Friction hydro-pillar processing (FHPP) is a novel technique that involves solid-state joining of an external plug onto a substrate by plastic deformation. A systematic investigation on material flow during FHPP is required but rarely reported. The present work reports a coupled theoretical and a three-dimensional X-ray computer tomography-based experimental study using a Ti-alloy as a tracer material to realise the material flow during FHPP of a AISI 4140 steel substrate. The cumulative results showed that the central portion of the plug deformed in a series of layer-wise shear planes. However, the plasticised material towards the outer area of the plug flowed through the clearance between the plug and the substrate with excess volume moving out as flash.
MeyerA.Friction hydro pillar processing – bonding mechanism and properties [master's dissertion]. Technical University Brunschweigh;2003.
2.
HattinghDG, BulbringDLH, Els-BotesA, Process parameter influence on performance of friction taper stud welds in AISI 4140 steel. Mater Des. 2011; 32:3421–3430. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.001
3.
YinY, YangX, CuiL, Material flow influence on the weld formation and mechanical performance in underwater friction taper plug welds for pipeline steel. Mater Des. 2015; 88:990–998. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.123
4.
XuYC, JingHY, HanYD, Numerical simulation of the effects of various stud and hole configurations on friction hydro-pillar processing. Int J Mech Sci. 2015; 90:44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.10.025
5.
VicharapuB, KananLF, ClarkeT, An investigation on friction hydro-pillar processing. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2017; 22:555–561. doi: 10.1080/13621718.2016.1274849
6.
KananLF, VicharapuB, BuenoAFB, Friction hydro-pillar processing of a high carbon steel: joint structure and properties. Metall Mater Trans B. 2018; 49(2):699–708. doi: 10.1007/s11663-018-1171-5
7.
ThomasWM, NicholasED.TWI, leading edge. Friction hydrop pillar processing. Cambridge: TWI Connect Press; 1992; [cited 2019 July 15]. Available from: www.twi.co.uk.
8.
MeinhardtCP, ChuldzinskiM, RibeiroRF, Evaluation of friction hydro-pillar processing welding in duplex stainless steels (UNS S31803). J Mater Process Technol. 2017; 246:158–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.03.010
9.
ZhangX, DengC, WangD, Improving bonding quality of underwater friction stitch welds by selecting appropriate plug material and welding parameters and optimizing the joint design. Mater Des. 2016; 91:398–410. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.114
10.
BulbringDLH, HattinghDG, BotesA, Friction hydro-pillar processing as an alternative joining technology for the nuclear industry. J S Afr Inst Min Metall. 2015; 113:903–912.
11.
CuiL, YangX, WangD, Friction taper plug welding for S355 steel in underwater wet conditions: welding performance, microstructures and mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014; 611:15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.04.087
12.
MaireE, WithersPJ.Quantitative X-ray tomography. Int Mater Rev. 2014; 59:1–43. doi: 10.1179/1743280413Y.0000000023
13.
DialamiN, ChiumentiM, CerveraM, Material flow visualization in friction stir welding via particle tracing. Int J Mater Form. 2015; 8:167–181. doi: 10.1007/s12289-013-1157-4
14.
DindaSK, WarnettJM, WilliamsMA, 3D imaging and quantification of porosity in electron beam welded dissimilar steel to Fe-Al alloy joints by X-ray tomography. Mater Des. 2016; 96:224–231. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.010
15.
KarA, SuwasS, KailasSV.Two-pass friction stir welding of aluminum alloy to titanium alloy: a simultaneous improvement in mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A. 2018; 733:199–210. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.07.057
16.
KrummM, KasperlS, FranzM.Reducing non-linear artifacts of multi-material objects in industrial 3D computed tomography. NDT E Int. 2008; 41:242–251. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.12.001
17.
Meyer-SpradowJ, RopinskiT, MensmannJ, Voreen: a rapid-prototyping environment for ray-casting-based volume visualizations. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2009; 29(6):6–13. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2009.130
18.
ABAQUS analysis user's manual. Chapter 6 – heat transfer and thermal-stress analysis.
19.
MoalA, MassoniE.Finite element simulation of the inertia welding of two similar parts. Eng Comput. 1995; 12:497–512. doi: 10.1108/02644409510799730
20.
ABAQUS Example problems guide. Example number 1.3.18 inertia friction welding.
21.
BuchibabuV, ReddyGM, DeA.Probing traverse force, torque and tool durability in friction stir welding of aluminum alloys. J Mater Process Technol. 2017; 241:86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.11.008
22.
VicharapuB, LiuH, FujiiH, Probing tool durability in stationary shoulder friction stir welding. Frict Stir Weld Process X. 2019: 91–98. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-05752-7_9.
23.
AgmellM, AhadiAS, StåhlJ-E.The link between plasticity parameters and process parameters in orthogonal cutting. Procedia CIRP. 2013; 8:224–229. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.093
24.
MeyerHW, KleponisDS.Modeling the high strain rate behavior of titanium undergoing ballistic impact and penetration. Int J Impact Eng. 2001; 26:509–521. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00107-5
