Occupational health physicians have better work conditions for handling sickness certification compared with general practitioners: Results from a nationwide survey in Sweden

Abstract

Aims: To study whether occupational health physicians (OPs) have a better work situation regarding handling of sickness certification compared with other physicians, in particular general practitioners (GPs), and to analyze associations between OPs’ experiences of assessing and providing a long-term prognosis of patients’ work capacity and some potentially interrelated factors. Methods: Answers to a nationwide survey from physicians who had sickness certification consultations at least once monthly were analyzed. Differences among OPs (n=481), GPs (n=4257) and physicians working in other clinical settings (n=9452) were estimated by chi square tests. Associations between OPs’ experiences as above and potentially interrelated factors were estimated using logistic regression analyses. Results: Among OPs, a lower proportion experienced clinical work situations related to sickness certifications as ‘very problematic’, compared with the other physicians, and especially so compared with GPs. A higher proportion of OPs also had organizational support for handling sickness certifications. For OPs, experience of sickness certification consultations as problematic once a month or less often, not experiencing sickness certification tasks as a work environment problem, and having a well-established workplace policy regarding sickness certification matters were significantly positively associated with finding assessing and providing a long-term prognosis of work capacity as ‘not at all/somewhat problematic’. Conclusions: OPs’ work situation regarding sickness certifications was favorable compared with that of other physicians, and especially compared with that of GPs. Our results underline the importance of organizational support for ensuring physicians’ experience of having professional competence in handling assessments of patients’ work capacity.

Keywords

General practice physician occupational health physician general practitioner sick leave sickness certification insurance medicine

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wahlström

Alexanderson

. Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 11. Physicians’ sick-listing practices (review). Scand J Public Health 2004;63(Suppl):222–55

Wainwright

Keogh

. Fit for purpose? Using the fit note with patients with chronic pain: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:e794–800, doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X613133.

Østerås

Gulbrandsen

Benth

JŠ

. Implementing structured functional assessments in general practice for persons with long-term sick leave: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract 2009;10:31, doi: 1471–2296–10–31.

Mortelmans

Donceel

Lahaye

. Does enhanced information exchange between social insurance physicians and occupational physicians improve patient work resumption? A controlled intervention study. Occup Environ Med 2006;63:495–502.

Wynne-Jones

Mallen

Main

. What do GPs feel about sickness certification? A systematic search and narrative review. Scand J Prim Health Care 2010;28:67–75.

Lindholm

Arrelöv

Nilsson

. Sickness-certification practice in different clinical settings; a survey of all physicians in a country. BMC Public Health 2010;10:752.

Arrelöv

Borgquist

Ljungberg

. Do GPs sick-list patients to a lesser extent than other physician categories? A population-based study. Fam Pract 2001;18:393–8.

Hugenholtz

Schreinemakers

A-Tjak

van Dijk

. Knowledge infrastructure needed for occupational health. Ind Health 2007;45:13–18.

Weel

van der Beek

Kroon

. Recent changes in occupational medicine in The Netherlands. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1999;72:285–91

10.

Kimanen

Manninen

Räsänen

. Factors associated with visits to occupational health physicians in Finland. Occup Med 2010;60:29–35.

11.

Anema

Jettinghoff

Houtman

. Medical care of employees long-term sick listed due to mental health problems: a cohort study to describe and compare the care of the occupational physician and the general practitioner. J Occup Rehabil 2006;16:41–52

12.

Kant

Jansen

van Amelsvoort

. Structured early consultation with the occupational physician reduces sickness absence among office workers at high risk for long-term sickness absence: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil 2008;18:79–86.

13.

Nieuwenhuijsen

Verbeek

de Boer

. Predicting the duration of sickness absence for patients with common mental disorders in occupational health care. Scand J Work Environ Health 2006;32:67–74

14.

Vlasveld

van der Feltz-Cornelis

Bultmann

. Predicting return to work in workers with all-cause sickness absence greater than 4 weeks: a prospective cohort study. J Occup Rehabil 2012;22:118–26.

15.

Bränström

Arrelöv

Gustavsson

. Reasons for and factors associated with issuing sickness certificates for longer periods than necessary: results from a nationwide survey of physicians. BMC Public Health 2013;13:478 doi: 1471–2458–13–478.

16.

von Knorring

Sundberg

Löfgren

. Problems in sickness certification of patients: a qualitative study on views of 26 physicians in Sweden. Scand J Prim Health Care 2008;26:22–8.

17.

Gerner

Alexanderson

. Issuing sickness certificates: a difficult task for physicians: a qualitative analysis of written statements in a Swedish survey. Scand J Public Health 2009;37:57–63.

18.

Bremander

Hubertsson

Petersson

. Education and benchmarking among physicians may facilitate sick-listing practice. J Occup Rehabil 2012;22:78–87.

19.

Sturesson

Edlund

Fjellman-Wiklund

. Work ability as obscure, complex and unique: views of Swedish occupational therapists and physicians. Work 2013;45:117–28.

20.

Ståhl

Svensson

Petersson

. The work ability divide: holistic and reductionistic approaches in Swedish interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams. J Occup Rehabil 2009;19:264–73.

21.

Thorstensson

Mathiasson

Arvidsson

. Cooperation between gatekeepers in sickness insurance - the perspective of social insurance officers. A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:231 doi: 1472–6963–8–231.

22.

Kärrholm

Ekholm

. Systematic co-operation between employer, occupational health service and social insurance office: a 6-year follow-up of vocational rehabilitation for people on sick-leave, including economic benefits. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:628–36.

23.

Ljungquist

Arrelöv

Lindholm

. Physicians who experience sickness certification as a work environmental problem: where do they work and what specific problems do they have? A nationwide survey in Sweden. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000704 doi: bmjopen-2011–000704.

24.

Ljungquist

Hinas

Arrelöv

. Sickness certification of patients–a work environment problem among physicians? Occup Med (Lond) 2013;63:23–9.

25.

Schaafsma

Hugenholtz

de Boer

. Enhancing evidence-based advice of occupational health physicians. Scand J Work Environ Health 2007;33:368–78.

26.

Schreuder

Roelen

de Boer

. Inter-physician agreement on the readiness of sick-listed employees to return to work. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:1814–19.

27.

Franco

. Agreement of medical decisions in occupational health as a quality requirement. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2006;79:607–11.

28.

Hoedeman

Krol

Blankenstein

. Sick-listed employees with severe medically unexplained physical symptoms: burden or routine for the occupational health physician? A cross sectional study. BMC Health Services Res 2010;10:305 doi: 10.1186/1472–6963–10–305.

29.

Schaafsma

Hulshof

de Boer

. Occupational physicians: what are their questions in daily practice? An observation study. Occup Med 2006;56:191–8.

30.

Wallace

Lemaire

Ghali

. Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator. Lancet 2009;374:1714–21.