Four experiments are described which aim to distinguish the relative contributions of measures of semantic distance based on formal and normative criteria. Experiment I replicates a previous finding by Collins and Quillian (1969) that sentence confirmation RTs support a hierarchically-organised memory model. Experiments II and III minimised the role of syntactic processes and examined the times taken to “see the relationship” between pairs of concepts. The results also supported a hierarchical model but cast doubt upon the formal distinction between superset and property relationships. Experiment IV showed similar results using only property relationships of the “has” form. Multiple regression analyses of the data indicate that “number of intervening links” is a more consistent predictor of RT than “associative” measures of semantic relatendness and confirm strong linearity effects consistent with a hierarchical model of storage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ. R.BowerG. H. (1973). Human Associative MemoryNew York: Wiley.
2.
AndersonR. C. (1972). Semantic organisation and retrieval of information from sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior11, 794–800.
3.
BattigW. F.MontagueW. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories. A Replication and extension of the Connecticut norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph80, no. 3, Pt. 21–46.
4.
BrownW. P. (1975). Category norms for related categoriesNottingham Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the British Psychological Society, April, 1975.
5.
CollinsA. M.LoftusE. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review82, 407–428.
6.
CollinsA. M.QuillianM. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior8, 240–7.
7.
CollinsA. M.QuillianM. R. (1970a). Does category size affect categorisation time?.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior9, 432–8.
8.
CollinsA. M.QuillianM. R. (1970b). Facilitating retrieval from semantic memory: The effect of repeating part of an inference.Acta Psychologica33, 304–314.
9.
CollinsA. M.QuillianM. R. (1972). Experiments on semantic memory and language comprehension.GreggL. W.Cognition in Learning and Memory.New York: Wiley.
10.
ConradC. E. H. (1972). Cognitive enconomy in semantic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology92, 149–54.
11.
GlassA. L.HolyoakK. T. (1975). Alternative conceptions of semantic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior3, 313–39.
12.
GlassA. L.HolyoakK. H.KigerJ. L. (1979). Role of antonym relations in semantic judgements.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Learning and Memory5, 598–606.
13.
GroveC. (1973). Retrieval Time and the Organisation of Memory Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, North East London Polytechnic (C.N.A.A.).
14.
HerbertL. A. (1975). The Structure of Concepts in Memory. Paper presented at Research Seminar, Department of Psychology, North East London Polytechnic, December1975.
15.
HermanD. J.PappermanT. J.ArmstrongA. D. (1978). Synonym comprehension and the generality of categorisation models.Memory and Cognition6, 150–5.
16.
HollanJ. D. (1975). Features and semantic memory: set-theoretic or network model?.Psychological Review82, 154–5.
17.
KintschW. (1974). The Representation of Meaning in MemoryHillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
KissG. R.ArmstrongC.MilroyR. (1972). Associative Thesaurus of EnglishWakefield: R. P. Microfilm Ltd. (microfilm version).
19.
LandauerT. K.FreedmanJ. L. (1968). Information retrieval from long-term memory: Category size and recognition time.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior7, 291–5.
20.
LoftusE. F. (1973). Activation of semantic memory.American Journal of Psychology86, 331–7.
21.
LoftusE. F.FreedmanJ. L.LoftusG. R. (1970). Retrieval of words from subordinate and superordinate categories in semantic hierarchies.Psychonomic Science21, 235–236.
22.
LoftusE. F.ScheffR. W. (1971). Category norms for fifty representative instances.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph91, no. 2355–364.
23.
LoftusG. R.LoftusE. F. (1976). Human Memory: The Processing of InformationHillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
LorchR. F. (1981). Effects of relation strength and semantic overlap on retrieval and comparison processes during sentence verification.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior20, 593–610.
25.
MeyerD. E. (1970). On the representation and retrieval of stored semantic information.Cognitive Psychology1, 242–300.
PaivioA.YuilleJ. C.MadiganS. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph76, (1, Pt. 2).
28.
PosnerM. I.MitchellR. F. (1967). Chronometric analysis of classification.Psychological Review74, 392–409.
29.
QuillianM. R. (1969). The Teachable Language Comprehender: a simulation program and theory of language.Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery12, 459–76.
30.
RipsL. J.ShobenE. J.SmithE. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior12, 1–20.
31.
RoschE. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories.MooreT. E.Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language.New York: Academic Press.
32.
SchaefferB.WallaceR. (1969). Semantic similarity and the comparison of word meanings.Journal of Experimental Psychology82, 343–6.
33.
SchaefferB.WallaceR. (1970). The comparison of word meanings.Journal of Experimental Psychology86, 144–52.
34.
SmithE. E. (1978). Theories of semantic memory.EstesW. K.Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes.Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence ErlbaumVol. 6.
35.
SmithE. E.ShobenE. J.RipsL. J. (1974). Comparison processes in semantic memory.Psychological Review81, 214–41.
36.
WilkinsA. T. (1971). Conjoint frequency, category size, and categorization time.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior10, 382–5.
