Using a visual and an acoustic sample set that appeared to favour the auditory modality of the monkey subjects, in Experiment 1 retention gradients generated in closely comparable visual and auditory matching (go/no-go) tasks revealed a more durable short-term memory (STM) for the visual modality. In Experiment 2, potentially interfering visual and acoustic stimuli were introduced during the retention intervals of the auditory matching task. Unlike the case of visual STM, delay-interval visual stimulation did not affect auditory STM. On the other hand, delay-interval music decreased auditory STM, confirming that the monkeys maintained an auditory trace during the retention intervals. Surprisingly, monkey vocalizations injected during the retention intervals caused much less interference than music. This finding, which was confirmed by the results of Experiments 3 and 4, may be due to differential processing of “arbitrary” (the acoustic samples) and species-specific (monkey vocalizations) sounds by the subjects. Although less robust than visual STM, auditory STM was nevertheless substantial, even with retention intervals as long as 32 sec.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CoxJ. K.D'AmatoM. R. (1982). Matching to compound samples by monkeys (Cebus apella): Shared attention or generalization decrement?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes8, 209–225.
2.
D'AmatoM. R. (1973). Delayed matching and short-term memory in monkeys.The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in theory and research.BowerG. H.New York: Academic PressVol. 7, 227–269.
D'AmatoM. R.O'NeillW. (1971). Effect of delayed-interval illumination on matching behavior in the capuchin monkey.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior15, 327–333.
5.
D'AmatoM. R.SalmonD. P. (1982). Tune discrimination in monkeys (Cebus apella) and in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior10, 126–134.
6.
D'AmatoM. R.SalmonD. P. (1984a). Processing and retention of complex auditory stimuli in monkeys (Cebus apella).Canadian Journal of Psychology38, 237–255.
7.
D'AmatoM. R.SalmonD. P. (1984b). Processing of complex auditory stimuli (tunes) by rats and monkeys (Cebus apella).Animal Learning & Behavior12, 184–194.
8.
D'AmatoM. R.SalmonD. P.ColomboM. (1985). Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes11, 35–51.
9.
D'AmatoM. R.WorshamR. W. (1974). Retrieval cues and short-term memory in capuchin monkeys.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology86, 274–282.
10.
DevineJ. V.BurkeM. W.RohackJ. J. (1979). Stimulus similarity and order as factors in visual short-term memory in nonhuman primates.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes5, 335–354.
11.
DewsonJ. H.III (1979). Toward an animal model of auditory cognitive function.The neurological basis of language disorders in children: Methods and directions for research.LudlowC. L.Doran-QuineM. E. NINCDS Monograph No. 22. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office19–28.
12.
EtkinM. W. (1972). Light produced interference in a delayed matching task with capuchin monkeys.Learning and Motivation3, 313–324.
13.
EtkinM.D'AmatoM. R. (1969). Delayed matching-to-sample and short-term memory in the capuchin monkey.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology69, 544–549.
14.
FarthingG. W.WagnerJ. M.GilmourS.WaxmanH. M. (1977). Short-term memory and information processing in pigeons.Learning and Motivation8, 520–532.
15.
HermanL. M.ForestellP. H. (1985). Short-term memory in pigeons: Modality-specific or code-specific effects?.Animal Learning & Behavior13, 463–465.
16.
HonigW. K.ThompsonR. K. R. (1982). Retrospective and prospective processing in animal working memory.The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in theory and research.BowerG. H.New York: Academic PressVol. 16, 239–283.
17.
HulseS. H.CynxJ. (1985). Relative pitch perception is constrained by absolute pitch in songbirds. (Mimus, Molothrus, and Sturnus).Journal of Comparative Psychology2, 176–196.
18.
KirkR. E. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciencesBelmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.
19.
KojimaS. (1985). Auditory short-term memory in the Japanese monkey.International Journal of Neuroscience25, 255–262.
20.
KraemerP. J.RobertsW. A. (1984). Short-term memory for visual and auditory stimuli in pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior12, 275–284.
21.
MedinD. L.DavisR. T. (1974). Memory.Behavior of nonhuman primates: Modern research trends.SchrierA. M.StollnitzF.New York: Academic Press1–47.
22.
MishkinM. (1982). A memory system in the monkey.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London298, 85–95.
23.
NakamuraR. K.GazzanigaM. S. (1975). Comparative aspects of short-term memory mechanisms.Short-term memory.DeutschD.DeutschJ. A.New York: Academic Press293–312.
24.
ParkT. J.DoolingR. J. (1985). Perception of species-specific contact calls by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).Journal of Comparative Psychology99, 391–02.
25.
PetersenM. R.BeecherM. D.ZolothS. R.MoodyD. B.StebbinsW. C. (1978). Neural lateralization of species-specific vocalizations by Japanese macaques (Macaca, fuscata).Science202, 324–327.
26.
RobertsW. A. (1972). Short-term memory in the pigeon: Effects of repetition and spacing.Journal of Experimental Psychology94, 74–83.
27.
SalmonD. P. (1984). An investigation of modality specificity in the cognitive processes of monkeys (Cebus apella). Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers–The State University.Dissertation Abstracts International45, 706B.
28.
SalmonD. P.D'AmatoM. R. (1981). Note on delay-interval illumination effects on retention in monkeys (Cebus apella).Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior36, 381–385.
29.
StepienL. S.CordeauJ. P. (1960). Memory in monkeys for compound stimuli.American Journal of Psychology73, 388–395.
30.
ThompsonR. K. R. (1980). Auditory cued reversal and matching-to-sample learning by rhesus monkeys. Paper presented at the Eighth International Congress of Primatology, Florence, Italy, July 1980.
31.
ThompsonR. K. R. (1981). Nonconceptual auditory matching by a rhesus monkey reflects biological constraints on cognitive processes? Paper presented at the Northeastern Meeting of the Animal Behavior Society, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, October 1981.
