Sixteen rats selected as high responders in a sensory contingent bar pressing situation, were studied when they had free access to four different sensory states. The experimental procedure allowed choices (entries into states) and preferences (as reflected by time spent in states) to be measured simultaneously. Although clear and consistent preferences were observed, they proved to be a relatively weak predictor of choice behaviour. Implications for theories of choice were discussed and the results were interpreted in accordance with the hypothesis that control over the environment has motivational and reinforcing properties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaumW. M.RachlinH. C. (1969). Choice as time allocation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior12, 861–74.
2.
EisenbergerR. (1972). Explanations of rewards that do not reduce tissue needs. Psychological Bulletin77, 319–39.
3.
ForgaysD. G.LevinH. (1959). Discrimination and reversal learning as a function of change of sensory stimulation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology52, 191–4.
4.
GlowP. H. (1970). Some acquisition and performance characteristics of response contingent sensory reinforcement in the rat. Australian Journal of Psychology22, 145–54.
5.
GlowP. H.RobertsJ. E.RussellA. (1971). Response contingent auditory reinforcement in the rat. Australian Journal of Psychology23, 125–31.
6.
GlowP. H.WinefieldA. H. (1978). Response contingent sensory change in a causally structured environment. Animal Learning and Behavior6, 1–18.
7.
HumphreyN. K.KeebleG. R. (1977). Do monkeys’ subjective clocks run faster in red light than in blue?Perception6, 7–14.
8.
HumphreyN. K.KeebleG. R. (1978). Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment. Perception7, 343–8.
9.
KishG. B. (1955). Learning when the onset of illumination is used as reinforcing stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology48, 261–4.
10.
KishG. B. (1966). Studies of sensory reinforcement. In HonigW. K. (Ed.), Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and ApplicationNew York: Appleton-Century-Crofts109–59.
11.
LaveryJ. J.FoleyP. J. (1965). Bar pressing by the rat as a function of auditory stimulation. Psychonomic Science3, 199.
12.
LockardR. B. (1963). Some effects of light on the behavior of rodents. Psychological Bulletin60, 509–29.
13.
LockardR. B. (1966). Several tests of stimulus-change and preference theory in relation to light-controlled behavior of rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology62, 415–26.
14.
LuceR. D. (1959). Individual Choice BehaviorNew York: Wiley.
15.
LuceR. D.RaiffaH. (1957). Games and DecisionsNew York: Wiley.
16.
MarxM. H.HendersonR. L.RobertsC. L. (1955). Positive reinforcement of the bar pressing response by a light stimulus following dark operant pretests with no aftereffect. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology48, 73–6.
