While social change research designed to promote recycling has increased rapidly in recent years, empirical documentation of the importance and effectiveness of distribution channel management for enhancing public support and participation is lacking. In this paper, it is argued mat the design of reverse distribution channels for recyclables influences support and participation through at least three distinct mechanisms:
it influences attitudes and behavior by affecting the perceived costs of recycling;
it influences behavior by affecting the opportunities for acting on recycling intentions, and;
it has the potential for improving attitudes (through dissonance reduction, attribution, and adjusting faulty cost expectations) through inducing trial.
The importance of channel design characteristics through these three mechanisms is illustrated by the results from a continuing research program aimed at boosting the recycling of household waste in Denmark.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AssaelH. (1987). Consumer behavior and marketing action. Boston: Kent Publishing Co.
2.
BelkR. W. (1975). Situational variables and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 157–164.
3.
BergP. E. O. (1985). Source grouping technology, An introduction to a household waste recycling technology. Ph. D. Dissertation, Chalmers Tekniska Högskola.
4.
CoteJ. A.McCulloughJ.ReillyM. (1985). Effects of unexpected situations on behavior-intention differences: A garbology analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 188–194.
5.
DholakiaR. R.DholakiaN.FiratA. F. (1983). From social psychology to political economy: A model of energy use behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3, 231–247.
6.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
7.
Enviroplan A/S, 1983. Kombineret indsamling af aviser, glas og dagrenovation i Farum kommune. [Combined collection of newspapers, glass, and refuse in Farum municipality], Environment Report No. 54/1983, Copenhagen: The National Agency of Environmental Protection.
8.
EriksenR., 1985. Spørgeskemaundersøgelse: Genbrug i Tarup 1984- 1985. [Ouestionnaire analysis: Recycling in Tamp 1984–1985.] Odense: Danish Data Archive, Odense University.
9.
EsterP.MandemakerT. (1994). Socialization of environmental policy objectives: tools for environmental marketing. In: Dutch Committee for Long-Term Environmental Policy (Ed.), The environment: Towards a sustainable future, pp. 49–80. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row Peterson. Firat, A. F. & Dholakia, N. (1977). Consumption patterns and macromarketing: A radical perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 11(4), 291–298.
11.
FishbeinM. (1967). Attitude and the prediction of behavior. In: FishbeinM. (Ed.). Readings in attitude theory and measurement, pp. 477–492. New York: John Wiley.
12.
GellerE. S.BrastedW.MannM. (1979–80). Waste receptacle designs as interventions for litter control. Journal of Environmental Systems, 9, 145–438.
13.
JacobsH. E.BaileyJ. S. (1982–83). Evaluating participation in a residential recycling program. Journal of Environmental Systems, 12(2), 141–152.
14.
JohanssonM.ThøgersenJ. (1991). Deltagelse i kildesortering af husholdningsaffald. Adfærdsteoretisk studie. [Participation in source-separation of household waste. A behavior-science study.] Miljøprojekt No. 164. Copenhagen: Miljøstyrelsen.
15.
JohanssonM. G. (1993). Et adfærdsteoretisk grundlag for regulering af husholdningernes affaldsbortskaffelse. [A behavioral science framework for regulation of the households' waste disposal.] Ph.D. thesis. Aarhus: The Department of Marketing, The Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus, Denmark.
16.
Jysk Teknologisk Institut (1985). Genanvendelse. Forsøg med indsamling af papir og glas fra private husstande i Århus Amt. Notat vedr. status og udvikling i Århus Kommune, december 1985. [Recycling. Test concerning the collection of paper and glass from households in Aarhus County. Note concerning status and development in Aarhus Municipality, December 1985]. Aarhus: Jysk Teknologisk Institut.
KotlerP.RobertoE. L. (1989). Social marketing. Strategies for changing public behavior.New York: The Free Press.
19.
Miljø- og Energiministeriet (1995). Natur-og miljøpolitisk redegørelse 1995.Købehavn: Miljø- og Energiministeriet.
20.
Miljøstyrelsen, Skov- og Naturstyrelsen & Danmarks Statistik (1990). Tal om natur og miljø. (Numbers about nature and the environment.)Copenhagen: Denmarks Statistik.
21.
OulanderF.ThøgersenJ. (1995). Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection. The Journal for Consumer Policy, 18, 317–357.
22.
PietersR.G.M. (1989). Attitudes and behavior in a source separation program: A garbology approach. Delft., The Netherlands: Euburon.
23.
SchwartzS. H. (1977). Normative influence on altruism. In: BerkowitzL. (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 10, pp. 221–279. New York: Academic Press.
24.
ShrumL. J.LowreyT. M.McCartyJ. A. (1994). Recycling as a marketing problem: A framework for strategy developmentPsychology & Marketing, 11(4), 393–416.
25.
ShrumL. J.McCartyJ. A.LowreyT. M. (1995). Buyer characteristics of the green consumer and their implications for advertising strategy. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 71–82.
26.
SternP. C.OskampS. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In: StokolsD.AltmanI. (Ed.). Handbook of environmental psychology, pp. 1043–1088. New York: Wiley.
27.
ThøgersenJ. (1990. A behaviour-theoretical framework for source-separation systems for household waste. A project outline, Working Paper, No. 20. Institut for Markedsøkonomi, Handelshøjskolen i Århus.
28.
ThøgersenJ. (1994). A model of recycling behaviour. With evidence from Danish source separation programmes. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 145–163.
29.
TriandisH. C. (1980). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. In: PageM. M. (Ed.). Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1979, pp. 195–259. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
30.
van OphemJ. A. C. (1992). Household waste activities and economics: Separation of current solid household waste. In: HeijmanW. J. M.KrabbeJ. J. (Ed.). Issues of environmental economic policy.Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.
31.
van RaaijW. F. (1988). The use of natural resources. In: van RaaijW. F.VeldhovenG. M. v.WärnerydK. E. (Ed.). Handbook of economic psychology, pp. 638–655. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32.
WeigelR. H. (1985). Ecological attitudes and actions. In: GrayD. B. (Ed.). Ecological beliefs and behaviors. Assessment and change.Westport: Greenwood Press.
33.
ZaltmanG. (1974). Strategies for diffusing innovations. In: ShethJ. N.WrightP. L. (Ed.). Marketing Analysis for Societal Problems, pp. 78–100. Urbana-Champaign: The University of Illinois.
34.
ZikmundW. G.StantonW. J. (1971). Recycling Solid Wastes: A Channels-of-distribution Problem. Journal of Marketing, 35 (July), 34–39.
