Improved viscoelastic composite hydrogels were successfully prepared from bacterial cellulose and hyaluronic acid by physical gelling. The composite hydrogels were characterised by Scanning electron microscope, Fourier transform infrared spectroscope, and X-ray diffraction. The thermodynamic and rheological properties of the gels were tested, and their thermodynamic stability and viscoelasticity were evaluated. The viscoelasticity of the composite hydrogels was improved because of the integration of BC nanofibrils. The material was able to be dried to avoid contamination and facilitate transportation. The rehydrated composite hydrogels maintained a high transmittance. The high porosity and high transmittance make these gels potential corneal tissue engineering scaffolds.
ChangC, ZhangL, ZhouJ, Structure and properties of hydrogels prepared from cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solutions. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;82(1):122–127. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.033
PalumboFS, PitarresiG, FioricaC, In situ forming hydrogels of new amino hyaluronic acid/benzoyl-cysteine derivatives as potential scaffolds for cartilage regeneration. Soft Matter. 2012;8(18):4918–4927. doi: 10.1039/c2sm07310b
4.
GuptaP, VermaniK, GargS.Hydrogels: from controlled release to pH-responsive drug delivery. Drug Discov Today. 2002;7(10):569–579. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(02)02255-9
HalloranDO, GradS, StoddartM, An injectable cross-linked scaffold for nucleus pulposus regeneration. Biomaterials. 2008;29(4):438–447. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.009
7.
RezaAT, NicollSB.Characterization of novel photocrosslinked carboxymethylcellulose hydrogels for encapsulation of nucleus pulposus cells. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(1):179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.004
8.
UllahF, OthmanMBH, JavedF, Classification, processing and application of hydrogels: A review. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2015;57:414–433. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.053
9.
DaiH, HuangH.Modified pineapple peel cellulose hydrogels embedded with sepia ink for effective removal of methylene blue. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;148:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.040
10.
SilvaD, FernandesAC, NunesTG, The effect of albumin and cholesterol on the biotribological behavior of hydrogels for contact lenses. Acta Biomater. 2015;26:184–194. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.011
11.
GhorpadeVS, YadavAV, DiasRJ.Citric acid crosslinked β-cyclodextrin/carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel films for controlled delivery of poorly soluble drugs. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;164:339–348. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.005
12.
KopečekJ.Hydrogel biomaterials: A smart future?Biomaterials. 2007;28(34):5185–5192. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.044
13.
SealBL, OteroTC, PanitchA.Polymeric biomaterials for tissue and organ regeneration. Mater Sci Eng: R: Rep. 2001;34(4–5):147–230. doi: 10.1016/S0927-796X(01)00035-3
14.
ChangSJ, HuangY-T, YangS-C, In vitro properties of gellan gum sponge as the dental filling to maintain alveolar space. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88(2):684–689. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.017
15.
de OliveiraJP, BruniGP, LimaKO, Cellulose fibers extracted from rice and oat husks and their application in hydrogel. Food Chem. 2017;221:153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.048
16.
KiritoshiY, IshiharaK.Synthesis of hydrophilic cross-linker having phosphorylcholine-like linkage for improvement of hydrogel properties. Polymer (Guildf). 2004;45(22):7499–7504. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.014
17.
CiolacuD, CazacuM.Synthesis of new hydrogels based on xanthan and cellulose allomorphs. Cellul Chem Technol. 2011;45(3):163.
18.
MasciG, HusuI, MurtasS, Physical hydrogels of poly(vinyl alcohol) with different syndiotacticity prepared in the presence of lactosilated chitosan derivatives. Macromol Biosci. 2003;3(9):455–461. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200350017
19.
JinS, LiuM, ZhangF, Synthesis and characterization of pH-sensitivity semi-IPN hydrogel based on hydrogen bond between poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) and poly(acrylic acid). Polymer (Guildf). 2006;47(5):1526–1532. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.009
20.
GuS, DuanL, RenX, Robust, tough and anti-fatigue cationic latex composite hydrogels based on dual physically cross-linked networks. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;492:119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.01.002
21.
ZhouX, WengL, ChenQ, Investigation of pH sensitivity of poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) hydrogel. Polym Int. 2003;52(7):1153–1157. doi: 10.1002/pi.1207
22.
LiuH, LiuM, JinS, Synthesis and characterization of fast responsive thermo- and pH-sensitive poly[(N, N -diethylacrylamide)-co-(acrylic acid)] hydrogels. Polym Int. 2008;57(10):1165–1173. doi: 10.1002/pi.2460
23.
de OliveiraSA, da SilvaBC, Riegel-VidottiIC, Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose membranes with hyaluronic acid from chicken comb. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;97:642–653. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.077
24.
RajwadeJ, PaknikarK, KumbharJ.Applications of bacterial cellulose and its composites in biomedicine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(6):2491–2511. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6426-3
25.
PetersenN, GatenholmP.Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;91(5):1277. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3432-y
26.
AminMCIM, AhmadN, HalibN, Synthesis and characterization of thermo- and pH-responsive bacterial cellulose/acrylic acid hydrogels for drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88(2):465–473. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.022
27.
CiechanskaD.Multifunctional bacterial cellulose/chitosan composite materials for medical applications. Fibres Text East Eur. 2004;12(4):69–72.
28.
AstleyOM, ChanliaudE, DonaldAM, Structure of acetobacter cellulose composites in the hydrated state. Int J Biol Macromol. 2001;29(3):193–202. doi: 10.1016/S0141-8130(01)00167-2
29.
VelichkoE, BuyanovA, SaprykinaN, High-strength bacterial cellulose–polyacrylamide hydrogels: mesostructure anisotropy as studied by spin-echo small-angle neutron scattering and cryo-SEM. Eur Polym J. 2017;88:269–279. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.01.034
30.
FigueiredoAR, VilelaC, NetoCP, Nanocellulose polymer nanocomposites: fundamentals and applications. America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2014; 17–64.
31.
LinN, DufresneA.Nanocellulose in biomedicine: current status and future prospect. Eur Polym J. 2014;59:302–325. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025
32.
SperlingLH.Interpenetrating polymer networks: an overview. New York: ACS Publications; 1994.
33.
TreesuppharatW, RojanapanthuP, SiangsanohC, Synthesis and characterization of bacterial cellulose and gelatin-based hydrogel composites for drug-delivery systems. Biotechnol Rep. 2017;15:84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2017.07.002
34.
BuyanovA, GofmanI, Revel'skayaL, Anisotropic swelling and mechanical behavior of composite bacterial cellulose–poly(acrylamide or acrylamide–sodium acrylate) hydrogels. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2010;3(1):102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.06.001
35.
SvenssonA, NicklassonE, HarrahT, Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials. 2005;26(4):419–431. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.049
36.
NakayamaA, KakugoA, GongJP, High mechanical strength double-network hydrogel with bacterial cellulose. Adv Funct Mater. 2004;14(11):1124–1128. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200305197
37.
KongBJ, KimA, ParkSN.Properties and in vitro drug release of hyaluronic acid-hydroxyethyl cellulose hydrogels for transdermal delivery of isoliquiritigenin. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;147:473–481. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.021
38.
ZhangF, HeC, CaoL, Fabrication of gelatin–hyaluronic acid hybrid scaffolds with tunable porous structures for soft tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2011;48(3):474–481. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.01.012
39.
ChenY-C, SuW-Y, YangS-H, In situ forming hydrogels composed of oxidized high molecular weight hyaluronic acid and gelatin for nucleus pulposus regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(2):5181–5193. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.09.039
40.
GiammonaG, PalumboF, PitarresiG.Method to produce hyaluronic acid functionalized derivatives and formation of hydrogels;2016;Google Patents.
41.
HanA, RujijanagulG, RandornC.Preparation of hydroxyapatite hydrogel for bone-like materials via novel self-initiated photocatalytic polymerization. Mater Lett. 2017;193:142–145. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.01.098
42.
PasquiD, TorricelliP, CagnaM, Carboxymethyl cellulose-hydroxyapatite hybrid hydrogel as a composite material for bone tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(5):1568–1579. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34810
43.
YuY, ZhangH, SunH, Nano-hydroxyapatite formation via co-precipitation with chitosan-g-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) in coil and globule states for tissue engineering application. Front Chem Sci Eng. 2013;7(4):388–400. doi: 10.1007/s11705-013-1355-0
44.
LuL, QiY, TianJ, ZhouC.Alginate/hydroxyapatite hydrogel as biodegradable in situ forming scaffold. 7th Asian-Pacific Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering. Springer, 22–25;2008.
45.
JangSH, JeongYG, MinBG, Preparation and lead ion removal property of hydroxyapatite/polyacrylamide composite hydrogels. J Hazard Mater. 2008;159(2):294–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.018
46.
ZhangZ, LiM, ChenW, Immobilization of lead and cadmium from aqueous solution and contaminated sediment using nano-hydroxyapatite. Environ Pollut. 2010;158(2):514–519. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.08.024
47.
LopesTD, Riegel-VidottiIC, GreinA, Bacterial cellulose and hyaluronic acid hybrid membranes: production and characterization. Int J Biol Macromol. 2014;67:401–408. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.047
48.
ZhongC, LiF, LiuM, Revealing differences in metabolic flux distributions between a mutant strain and Its parent strain Gluconacetobacter xylinus CGMCC 2955. PloS one. 2014;9(6):e98772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098772
49.
ZhongC, ZhangG-C, LiuM, Metabolic flux analysis of Gluconacetobacter xylinus for bacterial cellulose production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(14):6189–6199. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-4908-8
50.
ChenJ, ParkK.Synthesis and characterization of superporous hydrogel composites. J Controlled Release. 2000;65(1–2):73–82. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00238-2
LinW-C, LienC-C, YehH-J, Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose–chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;94(1):603–611. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.076
53.
LeeTW, TsangVWK, LoefEJ, and BirchNPSeminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 2017;62:152–159. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.09.007
54.
TakahashiT, Ikegami-KawaiM, OkudaR, A fluorimetric morgan–elson assay method for hyaluronidase activity. Anal Biochem. 2003;322(2):257–263. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2003.08.005
55.
MuckenschnabelI, BernhardtG, SprussT, Quantitation of hyaluronidases by the morgan–elson reaction: comparison of the enzyme activities in the plasma of tumor patients and healthy volunteers. Cancer Lett. 1998;131(1):13–20. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(98)00196-7
56.
TanH, ChuCR, PayneKA, Injectable in situ forming biodegradable chitosan–hyaluronic acid based hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30(13):2499–2506. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.080
57.
ChoiJ, PantB, LeeC, Preparation and characterization of eggshell membrane/PVA hydrogel via electron beam irradiation technique. J Ind Eng Chem. 2017;47:41–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.11.014
58.
ChenF, NiY, LiuB, Self-crosslinking and injectable hyaluronic acid/RGD-functionalized pectin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;166:31–44. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.059
59.
LinH, LiuJ, ZhangK, Dynamic mechanical and swelling properties of maleated hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;123:381–389. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.047
60.
FedericoS, NöchelU, LöwenbergC, Supramolecular hydrogel networks formed by molecular recognition of collagen and a peptide grafted to hyaluronic acid. Acta Biomater. 2016;38:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.018
61.
YeX, LiX, ShenY, Self-healing pH-sensitive cytosine- and guanosine-modified hyaluronic acid hydrogels via hydrogen bonding. Polymer (Guildf). 2017;108:348–360. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.11.063
62.
YuanN, XuL, ZhangL, Superior hybrid hydrogels of polyacrylamide enhanced by bacterial cellulose nanofiber clusters. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2016;67:221–230. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.074
63.
FukasawaM, SakaiT, ChungU-i, Synthesis and mechanical properties of a nanocomposite gel consisting of a tetra-PEG/clay network. Macromolecules. 2010;43(9):4370–4378. doi: 10.1021/ma100419c
64.
GorgievaS, GirandonL, KokolV.Mineralization potential of cellulose-nanofibrils reinforced gelatine scaffolds for promoted calcium deposition by mesenchymal stem cells. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2017;73:478–489. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.092
65.
DiaconuA, NitaLE, BerceaM, Hyaluronic acid gels with tunable properties by conjugating with a synthetic copolymer. Biochem Eng J. 2017;125:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2017.06.003
66.
LuoY, KirkerKR, PrestwichGD.Cross-linked hyaluronic acid hydrogel films: new biomaterials for drug delivery. J Controlled Release. 2000;69(1):169–184. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(00)00300-X
67.
LinY, LiL, LiG.A new supramolecular gel via host–guest complexation with cucurbit[8]uril and N-(4-diethylaminobenzyl)chitosan. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;92(1):429–434. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.027
68.
RusuAG, PopaMI, LisaG, Thermal behavior of hydrophobically modified hydrogels using TGA/FTIR/MS analysis technique. Thermochim Acta. 2015;613:28–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2015.05.018
69.
HuhHW, ZhaoL, KimSY.Biomineralized biomimetic organic/inorganic hybrid hydrogels based on hyaluronic acid and poloxamer. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;126:130–140. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.033
70.
ChangC, ZhangL.Cellulose-based hydrogels: present status and application prospects. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;84(1):40–53. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.023
71.
ThomasLV, RahulV, NairPD.Effect of stiffness of chitosan-hyaluronic acid dialdehyde hydrogels on the viability and growth of encapsulated chondrocytes. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;104:2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.116
72.
UmmartyotinS, JuntaroJ, SainM, The role of ferrofluid on surface smoothness of bacterial cellulose nanocomposite flexible display. Chem Eng J. 2012;193–194:16–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.03.074
73.
IchikawaT, NakajimaT.Superabsorptive polymers (from natural polysaccharides and polypeptides). Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1996. p. 8051.
74.
XiangJ, SunJ, HongJ, T-style keratoprosthesis based on surface-modified poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogel for cornea repairs. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2015;50:274–285. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.089
75.
ShimojoAAM, PiresAMB, LichyR, The crosslinking degree controls the mechanical, rheological, and swelling properties of hyaluronic acid microparticles. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015;103(2):730–737. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35225
76.
SahaD, BhattacharyaS.Hydrocolloids as thickening and gelling agents in food: a critical review. J Food Sci Technol. 2010;47(6):587–597. doi: 10.1007/s13197-010-0162-6
77.
SharobaA, SengeB, El-MansyH, Chemical, sensory and rheological properties of some commercial German and Egyptian tomato ketchups. Eur Food Res Technol. 2005;220(2):142–151. doi: 10.1007/s00217-004-0981-7
78.
BortnowskaG, BalejkoJ, SchubeV, Stability and physicochemical properties of model salad dressings prepared with pregelatinized potato starch. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;111:624–632. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.015
79.
DahlmannJ, KrauseA, MöllerL, Fully defined in situ cross-linkable alginate and hyaluronic acid hydrogels for myocardial tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2013;34(4):940–951. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.008
80.
IslamA, RiazM, YasinT.Structural and viscoelastic properties of chitosan-based hydrogel and its drug delivery application. Int J Biol Macromol. 2013;59:119–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.04.044
