News Media Coverage,Body Mass Index,and Public Attitudes about Obesity

Abstract

This study investigated change in and effects of exposure to news media coverage of the obesity epidemic. Investigators compared self-reported news media exposure between two Research Triangle Institute obesity surveys and examined interactions between exposure and body mass index (BMI) on beliefs about the causes of obesity and support for childhood obesity prevention. We found that higher exposure and BMI were each individually and in combination associated with beliefs about the causes of obesity and support for prevention. For instance, those with higher BMI and exposure were more likely to believe that societal factors cause obesity. This research has implications for media advocacy, social marketing, and policies to promote obesity prevention.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

L. S.

West.

S. G.

1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

American Association Of Public Opinion Research (Aapor).2004. Guidelines and tools for documenting survey results. Available at http://aapor.org/AAPOR_council_guidelines.pdf (accessed October 16, 2006).

American Public Health Association.2003. Americans attitudes on fighting obesity: Summary of study findings. Washington, DC: Widmeyer Polling & Research.

Biener

Flynn

C. A.

Gilpin

E. A.

2004. Impact of declining survey response rates estimates of smoking prevalence. Preventive Medicine27(3): 254–57.

Blendon

R. J.

Young.

J. T.

1998. The public and the comprehensive tobacco bill. Journal of the American Medical Association280(14): 1279–84.

Centers For Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department Of Health and Human Services, National Center For Health Statistics.2003. Health, United States, 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (cited as CDC 2003).

Dansinger

M. L.

Gleason

J. A.

Griffith

J. L.

Selker

H. P.

Schaefer.

E. J.

2005. Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: A randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association293: 43–53.

Dearing

J. W.

Rogers.

E. M.

1996. Communication concepts 6: Agenda setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Dorfman

2003. Studying the news on public health: How content analysis supports media advocacy. American Journal of Health Behavior27(suppl 3): s217–26.

10.

Evans

Ulasevich

Renaud.

2006. Exposure to pro-tobacco messages: Results from the National Youth Tobacco Survey. Social Marketing Quarterly12(2): 1–10.

11.

Evans

W. D.

2005. Public perceptions of childhood obesity: Implications for research. Presented at the RTI-IOM Childhood Obesity Prevention Research: Filling the Gaps Conference, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.rti.org/ (accessed October 16, 2006).

12.

Evans

W. D.

Finkelstein

Kamerow

Renaud.

2005. Public perceptions of childhood obesity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine28(1): 26–32.

13.

Evans

W. D.

Renaud

Finkelstein

Kamerow

Brown.

2006a. Changing perceptions of the childhood obesity epidemic. American Journal of Health Behavior30(2): 167–76.

14.

Evans

W. D.

Ulasevich

Stillman

Viswanath.

2006b. Tracking and evaluation of trends in print media. In Evaluation of project ASSIST: A blueprint for state-level tobacco control, ed. Stillman

Trochim

, Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.

15.

Farquhar

J. W.

Fortmann

S. P.

Flora

J. A.

Taylor

C. B.

Haskell

W. L.

Williams

P. T.

Maccoby

Wood.

P. D.

1990. Effects of communitywide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors: The Stanford Five-City Project. Journal of the American Medical Association264(3): 359–65.

16.

Fiske

S. T.

Taylor.

S. E.

1984. Social cognition: Topics in social psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

17.

Institute Of Medicine.2004. Preventing childhood obesity: Health in the balance. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine of the National Academies.

18.

International Food Information Council (Ific) Foundation and The Center For Media and Public Affairs.2005. Food for thought VI: Reporting of diet, nutrition and food safety. Washington, DC: IFIC Foundation.

19.

Jeffrey

R. W.

1996. Bias in reported body weight as a function of education, occupation, health and weight concern. Addictive Behavior21(2): 217–22.

20.

Johnston

L. D.

Terry-Mcelrath

Y. M.

O'Malley

P. M.

Wakefield.

2005. Trends in recall and appraisal of anti-smoking advertising among American youth: National survey results, 1997–2001. Prevention Science6(1): 1–19.

21.

Mccombs

M. E.

Shawl.

D. L.

1993. The evolution of agenda setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication43: 58–67.

22.

Mcleroy

K. R.

Bibeau

Steckler

Glanz.

1988. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly15: 351–77.

23.

Mokdad

Marks

Stroup

Gerberding.

2004. Actual causes of death in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association291: 1238–45.

24.

Murray

J. B.

Ozanne.

J. L.

1991. The critical imagination: Emancipatory interests in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research18: 129–44.

25.

Newman

2004. Why are we so fat?National Geographic. Available at http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0408/feature3/ (accessed October 16, 2006).

26.

Ogden

C. L.

Flegel

K. M.

Carroll

M. D.

Johnson.

C. L.

2002. Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999–2000. Journal of the American Medical Association288: 1728–32.

27.

Palta

Prineas

R. J.

Berman

Hannan.

1982. Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight. American Journal of Epidemiology115(2): 223–30.

28.

San Jose Mercury News/Kaiser Family Foundation.2004. Survey on childhood obesity: summary document and chartpack. Available at http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/7043.cfm (accessed October 16, 2006).

29.

Scheufele

D. A.

2000. Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society3: 297–316.

30.

Stillman

Cronin

Evans

Ulasevich.

2001. Can media advocacy influence newspaper coverage of tobacco: Measuring the effectiveness of the American stop smoking study's media advocacy strategies. Tobacco Control10: 137–44.

31.

Stillman

F. A.

Hartman

Graubard

Gilpin

Chavis

Garcia

Wun

L. M.

Lynn

Manley.

1999. The American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST): Conceptual framework and evaluation design. Evaluation Review23: 259–80.

32.

Time/Abc News Summit on Obesity.2004. Available at http://www.time.com/time/2004/obesity/ (accessed October 16, 2006).

33.

Viswanath

Finnegan.

J. R.

1996. The knowledge gap hypothesis: Twenty-five years later. In Communication yearbook 19, ed. Burleson

, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

34.

Wallack

2003. The role of mass media in creating social capital: A new direction for public health. In Promoting health: Intervention strategies from social and behavioral research, ed. Smedley

B. D.

Syme

S. L.

, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

35.

Wallack

Dorfman

Jernigan.

1993. Media advocacy and public health: Power for prevention. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.

36.

Winett

Wallack.

1996. Advancing public health goals through the mass media. Journal of Health Communication1(2): 173–96.