Randomized intervention trial on preventive home visits to older people: Baseline and follow-up characteristics of participants and non-participants

Abstract

Aims: In controlled intervention studies, a selective non-response or refusal to participate at baseline may bias measurable effects of the intervention. The aim of this study was to compare mortality and nursing home admission among older persons who accepted (participants) and older person who declined (non-participants) to join a controlled feasibility trial, and to describe and evaluate defined subgroups of non-participants. Methods: Prospective controlled three-year intervention study (1999—2001) in 34 Danish municipalities with five-year follow-up. Randomization and intervention (education of municipality employees) was done at municipality level. In total 5,788 home-dwelling 75- and 80-year-olds living in these municipalities were invited to participate in the study. Written consent was obtained from 4,060 persons (participation rate 71%). Results: During five-year follow-up non-participants had a higher mortality rate (survival analysis risk ratio RR=1.5, 95% CI=1.3—1.7, p<0.0001) and a higher rate of nursing home admissions (RR=1.7, 95% CI=1.3— 2.1, p<0.0001) compared with participants. Subgroups of non-participants describing themselves as ``too ill'' and persons ``not reached'' had a significantly higher mortality rate and risk of admission to nursing home than participants, whereas the subgroups of non-participants describing themselves as ``too healthy'' and having ``another reason for refusal'' did not differ from the participants. There was no difference in mortality rates between non-participants living in intervention municipalities compared with non-participants living in control municipalities. Conclusions: Mortality and nursing home admissions were higher among non-participants. Selection participation bias was of no clinical importance since subgroups of non-participants eligible for the intervention did not differ from the participants.

Keywords

Assessment community intervention functional ability health promotion longitudinal studies older people non-participation non-response preventive home visits refusers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mihelic AH , Crimmins EM Loss to follow-up in a sample of Americans 70 years of age and older: The LSOA 1984—1990. J Gerontol 1997;52B:S37—S48.

Hoeymans N. , Feskens EJM , Bos, GAM van den, Kromhout D. Non-response bias in a study of cardiovascular diseases, functional status and self-rated health among elderly men. Age Ageing 1998;27:35—40.

Launer LJ , Wind AW , Deeg DJH. Nonresponse pattern and bias in a community-based cross-sectional study of cognitive functioning among the elderly. Am J Epidemiol 1994;139:803—12.

Norton MC , Breitner JCS , Welsh KA , Wyse BW Characteristics of nonresponders in a community survey of the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994;42:1252—6.

Rakowski W. , Mor V. , Hiris J. An investigation of nonresponse to self-assessments of health by older persons. J Aging Health 1994;6:469—88.

Jackson R. , Chambless LE , Yang K. , Byrne T. , Watson R. , Folsom A. , Shahar E. , Kalsbeek W. Differences between respondents and nonrespondents in a multicenter community-based study vary by gender and ethnicity. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:1441—6.

Koval JJ , Ecclestone NA , Paterson DH , Brown B. , Cunningham DA , Rechnitzer PA Response rates in a survey of physical capacity among older persons . J Gerontol 1992;47:S140—S147.

Ganguli M. , Mendelsohn A. , Lytle M. , Dodge H. A follow-up comparison of study participants and refusers within a rural elderly population. J Gerontol 1998;53A:M465—M470.

Ives DG , Traven ND , Kuller LH , Schulz R. Selection bias and nonresponse to health promotion in older adults . Epidemiology 1994;5:456—61.

10.

Etter J-F. , Perneger TV Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1997 ;50: 1123—8.

11.

Tennstedt SL , Dettling U. , McKinley JB Refusal rates in a longitudinal study of older people: Implications for field methods. J Gerontol 1992;47:S313—S318.

12.

Minder CE , Müller T. , Gillmann G. , Beck J. , Stuck A. Subgroups of refusers in a disability prevention trial in older adults: baseline and follow-up analysis . Am J Public Health 2002;92:445—50.

13.

Vass M. , Avlund K. , Hendriksen C. , Andersen CK , Keiding N. Preventive home visits to older people in Denmark. Aging Clin Exp Res 2002;14:509—15.

14.

Vass M. , Avlund K. , Lauridsen J. , Hendriksen C. Feasible model for prevention of functional decline in older people. municipality-randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:563—68.

15.

Vass M. , Avlund K. , Kvist K. , Hendriksen C. , Andersen CK , Keiding N. Structured home visits to older people. Are they only of benefit for women? A randomised controlled trial. Scand J Prim Health Care 2004;22:106—11.

16.

Edwards P. , Roberts I. , Clarke M. , Guiseppi C. , Pratarp S. , Wentz R. , Kwan I. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: Systematic review. Br Med J 2002;324:1183.

17.

Stuck AE , Egger M. , Hammer A. , Minder CE , Beck JC Home visits to prevent nursing home admission and functional decline in elderly people: Systematic review and meta-regression analysis. JAMA 2002;287:1022—8.

18.

Jagger C. , Clarke M. , O''Shea C. , Gannon M.

Annual visits to patients over the age of 75 — who is missed?

Family Practice 1996;13:22—7.

19.

Dufouil C. , Brayne C. , Clayton D. Analysis of longitudinal studies with death and dropout: A case study. Stat Med 2004;23:2215—26.