Objective: The aim of this paper is to examine the background to the emblematic psychiatric term, schizophrenia, the historical, cultural and social factors affecting the two men who defined modern psychiatric practice, and anticipate what lies ahead in the next century.
Conclusions: The term schizophrenia was created by Swiss psychiatrist Eugene Bleuler and first used on 24 April 1908. The condition was first described by German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin and called dementia praecox. After a century, it is impossible to think of the practice of psychiatry without schizophrenia.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
IonRMBeerMD. The British reaction to dementia praecox 1893–1913. Part 1. History of Psychiatry2002; 13: 285–304.
2.
KuhnR. Eugen Bleuler's concepts of psychopathology. History of Psychiatry2004; 15: 361–366.
3.
JesteDVdel CarmenRLohrJBWyattRJ. Did schizophrenia exist before the eighteenth century?. Comprehensive Psychiatry1985; 26: 493–503.
4.
DowbigginI. Back to the future: Valentin Magnan, French psychiatry, and the classification of mental diseases, 1885–1925. Social History of Medicine1996; 9: 383–408.
5.
RoelckeV. Biologizing social facts: an early 20th century debate on Kraepelin's concepts of culture, neurasthenia, and degeneration. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry1997; 21: 383–403.
6.
EngstromEJ. Clinical Psychiatry in Imperial Germany: A History of Psychiatric Practice. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York2003.
7.
Hanauske-AbelHM. Not a slippery slope or sudden subversion: German medicine and national socialism in 1933. British Medical Journal1996; 313: 1453–1463.
8.
BoroffkaA. Emil Kraepelin (1856–1926). Transcultural Psychiatry1990; 27: 228–237.
9.
ShepherdM. Kraepelin and modern psychiatry. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience1995; 245: 189–195.
10.
KraamA. The legacy of Kraepelin (essay review). History of Psychiatry2002; 13: 475–480.
11.
MeyerA. In memoriam: Emil Kraepelin. American Journal of Psychiatry1994; 151 (Suppl. 6)140–143.
12.
SteinbergHAngermeyerMC. Emil Kraepelin's years at Dorpat as professor of psychiatry in nineteenth-century Russia. History of Psychiatry2001; 12: 297–327.
13.
HippiusHMüllerN. The work of Emil Kraepelin and his research group in München. European Archives of Clinical Neurscience2008; 258 (Suppl. 2)3–11.
14.
AdityanjeeAYAAderibigbeYATheodoridisDVictorRViewegWVR. Dementia praecox to schizophrenia: The first 100 years. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences1999; 53: 437–448.
15.
DeckerHS. How Kraepelinian was Kraepelin? How Kraepelinian are the neo-Kraepelinians? From Emil Kraepelin to DSM-III. History of Psychiatry2007; 18: 337–360.
16.
JablenskyA. Kraepelin's legacy: paradigm or pitfall for modern psychiatry?. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience1995; 245: 186–188.
17.
GreeneT. The Kraepelinian dichotomy: the twin pillars crumbling?. History of Psychiatry2007; 18: 361–379.
18.
BleulerM. Some aspects of the history of Swiss psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry1973; 130: 991–994.
19.
Henri Ellenberger. The Discovery of the Unconscious: The History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry. New York: Basic Books, 1970.
20.
BleulerMBleulerR. Dementia praecox oder die Gruppe der Schizophrenien: Eugen Bleuler. British Journal of Psychiatry1986; 149: 661–662.
21.
KrapfEE. Response to fellowship lecture on Eugen Bleuler. American Journal of Psychiatry1957; 114: 299–302.
22.
AcocellaJ.Secrets of Nijinsky. New York Review of Books. 1999; 46: 14 January.
23.
StierlinH. Bleuler's concept of schizophrenia: a confusing heritage. American Journal of Psychiatry1967; 123: 996–1001.
24.
McNallyK. Schizophrenia as split personality/Jekyll and Hyde: the origins of the informal usage in the English language. Journal of the History of the Behaivoral Sciences2007; 43: 69–79.
25.
DeckerHS. The psychiatric works of Emil Kraepelin: a many-faceted story of modern medicine. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences2004; 13: 248–276.
26.
CrowTJ. From Kraepelin to Kretschmer leavened by Schneider: the transition from categories of psychosis to dimensions of variation intrinsic to homo sapiens. Archives of General Psychiatry1998; 55: 502–504.
27.
Edward Shorter. A History of Psychiatry: From the Era of the Asylum to the Age of Prozac. New York: John Wiley, 1998.
28.
RonMAHarveyI. The brain in schizophrenia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry1990; 53: 725–726.
29.
CraddockNOwenMJ. The beginning of the end for the Kraepelinian dichotomy. British Journal of Psychiatry2005; 186: 364–366.
30.
GhaemiSNBaldessariniRJ. The manic-depressive spectrum and mood stabilization: Kraepelin's ghost. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics2007; 76: 65–69.
31.
CrowTJ. The continuum of psychosis and its genetic origins. The sixty-fifth Maudsley lecture. British Journal of Psychiatry1990; 156: 788–797.
32.
CrowTJ. The failure of the Kraepelinian binary concept and the search for the psychosis gene. Concepts of Mental Disorder: A Continuing Debate, KerrAMcClellandH. Gaskell, London1991; 37–41.
33.
CraddockNO'DonovanMCOwenMJ. Genes for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder? Implications for psychiatric nosology. Schizophrenia Bulletin2006; 32: 9–16.
34.
HeinrichsRWAmmariNMcDermid VazSMilesAA. Are schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder neuropsychologically distinguishable?. Schizophrenia Research2008; 99: 149–154.
35.
KraepelinEEngstromEJ. Psychiatric observations on contemporary issues. History of Psychiatry1992; 3: 253–269.
36.
EngstromEJ. Emil Kraepelin: psychiatry and public affairs in Wilhelmine Germany. History of Psychiatry1991; 2: 111–132.
37.
LomaxE. Infantile syphilis as an example of nineteenth century belief in the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences1979; 34: 23–39.
38.
DeckerHS. The psychiatric works of Emil Kraepelin: a many-faceted story of modern medicine. J. Hist. Neurosci.2004; 13: 248–276.
39.
EngstromEJ. Making Kraepelin history: a great instauration?. History of Psychiatry2007; 18: 267–273.
40.
LiftonRJ. The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide. Basic Books, New York1986.
41.
EngstromEJBurgmairWWeberMM. Emil Kraepelin's ‘Self-Assessment’: clinical autography in historical context. History of Psychiatry2002; 13: 89–119.
42.
PilgrimD. The Eugenic legacy in psychology and psychiatry. International Journal of Social Psychiatry2008; 54: 272–284.
43.
LewisA. German eugenic legislation: an examination of fact and theory. Eugenics Review1934; 26: 183–191.
44.
SeidelmanWE. Nuremberg lamentation: for the forgotten victims of medical science. British Medical Journal1996; 313: 1463–1467.
45.
ShepherdM. Two faces of Emil Kraepelin. British Journal of Psychiatry1995; 167: 174–183.
46.
MöllerAHellD. Eugen Bleuler and forensic psychiatry. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry2002; 25: 351–360.
47.
Stotz-IngenlathG. Epistemological aspects of Eugen Bleuler's conception of schizophrenia in 1911. Medicine Healthcare and Philosophy2000; 3: 153–159.
48.
DalzellTG. Eugene Bleuler 150: Bleuler's reception of Freud. History of Psychiatry2007; 18: 471–482.
49.
Zilboorg. Eugen Bleuler and present-day psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry1957; 114: 289–298.
50.
BerlimMTMatteviBSBelmonte-de-AbreuPCrowTJ. The etiology of schizophrenia and the origin of language: overview of a theory. Comprehensive Psychiatry2003; 44: 7–14.
51.
CrowTJ. Schizophrenia as the price that homo sapiens pays for language: a resolution of the central paradox in the origin of the species. Brain Research, Brain Research Reviews2000; 31: 118–129.
52.
O'ReillyTRobinDRichardB. Schizotypy and creativity: an evolutionary connection?. Personality and Individual Differences2001; 31: 1067–1078.
53.
WeinsteinSGravesRE. Are creativity and schizotypy products of a right hemisphere bias?. Brain and Cognition2002; 49: 138–151.
54.
KaplanRM.The neuropsychiatry of Shamanism. Before Farming2006/4 article 13.
55.
CrowTJ. Is schizophrenia the price that Homo sapiens pays for language?. Schizophrenia Research1997; 28: 127–141.
