Job strain,effort - reward imbalance,and stress at work: competing or complementary models?

Abstract

Background: The Demand Control Model (DCM) and the Effort - Reward Imbalance Model (ERI) offer putative explanations of the relationship between stressful working conditions, job strain, and psychological and physical ill health. Aims: The aims of this study are to: (a) compare the predictive powers of the two models for explaining perceived job stress and mental distress amongst workers as a whole, (b) identify whether a model which combines dimensions of the DCM and ERI might have more predictive power than either of them separately, and (c) ascertain whether the models make distinct contributions to explaining stress at work in specific occupational settings. Methods: Statistical analysis was carried out on data collected from a cross-sectional postal survey of a random sample (n=7,069), of the adult population in an urban area in Southern England. The analysis focused on the 4,135 respondents who were in paid employment. Results: There was little support for combining the models as the combined model was dominated by the predictive power of dimensions from the ERI. However, the results also showed that the models or dimensions of the models made distinct contributions to explaining perceived work stress in different types of occupation. Conclusions: There is little evidence to support a combined model of work characteristics. The ERI appears to be the stronger of the two models although the DCM has explanatory value for specific occupations.

Keywords

mental distress work characteristics work stress.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kasl SV Measuring job stressors and studying the health impact of the work environment: an epidemiologic commentary. J Occup Health Psychol 1998; 1: 42 - 56.

Karasek R. , Theorell T. Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life . New York: Basic Books, 1990.

Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/ low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1996; 1: 27 - 41.

Siegrist J. , Peter R. The Effort - Reward Imbalance Model. Occup Med: State of the Art Reviews 2000; 15: 83 - 7.

Siegrist J. Place, social exchange and health: proposed sociological framework. Soc Sci Med 2000; 1283 - 93.

de Jonge J. , Bosma H. , Peter R. , Siegrist J. Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee well-being: a large scale cross-sectional study. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 1317 - 27.

Annandale E. The sociology of health and medicine: a critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.

Sennett R. The Corrosion of Character. London: Norton, 1999.

Wainwright D. , Calnan M. Workstress: the making of a modern epidemic . Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 2002.

10.

Stansfeld S. , Head J. , Marmot M. Work related factors and ill health: The Whitehall II Study. HSE Books, Contract research report 266/2000.

11.

Calnan M. , Wainwright D. , Almond S. Job Strain, Effort - reward imbalance and mental distress: a study of general practice. Work and Stress 2001; 14: 297 - 311.

12.

Bartley M. , Marmot M. Social class and power relations at the workplace. Occup Med: State of the Art Reviews 2000; 15: 73 - 8.

13.

Sparks K. , Cooper CL Occupational differences in the work strain relationship: towards the use of situationspecific models. J Occup Organisational Psychol 1999; 72: 219 - 29.

14.

Smith A. , Brice C. , Collins A. , Mathews V. , McNamara R. The scale of occupational stress: the Bristol stress and health at work study . London: Health and Safety Executive /HMSO, 2000.

15.

Smith A. , Johal S. , Wadsworth E. , Peters T. , Harvey I. , Davey-Smith G. Stress and health at work III. Response rate and sample details. Occup Health Rev 1999; 77: 23-6.

16.

Goldberg D. The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.

17.

Karasek R. , Brisson C. , Kawakami N. , Huntman I. , Bougers P. , Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire. (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 1998; 3: 322 - 55.

18.

Bosma H. , Marmot G. , Hemingway H. , et al. Low job control and risk of coronary heart disease in Whitehall II (prospective cohort). Br Med J 1997; 314: 558 - 64.

19.

Marmot M. , Siegrist J. , Theorell T. Health and the psycho-social environment at work. In: Marmot M , Wilkinson RG , editors. Social determinants of health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999; 105 - 31.

20.

Elias P. , Halstead K. , Prandy K. CASOC. London: HMSO, 1993.

21.

Burke MJ , Brief AP , George JM The role of negative affectivity in understanding relations between self-reports of stressors and strain: a comment on the applied psychology literature. J Appl Psychol 1993; 78: 402 - 21.

22.

Eakin J. , MacEachen E. Health and the social relations of work: a study of the health-related experiences of employees in small workplaces. Sociol Health Illness 1998; 20: 896 - 914.

23.

Schnall PL , Belkic K. , Landsbergis P. , Baker D. , 2000. The Workplace and Cardiovascular Disease. Occupational Medicine: State of the Art Reviews, 15(1): 1 - 334.

24.

Steptoe A. , Fieldman G. , Evans O. , Perry L. , 1993. Control over work pace, job strain and cardiovascular responses in middle-aged men. J Hypertens, 11(7): 751 - 9.

25.

Saks M. , 1995. The changing response to medicine in Britain: a case of altruism or self interest? In Johnson T , Larkin G and Saks M (eds). Professionals and the State of Europe. London Routledge.