The effects of atmospheric contamination on wire arc additively manufactured (WAAM) components were studied by producing AM multilayer parts under controlled conditions. Gas impurity levels were maintained using an argon purge box at levels from atmospheric (210,000 ppm O2) to 1 ppm O2, and with corresponding levels of nitrogen. Stainless steel (308L), titanium (Ti–6Al–4V) and pure Ta were studied, each having different affinities for oxygen and nitrogen. Results show that WAAM parts made in air produce unacceptable oxygen and/or nitrogen levels for most applications. However, with moderate purging, all three metals can be deposited by WAAM with compositions similar to the starting wire, and the results are used to provide recommended minimum purge box atmospheres for each metal.
DebRoyT, WeiHL, ZubackJS, Additive manufacturing of metallic components-process structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci. 2018; 92:112–224. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001
2.
SamesWJ, ListFA, PannalaS, The metallurgy and processing science of additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev. 2016; 61(5):315–360. doi: 10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649
3.
Additive Manufacturing of Metals: From Fundamental Technology to Rocket Nozzles, Medical Implants, and Custom Jewelry, by John O. Milewski, Springer International Publishing, June, 2017.
4.
DingD, PanZ, CuririD, Wire-fed additive manufacturing of metal components: technologies, developments and future interests. Int J Adv Technol. 2015; 81:465–481.
5.
WangF, WilliamsS, ColegroveP, Microstructure and mechanical properties of wire and arc additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V. Metall Mater Trans A. 2013; 44A:968. doi: 10.1007/s11661-012-1444-6
6.
EagarTW.Oxygen and nitrogen contamination during arc welding. Technical Report No. 1 to the Office of Naval Research, Contract No. N00014-77-C-0569, August, 1978; also available as https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a063857.pdf.
7.
PalmerTA, DebRoyT.Numerical modeling of enhan-ced nitrogen dissolution during GTA welding. Metal Mater Trans B. 2000; 31(6):1371–1385. doi: 10.1007/s11663-000-0023-1
8.
PalmerTA, DebRoyT.Enhanced dissolution of nitrogen during GTA welding of steel. Sci Technol Weld Join. 1998; 3(4):190–203. doi: 10.1179/stw.1998.3.4.190
9.
BabuSS, KellySM, MurugananthM, Reactive gas shielding during laser surface alloying for production of hard coatings. Surf Coat Technol. 2006; 200:2663–2671. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.02.160
10.
ElmerJW, VajaJ, CarltonHD, The effect of Ar and N 2
shielding gas on laser weld porosity in steel, stainless steels, and nickel. Weld J. 2015; 94(10):313s–325s.
11.
KouS.Welding metallurgy. 2nd edHoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
12.
BrooksJA.Weldability of high N, high Mn austenitic stainless steel. Weld J. 1975; 54(6):189–195s.
13.
ScottMH, KnowlsonPM.The welding and brazing of the refractory metals Nb, Ta, Mo, and W – A review. J Less-Common Metals. 1963; 5:205–244. doi: 10.1016/0022-5088(63)90029-8
14.
OlsenDL, MishraB, WenmanDW.Welding, brazing and joining of refractory metals and alloys. Min Pro Ext Met Rev. 2001; 22:1–23. doi: 10.1080/08827509808962487
15.
TanM, XuW, DarguschMS, Review of the effect of oxygen on room temperature ductility of titanium and titanium alloys. Powder Metall. 2014; 57(4):251. doi: 10.1179/1743290114Y.0000000108
16.
StrumMJ, WagnerLM.Interstitial Embrittlement in Vanadium Laser Welds, International Conference of Laser Applications, San Diego, CA, December, 1991 also available as Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory report UCRL-JC-109917, 1992.
17.
ElmerJW, VajaJ, CarltonHD.The effect of reduced pressure on laser weld porosity and weld geometry in commercially pure titanium and nickel. Weld J. 2016; 95(11):419s–430s.
18.
KeistJS, PalmerTA.Role of geometry on the properties of additively manufactured structures fabricated using laser based directed energy deposition. Mater Des. 2016; 106:482–494. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.045
19.
ElmerJW, GibbsG.unpublished research, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2018.
