The distribution of residual stresses (RS) in repairs generated by Friction Hydro-Pillar Processing (FHPP) in AISI H13 was investigated. Three axial force levels, with consequent different deposition rates, were applied to replicate possible repaired conditions. The contour (CM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) methods were employed for RS analysis in samples that were also evaluated through metallography, microhardness analysis, micro-tensile and Charpy testing. CM produced 2D maps of the RS in the joints, showing symmetrical distributions around the welded rod for all welded conditions. Other common features for all conditions were the maximum level of compressive RS, which was found in the TMAZ of the rod, and the maximum tensile residual stress, which was found near the HAZ of the base block. There was good agreement between the RS measurement techniques. Mechanical tests show similar tensile resistance for all conditions and an apparent increase in toughness at higher force levels.
JiaZX, LiuYW, LiJQ, Crack growth behavior at thermal fatigue of H13 tool steel processed by laser surface melting. Int J Fatigue. 2015; 78:61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.04.005
3.
BaileyNS, KatinasC, ShinYC.Laser direct deposition of AISI H13 tool steel powder with numerical modeling of solid phase transformation, hardness and residual stresses. J Mater Process Technol. 2017; 247:223–233. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.020
4.
KattireP, PaulS, SinghR, Experimental characterization of laser cladding of CPM 9 V on H13 tool steel for die repair applications. J Manuf Process. 2015; 20(3):492–499. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.06.018
5.
XuYC, JingHY, HanYD, Numerical simulation of the effects of various stud and hole configurations on hydro-pillar processing. Int J Mech Sci. 2015; 90:44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.10.025
6.
MeyerA.Friction hydro Pillar Processing – bonding mechanism and properties [master's thesis]. Technical University Braunschweig; 2003.
HattinghDG, BulbringDLH, Els-BotesA, Process parameter influence on Performance of friction Taper Stud welds in AISI 4140 steel. Mater Des. 2011; 32(6):3421–3430. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.001
9.
CuiL, YangX, WangD, Experimental study of friction taper plug welding for low alloy structure steel: welding process, defects, microstructures and mechanical properties. Mater Des. 2014; 62:271–281. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.026
10.
YinY, YangX, CuiL, Material flow influence on the weld formation and mechanical performance in underwater friction taper plug welds for pipeline steel. Mater Des. 2015; 88:990–998. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.123
11.
MeinhardtCP, ChludzinskiM, RibeiroRF, Evaluation of friction hydro-pillar processing welding in duplex stainless steels (UNS S31803). J of Mater Process Technol. 2017; 246:158–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.03.010
12.
BuzzattiDT, ChludzinskiM, EugenioR, Toughness properties of a friction hydro-pillar processed offshore mooring chain steel. J Mater Res Technol. 2019; 8(3):2625–2637. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.002
13.
ChludzinskiM, PaesMP, BastianFL, Fracture toughness of friction hydro-pillar processing welding in C-Mn steel. Mater Des. 2012; 33:340–344. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.056
14.
YehFWT, CunhaPHCP, ClarkeT, Evaluation of discontinuities in A36 steel repairs with friction hydro-pillar processing using different axial forces. ISIJ Int. 2013; 53(12):2269–2271. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.53.2269
15.
LessaCRL, MartinazziD, FigueiredoAP, Microstructural behavior of SAF 2205 duplex stainless steel welded by friction hydro pillar processing. Mater Res. 2016; 19(4):928–936. doi: 10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2016-0023
SuominenL, KhurshidM, ParantainenJ.Residual stress in welded components following post-weld treatment methods. Procedia Eng. 2013; 66:181–191. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.073
18.
SchajerGS, RuudO.Overview of residual stresses and their measurement. In: SchajerGS, editor. Practical residual stress measurement methods. 1st ed. Wiley; 2013.
19.
SuarezS, SuarezAM, PreciadoWT.Arc welding procedures on steels for molds and dies. Procedia Eng. 2015; 100:584–591. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.408
20.
WedderburnIN, DoubellP, HattinghDG, Condition monitoring of high temperature, high stress components by means of core sampling and friction weld repair. 18th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing; 2012 Apr 16–20; Du rban, South Africa; SAINT; 2012.
21.
LiuC, DongC.Internal residual stress measurement on linear friction welding of titanium alloy plates with contour method. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2014; 24(5):1387–1392. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63203-9
22.
PrimeMB.Cross-sectional mapping of residual stresses by measuring the surface contour after a cut. J Eng Mater Technol. 2001; 123:162–168. doi: 10.1115/1.1345526
23.
PrimeMB, GonzalesAR.The contour method: simple 2-D mapping of residual stresses. The 6th International Conference on Residual Stresses; 2000 Jul 10–12; Oxford, UK. London: IOM Communications; 2000. p. 617–624.
24.
MuruganN, NarayananR.Finite element simulation of residual stresses and their measurement by contour method. Mater Des. 2009; 30(6):2067–2071. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.08.041
25.
PrimeMB, HillMR, DeWaldAT, Residual stress mapping in welds using the contour method. In: Trends in welding research, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference; 2002 Apr 15-19; Pine Mountain, GA. ASM; 2003. p. 891–896.
26.
ShiL, PriceAH, HungWN.Use of contour method for welding residual stress assessment. Procedia Manuf. 2018; 26:276–285. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.036
27.
HosseinzadehF, BouchardPJ.Mapping multiple components of the residual stress tensor in a large P91 steel pipe girth weld using a single contour cut. Exp Mech. 2013; 53(2):171–181. doi: 10.1007/s11340-012-9627-z
28.
FrankelP, PreussM, SteuwerP, Comparison of residual stresses in Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo linear friction welds. Mater Sci Technol. 2009; 25(5):640–650. doi: 10.1179/174328408X332825
29.
SmithM, LevesqueB, BichlerL, Residual stress analysis in linear friction welded in-service Inconel 718 superalloy via neutron diffraction and contour method approaches. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017; 691:168–179. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.03.038
30.
ZhangY, GangulyS, EdwardsM, Cross-sectional mapping of residual stresses in a VPPA weld using the contour method. Acta Mater. 2004; 52(17):5225–5232. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.045
31.
VranckenB, CainV, KnutsenR, Residual stress via the contour method in compact tension specimens produced via selective laser melting. In: Scr Mater. 2014; 87:29–32.
HatamlehO, RiveroIV, SwainSE.An investigation of the residual stress characterization and relaxation in peened friction stir welded aluminum-lithium alloy joints. Mater Des. 2009; 30(9):3367–3373. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.038
34.
LiuC, YiX.Residual stress measurement on AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy friction stir butt welds using contour method. Mater Des. 2013; 46:366–371. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.10.030
35.
PrimeMB, Gnäupel-HeroldT, BaumannJA, Residual stress measurements in a thick, dissimilar aluminum-alloy friction stir weld. Acta Mater. 2006; 54(15):4013–4021. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.034
