In this work, effects of pin thread and thread interruptions (flats) on weld quality and process response parameters during friction stir welding (FSW) of 6061 aluminium alloy were quantified. Otherwise, identical smooth and threaded pins with zero to four flats were adopted for FSW. Weldability and process response variables were examined. Results showed that threads with flats significantly improved weld quality and reduced in-plane forces. A three-flat threaded pin led to production of defect-free welds under all examined welding conditions. Spectral analyses of in-plane forces and weld cross-sectional analysis were performed to establish correlation among pin flats, force dynamics and defect formation. The lowest in-plane force spectra amplitudes were consistently observed for defect-free welds.
ColliganK.Material flow behaviour during friction welding of aluminum. Weld J. 1999; 75(7):229s–237s.
3.
SchneiderJ, NunesAJr. Characterization of plastic flow and resulting microtextures in a friction stir weld. Metall Mater Trans B. 2004; 35(4):777–783. doi: 10.1007/s11663-004-0018-4
4.
ZhaoY-H, LinS-B, WuL, The influence of pin geometry on bonding and mechanical properties in friction stir weld 2014 Al alloy. Mater Lett. 2005; 59(23):2948–2952. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.04.048
5.
FondaR, ReynoldsA, FengC, Material flow in friction stir welds. Metall Mater Trans A. 2013; 44(1):337–344. doi: 10.1007/s11661-012-1460-6
6.
BurfordD, TweedyB, WidenerC.Influence of shoulder configuration and geometric features on FSW track properties. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Friction Stir Welding; Saint Sauveur, Quebec, Canada. 2006. p. 10–13.
7.
DawesC, ThomasW.Development of improved tool designs for friction stir welding of aluminium. 1st International Symposium on Friction Stir Welding; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. 1999. p. 1–10.
8.
ZettlerR, LomolinoS, dos SantosJF.A Study of Material Flow in FSW of AA2024-T351 and AA 6056-T4 Alloys. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Friction Stir Welding; 2004 Sept 14–16; Metz. 2004; TWI, paper on CD.
DaviesP, WynneB, RainforthW, Development of microstructure and crystallographic texture during stationary shoulder friction stir welding of Ti-6Al-4V. Metall Mater Trans A. 2011; 42(8):2278–2289. doi: 10.1007/s11661-011-0606-2
11.
JiS, MengX, LiuJ, Formation and mechanical properties of stationary shoulder friction stir welded 6005A-T6 aluminum alloy. Mater Des (1980–2015). 2014; 62:113–117. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.016
12.
RussellMJ, BlignaultC.Recent developments in friction stir welding of Ti alloys. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Friction Stir Welding; 2006 Oct 10–13; Saint-Sauveur. 2006, CD-ROM.
13.
MishraRS, MaZ.Friction stir welding and processing. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2005; 50(1):1–78. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2005.07.001
14.
HattinghD, BlignaultC, Van NiekerkT, Characterization of the influences of FSW tool geometry on welding forces and weld tensile strength using an instrumented tool. J Mater Process Technol. 2008; 203(1):46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.028
15.
ElangovanK, BalasubramanianV.Influences of pin profile and rotational speed of the tool on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA2219 aluminium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2007; 459(1):7–18. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.124
16.
FujiiH, CuiL, MaedaM, Effect of tool shape on mechanical properties and microstructure of friction stir welded aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006; 419(1):25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.11.045
17.
MahmoudE, TakahashiM, ShibayanagiT, Effect of friction stir processing tool probe on fabrication of SiC particle reinforced composite on aluminium surface. Sci Technol Welding Joining. 2009; 14(5):413–425. doi: 10.1179/136217109X406974
18.
PalanivelR, Koshy MathewsP, MuruganN, Effect of tool rotational speed and pin profile on microstructure and tensile strength of dissimilar friction stir welded AA5083-H111 and AA6351-T6 aluminum alloys. Mater Des. 2012; 40:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.027
19.
AissaniM, GachiS, BoubeniderF, Design and optimization of friction stir welding tool. Mater Manuf Process. 2010; 25(11):1199–1205. doi: 10.1080/10426910903536733
20.
Jamshidi AvalH, SerajzadehS, KokabiA, Effect of tool geometry on mechanical and microstructural behaviours in dissimilar friction stir welding of AA 5086-AA 6061. Sci Technol Welding Joining. 2011; 16(7):597–604. doi: 10.1179/1362171811Y.0000000044
21.
ThomasWM, NicholasED, SmithSD.Friction Stir Welding-Tool Developments. Aluminum 2001-Proceedings of the TMS 2001; 2001 Feb 11–15; New Orleans, LA. 2001. p. 213–224.
22.
PrangnellP, HeasonC.Grain structure formation during friction stir welding observed by the ‘stop action technique’. Acta Mater. 2005; 53(11):3179–3192. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.044
23.
ColegroveP, ShercliffH.Development of trivex friction stir welding tool part 2–three-dimensional flow modelling. Sci Technol Welding Joining. 2004; 9(4):352–361. doi: 10.1179/136217104225021661
24.
TrimbleD, MonaghanJ, O'DonnellG.Force generation during friction stir welding of AA2024-T3. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 2012; 61(1):9–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.024
25.
BalasubramanianN, GattuB, MishraRS.Process forces during friction stir welding of aluminium alloys. Sci Technol Welding Joining. 2009; 14(2):141–145. doi: 10.1179/136217108X372540
26.
Reza-E-RabbyM, ReynoldsAP.Effect of tool pin thread forms on friction stir weldability of different aluminum alloys. Procedia Eng. 2014; 90:637–642. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.784
27.
SchneiderJ, BrookeS, NunesACJr. Material flow modification in a FSW through introduction of flats. Metall Mater Trans B. 2016; 47(1):720–730. doi: 10.1007/s11663-015-0523-7
28.
BrownR, TangW, ReynoldsA.Multi-pass friction stir welding in alloy 7050-T7451: effects on weld response variables and on weld properties. Mater Sci Eng A. 2009; 513–514:115–121. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.01.041
29.
ReynoldsA, TangW, KhandkarZ, Relationships between weld parameters, hardness distribution and temperature history in alloy 7050 friction stir welds. Sci Technol Welding Joining. 2005; 10(2):190–199. doi: 10.1179/174329305X37024
30.
BoldsaikhanE, BurfordDA, GimenezP.Effect of plasticized material flow on the tool feedback forces during friction stir welding. Proc. Conf. On ‘Friction stir welding and processing VI’, San Francisco, CA; 2011. p. 335–343.
31.
ReynoldsA.Flow visualization and simulation in FSW. Scr Mater. 2008; 58(5):338–342. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.048
32.
BurfordD, BritosPG, BoldsaikhanE, Evaluation of friction stir weld process and properties for aerospace application: e-NDE for friction stir processes. National Institute for Aviation Research, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS FAA Joint Advanced Materials & Structures (JAMS) 6th Annual Technical Review Meeting; 2010.
33.
CrawfordR, CookG, StraussA, Experimental defect analysis and force prediction simulation of high weld pitch friction stir welding. Sci Technol Welding Joining. 2006; 11(6):657–665. doi: 10.1179/174329306X147742
34.
DoudeH, SchneiderJ, PattonB, Optimizing weld quality of a friction stir welded aluminum alloy. J Mater Process Technol. 2015; 222;188–196. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.01.019
35.
YanJ, SuttonM, ReynoldsA.Processing and banding in AA2524 and AA2024 friction stir welding. Sci Technol Welding Joining. 2007; 12(5):390–401. doi: 10.1179/174329307X213639
36.
DoudeHR, SchneiderJA, NunesACJr. Influence of the tool shoulder contact conditions on the material flow during friction stir welding. Metall Mater Trans A. 2014; 45(10):4411–4422. doi: 10.1007/s11661-014-2384-0
