Schema Therapy for Forensic Patients with Personality Disorders: Design and Preliminary Findings of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial in the Netherlands
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2012
Schema Therapy for Forensic Patients with Personality Disorders: Design and Preliminary Findings of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial in the Netherlands
According to Dutch Law, patients committing severe crimes justifying imprisonment of four years or more who cannot be held (fully) accountable for these acts can be sentenced to compulsory hospitalization in a specialized TBS hospital in the Netherlands. In the current paper, the effects of TBS treatment will be addressed in terms of recidivism numbers after termination of TBS treatment, as well as in behavioral changes that are observed during admission to TBS hospitals. Although these results offer some indirect support suggesting that TBS is effective, no randomized controlled trials had been conducted up until now that could confirm this. In the current study, preliminary results are reported from a multicenter randomized clinical trial on the effectiveness of Schema Therapy (ST) for hospitalized TBS patients with Antisocial, Borderline, Narcissistic, or Paranoid Personality Disorders, including those with high levels of psychopathy. Patients at seven TBS clinics were randomly assigned to receive three years of either ST or Treatment As Usual (TAU), and are being assessed on several outcome variables, such as recidivism risk (HCR-20, START), personality disorder symptoms (SIDP-IV, SNAP), and successful re-integration into the community. A three-year follow-up study will examine actual recidivism. One hundred and two patients are participating in the study. The preliminary findings from the first 30 patients to complete the three-year study suggest that ST is yielding better outcomes than TAU with regard to reducing recidivism risk and promoting re-entry into the community. These findings are not yet statistically significant, and thus need to be interpreted with caution until confirmed in our complete sample and follow up. However, they suggest that ST may be a promising treatment for offenders with personality disorders, including some psychopathic ones.
BernsteinD.P.ArntzA.de VosM.E.2007. Schema-Focused Therapy in forensic settings: theoretical model and recommendations for best clinical practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 6(2): 169–183. doi:10.1080/14999013.2007.10471261
3.
BernsteinD.P.Keulen-de VosM.JonkersP.de JongeE.ArntzA.2012. “Schema Therapy in forensic settings (pp”. In The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of schema therapy, Edited by: van VreeswijkM.BroersenJNadortM.425–438. West Sussex, , UK: Routledge.
4.
BiddeyJ.BeechA.2003. Implications for treatment of sexual offenders of the Ward and Hudson model of relapse. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15: 121134
5.
BlackburnR.LoganC.DonnellyJ.RenwickS.2003. Personality disorders, psychopathy and other mental disorders: co-morbidity among patients at English and Scottish high security hospitals. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 14(1): 111137 doi:10.1080/1478994031000077925
6.
BregmanI.M.WartnaB.S. J.2010. Recidive TBS 1974-2006. Ontwikkelingen in de strafrechtelijke recidive van ex-terbeschikkinggestelden: een tussenverslag (factsheet 2010 – 4) [Developments in the judicial recidivism of ex-TBS patients: an interim report], The Hague, NL: Wetenschappelijk onderzoek- en documentatiecentrum, Ministerie van Justitie.
7.
BregmanI.M.WartnaB.S. J.2011. Recidive TBS 1974-2008. Ontwikkelingen in de strafrechtelijke recidive van ex-terbeschikkinggestelden. [Recidivism TBS 1974 – 2008. Developments in the judicial recidivism of ex-TBS patients], The Hague, NL: Wetenschappelijk onderzoek- en documentatiecentrum, Ministerie van Justitie.
8.
ClarkL.A.1993. SNAP (Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality): Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
CoidJ.W.HickeyN.YangM.2007. Comparison of outcomes following after-care from forensic and general adult psychiatric services. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190: 509–514. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.106.023044
10.
De JongeE.LammersS.NijmanH.2009. Gedragsveranderingen tijdens TBS-behandeling: een multicenter onderzoek. >;[Behavior change during TBS treatment: a multicenter study]. Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie, 51: 205–215.
11.
DerogatisL.R.LipmanR.S.CoviL.1973. The SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale-Preliminary report. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9: 13–28.
12.
De VogelV.2005. Structured risk assessment of (sexual) violence in forensic clinical practice: the HCR-20 and SVR-20 in Dutch forensic psychiatric patients, Amsterdam, , the Netherlands: Dutch University Press. (Dissertation manuscript)
13.
De VogelV.de RuiterC.van BeekB.MeadG.2004. Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. Law and Human Behaviour, 28(3): 235–251. doi:10.1023/B:LAHU.0000029137.41974.eb
14.
DouglasK.S.WebsterC.D.1999. The HCR-20 violence risk scheme: concurrent validity in a sample of incarcerated offenders. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 26(1): 3–19. doi:10.1177/0093854899026001001
15.
D’SilvaK.DugganC.McCarthyL.2004. Does treatment really make psychopaths worse? A review of the evidence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(2): 163–177. doi:10.1521/pedi.18.2.163.32775
16.
EmmerikJ.2001. De terbeschikkingstelling in maat en getal [Data on involuntary inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment in the Netherlands], The Hague, NL: Ministry of Justice.
17.
FarrellJ.M.ShawI.A.WebberM.A.2009. A schema-focused approach to group psychotherapy for outpatients with borderline personality disorder: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40: 317–328. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.01.002
18.
Giesen-BlooJ.DyckR.van, SpinhovenP.TilburgW.van, DirksenC.AsseltT.van, KremersI.NadortM.ArntzA.2006. Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: A randomized clinical trial of schema focused therapy versus Transference focused psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63: 649–658.
19.
GrothA.BirnbaumH.1978. Adult sexual orientation and attraction to underage persons. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 7: 175–181. doi:10.1007/BF01542377
20.
HareR.1991. Manual for the Hare psychopathy checklist–revised, Toronto, , Canada: Multi-health Systems.
21.
HemphillJ.HareR.WongS.1998. Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal Criminology Psychology, 3: 141–172. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00355.x
22.
HildebrandM.HesperB.SpreenM.NijmanH.L. I.2005. De waarde van gestructureerde risicotaxatie en van de diagnose psychopathie: Een onderzoek naar de betrouwbaarheid en predictieve validiteit van de HCR-20, HKT-30 en PCL-R, Utrecht, , the Netherlands: Expertisecentrum Forensische Psychiatrie. [The value of structured risk assessment and the diagnosis of psychopathy: a research on the reliability and predictive validity of the HCR-20, HKT-30, and PCL-R]
23.
HiscokeU.L.LångströmN.OttossonH.GrannM.2003. Self-reported personality traits and disorders (DSM-IV) and risk of criminal recidivism: A prospective study. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17: 293–305.
24.
HornsveldR.NijmanH.KraaimaatF.2008. Aggression Control Therapy for violent forensic patients: First results. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14: 1–18. 10.1080/10683160701340569
25.
JamiesonL.TaylorP.2004. A re-conviction study of special (high security) hospital patients. British Journal of Criminology, 44: 783–802. doi:10.1093/bjc/azh054
26.
Keulen-de VosM.E.BernsteinD.P.ClarkL.A.ArntzA.LuckerT.de SpaE.2011. Patient versus informant reports of personality disorders in forensic patients. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 22(1): 52–71.
27.
Keulen-de VosM.E.BernsteinD.P.DugganC.2012a. Treatment of cluster B personality disordered offenders: Which treatments might be most effective for which problems in which patients under which circumstances? Part I. Treatment alternativesManuscript submitted for publication
28.
Keulen-de VosM.E.BernsteinD.P.DugganC.2012b. Treatment of cluster B personality disordered offenders: Which treatments might be most effective for which problems in which patients under which circumstances? Part II. Applying a decision-making algorithm to select treatmentsManuscript submitted for publication
29.
Keulen-de VosM.E.BernsteinD.P.VanstipelenS.de VogelV.LuckerT.ArntzA.2012. Emotional states in criminal behaviorManuscript in preparation
30.
Keulen-de VosM.E.van den BroekE.BernsteinD.P.ValentinR.ArntzA.2012. Evoking emotional states in personality disordered offenders: An experimental study of drama therapy techniquesManuscript submitted for publication
31.
LindsayW.R.HogueT.TaylorJ.L.MooneyP.SteptoeL.JohnstonS.O’BrienG.SmithA.H. W.2006. Two studies on the prevalence and validity of personality disorders in three forensic intellectual disability samples. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 17(3): 485–506. doi:10.1080/14789940600821719
32.
LobbestaelJ.ArntzA.CimaM.ChakhssiF.2009. Effects of induced anger in patients with Antisocial Personality Disorder. Psychological Medicine, 39: 557–568.
33.
LobbestaelJ.van VreeswijkM.SpinhovenP.SchoutenE.ArntzA.2010. Reliability and validity of the short Schema Mode Inventory (SMI). Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38: 437–458. doi:10.1017/S1352465810000226
34.
NadortM.ArntzA.SmitJ.H.Giesen-BlooJ.EikelenboomM.SpinhovenPh.Van AsseltT.WensingM.van DyckR.2009. Implementation of outpatient schema therapy for borderline personality disorder with versus without crisis support by the therapist outside office hours: a randomized trial. Behavior Research and Therapy, 47: 961–973. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.013
35.
NijmanH.L. I.CimaM.MerckelbachH.L. G. J.2003. Nature and antecedents of psychotic patients’ crimes. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 14: 542–553. doi:10.1080/1478994031000152754
36.
NijmanH.L. I.van NieuwenhuizenCh.de KruykC.2004. Behavioral changes during forensic psychiatric (TBS) treatment in the Netherlands. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27: 7985 doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2003.12.001
37.
PfohlB.BlumN.ZimmermanM.1995. Structured interview for DSM-IV personality: SIDP-IV, Iowa City, , US: University of Iowa College of Medicine.
38.
Raad voor de Strafrechtstoepassing en Jeugdbescherming. 2011. De oplopende duur van de TBS (advies 17 februari 2011), The Hague, , the Netherlands: Raad voor de Strafrechtstoepassing en Jeugdbescherming. [The increasing length of TBS]
39.
RafaeliE.BernsteinD.P.YoungJ.2011. Schema therapy: Distinctive features, New York: Routledge.
40.
RiceM.HarrisG.CormierC.1992. An evaluation of a maximum security therapeutic community for psychopaths and other mentally disordered offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 16: 399–412. doi:10.1007/BF02352266
41.
SalekinR.RogersR.SewellK.1996. A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy checklist and Psychopathy Checklist-revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology, 3: 203–215. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.1996.tb00071.x
42.
SchoutenH.1995. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible. Biometrics, 51: 1529–1535.
43.
SpaansM.BarendregtM.HaanB.NijmanH.de BeursE.2011. Diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder and criminal responsibility. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 34: 374–378. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.08.008
44.
SpinhovenP.Giesen-BlooJ.van DyckR.KooimanK.ArntzA.2007. The therapeutic alliance in schema-focused therapy and transference-focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75: 104–115. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.1.104
45.
SteelsM.RoneyG.LarkinE.JonesP.CroudaceT.DugganC.1998. Discharged from special hospital under restrictions: a comparison of the fates of psychopaths and the mentally ill. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 8: 39–55. doi:10.1002/cbm.210
46.
TarrierT.DolanM.DoyleM.DunnG.ShawJ.BlackburnR. March. Exploratory randomized clinical trial of schema modal therapy in the Personality Disorder Service at Ashworth Hospital, Ministry of Justice, , UK: Research Series 5/10.
47.
TimmermanI.G. H.EmmelkampP.M. G.2005. The effects of cognitive-behavior al treatment for forensic inpatients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(5): 590–606. doi:10.1177/0306624x01452006
48.
Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal. 2005/2006. Parlementair Onderzoek TBS, Gravenhage, , the Netherlands: Sdu Uitgevers. [Parliamentary investigation of TBS]. ‘s
49.
Van den BroekE.P. A.Keulen-de VosM.E.BernsteinD.P.2011. Arts Therapies and Schema Focused Therapy; a pilot study. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 38: 325–332. doi:10.1016/j.aip.2011.09.005
50.
WartnaB.S. J.KalidienS.N.TollenaarN.EssersA.A. M.2006. Strafrechtelijke recidive van ex-gedetineerden. Uitstroomperiode 1996-2003 (factsheet 2006 – 6), The Hague, , the Netherlands: Wetenschappelijk onderzoek- en documentatiecentrum, Ministerie van Justitie. [Judicial recidivism of ex-prisoners. Release period 1996-2003]
51.
WebsterC.D.MartinM.BrinkJ.NichollsT.L.DesmaraisS.L.2009. Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START). Clinical guide for evaluation risk and recovery (version 1.1), Ontario, , Canada: St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton.
52.
WebsterC.D.MartinM.BrinkJ.NichollsT.L.MiddletonC.2004. Short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START), St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton and British Columbia Mental Health and Addiction Services.
