Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-12
The social relations of university students: intensity,interaction and association with academic performance / Las relaciones sociales de los estudiantes en la universidad: intensidad,interrelación y vinculación con el rendimiento académico
In recent years, the literature has stressed the importance of relational factors in students’ academic performance. Thus, the networks of assistance and exchange in academic matters and the expressive or friendship networks established in the classroom can have a significant influence on students’ academic performance. For this reason, we thought that it might be interesting to explore the intensity, structure and interaction of these networks, as well as their ties with students’ academic performance. Using social network analysis, we performed an exploratory study on the relations in a sample of students from the Universitat Politècnica de València. The results show that students’ academic assistance and exchange network and friendship network show a high density and mutual correlation, and that the way students integrate socially into the academic network determines their university performance. These results can guide universities in the development of activities aimed at shaping the form and quality of students’ relational capacity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaldwinT. T.BedellM. D.JohnsonJ. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1369–1397. doi:10.2307/257037
2.
BarghJ.SchulY. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593–604. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.72.5.593
3.
Benbunan-FichR.HiltzS. R. (1999). Impacts of asynchronous learning networks on individual and group problem solving: A field experiment. Group decision and Negotiation, 8, 409–426. doi:10.1023/A:1008669710763
4.
BiancaniS.McFarlandD. A. (2013). Social networks research in higher education. In PaulsenM. B. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 151–215). Holanda: Springer.
5.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G. (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21, 375–395. doi:S0378-87339900019-2
6.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G.FreemanL. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
7.
CattaniG.FerrianiS. (2008). A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry. Organization Science, 19, 824–844. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0350
8.
ChenB.WangF.SongJ. (2012). Are they connected? Exploring academic and social networks among MPA students at a Chinese University. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18, 137–156.
9.
ChoH.GayG.DavidsonB.IngraffeaA. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49, 309–329. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.07.003
10.
DurlingR.SchickC. (1976). Concept attainment by pairs and individuals as a function of vocalization. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 83–91. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.68.1.83
11.
EricksonB. H.NosanchukT. A.LeeE. (1981). Network sampling in practice: Some second steps. Social Networks, 3, 127–136. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(81)90011-3
12.
FloodJ. (2002). Read All About It: Online Learning Facing 80% Attrition Rate. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–4.
13.
FreemanL. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
14.
FriedkinN. E. (2009). Jaccard-spline index of structural proximity in contact networks. Social Networks, 31, 76–84. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.10.002
15.
GallM. D.GallJ. P. (1976). The discussion method. In GageN. L. (Ed.), The psychology of teaching methods (pp. 166–216). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
16.
García-MuñizA. S.Morillas-RayaA.Ramos-CarvajalC. (2011). Core periphery valued models in input-output field: A scope from network theory. Papers in Regional Science, 90, 111–121. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00283.x
17.
GaševićD.ZouaqA.JanzenR. (2013). Choose your classmates, your GPA is at stake!: The association of cross-class social ties and academic performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 1460–1479. doi:10.1177/0002764213479362
18.
GuimeràR.UzziB.SpiroJ.AmaralL. A. N. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308, 697–702. doi:10.1126/science.1106340
19.
HarasimL. (1990). On-Line Education: Perspectives on a new medium. New York, NY: Praeged/Greenwood.
20.
HargadonA. B. (2006). Bridging old worlds and building new ones: Toward a microsociology of creativity. In ThompsonL.SeokH. (Ed.), Creativity and innovation in organizational teams (pp. 199–216). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
HaythornthwaiteC. (2002). Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society, 18, 385–401. doi:10.1080/01972240290108195
22.
HommesJ.RientiesB.GraveW. D.BosG.SchuwirthL.ScherpbierA. (2012). Visualising the invisible: A network approach to reveal the informal social side of student learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17, 743–757. doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9349-0
23.
IbarraH. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56–87.
24.
IbarraH. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of management journal, 38, 673–703. doi:10.2307/256742
25.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research, 49, 51–69. doi:10.3102/00346543049001051
26.
JohnsonR. D.HornikS.SalasE. (2008). An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 356–369. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.11.003
27.
KassimM. A.HanafiR. M.HancockD. R. (2008). Test anxiety and its consequences on academic performance among university students. Advance in Psychology Research, 53, 75–95.
28.
KrackardtD. (1987). QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness. Social Networks, 9, 171–186. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(87)90012-8
MafokoziJ. (2011). Nivel de alfabetización estadística del alumnado universitario de letras: El caso de la Facultad de Educación de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Revista Complutense de Educación, 22, 95–125. doi:10.5209/rev_RCED.2011.v22.n1.5
31.
McKenzieK.SchweitzerR. (2001). Who Succeeds at University? Factors predicting academic performance in first year Australian university students. Higher Education Research & Development, 20, 21–33. doi:10.1080/07924360120043621
32.
MeeceJ. L.AndermanE. M.AndermanL. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258
33.
MoraC. D.GarcíaJ. A.MolinaA. (2016). ¿Dónde está la clave del éxito académico? Un análisis de la relación entre el uso del tiempo y el rendimiento académico. Cultura y Educación, 28, 173–195. doi:10.1080/11356405.2015.1130294
34.
MorrisonA.RabellottiR. (2005). Knowledge and information networks: Evidence from an Italian wine local system (Working paper 174/2005). Milán: CESPRI, Università Bocconi.
35.
PekrunR.ElliotA. J.MaierM. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135. doi:10.1037/a0013383
36.
RamosI.Maya-JariegoI. (2013). Alianzas y redes de colaboración entre las agrupaciones culturales de las Artes Escénicas en Andalucía. EMPIRIA. Revista de Metodología de Ciencias sociales, 26, 15–34. doi:10.5944/empiria.26.7151
37.
RizzutoT. E.LeDouxJ.HatalaJ. P. (2009). It’s not just what you know, it’s who you know: Testing a model of the relative importance of social networks to academic performance. Social Psychology of Education, 12, 175–189. doi:10.1007/s11218-008-9080-0
38.
SchillingM. A. (2005). A ‘small-world’ network model of cognitive insight. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 131–154. doi:10.1080/10400419.2005.9651475
39.
SlavinR. E. (1977). Classroom reward structure: An analytical and practical review. Review of Educational Research, 47, 633–650. doi:10.3102/00346543047004633
40.
SmithR. A. (2010). Only connect: A mixed methods study of how 1st-year students create residential academic and social networks(Higher Education-Dissertations, Paper 56). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.
41.
SmithR. A.PetersonB. L. (2007). “Psst … What Do You Think?” The Relationship between Advice Prestige, Type of Advice, and Academic Performance. Communication Education, 56, 278–291. doi:10.1080/03634520701364890
42.
StassenM. L. A. (2003). Student outcomes: The impact of varying living-learning community models. Research in Higher Education, 44, 581–613. doi:0361-0365/03/1000-0581/0
43.
ThomasS. L. (2000). Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 591–615. doi:10.2307/2649261
44.
Tomás-MiquelJ. V.Expósito-LangaM.Sempere-CastellóS. (2014). Determinantes del rendimiento académico en los estudiantes de grado. Un estudio en administración y dirección de empresas. RIE: Revista de Investigacion Educativa, 32, 379–392. doi:10.6018/rie.32.2.177581
45.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
WebbN. M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52, 421–445. doi:10.3102/00346543052003421
47.
YangH. L.TangJ. H. (2003). Effects of social network on student performance: Web-based forum study in Taiwan. The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks (JALN), 7, 93–107.
