Polymer-modified bitumen (PmBs) has been characterised by fluorescence microscopy, conventional performance tests and by the rheological measurements, before and after the Rolling Thin Film Oven Test (RTFOT), and by multi-fractal analysis. The addition of 2–7 wt-% of linear styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymer (SBS-L) or radial block copolymer (SBS-R) increased viscosity, softening point and complex modulus of PmBs. Hardening of PmBs occurred and the elastic response decreased after RTFOT aging. SBS-L PmBs are more susceptible to RTFOT aging. Digital fluorescence micrographs of sections of PmBs qualitatively exhibit different morphological structures which can be quantitatively probed by multi-fractal analysis: differences are reflected in the f (α) spectrum. The PmBs which appear less multi-fractal have the best rheological properties. In another approach, the focal fractal dimensions’ distributions for the SBS-modified bitumen have peak around 2.35 (which corresponds to the bitumen-rich phase) and around 2.7 (which corresponds to the noncontinuous SBS-rich phase).
LuX, RedeliusP.Compositional and structural characterization of waxes isolated from bitumens. Energy Fuel. 2006;20:653–660. doi: 10.1021/ef0503414
2.
HespSAM, IliutaS, ShirokoffJW.Reversible ageing in asphalt binders. Energy Fuel. 2007;21:1112–1121. doi: 10.1021/ef060463b
3.
ForbesA, HaverkampRG, RobertsonT, Studies of the microstructure of polymer-modified bitumen emulsions using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Microstruct. 2001;204:252–257.
4.
SengozB, IsikyakarG.Analysis of styrene-butadiene-styrene polymer modified bitumen using fluorescent microscopy and conventional test methods. J Hazard Mater. 2008;150:424–432. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.122
5.
Ocelić BulatovićV, RekV, Jurkaš MarkovićK.Polymer modified bitumen. Mater Res Innov. 2012;16:1–6. doi: 10.1179/1433075X11Y.0000000021
JelčićŽ, Ocelić BulatovićV, RekV, Relationship between fractal, viscoelastic, and ageing properties of linear and radial styrene-butadiene-styrene polymer-modified bitumen. J Elast Plast. 2016;48(1):14–46. doi: 10.1177/0095244314538437
8.
ChengQ.Multi-fractality and spatial statistics. Comput Geosci. 1999;25(9):946–961.
9.
GaoJ, HuJ, TungWW, Assessment of long range correlation in time series: how to avoid pitfalls. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006;73:016117. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.016117
10.
LeeKS, KimJ, VidakovicB.Regularity of irregularity: testing for monofractality by multi-fractal tools. Int J Math Comput Sci. 2010;5 (2):65–85.
11.
LuX, IsacssonU.Modification of road bitumens with thermoplastic polymers. Polym Test. 2000;20:77–86. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9418(00)00004-0
12.
LuX, IsacssonU.Chemical and rheological evaluation of ageing properties of SBS polymer modified bitumens. Fuel. 1998;77:961–972. doi: 10.1016/S0016-2361(97)00283-4
HabibNZ, KamaruddinI, NapiahM, Rheological properties of polyethylene and polypropylene modified bitumen. Int J Civil Env Eng. 2011;3(2):96–100. Available from:http://waset.org/publications/10174.
18.
PengY, RuiboR, LizhiW, Characteristic behavior of asphalt with SBS and PE, 2012, Proc. of Second Int. Conf. on Sustainable Construction Materials: ‘Design, Performance, and Application; 2012 Oct 18–22; Wuhan, China. p. 421–429. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784412671.0035.
19.
LiangaM, LiangaP, FanaW, Thermo-rheological behaviour and compatibility of modified asphalt with various styrene-butadiene structures in SBS copolymers. Mater Des. 2015;88:177–185.
ChenJS, LiaoMC, ShiahMS.Asphalt modified by styrene-butadiene-styrene triblock copolymer: ‘morphology and model. J Mater Civil Eng. 2002;14(3):224–229. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(224)
26.
SengozB, TopalA, IsikyakarG.Morphology and image analysis of polymer modified bitumens. Constr Build Mater. 2009;23(5):1986–1992. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.020
27.
ZhuJ, BirgissonB, KringosN.Polymer modification of bitumen: ‘advances and challenges’. Eur Polym J. 2014;54:18–38. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.02.005
28.
MouilletV, LamontagneJ, DurrieuF, Infrared microscopy investigation of oxidation and phase evolution in bitumen modified with polymers. Fuel. 2008;87:1270–1280. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.06.029
29.
AmeriM, MansourianA, SheikhmotevaliAH.Laboratory evaluation of ethylene vinyl acetate modified bitumens and mixtures based upon performance related parameters. Constr Build Mater. 2013;40:438–447. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.109
30.
PolaccoG, StastnaJ, BiondiD, Relation between polymer architecture and nonlinear viscoelastic behaviour of modified asphalts. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;11:230–245. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2006.09.001
31.
LesueurD.The colloidal structure of bitumen: ‘consequences on the rheology and on the mechanisms of bitumen modification. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;145:42–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2008.08.011
KennedyTW, HubertGA, HarriganET, Superior performing asphalt pavements (Superpave): the product of the SHRP asphalt research program. Publication SHRP-A-410; 1994, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
34.
SunD, YeF, ShiFStorage stability of SBS-modified road asphalt: ‘preparation, morphology, and rheological properties’. Petrol Sci Technol. 2006;24:1067–1077. doi: 10.1081/LFT-200048186
35.
HandleF, FüsslJ, NeudlS, The bitumen microstructure: ‘a fluorescent approach. Mater Struct. 2016;49:167–180. doi: 10.1617/s11527-014-0484-3
36.
BulatovićVO, RekV, MarkovićKJ.Effect of polymer modifiers on the bitumen properties. J Elastom Plast. 2014;46(5):448–469. doi: 10.1177/0095244312469964
BulatovićVO, RekV, MarkovićKJ.Rheological properties and stability of ethylene vinyl acetate polymer-modified bitumen. Polym Eng Sci. 2013;53:2276–2283. doi: 10.1002/pen.23462
40.
NejadFM, AghajaniP, ModarresA, Investigating the properties of crumb rubber modified using classic and SHRP testing method. Constr Build Mater. 2012;26:481–489. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.048
41.
HerzfeldUC, OverbeckC.Analysis and simulation of scale-dependent fractal surfaces, with application to seafloor morphology. Comput Geosci. 1999;25:979–1007. doi: 10.1016/S0098-3004(99)00062-X
42.
BlacherS, BrouersF, AnanthakrishnaG.Multi-fractal analysis of real heterogeneous materials. Acta Stereol. 1992;11:327–333.
43.
BlacherS, BrouersF, FaytR, Multi-fractal analysis: ‘a new method for the characterisation of multicomponent polymer systems’. J Polym Sci B. 1993;31:655–662. doi: 10.1002/polb.1993.090310605
44.
KarperienA.FracLac for ImageJ. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2013.
45.
HalseyTC, JensenMH, KadanoffLP, Fractal measures and their singularities: ‘the characterization of strange sets’. Phys Rev A. 1986;33:1141–1151. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.1141
46.
GouldH, TobochnikJ.More on fractals and chaos: multi-fractals. Comput Phys. 1990;4:202–207. doi: 10.1063/1.4822901
47.
TheilerJ.Estimating fractal dimension. J Opt Soc Am A. 1990;7:1055–1073. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.7.001055
48.
VicsekT.Mass multi-fractals. Physica A. 1990;168:490–497. doi: 10.1016/0378-4371(90)90401-D
49.
ChabraA, JensenRV.Direct determination of the f(α) singularity spectrum. Phys Rev Lett. 1989;62:1327–1330. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1327
50.
NodaI, OzakiY.Two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy: applications in vibrational and optical spectroscopy. New York: Wiley; 2004.
51.
WuX, WangH, ZhuZ, Quantifying changes in the low-frequency dynamics of amorphous polymers by 2D correlation mechanical spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117(1):467–472. doi: 10.1021/jp311652h
52.
WangXA, HuangGS, WuJR, Using two-dimensional correlation dynamic mechanical spectroscopy to detect different modes of molecular motions in the glass−rubber transition region in polyisobutylene. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115(8):1775–1779. doi: 10.1021/jp110890n
53.
WuX, LiuCS, NgaiKL.Origin of the crossover in dynamics of the sub-rouse modes at the same temperature as the structural α-relaxation in polymers. Soft Matter. 2014;10:9324–9333. doi: 10.1039/C4SM01658K
54.
WangX, XiangK, ZhangD, Influence of pretreatment factors on two-dimensional correlation dynamic mechanical spectroscopy features. Physics Procedia. 2013;48:132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2013.07.022
55.
WangXA, HuangGS, WuJR, Molecular motions in glass-rubber transition region in polyisobutylene investigated by two-dimensional correlation dielectric relaxation spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett. 2011;99:121902. doi: 10.1063/1.3640479
56.
LacknerR, SpieglM, BlabR, Is low-temperature creep of asphalt mastic independent of filler shape and mineralogy? Arguments from multiscale analysis. J Mater Civil Eng. 2005;17:485–491. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:5(485)
57.
HofkoB, EberhardsteinerL, FüsslJ, Impact of maltene and sphaltene fraction on mechanical behaviour and microstructure of bitumen. Mater Struct. 2016;49:829–841. doi: 10.1617/s11527-015-0541-6
ZhuJ, LuX, BalieuR, Modelling and numerical simulation of phase separation in polymer modified bitumen by phase-field method. Mater Des. 2016;107:322–332.
SoenenH, LuX, RedeliusP.The morphology of bitumen-SBS blends by UV microscopy: ‘an evaluation of preparation methods’. Road Mater Pavem. 2008;9:97–110.
66.
LiangM, LiangP, FanW, Thermo-rheological behavior and compatibility of modified asphalt with various styrene–butadiene structures in SBS copolymers. Mater Des. 2015;88:177–185.
HentschelHGE, ProcacciaI.The infinite number of generalised dimensions of fractals and strange attractors. Physica D. 1983;8:435–444. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(83)90235-X
69.
CaniegoJ, MartínMA, San JoséF.Rényi dimensions of soil pore size distribution. Geoderma. 2003;112:205–216. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00307-5
