Blocking was studied with rats in two serial conditioning experiments in which CS1 was followed by CS2 and then shock. Experiment 1 demonstrated that pretraining with CS1 was able to block conditioning to CS2 when the pretraining consisted of trace conditioning. But when serial conditioning was used for pretraining, with a third stimulus as the second element of the compound, then blocking was not detected during the subsequent phase. In Experiment 2 the effect of pretraining with CS2 on blocking with CS1 was examined. Blocking was effective, but only when steps were taken to minimize the growth of second-order associations resulting from the pairing of CS1 with CS2. These results are consistent with a principle stating that the ability of a pretrained stimulus to block the added stimulus in a compound depends on the relative contiguity of each stimulus to the US.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AyresJ. J. B.AlbertM.BombanceJ. C. (1987). Extending conditioned stimuli before versus after unconditioned stimuli: Implications for real-time models of conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes13, 168–181.
2.
CheatleM. D.RudyJ. W. (1978). Analysis of second-order odor-aversion conditioning in neonatal rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology; Animal Behavior Processes5, 142–151.
3.
CollinsL.YoungD. B.DaviesK.PearceJ. (1983). The influence of partial reinforcement on serial autoshaping with pigeons.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology35B, 275–290.
4.
GaioniS. J. (1982). Blocking and non-simultaneous compounds: Comparison of responding during compound conditioning and testing.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Sciences17, 16–29.
5.
KaminL. J. (1968). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning.Punishment and aversive behavior.CampbellB. A.ChurchR. M.New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts279–296.
6.
KaplanP. S.HearstE. (1982). Bridging temporal gaps between CS and US in autoshaping: Insertion of other stimuli before, during and after CS.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes8, 187–203.
7.
KehoeE. J. (1982). Conditioning with serial compound stimuli: Theoretical and empirical issues.Experimental Animal Behaviour1, 30–65.
8.
KehoeE. J.GibbsC. M.GarciaE.GormezanoI. (1979). Associative transfer and stimulus selection in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to serial compound CSs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes5, 1–18.
9.
KehoeE. J.ScheursB. G.AmodeiN. (1981). Blocking acquisition of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to serial conditioned stimuli.Learning and Motivation12, 92–108.
10.
KehoeE. J.ScheursB. G.GrahamP. (1987). Temporal primacy overrides prior training in serial compound conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response.Animal Learning and Behavior15, 455–464.
11.
KohlerE. A.AyresJ. J. B. (1979). The Kamin blocking effect with variable duration CSs.Animal Learning and Behavior7, 347–350.
12.
KohlerA. A.AyresJ. J. B. (1982). Blocking with serial and simultaneous compounds in a trace conditioning procedure.Animal Learning and Behavior10, 277–287.
13.
MaleskeR. T.FreyP. W. (1979). Blocking in eyelid conditioning: Effect of changing the CS-US interval and introducing an intertrial stimulus.Animal Learning and Behavior7, 452–456.
14.
MooreJ. W.StickneyK. J. (1980). Formation of attentional-associative networks in real time: Role of the hippocampus and implications for conditioning.Physiological Psychology8, 207–217.
15.
PearceJ. M.NicholasD. J.DickinsonA. (1981). The potentiation effect during serial conditioning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology33 B, 159–179.
16.
RescorlaR. A.ColwillR. T. (1983). Within-compound associations in unblocking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes9, 390–400.
17.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement.Classical conditioning, II: Current research and theory.BlackA.ProkasyW. F.New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts64–99.
18.
RevuskyS. (1971). The role of interference in association over a delay.Animal memory.HonigW. K.JamesP. H. R.New York: Academic Press115–213.
19.
RevuskyS. (1977). Learning as a general process with an emphasis on feeding experiments.Food aversion learning.MilgramN. W.KramesL.AllowayT. M.New York: Plenum Press1–51.
20.
ScheursB. G.WestbrookR. F. (1982). The effects of changes in the CS-US interval during compound conditioning upon an otherwise blocked element.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology34 B, 19–30.
