Selection of an appropriate method of extraction is the basis of an underground mining operation. Primarily in the present market with decreasing metal prices, selecting an optimal mining method means a difference between a viable and a nonviable project. Importantly, a feasible mining method increases the safety of employees and production efficiency. In this paper a numerical ranking mining method selection technique and two simple applicable multiple attribute decision-making methods are applied. These are the analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making. These methods have been employed to select the optimal underground mining method for the Upper Orebody at Nchanga mine in Zambia. Results from the numerical ranking mining method selection technique considered Cut and fill as the appropriate mining method. The multiple attribute decision-making methods accurately defined the feasible mining method. Both the analytic hierarchy process model and Yager's method considered Sublevel caving as the optimal mining method for Nchanga's Upper Orebody.
AlpayS, YavuzM.2009. Underground mining method selection by decision making tools. Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 24(2):173–184.10.1016/j.tust.2008.07.003
2.
AtaeiM, JamshidiM, SereshkiF, JalaliSME. 2008. Mining method selection by AHP approach. J S Afr Inst Min Metall. 108(12):741–749.
3.
BascetinA, KesimalA.1999. The study of a fuzzy set theory for the selection of an optimum coal transportation system from pit to the power plant. Int J Surf Min Reclam Environ. 13(3):97–101.10.1080/09208119908944224
4.
BellmanRE, ZadehLA. 1970. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manage Sci. 17(4): B-141–B-146.10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
5.
BieniawskiZT. 1989. Engineering rock mass classifications: a complete manual for engineers and geologists in mining, civil, and petroleum engineering. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons.
6.
BitarafanMR, AteiM.2004. Mining method selection by multiple criteria decision making tools. J S Afr Inst Min Metall. 104(9):493–498.
7.
BoshkovSH, WrightF.1973. Basic and parametric criteria in the selection, design and development of underground mining systems. SME Min Eng Handb. 1:12.2–12.13.
8.
BrunelliM.2014. Introduction to the analytic hierarchy process. New York (NY): Springer.
9.
ChenCB, KleinCM. 1997. An efficient approach to solving fuzzy MADM problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 88:51–67.10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00048-6
10.
Diederix. 1977. The geology of Nchanga mining licence area. Chingola: NCCM Ltd, Chingola Division. Unpublished.
FloresG, KarzulovicA.2004. Geotechnical guidelines for a transition from open pit to underground mining. Subsidence. ICSII. Task 4, Technical Report, Codelco Norte Division, Codelco Chile.
13.
GarlickWG, HaldaneR.1976. Geology of the Zambian Copperbelt. In: WolfKH. Handbook of stratabound and staratiform ore deposits. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 256–273.
14.
GarrardP.1972. The geology of the Chingola area, Zambia [doctoral dissertation]. London: University of London.
JamshidiM, AtaeiM, SereshkiF, SeyedMEJ. 2009. The application of AHP approach to selection of optimum underground mining method, case study: Jajarm Bauxite Mine (Iran). Arch Min Sci. 54:103–117.
20.
KabweEugie, YimingWang. 2015. Production potential of Nchanga underground mine's collapsed blocks. Int J Sci Technol Res. 4:289–301.
21.
KantR, SenP, PaulPS, KherAA. 2016. A review of approaches used for the selection of optimum stoping method in hard rock underground mine. Int J Appl Eng Res. 11:7483–7490.
22.
KaradoganA., KahrimanA., & OzerU. (2008). Application of fuzzy set theory in the selection of underground mining method. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 108(2), 73–79.
23.
KizilMS, AbdallaS, CanbulatI.2014. Underground coal mine layout selection using analytical hierarchy process. Min Technol. 123:20–29.10.1179/1743286313Y.0000000053
24.
KursunogluN, OnderM.2015. Selection of an appropriate fan for an underground coal mine using the analytic hierarchy process. Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 48:101–109.10.1016/j.tust.2015.02.005
25.
LaubscherDH. 1981. Selection of mass underground mining methods. In: StewartDr, editor. Design and operation of caving and sublevel stoping mines. New York (NY): Society of Mining Engineers, AlME; p. 23–38.
26.
MasonCF. 1970. The geology of Nchanga. Report, NCCM (Chingola Division). Chingola: Geology Dept.
27.
MbiriL.2011. The Upper Orebody, a new dimension to Nchanga underground mining operation. In: The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 6th Southern African Base Metals (Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy); p. 187–208. Phalaborwa.
28.
MorrisonRGK. 1976. A philosophy of ground control: a bridge between theory and practice. Rev ed.Montreal: Department of Mineralogy, Metallurgy, and Engineering, McGill University.
29.
MundikeS, LipalileM.2005. Applications of fibre-reinforced shotcrete (fibrecrete) support in drifts. The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy; The Third Southern African Conference on Base Metals; p. 225–234. Kitwe.
30.
Miller-TaitL, PanalkisL, PoulinR.1995. UBC mining method selection. In: Proceeding of the Mine Planning and Equipment Selection Symposium; p. 163–168. Calgary.
31.
NaghadehiMZ, MikaeilR, AtaeiM.2009. The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran. Expert Syst App. 36:8218–8226.10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.006
32.
NicholasDE, MarekJ.1981. Feasibility study – selection of a mining method integrating rock mechanics and mine planning. In: Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference. Littleton, CO: American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers; Proceedings of the 5th Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference, May, San Francisco (CA); Vol. 2, p. 1018–1031.
33.
PearsonBN. 1981. The development and control of block caving at the Chingola division of Nchanga consolidated copper mines limited, Zambia. In: StewartDr. Design and operation of caving and sublevel stoping mines. New York (NY): Society of Mining Engineers, AlME; p. 211–223.
34.
PeskensTW. 2013. Underground mining method selection and preliminary techno-economic mine design for the Wombat orebody, Kylylahti deposit, Finland [PhD thesis]. Netherlands: Section for Resource Engineering, Department of Geoscience & Engineering, Delft University of Technology.
SaatyTL. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
37.
SaatyTL. 2000. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh (PA): Rws Publications; Vol. 6.
38.
SRK. 2007. Geological modelling and mineral resource evaluation, Nchanga underground Upper Orebody. Chingola: SRK Consulting.
39.
StonleyDCW. 1975. A geological manual for the Upper Orebody. Report, NCCM (Chingola Division). Chingola: Geology Dept.
40.
YagerRR. 1978. Fuzzy decision making including unequal objectives. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1:87–95.10.1016/0165-0114(78)90010-6
41.
YavuzM.2015. The application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Yager's method in underground mining method selection problem. Int J Min Reclam Environ. 29:453–475.10.1080/17480930.2014.895218
42.
YavuzM., IpharM., & OnceG. (2008). The optimum support design selection by using AHP method for the main haulage road in WLC Tuncbilek colliery. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. 23(2):111–119.
43.
ZadehLA. 1973. Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1:28–44.10.1109/TSMC.1973.5408575
