The Prediction of Imminent Aggression in Patients with Mental Illness and/or Intellectual Disability Using the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression Instrument
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2009
The Prediction of Imminent Aggression in Patients with Mental Illness and/or Intellectual Disability Using the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression Instrument
Objective: The aim of this paper was to determine whether imminent aggression in psychiatric inpatients can be accurately predicted using a structured risk assessment instrument, the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression (DASA).
Methods: This prospective validation study involved 10 013 DASA risk assessments of patients residing in a psychiatric hospital. Twenty-four hours after the risk assessment, psychiatric nurses documented whether patients had behaved aggressively towards others or whether they had deliberately damaged property. They also noted the target of aggression, whether towards staff, patients or property.
Results: The predictive validity of the DASA varied according to the type and target of aggression. The prediction of any aggressive behaviour, irrespective of type of aggression or target, was significantly greater than chance (AUC = 0.69). The strongest predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.80) was for physical aggression towards staff.
Conclusions: These results suggest that imminent aggression in psychiatric hospitals may be able to be accurately predicted by psychiatric nurses using a structured risk assessment instrument.
NichollsTLOgloffJRPDouglasKS. Assessing risk for violence among male and female civil psychiatric patients: the HCR-20, PCL:SV, and McNiel & Binder's screening measure. Behavioural Sciences and the Law2004; 22:127–158.
2.
DouglasKSSkeemJL. Violence risk assessment: getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law2005; 11: 347–383.
3.
SkeemJMulveyE. Monitoring the violence potential of mentally disordered offenders being treatment in the community. In: BuchananA, Care of the Mentally Disordered Offender in the CommunityNew York: Oxford Press, 2002; 111–142.
4.
WebsterCDDouglasKSEavesDHartSD. HCR-20: Assessing Risk of Violence (Version 2). Vancouver: Mental Health Law & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University, 1997.
5.
AlmvikRWoodsPRasmussenK. (2000). The Broset violence checklist: sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability. Journal of Interpersonal Violence2000; 15: 1284–1296.
6.
OgloffJRPDaffernM. The Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression: An instrument to assess risk for imminent aggression in psychiatric inpatients. Behavioural Sciences and the Law2006; 24: 799–813.
7.
WebsterCDMartinMBrinkJNichollsTLMiddletonC. Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START). Ontario: St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Canada and Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission, Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada, 2004.
8.
AberhaldenCNeedhamIMiserezB. Predicting inpatient violence in acute psychiatric wards using the Broset-Violence-Checklist: A multicentric prospective cohort study. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing2004; 11: 422–427.
9.
DaffernMHowellsK. The prediction of imminent aggression and self-harm in personality disordered patients of a high security hospital using the HCR-20 Clinical Scale and the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health2007; 6:137–143.
10.
NichollsTTBrinkJDesmaraisSLWebsterCDMartinM-LThe Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): A prospective validation study in a forensic psychiatric sample. Assessment2006; 13: 313.
11.
DaffernMHowellsKOgloffJRP. What's the point? Towards a methodology for assessing the function of psychiatric inpatient aggression. Behaviour Research and Therapy2006; 45:101–111.
12.
DouglasKSWebsterCD. Predicting violence in mentally and personality disordered individuals. In: RoeschRHartSDOgloffJRP, Psychology and Law: The State of the DisciplineNew York: Plenum, 1999; 175–239.
