Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In Experiment 1 rats were presented with two flavours, A and B, that were accompanied either by a third common flavour, X, or by two different flavours, X and Y, respectively. An aversion was then established to A, and the extent to which this aversion generalized to B was measured. Stimulus generalization was found to be more marked when A and B had both been presented with the same flavour, X, during pre-exposure than when A and B had been presented with X and Y. In Experiment 2 three target flavours, A, B, and C, were initially presented. In one pre-exposure condition presentations of A and B were accompanied by X, and C was presented alone; in a second condition A and B were presented in isolation, and C was accompanied by X. After an aversion had been established to A, half of the animals in each of the pre-exposure conditions were tested with B, and the remainder were tested with C. In both of the pre-exposure conditions the generalized aversion was more substantial to B than to C. An analysis of these results in terms of the mechanisms that have been supposed to underlie sensory preconditioning is presented.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnoult

M. D.

(1957). Stimulus predifferentiation: Some generalizations and hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin 54, 339–350.

Atkinson

R. C.

Estes

W. K.

(1963). Stimulus sampling theory. Handbook of mathematical psychology. Luce

R. D.

Bush

R. R.

Galanter

New York: Wiley Vol. 2, 121–268.

Brogden

W. J.

(1939). Sensory pre-conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 25, 323–332.

Gibson

E. J.

(1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Grice

G. R.

(1965). Investigation of response-mediated generalization. Stimulus Generalization. Mostofsky

D. I.

Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 373–382.

Grice

G. R.

Davis

J. D.

(1960). Mediated stimulus equivalence and distinctiveness in human conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 59, 391–395.

Holland

P. C.

(1981). Acquisition of representation-mediated conditioned food aversions. Learning and Motivation 12, 1–18.

Honey

R. C.

Hall

(1989). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 15, 338–346.

Hull

C. L.

(1939). The problem of stimulus equivalence in behavior theory. Psychological Review 46, 9–30.

10.

Konorski

(1967). Integrative activity of the brain Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

11.

Malloy

T. E.

Ellis

H. C.

(1970). Attention and cue-producing responses in responsemediated generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology 83, 191–200.

12.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1974). The psychology of animal learning London: Academic Press.

13.

McLaren

I. P. L.

Kaye

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology. Morris

R. G. M.

Oxford: Clarendon Press 102–130.

14.

Miller

N. E.

(1948). Theory and experiment relating psychoanalytic displacement to stimulus-response generalization. Journal of Abnormal and Social psychology 43, 155–178.

15.

Miller

N. E.

Dollard

J. C.

(1941). Social learning and imitation New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

16.

Pearce

J. M.

(1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review 94, 61–73.

17.

Peterson

G. B.

Trapold

M. A.

(1980). Effects of altering outcome expectancies on pigeons’ delayed conditional discrimination performance. Learning and Motivation 11, 267–288.

18.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1976). Stimulus generalization: Some predictions from a model of Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2, 86–96.

19.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1980). Simultaneous and successive associations in sensory preconditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 6, 2072–16.

20.

Rescorla

R. A.

Cunningham

C. L.

(1978). Within-compound flavor associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 4, 267–275.

21.

Rescorla

R. A.

Durlach

P. J.

(1981). Within-event learning in Pavlovian conditioning. Information processing in animals: Memory Mechanisms. Spear

N. E.

Miller

R. R.

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 81–111.

22.

Spiker

C. C.

(1956). Experiments with children on the hypotheses of acquired distinctiveness and equivalence of cues. Child development 27, 253–263.

23.

Trapold

M. A.

(1970). Are expectancies based upon different reinforcing events discrminably different?. Learning & Motivation 1, 129–140.

24.

Trapold

M. A.

Overmier

J. B.

(1972). The second learning process in instrumental learning. Classical conditioning. II: Current research and theory. Black

A. H.

Prokasy

W. K.

New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 427–452.

25.

Wickens

D. D.

Briggs

G. E.

(1951). Mediated stimulus generalization as a factor in sensory preconditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 42, 197–200.

Acquired Equivalence and Distinctiveness of Cues using a Sensory-Preconditioning Procedure

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References