Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-03
Intercultural sensitivity among university students: measurement of the construct and its relationship with international mobility programmes / Sensibilidad intercultural de los estudiantes universitarios: medición del constructo y su relación con los programas de movilidad internacional
The purpose of this study was to validate the IDI (Intercultural Development Inventory) and to assess the impact of international mobility programmes on the intercultural sensitivity of university students. For this, a quasi-experimental study was carried out using a longitudinal design of repeated pre-test and post-test measures, with an experimental group of students who carried out international mobility programmes and a control group of students who did not. The sample consisted of 3,047 university students. The inventory yielded a five-factor structure (negation/defence, minimization, reversion, acceptance/adaptation and encapsulated marginality) with alpha coefficients ranging from .82 to .91, revealing adequate reliability and validity. The results indicate the effectiveness of the IDI to measure intercultural sensitivity. Although the post-test scores are higher than the pre-test scores for both groups, there are significant differences in favour of the experimental group (p = .000) in all factors except the negation/defence stage. The conclusions focus on the implications of this study for curriculum development and policy at an educational level.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltshulerL.SussmanN.KachurE. (2003). Assessing changes in intercultural sensitivity among physician trainees using the intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 387–401.
2.
AndersonP.LawtonL.RexeisenR.HubbardA. (2006). Short-term study abroad and intercultural sensitivity: A pilot study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 457–469.
3.
AshwillM. (2004). Developing intercultural competence for the masses. International Educator, 13, 16–25.
4.
BennettJ.BennettM. (2004). Developing intercultural sensitivity: An integrative approach to global and domestic diversity. In LandisD.BennettJ.BennettM. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (pp. 147–165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
BennettM. (1986a). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 179–195.
6.
BennettM. (1986b). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In PaigeR. (Ed.), Cross-cultural orientation: New conceptualizations and applications (pp. 27–70). New York NY: University Press of America.
7.
BennettM. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A develomental model of intercultural sensitivity. In PaigeR. (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21–71). Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.
BennettM. (2004). Becoming interculturally competent. In WurzelJ. (Ed.), Toward multiculturalism: A reader in multicultural education (pp. 62–78). Newton: Intercultural Resource.
10.
BennettM. (2012, February15). Turning cross-cultural contact into intercultural learning. Proceedings of the International Congress on Higher Education. The University for Sustainable Development. Cuba: Havana.
11.
BennettM.CastiglioniI. (2004). Embodied ethnocentrism and the feeling of culture: A key to training for intercultural competence. In LandisD.BennettJ.BennettM. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (pp. 249–265). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
BhawukD.BrislinR. (1992). The measurement of cultural sensitivity. Using the concepts of individualism and collectivism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 413–436.
13.
BrislinR. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In LonnerW.BerryJ. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
ByrneB. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group.
15.
CeaM. (2004). Métodos de encuesta. Teoría y práctica, errores y mejora. Madrid: Síntesis.
16.
ChenG.StarostaW. (2000). The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale. Human Communication, 3, 2–14.
17.
De SantosF. (2004). Desarrollo de la competencia intercultural en alumnado universitario: Una propuesta formativa para la gestión en empresas multiculturales(Doctoral dissertation). Mide. UB. Barcelona.
18.
De VeauxR.VellemanP.BockD. (2012). Stats: Data and models (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
19.
DeardorffD.WitH.HeylJ. (2012). The SAGE Handbook of international Higher Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
20.
EngleL.EngleJ. (2004). Assessing language acquisition and intercultural sensitivity development in relation to study abroad program design. Frontiers: the Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, X, 219–236.
FabregasM.KelseyK.RobinsonS. (2012). Predicting intercultural sensitivity using demographic variables among college of agriculture undergraduate students. US-China Education Review, A, 8, 710–719.
25.
Gacel-AvilaJ. (2005). The internationalization of Higher Education: A paradigm for global citizens. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9, 121–136.
26.
GeldhofG.PreacherK.ZyphurM. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19, 72–91.
27.
HairJ.BlackW.BabinB.AndersonR.TathamR. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson.
28.
HammerM.BennettM. (2002). The intercultural development inventory: Manual. Portland, OR: Intercultural Communication Institute.
29.
HammerM.BennettM.WisemanR. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 421–443.
30.
HofstedeG.Van DeusenC.MuellerC.CharlesT. (2002). What goals do business leaders pursue? A study in fifteen countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 785–803.
31.
JacoboneV.MoroG. (2015). Evaluating the impact of the Erasmus programme: Skills and European identity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 309–328.
32.
JonesE. (2012). Internationalisation and employability: Are we missing a trick?EAIE Forum Winter: Employability, 6–9.
KlakT.MartinP. (2003). Do university-sponsored international cultural events help students to appreciate “Difference”? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 445–465.
35.
LyttleA.BarkerG.CornwellT. (2011). Adept through adaptation: Third culture individuals’ interpersonal sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 686–694.
36.
McMurraryA. (2007). Measuring intercultural sensitivity of international and domestic college students: The impact of international travel. Florida, FL: University of Florida.
37.
Medina-López-PortilloA. (2004). Intercultural learning assessment: The link between program duration and the development of intercultural sensitivity. Frontiers: the Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, X, 179–199.
38.
MesselinkH.Van MaeleJ.Spencer-OateyH. (2015). Intercultural competencies: What students in study and placement mobility should be learning. Intercultural Education, 26, 62–72.
39.
MoranR.HarrisP.MoranS. (2007). Managing cultural differences: Global leadership strategies for the 21st Century (7th ed.). Burlington: Butterworth-Heinemann.
40.
PaigeR.FryG.StallmanE.JosićJ.Jae-EunJ. (2009). Study abroad for global engagements: The long-term impact of mobility experiences. In M. Bennett (Eds.). Journal of Intercultural Education, 20, 29–44.
41.
PaigeR.Jacobs-CassutoM.YershovaY.DeJaeghereJ. (2003). Assessing intercultural sensitivity: An empirical analysis of the Hammer and Bennett intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 467–486.
PedersenP. (2010). Assessing intercultural effectiveness outcomes in a year-long study abroad program. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 70–80.
44.
Pozo-VicenteC.Aguaded-GómezJ. (2012). El programa de movilidad ERASMUS: Motor de la adquisición de competencias interculturales. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 30, 441–458.
45.
Rodríguez-IzquierdoR. M. (2015). Competencias genéricas en la enseñanza superior a través de los programas de internacionalización. Revista Complutense de Educación, 26, 81–100.
46.
Ruiz-BernardoP.Ferrández-BerruecoR.Sales-CigesM. (2012). Aplicación del modelo CIPP en el estudio de los factores que favorecen la sensibilidad intercultural. Relieve, 18, 4.
47.
SanhuezaS.CardonaM. (2009). Evaluación de la sensibilidad intercultural en alumnado de educación primaria escolarizado en aula culturalmente diversas. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 27, 247–262.
48.
StraffonD. (2003). Assessing the intercultural sensitivity of High School students attending an international school. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 487–501.
Vande BergM. (2007). Intervening in the learning of U.S. students abroad. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 392–399.
51.
Vande BergM.BalkcumA.ScheidM.WhalenB. (2004). The Georgetown University consortium project: A report from the halfway mark. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10, 101–116.
52.
VilàR. (2006). La dimensión afectiva de la competencia comunicativa intercultural en la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria: Escala de sensibilidad intercultural. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 24, 353–372.
53.
WangM.BealD.ChanD.NewmanD.VancouverJ.VandenbergR. (2017). Longitudinal research: A panel discussion on conceptual issues, research design, and statistical techniques. Work, Aging and Retirement, 3, 1–24.
54.
WilliamsT. (2005). Exploring the impact of study abroad on students’ intercultural communication skills: Adaptability and Sensitivity. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9, 356–371.
55.
WorthingtonR.WhittakerT. (2006). Scale development research a content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838.
