(6):690–701. doi: 10.1039/B810675D
16.
AhmedI, CollinsCA, LewisMP, Processing, characterisation and biocompatibility of iron-phosphate glass fibers for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2004;25(16):3223–3232. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.013
17.
AbdelghanyAM, OuisMA, AzoozMA, Spectrochim, role of SrO on the bioactivity behavior of some ternary borate glasses and their glass ceramic derivatives. Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2016;152(1):126–133. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2015.07.072
18.
BainoF, NovajraG, Miguez-PachecoV, Bioactive glasses: special applications outside the skeletal system. J Non Cryst Solids. 2016;432(1):15–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.02.015
19.
RajkumarG, AravindanS, RajendranV.Structural analysis of zirconia-doped calcium phosphate glasses. J Non Cryst Solids. 2010;356(28–30):1432–1438. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.05.003
20.
KumarA, BiswasK, BasuB.Hydroxyapatite-titanium bulk composites for bone tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015;103(2):791–806. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35198
21.
RabieeSM, NazparvarN, AzizianM, Effect of ion substitution on properties of bioactive glasses: A review. Ceram Int. 2015;41(6):7241–7251. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.140
22.
WuS, LiuX, YeungKW, Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2014;80(1):1–36. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001
23.
BoseS, RoyM, BandyopadhyayA.Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol.2012;30(10):546–554. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005
24.
WalmsleyGG, McArdleA, TevlinR, Nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering. Nanomedicine. 2015;11(5):1253–1263. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.02.013
25.
YuCJ, EifertH H, BanhartJ, Metal foaming by a powder metallurgy method: production, properties and applications. Mater Res Innov. 1998;2(3):181–188. doi: 10.1007/s100190050082
26.
CaiS, XuGH, YuXZ, Fabrication and biological characteristics of β-tricalcium phosphate porous ceramic scaffolds reinforced with calcium phosphate glass. J Mater Sci. 2009;20(1):351–358.
MassitA, YacoubiAE, IdrissiBCE, Synthesis and characterization of nano-sized β-Tricalcium phosphate: effects of the aging time. Appl Chem. 2014;7(7):57–61.
29.
KarageorgiouV, KaplanD.Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005;26(27):5474–5491. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002
30.
JonesJR, HenchLL.Regeneration of trabecular bone using porous ceramics, solid state. Mater Sci. 2003;7(4–5):301–307.
31.
ParkJH, BaeJY, ShimJ, Evaluation of suitable porosity for sintered porous β-tricalcium phosphate as a bone substitute. Mater Charact.2012;71(1):103–111. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2012.06.012
32.
LouT, WangX, SongG, Fabrication of PLLA/β-TCP nanocomposite scaffolds with hierarchical porosity for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2014;69(1):464–470. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.06.004
33.
Lo ReG, LoprestiF, PetrucciG, A facile method to determine pore size distribution in porous scaffold by using image processing. Micron. 2015;76(1):37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2015.05.001
34.
RenghiniC, KomlevV, FioriF, Micro-CT studies on 3-D bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(4):1328–1337. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.10.017
35.
MittonD, RappeneauJ, BardonneR.Effet d'un traitement utilisant le CO2 supercritique, sur les propriétés mécaniques de l'os spongieux humain, Eur. J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2005;15(4):264–269. doi: 10.1007/s00590-005-0250-x
36.
LaugierP, HaïatG.B. Q. Ultrasound, bone quantitative ultrasound. France: Springer; 2011.
37.
KamathMS, AhmedSSSJ, DhanasekaranM, Bone regeneration based on tissue engineering conceptions – a 21st century perspective. Int J Nanomed. 2014;1(3):183–195.
38.
MartinRB, BurrDB, SharkeyNA, Skeletal tissue mechanics. New York (NY): Springer; 2015.
39.
QinL, GenantHK, GriffithJF, Advanced bioimaging technologies in assessment of the quality of bone and scaffold materials: techniques and applications. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media;2007.
40.
LuX, LengY.Theoretical analysis of calcium phosphate precipitation in simulated body fluid. Biomaterials. 2005;26(10):1097–1108. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.034
41.
WangM, ShihW, HungI, Characterization of calcium phosphate apatite with variable Ca/P ratios sintered at low temperature. Ceram Int. 2015;41(1):1223–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.051
42.
Malakauskaite-PetrulevicieneM, StankeviciuteZ, NiauraG, Characterization of sol-gel processing of calcium phosphate thin films on silicon substrate by FTIR spectroscopy. Vib Spectrosc. 2016;85(1):16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.vibspec.2016.03.023
43.
KienapfelH, SpreyC, WilkeA, Implant fixation by bone ingrowth. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14(3):355–368. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90063-3
44.
De AzaPN, SantosC, PazoA, Vibrational properties of calcium phosphate compounds. 1. Raman spectrum of beta-tricalcium phosphate. Chem Mater. 1997;9(4):912–915. doi: 10.1021/cm960425d
45.
De Fátima GimenezI, MazaliIO, AlvesOL.Application of Raman spectroscopy to the study of the phase composition of phosphate based glass-ceramic. JPhys Chem Solids. 2001;62(1):1251–1255. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3697(01)00017-8
46.
HerathHMTU, Di SilvioL, EvansJRG.Osteoblast response to zirconia surfaces with different topographies. Mater Sci Eng C. 2015;57:363–370. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.052
47.
PaeA, LeeH, NohK, Cell attachment and proliferation of bone marrow-derived osteoblast on zirconia of various surface treatment. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6(2):96–102. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.96
48.
ZhuY, ZhuR, MaJ, In vitro cell proliferation evaluation of porous nano-zirconia scaffolds with different porosity for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Mater. 2015;10(5):55009. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/10/5/055009
