The abstract logical structure of family relationship problems, such as, “What relationship to a man is his mother's father?” was described in terms of a “distinctive-feature-transition count (dft)”, where the answer to the problem was characterized in terms of the distinctive features of descendancy, co-linearity, and sex. On average, it proved possible to predict the difficulty of such problems from such a count; thus tending to support the idea of a relational rather than an associative memory structure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrownR. (1965). Social PsychologyNew York: Collier-Macmillan.
2.
ClarkH. H. (1969a). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review76, 387–404.
3.
ClarkH. H. (1969b). The influence of language in solving three-term series problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology82, no. 2205–15.
4.
ClarkH. H. (1971). More about “Adjectives, comparatives, and syllogisms”. A reply to Huttenlocher and Higgins. Psychological Review78, 515–27.
5.
DeSotoC. B.LondonM.HandelS. (1965). Social reasoning and spatial paralogic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology2, 513–21.
6.
HayesJ. R. (1965). Problem topology and the solution process. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior4, 371–9.
7.
HandelS.DeSotoC. B.LondonM. (1968). Reasoning and spatial representations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior7, 351–7.
8.
HuttenlocherJ. (1968). Constructing spatial images; a strategy in reasoning. Psychological Review75, 550–60.
9.
HuttenlocherJ.HigginsE. T. (1971). Adjectives, comparatives, and syllogisms. Psychological Review78, 505–14.
