The effect of partial reinforcement on the rate of responding during the first element of a serial compound was investigated using autoshaping in pigeons. Experiment I employed the illumination of a response key by two different colours as the elements of the compound. Responding during the first element was faster when this stimulus was intermittently paired with the second element and the unconditioned stimulus than when a continuous reinforcement schedule was employed. Experiment II demonstrated that this effect of partial reinforcement is unaffected by maniuplating the associative strength of the second element at the outset of compound conditioning. A similar effect of partial reinforcement was also found in Experiment III which used a tone as the first element of the serial compound.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmselA. (1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations.Psychological Bulletin55, 102–19.
2.
BoakesR. A. (1977). Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement.Operant-Pavlovian interactions.DavisH.HurwitzH. M. B.Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
3.
DaveyG. C. L.ClelandG. G. (1982). The effect of partial reinforcement on the acquisition and extinction of sign-tracking and goal-tracking in the rat.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society19, 115–8.
4.
FeldmanJ. M. (1971). Added cue control as a function of reinforcement predictability.Journal of Experimental Psychology91, 318–25.
5.
GibbonJ.FarrellL.LocurtoC. M.DuncanH. J.TerraceH. S. (1980). Partial reinforcement in autoshaping with pigeons.Animal Learning and Behavior8, 45–59.
6.
GoodrichK. P. (1959). Performance in different segments of an instrumental response chain as a function of reinforcement schedule.Journal of Experimental Psychology57, 57–63.
7.
HollandP. C. (1979). Differential effects of omission contingencies on various components of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responding in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes5, 178–93.
8.
KaplanP. S.HearstE. (1982). Bridging temporal gaps between CS and US in autoshaping: Insertion of other stimuli before, during and after CS.Journal of Experimental Pscyhology: Animal Behavior Processes8, 187–203.
9.
KirkR. E. (1968). Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral SciencesMonterey, California: Brooks/Cole.
10.
LeylandC. M.MackintoshN. J. (1978). Blocking of first- and second-order autoshaping in pigeons.Animal Learning and Behavior6, 391–4.
11.
McFarlandD. J. (1966). The role of attention in the disinhibition of displacement activities.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology18, 19–30.
12.
MackintoshN. J. (1974). The Psychology of Animal LearningLondon: Academic Press.
13.
NeeleyJ. H.WagnerA. R. (1974). Attenuation of blocking with shifts in reward: The involvement of schedule-generated contextual cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology102, 751–63.
14.
NewlinR. J.LolordoV. M. (1976). A comparison of pecking generated by serial, delay, and trace autoshaping procedures.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior25, 227–41.
15.
PearceJ. M.HallG. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review87, 532–52.
16.
PearceJ. M.NicholasD. J.DickinsonA. (1981). The potentiation effect during serial conditioning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology33B, 159–79.
17.
RashotteM. E. (1981). Second-order autoshaping: Contributions to the research and theory of Pavlovian reinforcement by conditioned stimuli.Autoshaping and Conditioning Theory.LocurtoC. M.TerraceH. S.GibbonJ.New York: Academic Press.
18.
RashotteM. E.MarshallB. S.O'ConnellJ. M. (1981). Signalling functions of the second-order CS: Partial reinforcement during second-order conditioning of the pigeon's keypeck.Animal Learning and Behavior9, 253–60.
19.
RescorlaR. A. (1982). Effects of a stimulus intervening between CS and US in autoshaping.Journal of Experimental131–41.
20.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement.Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory.BlackA. H.ProkasyW. F.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
21.
SlivkaR. M.BittermanM. E. (1966). Classical appetitive conditioning in the pigeon: Partial reinforcement.Psychonomic Science4, 181–2.
22.
SutherlandN. S.MackintoshN. J. (1971). Mechanisms of Animal Discrimination LearningNew York: Academic Press.
23.
WeinstockS. (1958). Acquisition and extinction of partially reinforced running response at a 24-hour intertrial interval.Journal of Experimental Psychology56, 151–8.
