An effective nanocomposite-based microwave absorber made of polyurethane /graphene/glass/epoxy with different weight percentages of graphene (0 to 2.5 wt%) is proposed. Microstructural characterization of samples is done with the help of XRD, FESEM and TEM. Graphene crystalline structure maximum diffraction peak is observed at 26o associated interlayer d-spacing is 0.341 nm (plane 002), the same affirmed with TEM analysis. Graphene flake structure is identified from FESEM results. Firstly, experimental investigation is done using wave guide setup, later numerical model is developed using RF module in COMSOL. The experimental results reveal more than 90% absorption capability in broad bandwidth i.e., 3 GHz and maximum Reflection loss -35.9 dB is attained at 12.1 GHz. Also, maximum shielding effectiveness is -47 dB for 2.5 wt% PU/graphene composite due to its semi conduction. Further, a composite concrete block using 2.5 wt% PU/graphene is analysed using numerical model for the application of anechoic.
Bin ZhangH, YanQ, ZhengWG, Tough graphene-polymer microcellular foams for electromagnetic interference shielding. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces.. 2011; 3: 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1021/am200021v.
2.
YanDX, RenPG, PangH, Efficient electromagnetic interference shielding of lightweight graphene/polystyrene composite. J Mater Chem. 2012; 22: 18772–18774. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm32692b.
3.
DasCK, BhattacharyaP, KalraSS.Graphene and MWCNT: potential candidate for microwave absorbing materials. J Mater Sci Res. 2012; 1: 126, https://doi.org/10.5539/jmsr.v1n2p126.
4.
SinghBP, PrasantaChoudhary V, SainiP, Enhanced microwave shielding and mechanical properties of high loading MWCNT-epoxy composites. J Nanoparticle Res. 2013; 15: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1554-0.
5.
SalimbeygiG, NasouriK, ShoushtariAM, Fabrication of polyvinyl alcohol/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composite electrospun nanofibres and their application as microwave absorbing material. Micro Nano Lett. 2013; 8: 455–459. https://doi.org/10.1049/mnl.2013.0381.
6.
BhattacharyaP, SahooS, DasCK.Microwave absorption behaviour of MWCNT based nanocomposites in X-band region. Express Polym Lett. 2013; 7: 212–223. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.20.
SongWL, CaoMS, FanLZ, Highly ordered porous carbon/wax composites for effective electromagnetic attenuation and shielding. Carbon N.Y. 2014; 77: 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.014.
10.
HuangCL, LouCW, LiuCF, Polypropylene/graphene and polypropylene/carbon fiber conductive composites: mechanical, crystallization and electromagnetic properties. Appl Sci. 2015; 5: 1196–1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/app5041196.
11.
VermaM, VermaP, DhawanSK, Tailored graphene based polyurethane composites for efficient electrostatic dissipation and electromagnetic interference shielding applications. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 97349–97358. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra17276d.
12.
KarimiP, Ostoja-StarzewskiM, JasiukI.Experimental and computational study of shielding effectiveness of polycarbonate carbon nanocomposites. J Appl Phys. 2016; 120: 145103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4964691.
13.
HoghoghifardS, MokhtariH, DehghaniS.Improving EMI shielding effectiveness and dielectric properties of polyaniline-coated polyester fabric by effective doping and redoping procedures. J Ind Text. 2018; 47: 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083716665630.
DrakakisE, KymakisE, TzagkarakisG, A study of the electromagnetic shielding mechanisms in the GHz frequency range of graphene based composite layers. Appl Surf Sci. 2017; 398: 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.030.
16.
YunS, KirakosyanA, SurabhiS, Controlled morphology of MWCNTs driven by polymer-grafted nanoparticles for enhanced microwave absorption. J Mater Chem C. 2017; 5: 8436–8443. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tc02892j.
17.
JanR, SaboorA, KhanAN, Estimating EMI shielding effectiveness of graphene-polymer composites at elevated temperatures. Mater Res Express. 2017; 4: 085605, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa81e9.
18.
ZhangC, LiH, ZhuoZ, Facile fabrication of ultra-light and highly resilient PU/RGO foams for microwave absorption. RSC Adv. 2017; 7: 41321–41329. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra07794g.
19.
JanR, HabibA, AkramMA, Flexible, thin films of graphene-polymer composites for EMI shielding. Mater Res Express. 2017; 4: 035605, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa6351.
20.
VermaM, ChauhanSS, DhawanSK, Graphene nanoplatelets/carbon nanotubes/polyurethane composites as efficient shield against electromagnetic polluting radiations. Compos Part B Eng. 2017; 120: 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.068.
21.
GuoAP, ZhangXJ, QuJK, Improved microwave absorption and electromagnetic interference shielding properties based on graphene-barium titanate and polyvinylidene fluoride with varying content. Mater Chem Front. 2017; 1: 2519–2526. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7qm00204a.
22.
ChenCY, PuNW, LiuYM, Remarkable microwave absorption performance of graphene at a very low loading ratio. Compos Part B Eng. 2017; 114: 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.016.
23.
MengF, WangH, HuangF, Graphene-based microwave absorbing composites: a review and prospective. Compos Part B Eng. 2018; 137: 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.023.
24.
ShuklaV.Review of electromagnetic interference shielding materials fabricated by iron ingredients. Nanoscale Adv. 2019; 1: 1640–1671. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9na00108e.
25.
AdelR, EbrahimS, ShokryA, Nanocomposite of CuInS/ZnS and nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots for cholesterol sensing. ACS Omega. 2021; 6, American Chemical Society. 2167–2176. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSOMEGA.0C05416.
ShokryAzza, TahanAyman El, IbrahimHesham, SolimanMoataz, and EbrahimShaker., The development of a ternary nanocomposite for the removal of Cr(VI) ions from aqueous solutions, RSC Adv9 ( 2019 ), The Royal Society of Chemistry: 39187–39200. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA08298K.
30.
HuL, JiangP, ZhangP, Amine-graphene oxide/waterborne polyurethane nanocomposites: effects of different amine modifiers on physical properties. J Mater Sci. 2016; 51: 8296–8309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9993-5.
MicheliD, PastoreR, GradoniG, Reduction of satellite electromagnetic scattering by carbon nanostructured multilayers. Acta Astronaut. 2013; 88: 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.03.003.
33.
LiuH, DongM, HuangW, Lightweight conductive graphene/thermoplastic polyurethane foams with ultrahigh compressibility for piezoresistive sensing. J Mater Chem C. 2017; 5: 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6tc03713e.
34.
MicheliD, PastoreR, VricellaA, Electromagnetic characterization and shielding effectiveness of concrete composite reinforced with carbon nanotubes in the mobile phones frequency band. Mater Sci Eng B Solid-State Mater Adv Technol. 2014; 188: 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2014.07.001.
35.
MicheliD, PastoreR, ApolloC, Broadband electromagnetic absorbers using carbon nanostructure-based composites. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2011; 59: 2633–2646. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2011.2160198.
MicheliD, MarchettiM.Mitigation of human exposure to electromagnetic fields using carbon foam and carbon nanotubes. 2012; 4: 928–943. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2012.412A118.
38.
MicheliD, ApolloC, PastoreR, Modeling of microwave absorbing structure using winning particle optimization applied on electrically conductive nanostructured composite material, in. 19th int. Conf. Electr. Mach. ICEM 2010, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICELMACH.2010.5607881.
39.
MicheliD, ApolloC, PastoreR, Optimization of multilayer shields made of composite nanostructured materials. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2012; 54: 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2011.2171688.
40.
DangS, LinY, WeiX, Design and preparation of an ultrawideband gradient triple-layered planar microwave absorber using flaky carbonyl iron as absorbent. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2018; 29: 17651–17660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-9869-3.
41.
JiangL, LiX, ZhangJ.Design of high performance multilayer microwave absorbers using fast pareto genetic algorithm. Sci China Ser E Technol Sci. 2009; 52: 2749–2757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0145-x.
42.
PanwarR, AgarwalaV, SinghD.Design and experimental verification of a thin broadband nanocomposite multilayer microwave absorber using genetic algorithm based approach, in. AIP conf. Proc., AIP Publishing LLC, 2014: pp. 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4898273.
43.
KumarA, SinghS, SinghD.Development of Double layer microwave absorber using genetic algorithm, in. IOP conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., Institute of Physics Publishing, 2017: p. 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/234/1/012009.
44.
SinghS, SinhaA, ZunkeRH, Double layer microwave absorber based on Cu dispersed SiC composites. Adv Powder Technol. 2018; 29: 2019–2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2018.05.008.
45.
WangF, YangX, LiuX, Design of an ultra-thin absorption layer with magnetic materials based on genetic algorithm at the S band. J Magn Magn Mater. 2018; 451: 770–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.12.025.
46.
Al-ZoubiOH, NaseemH.Enhancing the performance of the microwave absorbing materials by using dielectric resonator arrays. Model Simul Eng. 2017; 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3658247.
47.
SanthosiBVSRN, RamjiK, RaoNBRM.Design and development of polymeric nanocomposite reinforced with graphene for effective EMI shielding in X-band. Phys B Condens Matter. 2020; 586: 412144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2020.412144.
SanthosiBVSRN, RamjiK, RaoNBRM, Comparative study of polymer-based nanocomposites microwave absorption performance in X-band. Mater Res Express. 2020; 7: 015324, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab621e.
