Nano boron oxide (B2O3) was firstly produced from granular B2O3 by ball milling under cryogenic conditions. Then, PMMA/B2O3 nanocomposites were synthesized by melting method and then characterized. Finally, the rheological properties of PMMA/B2O3 nanocomposite were investigated using a high pressure capillary rheometer. Brauner-Emmet-Teller (BET) surface area analysis showed that the surface area of B2O3 increased with cryogenic grinding. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images revealed that B2O3 particles were nano-sized. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed that the morphology changed with the increase of B2O3 amount. The thermal stability of nanocomposites was found to be better than PMMA. PMMA degraded in two steps, while nanocomposites degraded in one step. It was determined that the amount of residue increased with increasing amount of B2O3. Both PMMA and nanocomposites exhibited non-Newtonian shear thinning flow behavior. In addition, rheological data were found to be highly compatible with the Power Law model.
SeoSD, KangKC, JeongJW, Preparation and characterization of poly methyl methacrylate/clay nanocomposite powders by microwave-assisted in-situ suspension polymerization. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2020; 20: 4193–4197. DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2020.17574.
3.
QinL, LiG, HouJ, Preparation, characterization, and thermal properties of poly (methyl methacrylate)/boron nitride composites by bulk polymerization. Polym Compos. 2015; 36 ( 9 ): 1675–1684. doi: 10.1002/pc.23078.
4.
ZhaoXY, SunZY, JiJQ, Design, synthesis and characterisation of novel photoresponsive poly(methyl methacrylate). Mater Res Innovations. 2013; 18 ( 6 ): 451–456. DOI: 10.1179/1433075(13y.0000000172.
5.
KulE, Aladağİ. The physically and mechanically reinforcement of polymethylmethacrylate denture base material. J Dentistry Faculty Atatürk Univ. 2016; 15: 102–108.
6.
AmirN, TaherA, AyubG.Influence of processing condition and carbon nanotube on mechanical properties of injection molded multi-walled carbon nanotube/poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2016; 133 ( 31 ): 43738–43746. DOI: 10.1002/app.43738.
7.
SoygunK, BolayirG, BoztugA.Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013; 5 ( 2 ): 153–160. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.153.
8.
AyanoğluZG, DoğanM.Characterization and thermal kinetic analysis of PMMA/modified-MWCNT nanocomposites. Diamond Relat Mater. 2020; 108: 107950. DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2020.107950.
9.
AhmadS, AhmadS, AgnihotrySA.Nanocomposite electrolytes with fumed silica in poly(methylmethacrylate): thermal, rheological and conductivity studies. J Power Sources. 2005; 140: 151–156. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.08.002.
KizildumanBK, AlkanM, DoğanM, Al-pillared-montmorillonite (AlPMt)/poly(methyl methacrylate)(PMMA) nanocomposites:the effects of solvent types and synthesis methods. Adv Mater Sci. 2017; 17 ( 53 ): 5–23. DOI: 10.1515/adms-2017-0012.
13.
MeneghettiP, QutubuddinS, WebberA.Synthesis of polymer gel electrolyte with high molecular weight poly(methyl methacrylate)–clay nanocomposite. Electrochim Acta. 2004; 49: 4923–4931. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.06.023.
14.
YehJM, LiouSJ, LaiMC, Comparative studies of the properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)-clay nanocomposite materials prepared byin situ emulsion polymerization and solution dispersion. J Appl Polym Sci. 2004; 94 ( 5 ): 1936–1946. DOI: 10.1002/app.21095.
15.
MohamadianN, GhorbaniH, WoodDA, A hybrid nanocomposite of poly(styrene-methyl methacrylate- acrylic acid) /clay as a novel rheology-improvement additive for drilling fluids. J Polym Res. 2019; 26 ( 2 ): 33. DOI: 10.1007/s10965-019-1696-6.
16.
OuaadK, DjadounS, Ferfera-HarrarH, Synthesis and thermal behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate)/maghnia bentonite nanocomposite prepared at room temperature via in situ polymerization initiated by a new Ni(II)alfa-benzoinoxime complex. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011; 119 ( 6 ): 3227–3233. DOI: 10.1002/app.32872.
17.
DikenME, DoğanS, TurhanY, Synthesis and characterization of poly(acrylic acid)/organo-modified nanohydroxyapatite nanocomposites: thermal, optical and biocompatibility properties. Adv Mater Sci. 2018; 57 18 ( 3 ): 54–67. DOI: 10.1515/adms-2017-0041.
18.
DoğanS, ÖzcanT, DoğanM, The effects on antioxidant enzymes of PMMA/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites/composites. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2020; 142: 109676. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2020.109676.
19.
WijesingheWPSL, MantilakaMMMGPG, KarunarathneTSEF, Synthesis of a hydroxyapatite/poly(methylmethacrylate) nanocomposite using dolomite. Nanoscale Adv. DOI: 10.1039/c8na00006a
20.
PehlivanF, KızıldumanBK, BicilZ, Synthesis, characterization and environmental application of polymethyl methacrylate/glass fiber composite. Fresenius Environ Bull. 2018; 27 ( 11 ): 7643–7651.
21.
TurhanY, DoǧanM, AlkanM.Poly(vinyl chloride)/kaolinite nanocomposites: characterization and thermal and optical properties. Ind & Eng Chem Res. 2010; 49 ( 4 ): 1503–1513. DOI: 10.1021/ie901384x.
22.
ColonnaM, BertiC, BinassiE, Nanocomposite of montmorillonite with telechelic sulfonated poly(butylene terephthalate): effect of ionic groups on clay dispersion, mechanical and thermal properties. Express Polym Lett. 2010; 46 ( 5 ): 918–927. DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2017.38.
23.
CuiY, KumarS, Rao KonaB, Gas barrier properties of polymer/clay nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2015; 5 ( 78 ): 63669–63690. DOI: 10.1039/C5RA10333A.
24.
CherifiZ, BoukoussaB, ZaouiA, Structural, morphological and thermal properties of nanocomposites poly(GMA)/clay prepared by ultrasound and in-situ polymerization. Ultrason Sonochem. 2018; 48: 188–198. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.05.027.
25.
SieradzkaM, FabiaJ, BiniasD, The role of reduced graphene oxide in the suspension polymerization of styrene and its effect on the morphology and thermal properties of the polystyrene/rGO nanocomposites. Polymers (Basel). 2020; 12 ( 7 ): 1468. DOI: 10.3390/polym12071468.
26.
YadavR, PurwarR.Influence of metal oxide nanoparticles on morphological, structural, rheological and conductive properties of mulberry silk fibroin nanocomposite solutions. Polym Test. 2021; 93: 106916. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106916.
27.
KumarM, KumarV, MuthurajaA, Influence of nanoclay on the rheological properties of PMMA/organoclay nanocomposites prepared by solvent blending technique. Macromol Symp. 2016; 365: 104–111. DOI: 10.1002/masy.201650017.
28.
LiJQ, SaloveyR.Model filled polymers: The effect of particle size on the rheology of filled poly(methyl methacrylate) composites. Polym Eng Sci. 2004; 44 ( 3 ): 452–462. DOI: 10.1002/pen.20040.
29.
LinX, KellyA, RenD, Geometrical dependence of viscosity of polymethylmethacrylate melt in capillary flow. J Appl Polym Sci. 2013; 130 ( 5 ): 3384–3394.
30.
LinX, KellyA, WoodheadM, Capillary study on geometrical dependence of shear viscosity of polymer melts. J Appl Polym Sci. 2014; 131 ( 6 ). DOI: 10.1002/APP.39982.
31.
ChenY, YangQ, HuangY, Influence of phase coarsening and filler agglomeration on electrical and rheological properties of MWNTs-filled PP/PMMA composites under annealing. Polymer. 2015; 79: 159–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.10.027.
ZhangXC, ScarpaF, McHaleR, Poly(methyl methacrylate)-decorated single wall carbon nanotube/epoxy nanocomposites with re-agglomeration networks: rheology and viscoelastic damping performance. Polymer. 2016; 87: 236–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.02.002.
34.
BeyliPT, DoğanM, GündüzZ, Synthesis, characterization and their antimicrobial activities of boron oxide/poly(acrylic acid) nanocomposites: thermal and antimicrobial properties. Adv Mater Sci. 2018; 18 1 ( 55 ): 29–36. DOI: 10.1515/adms-2017-0025.
35.
PittoniPG, ChangYY, LinSY.Interpretation of the peculiar temperature dependence of surface tension for boron trioxide. J Taiwan Institute Chem Eng. 2012; 43: 852–859.
36.
YılmazZ, DoğanM, AlkanM.Rheological and wall slip properties of kaolinite-silicon oil pastes during extrusion. J Ceramic Process Res. 2010; 11 ( 6 ): 752–759.
Töreİ, AyN.Amorphous boroxide production and characterization. 2nd International boron symposium; Eskişehir-Turkey; 2004.
39.
ErenE., Kinetic investigation of boron oxide production from boric acid [ Master thesis ]: Gazi University Institute of Science; 2005.
40.
MaoD, LuG.The effect of B2O3 addition on the crystallization of amorphous TiO2–ZrO2 mixed oxide. J Solid State Chem. 2007; 180 ( 2 ): 484–488. DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2006.11.009.
41.
MoonOM, KangBC, LeeSB, Temperature effect on structural properties of boron oxide thin films deposited by MOCVD method. Thin Solid Films. 2004; 464–465: 164–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.05.107.
42.
SinghAK, MishraRK, PrakashR, Specific interactions in partially miscible polycarbonate (PC)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends. Chem Phys Lett. 2010; 486 ( 1–3 ): 32–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.12.072.
43.
MohapatraS.D., FTIR analysis of Bi2O3-B2O3-Fe2O3 glass system doped with Nd2O3. Department of Ceramic Engineering National Institute of Technology [ Thesis for the Degree of Bachelor of Technology ]. Rourkela; 2009.
44.
GuanmingQ, ChanghaoY, ChunfangG, Study on properties and synthesis of fluorescence PMMA. J Rare Earths. 2007; 25 ( 5 ): 5–8. DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0721(07)60512-2.
45.
FerriolM, GentilhommeA, CochezM, Thermal degradation of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA): modelling of DTG and TG curves. Polym Degrad Stab. 2003; 70 ( 2 ): 271–281. DOI: 10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00291-4.
46.
ManringLE, SogahDY, CohenGM.Thermal degradation of poly(methyl methacrylate). 3. polymer with head-to-head linkages. Macromolecules. 1989; 22: 4652–4654. DOI: 10.1021/ma00202a048.
47.
ZengWR, LiSF, ChouWK.Chemical kinetics on thermal oxidative degradation of PMMA. Chin J Chem Phys. 2003; 16: 64–68.
48.
ManringLE.Thermal degradation of poly(methyl methacrylate). 4. Random side-group scission. Macromolecules. 1991; 24: 3304–3309. DOI: 10.1021/ma00011a040.
KalyonDM, YarasP, AralB, Rheological behavior of a concentrated suspension: a solid rocket fuel simulant. J Rheol. 1993; 37 ( 1 ): 35–53. DOI: 10.1122/1.550435.
55.
YılmazerÜ, KalyonDM.Slip effects in capillary and parallel disk torsional flows of highly filled suspensions. J Rheol. 1989; 33 ( 8 ): 1197. DOI: 10.1122/1.550049.
56.
MooneyM.Explicit formulas for slip and fluidity. J Rheol. 1931; 2 ( 2 ): 210–222. DOI: 10.1122/1.2116364.
57.
PhewthonginN, SaeouiP, SirisinhaC.A study of rheological properties in sulfur-vulcanized CPE/NR blends. Polym Test. 2005; 24 ( 2 ): 227–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.08.005.
58.
SteffeJF.Rheological methods in food process engineering. 2nd ed. East Lansing: Freeman Press; 1996.
59.
KulkarniAR, SoppimathKS, AminabhaviTM.Rheological properties of the dispersions of starch, guar gum, and their physical mixtures in the temperature interval 298.15–333.15 K. Polym-Plast Technol Eng. 2010; 39 ( 3 ): 437–456. DOI: 10.1081/PPT-100100039.
60.
RaoMA, CooleyHJ.Determination of effective shear rates in rotational viscometers with complex geometries. J Texture Stud. 1984; 15 ( 4 ): 327–335. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4603.1984.tb00390.x.
61.
RaghavanSR, RileyMW, FedkiwPS, Composite polymer electrolytes based on poly(ethylene glycol) and hydrophobic fumed silica: dynamic rheology and microstructure. Chem Mater. 1998; 10 ( 1 ): 244–251. DOI: 10.1021/cm970406j.
62.
CarozzaS.Rheological Characterisation of Gels and Foams for Food, Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität, München. Dipl Ing-Univ Nr. 2001; 101.
