A model of the electrochemistry in a stress corrosion crack in martensitic stainless steel in low-chloride containing solution has been applied to predict the impact of the hydroxide ion–chloride ion ratio in the bulk solution on the local electrode potential and solution chemistry. Computations were undertaken for bulk chloride ion concentrations between 0.1 and 1000 ppm (by mass) and bulk pH values between 6.0 and 11.5. For near-neutral pH, a significant deviation of crack-tip electrochemistry from the bulk electrochemistry is predicted. However, above pH 9.5, a hydroxide-dominated regime is encountered with uniformity of potential, pH and chloride concentration.
TurnbullAWrightL.Modelling of the electrochemical crack size effect on stress corrosion crack growth rate. Corros. Sci. 2017; 126C: 69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2017.06.016
2.
WhillockGOHHandsBJMajchrowskiTP. Investigation of sensitised stainless steel as analogues for spent AGR fuel cladding to test a corrosion inhibitor for intergranular stress corrosion cracking. J. Nucl. Mater. 2018; 498: 187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.10.017
3.
WangSNewmanRC.Crevice corrosion of Type 316L stainless steel in alkaline chloride solution. Corrosion. 2004; 60: 448–454. doi: 10.5006/1.3299240
4.
LeckieHPUhligHH.Environmental factors affecting the critical potential for pitting in 18-8 stainless steel. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1966; 133: 1262–1267. doi: 10.1149/1.2423801
5.
BertoliniLBolzoniFPastoreT. Behaviour of stainless steel in simulated concrete pore solution. Br. Corros. J. 1996; 31: 218–222. doi: 10.1179/bcj.1996.31.3.218
6.
GalveleJR.Transport processes and the mechanism of pitting of metals. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1976; 123: 464–474. doi: 10.1149/1.2132857
