Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Spanish

This study describes and evaluates a teaching experience that combines the use of financial press with the ‘writing to learn’ method, within the subject Intermediate Macroeconomics. The subject belongs to a field of economics which is characterized by a particularly high degree of mathematical abstraction and in which the accurate assimilation of theoretical content thus becomes essential. Thanks to the establishment of a collaboration agreement, students are offered the chance to publish press articles related to economic issues in a special supplement of El Periódico de Huelva. When comparing the academic performance of students who did or did not participate in the experience, the results appear to confirm the positive effects of using methods that promote active learning, such as the one used in this experience.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Becker

W. E.

(1998). Engaging students in quantitative analysis with short case examples from the academic and popular press. American Economic Review, 88, 480–486.

Becker

W. E.

(2002). Teaching quantitative methods in economics: Alternatives to theorem and proof and chalk and talk. Economic Analysis and Policy, 32, 159–180. doi:10.1016/S0313-5926(02)50027-8

Becker

W. E.

Watts

(2001). Teaching economics at the start of the 21st century: Still chalk and talk. American Economic Review, 91, 446–451. doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.446

Carlino

(2004). La distancia que separa la evaluación escrita frecuente de la deseable. Acción Pedagógica, 13, 8–17.

Cate

Dynan

(2010). Structured writing assignments as pedagogy: Teaching content, enhancing skills. Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 29, 47–60.

Crowe

Youga

(1986). Using writing as a tool for learning economics. Journal of Economic Education, 17, 218–222. doi:10.1080/00220485.1986.10845169

Dynan

Cate

(2009). The impact of writing assignments on student learning: Should writing assignments be structured or unstructured? International Review of Economics Education, 8, 64–86. doi:10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30078-5

Emig

(1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122–128. doi:10.2307/356095

Fundación BBVA . (2010). Estudio internacional Fundación BBVA sobre estudiantes universitarios de seis países europeos. Madrid: Departamento de Estudios Sociales y Opinión Pública de la Fundación BBVA.

10.

Greenlaw

(2003). Using writing to enhance student learning in undergraduate Economics. International Review of Economics Education, 1, 61–70. doi:10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30211-5

11.

Hamlin

Janssen

(1987). Active learning in large introductory sociology courses. Teaching Sociology, 15, 45–54. doi:10.2307/1317817

12.

Iglesias

Toscano

M. O.

Román

(2012). Taller de prensa económica como instrumento de innovación educativa. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 30, 423–440.

13.

Scardamalia

Bereiter

(1985). Development of dialectical processes in composition. In Olson

Torrance

Hildyard

(Eds.), Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 307–329). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Serrano

(2014). La lectura, la escritura y el pensamiento. Función epistémica e implicaciones pedagógicas. Lenguaje, 42, 97–122.

15.

Simpson

M. S.

Carroll

S. E.

(1999). Assignments for a writing-intensive Economics course. Journal of Economic Education, 30, 402–410. doi:10.1080/00220489909596097

16.

Stowe

(2010). A quick argument for active learning: The effectiveness of one-minute papers. Journal for Economic Educators, 10(1), 33–39.

17.

Vicente

M. R.

(2013). Y la Reina preguntó: ¿Por qué los economistas no han sido capaces de predecir la crisis económica? ¿Será quizás que no leen la prensa? … La importancia de usar las noticias de prensa en la docencia de Economía. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 19(número especial marzo), 523–530.

18.

Wells

(1990). Talk about text: Where literacy is learned and taught. Curriculum Inquiry, 20, 369–405. doi:10.1080/03626784.1990.11076083

Writing to learn: an experience applied within the subject Intermediate Macroeconomics / Escribir para aprender: una aplicación para la asignatura macroeconomía intermedia

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References