In a self-paced task subjects responded to each of four equally probable signals with a different one of their four limbs. Response times were examined as a function of the 16 possible transitions between limbs. Repeated responses were shown to be faster than any other transitions, while responses following responses with an ipsilateral limb were relatively slow. The implications of these results for models for the “repetition effect” are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BertelsonP. (1963). S-R relationships and reaction-times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task. J. exp. Psychol.65, 478–84.
2.
BertelsonP. (1965). Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature206, 217–8.
3.
BlythK. W. (1962). Experiments on Choice Reactions with the Hands and FeetUniversity of Cambridge Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.
4.
BlythK. W. (1963). Ipsilateral confusion in 2-choice and 4-choice responses with the hands and feet. Nature199, 1312.
5.
BlythK. W. (1964). Errors in a further 4-choice reaction task with the hands and feet. Nature201, 641.
6.
RabbittP. M. A. (1965). Response facilitation on repetition of a limb movement. Brit. J. Psychol.56, 303–4.
7.
VinceM. (1948). The intermittency of control movements and the psychological refractory period. Brit. J. Psychol.38, 149–57.
8.
WelfordA. T. (1952). The psychological refractory period and the timing of highspeed performance—a review and a theory. Brit. J. Psychol.43, 2–19.
9.
WelfordN. (1952). An electronic digital recording machine—the SETAR. J. Sci. Instrum.29, 1–4.
10.
WinerB. J. (1962). Statistical Principles in Experimental DesignNew York: McGraw-Hill.
