Sickness certificates as a basis for decisions regarding entitlement to sickness insurance benefits

Abstract

Background: The sickness certificate is a major instrument for establishing contact and conveying information between two authorities that have a substantial impact on the life situation and work situation of the patients, as well as on the economic costs of the society. Aim: A study was undertaken to assess the quality of physicians' sickness certificates as a basis for social insurance officers' decisions regarding entitlement to sickness benefits. Method: Information on all 2,449 sickness certificates for sick-leave periods exceeding 28 days' sick leave period received at the social insurance offices in one Swedish county during one week in 2002 was coded and analysed. Results: Information provided in the certificates was often not sufficient to allow social insurance officers to determine eligibility for sickness benefits. Qualitative analyses of certificates from general practitioners (GPs) revealed that 21% contained ambiguous statements about the medical disorder, 30% were unclear regarding the assessment of functional capacity, and 22% required additional information on both those aspects. Sickness certificates issued by GPs and physicians under specialist training, as compared with other categories of physicians, more often provided essential data, for example concerning the patient's occupational tasks and type of employment. Conclusions: Physicians often fail to contribute required information concerning functional capacity and other important aspects when issuing sickness certificates. This limits the use of these documents as a basis for decisions regarding sickness insurance benefits. The practical consequences of incomplete certificates might be delayed payment of benefits and delayed initiation of return to work measures.

Keywords

sickness benefit sickness certificate sickness insurance sick leave

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Himmel W. , Sandholzer H. , Kochen M. Sickness certification in general practice. Eur J Gen Pract 1995;1:161—6.

Cassis I. , Dupriez K. , Burnand B. , et al. Quality of work incapacity assessment in the Swiss disability insurance system. Int J Qual Health Care 1996 ;8:567—75.

Ford F. , Ford J. , Dowrick C. Welfare to work: The role of general practice. Brit J Gen Pract 2000;50:497—500.

Alexanderson K, Norlund A, editors. Sickness absence — causes, consequences, and physicians' sickness certification practice. A systematic review by the Swedish Council of Technology Assessment in Health Care. Scand J Public Health 2004;32(Suppl 63).

Söderberg E. , Alexanderson K. Gate-keepers in sickness insurance — a systematic review of the literature on practices of social insurance officers . Health and Social Care in the Community 2004;accepted.

Timpka T. , Hensing G. , Alexanderson K. Dilemmas in sickness certification among Swedish Physicians. Eur J Public Health 1994;5:215—19.

Alexanderson K. Sickness absence: A review of performed studies with focus on levels of exposures and theories utilized. Scand J Soc Med 1998;26:241—9.

Sawney P. Current issues in fitness for work certification. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52:217—22.

Hensing G. , Alexanderson K. , Timpka T. Dilemmas in the daily work of social insurance officers. Scand J Soc Welfare 1997;6:301—9.

10.

Brage S. , Bentsen B. , Bjerkedal T. , Nygard J. , Tellnes G. ICPC as a standard classification in Norway. Fam Pract 1996;13:391—6.

11.

Arrelöv B. , Borgquist L. , Ljungberg D. , Svärdsudd K. Do GPs sick-list patients to a lesser extent than other physician categories? A population based study. Fam Pract 2001;18:393—8.

12.

Englund L. , Tibblin G. , Svärsudd K. Effects on physicians' sick-listing practice of an administrative reform narrowing sick-listing benefits . Scand J Prim Health Care 2000;18:1—5.

13.

Arrelöv B. , Borgquist L. , Ljungberg D. , Svärdsudd K. The influence of change of legislation concerning sickness absence on physicians' performance as certifiers: A population-based study. Health Policy 2003;63:259—68.

14.

Maeland JG , Ringdal PR , Haug K. Kvalitetsvurdering av Sykmelding II — en nyttig legeerklaering eller et onodvendig schema [Assessing the quality of medical certificates in long-term sickness absence] (in Norwegian). Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2002 ;122:161—4.

15.

Söderberg E. Underlag för beslut — En studie av läkarintyg i åtta län ur ett socialförsäkringsperspektiv [Basis for decision — A study on sickness certificates in eight counties from a social insurance perspective] (in Swedish). Linköping : Försäkringskassan Östergötland, 2002.

16.

Devore J. , Roxy P. Statistics. The exploration and analysis of data. 2nd ed. Belmont: Duxberry Press, 1993.

17.

Patton MQ Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London : Sage Publications, 1990.

18.

Söderberg E. , Alexanderson K. Sickness certification practices of physicians: A review of the literature. Scand J Public Health 2003;31:460—74.

19.

Gunnarsson E. `On the outskirts of the welfare state`: On social assistance and support among women without children. Stockholm: Socialhögskolan. Stockholms Universitet , 1993.

20.

Kullberg C. Socialt arbete som kommunikativ praktik. Samtal med och om klienter [Social work as communicative practices] (in Swedish). PhD thesis, Linköpings Universitet . Linköping: Tema Kommunikation , 1994.

21.

Alexanderson K. Sickness absence: A review of performed studies with focus on levels of exposures and theories utilized. Scand J Soc Med 1998;26:241—9.

22.

Marnetoft S-U. Vocational rehabilitation of unemployed sick-listed people in a Swedish rural area. An individual-level study based on social insurance data. PhD thesis Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet, 2000.

23.

SBU. Ont i ryggen, ont i nacken. En evidensbaserad kunskapssammanställning [Disorders in the back and the neck. A systematic review by the Swedish County Council of Technology Assessment in Health Care] (in Swedish). Stockholm: Offset AB, 2000.

24.

SBU. Prescribed sick leave — causes, consequences and practices: A systematic review. Stockholm: Swedish Council of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2004.

25.

Bredkjaer-Rask S. , Hvas AC , Vass M. , Nielsen H. Er Den Udvidede Attest LAE 355 Anvendelig ved Langvarige Sygedagpengesager? [Is the extended certificate usable in long-term sickness absence] (in Danish). Ugeskr Laeger 1996;158:603—6.

26.

Kersnik J. Management of sickness absence: a quality improvement study from Slovenia. Quality in Health Care 1999;8:262—5.

27.

Hansen H-T. Kunnskapsstatus for den nordiske trygdeforskningen på 1990—tallet [State of the art regarding Nordic research on sickness absence in the 1990s] (in Norwegian). Bergen: Stiftelsen for samfunns- og naeringslivsforskning, 1999. Report No. 12/99.

28.

Getz L. , Westin S. Innstramninger i uförepensjonen — legers syn på lovendringen [Revisions in the Norwegian legislation on disability pension in 1991 — doctors' opinion] (in Norwegian). Nor Laegeforen 1993 ;17:2133—6.

29.

Getz L. , Westin S. Behandler og sakkyndig — mellom barken og veden? [Doctors and the disability pension] (in Norwegian). Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1994;114: 1435—40.