This study investigated the mechanical properties of blends and their nanocomposite blends (BNCs) of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and polylactic acid (PLA) at different loadings (0.5, 1, and 2%) of cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) and nano titanium dioxide (n–TiO2), and parameter optimisation of the BNCs was conducted using a statistical technique such as Taguchi-grey relational and regressional analysis. The results showed that adding PLA to PHB increased the mechanical properties of the blends, and the mechanical properties increased more with the high loading of PLA. The reinforcement with n–TiO2 improved the mechanical properties of the blends; however, the presence of the CNF in the blends generally decreased the mechanical properties. The grey relational analysis showed that the best BNCs were 75% PHB /25% PLA with 0.5% CNF. However, Taguchi analysis found that 75% PHB / 25% PLA with 2% n–TiO2 has the best mechanical properties.
GunningMA, GeeverLM, KillionJA, The effect of the mixing routes of biodegradable polylactic acid and polyhydroxybutyrate nanocomposites and compatibilised nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos. 2016; 29 ( 4 ): 538–557. doi: 10.1177/0892705714526912.
5.
Lopera-ValleA, CaputoJV, LeãoR, Influence of epoxidized canola Oil (eCO) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) on the mechanical and thermal properties of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB)—poly (lactic acid)(PLA) blends. Polymers (Basel). 2019; 11 ( 6 ): 933. doi: 10.3390/polym11060933.
6.
ErcegM, KovacicT, KlaricI.Thermal degradation of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) plasticized with acetyl tributyl citrate. Polym Degrad Stab. 2005; 90: 313–318. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.048.
7.
SeoaneIT, ManfrediLB, CyrasVP.Properties and processing relationship of polyhydroxybutyrate and cellulose biocomposites. Proc Mater Sci. 2015; 8: 807–813. doi: 10.1016/j.mspro.2015.04.139.
8.
ArrietaMP, FortunatiE, DominiciF, Bionanocomposite films based on plasticized PLA–PHB/cellulose nanocrystal blends. Carbohyd Polym. 2015; 121: 265–275. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.056.
9.
FortunatiE, PeltzerM, ArmentanoI, Effects of modified cellulose nanocrystals on the barrier and migration properties of PLA nano-biocomposites. Carbohyd Polym. 2012; 90 ( 2 ): 948–956. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.06.025.
BartczakZ, GaleskiA, KowalczukM, Tough blends of poly (lactide) and amorphous poly ([R, S]-3-hydroxy butyrate)–morphology and properties. Eur Polym J. 2013; 49 ( 11 ): 3630–3641. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.07.033.
12.
OthmanSH.Bio-nanocomposite materials for food packaging applications: types of biopolymer and nano-sized filler. Agric and Agric Sci Proc. 2014; 2: 296–303. doi: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2014.11.042.
13.
BraconeM, MerinoD, GonzalezJS, Natural polymers derivatives, blends and composites. New Delhi: Nova Publisher; 2016. p. 171–194.
14.
UzunG, AydemirD.Biocomposites from polyhydroxybutyrate and bio-fillers by solvent casting method. B Mater Sci. 2017; 40: 383–393. doi: 10.1007/s12034-017-1371-7.
15.
Resano-GoizuetaI, AshokanBK, TrezzaTA, Effect of nano-fillers on tensile properties of biopolymer films. J Polym Environ. 2018; 26 ( 9 ): 3817–3823. doi: 10.1007/s10924-018-1260-1.
16.
Díez-PascualAM.Synthesis and applications of biopolymer composites. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20: 2321. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092321.
17.
FroneAN, BataluD, ChiulanI, Morpho-Structural, thermal and mechanical properties of PLA/PHB/cellulose biodegradable nanocomposites obtained by compression molding, extrusion, and 3D printing. Nanomater. 2020; 10 ( 1 ): 51. doi: 10.3390/nano10010051.
LiuAR, XuBZ, ChenCC, Effects of modified SWCNT on the mechanical and thermal properties of PLA/PHB bio-composites. AIP Adv. 2020; 10 ( 7 ): 075122. doi: 10.1063/5.0011522.
21.
SmithMK, PaleriDM, AbdelwahabM, Sustainable composites from poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)(PHB) bioplastic and agave natural fibre. Green Chem. 2020; 22 ( 12 ): 3906–3916. doi: 10.1039/D0GC00365D.
22.
AydemirD, GardnerDJ.Biopolymer blends of polyhydroxybutyrate and polylactic acid reinforced with cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohyd Polym. 2020; 250: 116867. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116867.
23.
Toloie-EshlaghyA, HomayonfarM.MCDM methodologies and applications: a literature review from 1999 to 2009. Res J Int Stud. 2011; 21: 86–137.
24.
NoryaniM, SapuanSM, MasturaMT.Multi-criteria decision-making tools for material selection of natural fibre composites: a review. J Mec Eng Sci. 2018; 12 ( 1 ): 3330–3353. doi: 10.15282/jmes.12.1.2018.5.0299.
25.
AydemirD, AlsanM, AltuntasE, Mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of heat-treated wood-polypropylene composites and comparison of the composites with PROMETHEE method. Plast, Rubber Compos. 2019; 48 ( 9 ): 389–400. doi: 10.1080/14658011.2019.1638132.
26.
RieraMA, PalmaRR.Advances in the domain of environmental biotechnology. Berlin: Springer; 2021. p. 335–356.
27.
MilaniAS, EskiciogluC, RoblesK, Multiple criteria decision making with life cycle assessment for material selection of composites. Express Polym Lett. 2011; 5 ( 12 ): 1062–1074. doi: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2011.104.
28.
BabalolaMA.A multi-criteria decision analysis of waste treatment options for food and biodegradable waste management in Japan. Environ. 2015; 2 ( 4 ): 471–488. doi: 10.3390/environments2040471.
29.
Al-OqlaFM, SapuanSM.Materials selection for natural fiber composites. Duxford: Woodhead Publishing; 2017. p. 49–71.
30.
KhanZA, SiddiqueeAN, KamaruddinS.Optimization of in-feed centreless cylindrical grinding process parameters using grey relational analysis. Pertanika J Sei Technol. 2012; 20 ( 2 ): 257–268.
31.
PawadeRS, JoshiSS.Multi-objective optimization of surface roughness and cutting forces in high-speed turning of Inconel 718 using Taguchi grey relational analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. 2011; 56 ( 1-4 ): 47–62. doi: 10.1007/s00170-011-3183-z.
32.
PandaA, SahooA, RoutR.Multi-attribute decision making parametric optimization and modeling in hard turning using ceramic insert through grey relational analysis: a case study. Decision Sci Lett. 2016; 5 ( 4 ): 581–592. doi: 10.5267/j.dsl.2016.3.001.
33.
TaguchiG, ElsayedEA, HsiangT.Quality engineering in production systems. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1989. p. 5–30.
34.
ChangC, KuoC.Evaluation of surface roughness in laser-assisted machining of aluminium oxide ceramics with Taguchi method. Int J Mac Tools Manuf. 2007; 47: 141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.02.009.
35.
PınarA, GüllüA.Sayısal Denetimli Hidrolik Pozisyonlama Sisteminin Taguchı Metodu İle Optimizasyonu. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010; 25 ( 1 ): 93–100.
36.
ChenYH, TamSC, ChenWL, Application of the Taguchi method in the optimization of laser micro–engraving of photomasks. Int J Mat Prod Tech. 1996; 11 ( 3-4 ): 333–344. doi: 10.1504/IJMPT.1996.036336.
37.
KöksoyO, MulukFZ.Solution to the Taguchi's problem with correlated responses. Gazi Univer J Sci. 2004; 17 ( 1 ): 59–70.
38.
KıvakT.Optimization of surface roughness and flank wear using the Taguchi method in milling of Hadfield steel with PVD and CVD coated inserts. Measurement (Mahwah N J). 2014; 50: 19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.12.017.
39.
MasmiatiN, SarhanAA.Optimizing cutting parameters in inclined end milling for minimum surface residual stress–Taguchi approach. Measurement (Mahwah N J). 2015; 60: 267–275. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.10.002.
40.
StepanovaM, Korzhikova-VlakhE.Modification of cellulose micro-and nanomaterials to improve properties of aliphatic polyesters/cellulose composites: a review. Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14 ( 7 ): 1477. doi: 10.3390/polym14071477.
41.
dos SantosFA, IulianelliGC, TavaresMIB.The use of cellulose nanofillers in obtaining polymer nanocomposites: properties, processing, and applications. Mater Sci Appl. 2016; 7 ( 05 ): 257–294.
EichhornSJ, EtaleA, WangJ, Current international research into cellulose as a functional nanomaterial for advanced applications. J Mater Sci. 2022: 1–71. doi: 10.1007/s10853-022-06903-8.
44.
MofokengJP, LuytAS.Dynamic mechanical properties of PLA/PHBV, PLA/PCL, PHBV/PCL blends and their nanocomposites with TiO2 as nanofiller. Thermochim Acta. 2015; 613: 41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2015.05.019.
45.
GumusH, AydemirD, AltuntasE, Cellulose nanofibrils and nano-scaled titanium dioxide-reinforced biopolymer nanocomposites: selecting the best nanocomposites with multicriteria decision-making methods. J Compos Mater. 2020; 54 ( 7 ): 923–935. doi: 10.1177/0021998319870842.
