With the increased pressure to decarbonise the power generation sector several gas turbine manufacturers are working towards increasing the hydrogen-firing capabilities of their engines towards 100%. In this review, we discuss the potential materials challenges of gas turbines fuelled with hydrogen, provide an updated overview of the most promising alloys and coatings for this application, and highlight topics requiring further research and development. Particular focus is given to the high-temperature oxidation of gas turbine materials exposed to hydrogen and steam at elevated temperatures and to the corrosion challenges of parts fabricated by additive manufacturing. Other degradation mechanisms such as hot corrosion, the dual atmosphere effect and hydrogen diffusion in the base alloys are also discussed.
SpathPLMannMK. Life cycle assessment of a natural gas combined cycle power generation system. 2000. https://doi.org/10.2172/776930.
3.
KloessMZachK.Bulk electricity storage technologies for load-leveling operation – an economic assessment for the Austrian and German power market. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2014;59:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.02.002.
4.
SantosSCollodiGAzzaroG Reference Data and Supporting Literature Reviews for SMR based Hydrogen Production with CCS. IEAGHG; 2017.
5.
Energy Information Administration. The impact of increased use of hydrogen on petroleum consumption and carbon dioxide emissions. 2008.
6.
LangstonLS.Hydrogen fueled gas turbines. Mech Eng. 2019;141:52–54. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2019-MAR-6.
7.
QuartonCJSamsatliS.Power-to-gas for injection into the gas grid: what can we learn from real-life projects, economic assessments and systems modelling?Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2018;98:302–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.007.
8.
Siemens Gas and Power GmbH & Co. KG, Hydrogen power with Siemens gas turbines - reliable carbon-free power with flexibility, White Paper. 2020.
9.
du ToitMHAvdeenkovAVBessarabovD.Reviewing H2 combustion: a case study for non-fuel-cell power systems and safety in passive autocatalytic recombiners. Energy Fuels. 2018;32:6401–6422. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b00724.
10.
ETN GLOBAL. 2020. ETN Hydrogen Gas Turbines report – “The path towards a zero-carbon gas turbine”
World’s First Successful Technology Verification of 100% Hydrogen-fueled Gas Turbine Operation with Dry Low NOx Combustion Technology | NEDO [cited 2020 September 14]. https://www.nedo.go.jp/english/news/AA5en_100427.html.
13.
BothienMRCianiAWoodJPToward decarbonized power generation with gas turbines by using sequential combustion for burning hydrogen. J Eng Gas Turbine Power. 2019;141. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4045256.
14.
GriebelP.Gas turbines and hydrogen. hydrogen science and engineering : materials, processes, systems and technology. John Wiley; 2016. p. 1011–1032. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527674268.ch43.
15.
DanieleSJansohnPMantzarasJTurbulent flame speed for syngas at gas turbine relevant conditions. Proc Combust Inst. 2011;33:2937–2944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.057.
16.
DreizlerABöhmB.Advanced laser diagnostics for an improved understanding of premixed flame-wall interactions. Proc Combust Inst. 2015;35:37–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2014.08.014.
17.
GruberASankaranRHawkesERTurbulent flame–wall interaction: a direct numerical simulation study. J Fluid Mech. 2010;658:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112010001278.
18.
ChiesaPLozzaGMazzocchiL.Using hydrogen as gas turbine fuel. J Eng Gas Turbines Power. 2005;127:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1787513.
19.
AlvinMA. Materials and component development for advanced turbine systems. Volume 4: Cycle Innovations; Industrial and Cogeneration; Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy; Marine, Orlando, Florida, USA: ASMEDC; 2009, p. 737–46. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2009-59106.
20.
ClarkeDROechsnerMPadtureNP.Thermal-barrier coatings for more efficient gas-turbine engines. MRS Bull. 2012;37:891–898. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2012.232.
21.
WrightIGGibbonsTB.Recent developments in gas turbine materials and technology and their implications for syngas firing. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2007;32:3610–3621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.08.049.
22.
SinghK.Advanced materials for land based gas turbines. Trans Indian Inst Met. 2014;67:601–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-014-0398-3.
23.
PollockTMTinS.Nickel-based superalloys for advanced turbine engines: chemistry, microstructure and properties. J Propul Power. 2006;22:361–374. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.18239.
24.
MuktinutalapatiNR. Materials for gas turbines – an overview. Advances in Gas Turbine Technology 2011. https://doi.org/10.5772/20730.
25.
SchilkeP. Advanced gas turbine materials and coatings. GE Reference Library GER-3569G 2004:1–25.
26.
WeeSDoJKimKReview on mechanical thermal properties of superalloys and thermal barrier coating used in gas turbines. Applied Sciences. 2020;10:5476, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165476.
27.
LagowBW.Materials selection in gas turbine engine design and the role of low thermal expansion materials. JOM. 2016;68:2770–2775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2071-2.
28.
BakanEMackDEMauerGHigh-temperature materials for power generation in gas turbines. advanced ceramics for energy conversion and storage. Elsevier. 2020: 3–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102726-4.00001-6.
29.
PauziAAGhazaliMJZamri WFHWWear characteristics of superalloy and hardface coatings in gas turbine applications – a review. Metals (Basel). 2020;10:1171, https://doi.org/10.3390/met10091171.
30.
DorchehASGaletzMC.Challenges in developing oxidation-resistant chromium-based alloys for applications above 900°C. JOM. 2016;68:2793–2802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2079-7.
31.
GuYFHaradaHRoY.Chromium and chromium-based alloys: problems and possibilities for high-temperature service. JOM. 2004;56:28–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-004-0197-0.
32.
MichalikMTobingSLHänselMEffects of water vapour on the high temperature nitridation of chromium. Mater Corros. 2014;65:260–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201307160.
33.
SzwedaAButnerSRuffoniJDevelopment and evaluation of hybrid oxide/oxide ceramic matrix composite combustor liners. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. 2008: 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2005-68496.
34.
PimentelGCapdevilaCBartolomeMAdvanced FeCrAl ODS steels for high-temperature structural applications in energy generation systems. Revista de Metalurgia. 2012;48:303–316. https://doi.org/10.3989/revmetalm.1165.
35.
FurrerDFechtH.Ni-based superalloys for turbine discs. JOM. 1999;51:14–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-999-0005-y.
36.
SmithTMEsserBDAntolinNPhase transformation strengthening of high-temperature superalloys. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13434. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13434.
37.
PanwisawasCTangYTReedRC.Metal 3D printing as a disruptive technology for superalloys. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2327. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16188-7.
38.
BasoaltoHCPanwisawasCSovaniYA computational study on the three-dimensional printability of precipitate-strengthened nickel-based superalloys. Proceedings of the royal society A: mathematical. Phys Eng Sci. 2018;474:20180295, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0295.
39.
ChauvetEKontisPJägleEHot cracking mechanism affecting a non-weldable Ni-based superalloy produced by selective electron beam melting. Acta Mater. 2018;142:82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.047.
40.
HojjatzadehSMHParabNDYanWPore elimination mechanisms during 3D printing of metals. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3088. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10973-9.
41.
SmialekJLMillerRA.Revisiting the birth of 7YSZ thermal barrier coatings: Stephan Stecura †. Coatings. 2018;8:255. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8070255.
42.
HasselmanDPHJohnsonLFBentsenLDThermal diffusivity and conductivity of dense polycrystalline Zr02 ceramics. A Survey. 1987;66:9.
SchulzU.Phase transformation in EB-PVD yttria partially stabilized zirconia thermal barrier coatings during annealing. J Am Ceram Soc. 2000;83:904–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01292.x.
46.
WitzGShkloverVSteurerWPhase evolution in yttria-stabilized zirconia thermal barrier coatings studied by rietveld refinement of X-Ray powder diffraction patterns. J Am Ceram Soc. 2007;90:2935–2940. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01785.x.
47.
LiuBLiuYZhuCAdvances on strategies for searching for next generation thermal barrier coating materials. J Mater Sci Technol. 2019;35:833–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.11.016.
48.
BakanEVaßenR.Ceramic top coats of plasma-sprayed thermal barrier coatings: materials, processes, and properties. J Therm Spray Technol. 2017;26:992–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-017-0597-7.
49.
PadtureNPGellMJordanEH.Thermal barrier coatings for gas-turbine engine applications. Science. 2002;296:280–284. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068609.
50.
NaumenkoDPillaiRChyrkinAOverview on recent developments of bondcoats for plasma-sprayed thermal barrier coatings. J Therm Spray Tech. 2017;26:1743–1757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-017-0649-z.
51.
EvansAGMummDRHutchinsonJWMechanisms controlling the durability of thermal barrier coatings. Prog Mater Sci. 2001;46:505–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00020-7.
52.
QuestedPNBrooksRFChapmanLMeasurement and estimation of thermophysical properties of nickel based superalloys. Mater Sci Technol. 2009;25:154–162. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328408X361454.
53.
TaylorTAWalshPN.Thermal expansion of MCrAlY alloys. Surf Coat Technol. 2004;77–178:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2003.05.001.
54.
TaylorTA.Thermal properties and microstructure of two thermal barrier coatings. In: SartwellBDMcGUIREGEHofmannS, editors. Metallurgical coatings and thin films 1992. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1992. p. 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-89900-2.50015-4.
MartenaMBottoDFinoPModelling of TBC system failure: stress distribution as a function of TGO thickness and thermal expansion mismatch. Eng Fail Anal. 2006;13:409–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.12.027.
57.
ErikssonRSjöströmSBrodinHTBC bond coat–top coat interface roughness: influence on fatigue life and modelling aspects. Surf Coat Technol. 2013;236:230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.09.051.
58.
AhrensMVaßenRStöverD.Stress distributions in plasma-sprayed thermal barrier coatings as a function of interface roughness and oxide scale thickness. Surf Coat Technol. 2002;161:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00359-6.
59.
GötlindHLiuFSvenssonJ-EThe effect of water vapor on the initial stages of oxidation of the FeCrAl alloy kanthal AF at 900°C. Oxid Met. 2007;67:251–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-007-9055-0.
60.
DongHYangG-JCaiH-NThe influence of temperature gradient across YSZ on thermal cyclic lifetime of plasma-sprayed thermal barrier coatings. Ceram Int. 2015;41:11046–11056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.05.049.
61.
SunJWangJZhangHPreparation, structure, mechanical properties and thermal cycling behavior of porous LaMgAl11O19 coating. J Alloys Compd. 2018;750:1007–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.097.
62.
ZhangJBaiYLiEYb2O3-Gd2O3 codoped strontium zirconate composite ceramics for potential thermal barrier coating applications. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 2020;17:1608–1618. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.13500.
63.
GellMWangJKumarRHigher temperature thermal barrier coatings with the combined use of yttrium aluminum garnet and the solution precursor plasma spray process. J Therm Spray Tech. 2018;27:543–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-018-0701-7.
64.
DolekerKMKaraoglanliAC.Comparison of oxidation behavior of YSZ and Gd2Zr2O7 thermal barrier coatings (TBCs). Surf Coat Technol. 2017;318:198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.12.078.
65.
OpilaEJSmialekJLRobinsonRCSic recession caused by SiO2 scale volatility under combustion conditions: II, thermodynamics and gaseous-diffusion model. J Am Ceram Soc. 1999;82:1826–1834. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02005.x.
66.
ParkerCGOpilaEJ.Stability of the Y2O3–SiO2 system in high-temperature, high-velocity water vapor. J Am Ceram Soc. 2020;103:2715–2726. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.16915.
67.
PintBA.High-temperature corrosion in fossil fuel power generation: present and future. JOM. 2013;65:1024–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0642-z.
68.
EvansHETaylorMP.Diffusion cells and chemical failure of MCrAlY bond coats in thermal-barrier coating systems. Oxid Met. 2001;55:17–34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010369024142.
69.
LiZBradtRC.Thermal expansion of the cubic (3C) polytype of SiC. J Mater Sci. 1986;21:4366–4368. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01106557.
70.
EatonHELinseyGD.Accelerated oxidation of SiC CMC’s by water vapor and protection via environmental barrier coating approach. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2002;22:2741–2747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00141-3.
71.
XuYHuXXuFRare earth silicate environmental barrier coatings: present status and prospective. Ceram Int. 2017;43:5847–5855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.153.
72.
PadtureNP.Environmental degradation of high-temperature protective coatings for ceramic-matrix composites in gas-turbine engines. Npj Mater Degrad. 2019;3:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-019-0075-4.
73.
LucatoSdSeSudreOHMarshallDB.A method for assessing reactions of water vapor with materials in high-speed, high-temperature flow. J Am Ceram Soc. 2011;94:s186–s195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04556.x.
74.
GoldenRAOpilaEJ.A method for assessing the volatility of oxides in high-temperature high-velocity water vapor. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2016;36:1135–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.016.
75.
MummD. Mechanisms underpinning degradation of protective oxides and thermal barrier coatings in high hydrogen content (HHC) – Fueled Turbines. 2013. https://doi.org/10.2172/1149472.
76.
YuCTLiuHZhangJGradient thermal cycling behavior of a thermal barrier coating system constituted by NiCoCrAlY bond coat and pure metastable tetragonal nano-4YSZ top coat. Ceram Int. 2019;45:15281–15289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.018.
77.
Ziaei-AslARamezanlouMT.Thermo-mechanical behavior of gas turbine blade equipped with cooling ducts and protective coating with different thicknesses. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;150:656–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.070.
78.
VaßenRKerkhoffGStöverD.Development of a micromechanical life prediction model for plasma sprayed thermal barrier coatings. Mater Sci Eng A. 2001;303:100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01853-0.
79.
SaundersSRJMonteiroMRizzoF.The oxidation behaviour of metals and alloys at high temperatures in atmospheres containing water vapour: a review. Prog Mater Sci. 2008;53:775–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.11.001.
80.
MeschterPJOpilaEJJacobsonNS.Water vapor–mediated volatilization of high-temperature materials. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2013;43:559–588. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-121636.
81.
OpilaEJMyersDLJacobsonNSTheoretical and experimental investigation of the thermochemistry of CrO2(OH)2(g). J Phys Chem A. 2007;111:1971–1980. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0647380.
82.
AstemanHSvenssonJ-ENorellMInfluence of water vapor and flow rate on the high-temperature oxidation of 304L; effect of chromium oxide hydroxide evaporation. Oxid Met. 2000;54:11–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004642310974.
83.
TedmonCS.The effect of oxide volatilization on the oxidation kinetics of Cr and Fe-Cr alloys. J Electrochem Soc. 1966;113:766–768. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2424115.
84.
SachitanandRSvenssonJ-EFroitzheimJ.The influence of Cr evaporation on long term Cr depletion rates in ferritic stainless steels. Oxid Met. 2015;84:241–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-015-9552-5.
85.
HooshyarHJonssonTHallJThe effect of H2 and H2O on the oxidation of 304L-stainless steel at 600 °C: general behaviour (Part I). Oxid Met. 2016;85:321–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-015-9597-5.
86.
HenrySMouginJWoutersYCharacterization of chromia scales grown on pure chromium in different oxidizing atmospheres. Mater High Temp. 2000;17:231–234. https://doi.org/10.1179/mht.2000.17.2.008.
87.
HultquistGTvetenBHörnlundE.Hydrogen in chromium: influence on the high-temperature oxidation kinetics in H2O, oxide-growth mechanisms, and scale adherence. Oxid Met. 2000;54:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004610626903.
88.
ZurekJYoungDJEssumanEGrowth and adherence of chromia based surface scales on Ni-base alloys in high- and low-pO2 gases. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;477:259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.05.035.
89.
SimonDGorrBChristHJ.Effect of atmosphere and sample thickness on kinetics, microstructure, and compressive stresses of chromia scale grown on Ni–25Cr. Oxid Met. 2017;87:417–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-016-9702-4.
90.
SandTGeersCCaoYEffective reduction of chromium-oxy-hydroxide evaporation from Ni-base alloy 690. Oxid Met. 2019;92:259–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-019-09935-9.
91.
PintBADryepondtSUnocicKA.Oxidation of superalloys in extreme environments. Superalloy 718 and Derivatives, John Wiley; 2012, p. 859–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118495223.ch66.
92.
Maris-SidaMCMeierGHPettitFS.Some water vapor effects during the oxidation of alloys that are -Al2O3 formers. Metall Mater Trans A. 2003;11.
93.
ZhaoWGleesonB.Assessment of the detrimental effects of steam on Al2O3-scale establishment. Oxid Met. 2015;83:607–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-015-9541-8.
94.
LiuFJosefssonHSvenssonJ-ETEM investigation of the oxide scales formed on a FeCrAlRE alloy (Kanthal AF) at 900°C in dry O2 and O2 with 40% H2O. Mater High Temp. 2005;22:521–526. https://doi.org/10.1179/mht.2005.062.
95.
SohlbergKPennycookSJPantelidesST.Hydrogen and the structure of the transition aluminas. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:7493–7499. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja991098o.
96.
PintBAHaynesJAZhangYThe effect of water vapor on the oxidation behavior of Ni–Pt–Al coatings and alloys. Surf Coat Technol. 2006;201:3852–3856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.244.
OpilaEJMyersDL.Alumina volatility in water vapor at elevated temperatures. J Am Ceram Soc. 2004;87:1701–1705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.01701.x.
99.
SumnerJSimmsNJStammWSimulating novel gas turbine conditions for materials assessment: cascade design and operation. Mater Sci Technol. 2017;33:1090–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2017.1310492.
100.
ZhouCYuJGongSInfluence of water vapor on the high temperature oxidation behavior of thermal barrier coatings. Mater Sci Eng A. 2003;348:327–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00742-6.
101.
CernuschiFBisonPMackDEThermo-physical properties of as deposited and aged thermal barrier coatings (TBC) for gas turbines: state-of-the art and advanced TBCs. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2018;38:3945–3961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.04.044.
102.
SullivanMHMummDR.Transient stage oxidation of MCrAlY bond coat alloys in high temperature, high water vapor content environments. Surf Coat Technol. 2014;258:963–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.07.048.
103.
UnocicKAPintBA.Effect of water vapor on thermally grown alumina scales on bond coatings. Surf Coat Technol. 2013;215:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.08.100.
104.
PintBAGarnerGWLoweTMEffect of increased water vapor levels on TBC lifetime with Pt-containing bond coatings. Surf Coat Technol. 2011;206:1566–1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.06.008.
105.
NowakW. High Temperature Corrosion of Alloys and Coatings in Gas-Turbines Fired with Hydrogen-Rich Syngas Fuels. 2014.
106.
LiLHitchmanNKnappJ.Failure of thermal barrier coatings subjected to CMAS attack. J Therm Spray Tech. 2010;19:148–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-009-9356-8.
107.
YangZWalkerMSSinghPAnomalous corrosion behavior of stainless steels under SOFC interconnect exposure conditions. Electrochem Solid-State Lett. 2003;6:B35–B37. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1603012.
108.
KurokawaHKawamuraKMaruyamaT.Oxidation behavior of Fe–16Cr alloy interconnect for SOFC under hydrogen potential gradient. Solid State Ionics. 2004;168:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2004.02.008.
109.
HolcombGRZiomek-MorozMCramerSDDual-environment effects on the oxidation of metallic interconnects. J of Materi Eng and Perform. 2006;15:404–409. https://doi.org/10.1361/105994906X117198.
110.
AlnegrenPSattariMSvenssonJ-ESevere dual atmosphere effect at 600 °C for stainless steel 441. J Power Sources. 2016;301:170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.001.
GoebelCAlnegrenPFaustRThe effect of pre-oxidation parameters on the corrosion behavior of AISI 441 in dual atmosphere. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43:14665–14674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.165.
113.
YangZWalkerMSSinghPOxidation behavior of ferritic stainless steels under SOFC interconnect exposure conditions. J Electrochem Soc. 2004;151:B669–B678. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1810393.
114.
ZhaoYFergusJW.Oxidation behavior of stainless steel 441 and 430 in dual atmosphere: effects of alloy grain boundaries. J Electrochem Soc. 2014;161:C69–C76. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.076401jes.
115.
RufnerJGannonPWhitePOxidation behavior of stainless steel 430 and 441 at 800°C in single (air/air) and dual atmosphere (air/hydrogen) exposures. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33:1392–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.12.067.
116.
GalerieAHenrySWoutersYMechanisms of chromia scale failure during the course of 15–18Cr ferritic stainless steel oxidation in water vapour. Mater High Temp. 2005;22:105–112. https://doi.org/10.1179/mht.2005.012.
117.
ZhaoYFergusJW.Oxidation of alloys 430 and 441 in SOFC dual atmospheres: effects of flow rate and humidity. J Electrochem Soc. 2012;159:C109–C113. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.013203jes.
118.
Nickel institute. High temperature characteristics of stainless steels, A designers' handbook series No. 9004.
119.
NelsonGAEffingerRT.Blistering and embrittlement of pressure vessel steels by hydrogen. Welding J (NY). 1955;34.
120.
NiburKASomerdayBP.7 – Fracture and fatigue test methods in hydrogen gas. In: GangloffRPSomerdayBP, editors. Gaseous hydrogen embrittlement of materials in energy technologies, vol. 2. Woodhead; 2012. p. 195–236. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857093899.2.195.
121.
GrayHR. Embrittlement of nickel-, cobalt-, and iron-base superalloys by exposure to hydrogen. 1975.
122.
Balyts’kyiAIKvasnyts’kaYIvas’kevichLMCorrosion- and hydrogen-resistance of heat-resistant blade nickel-cobalt alloys. Mater Sci. 2018;54:230–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-018-0178-z.
FuWHaberlandCKlapdorEVStreamlined frameworks for advancing metal based additive manufacturing technologies. J Glob Power Propuls Soc. 2018;2:317–328. https://doi.org/10.22261/JGPPS.QJLS4L.
127.
GebisaAWLemuHG.Additive manufacturing for the manufacture of gas turbine engine components: Literature review and future perspectives. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-76686.
128.
ShaikhAS. Development of a γ’ Precipitation Hardening Ni-Base Superalloy for Additive Manufacturing. 2018. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11472.81921.
ZhangFLevineLEAllenAJEffect of heat treatment on the microstructural evolution of a nickel-based superalloy additive-manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Acta Mater. 2018;152:200–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.017.
131.
AnderssonOGraichenABrodinHDeveloping additive manufacturing technology for burner repair. J Eng Gas Turbines Power. 2017;139. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034235.
132.
ÖrnekC.Additive manufacturing – a general corrosion perspective. Corros Eng, Sci Technol. 2018;53:531–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478422X.2018.1511327.
133.
KongDDongCNiXCorrosion of metallic materials fabricated by selective laser melting. Npj Materials Degradation. 2019;3:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-019-0086-1.
134.
LalehMHughesAEXuWA critical review of corrosion characteristics of additively manufactured stainless steels. Int Mater Rev. 2020;0:1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2020.1855381.
135.
BaekS-WSongEJKimJHHydrogen embrittlement of 3-D printing manufactured austenitic stainless steel part for hydrogen service. Scr Mater. 2017;130:87–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.11.020.
136.
SmithTRSan MarchiCSugarJDEffects of extreme hydrogen environments on the fracture and fatigue behavior of additively manufactured stainless steels. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2019-93903.
137.
KongDDongCNiXSuperior resistance to hydrogen damage for selective laser melted 316L stainless steel in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell environment. Corros Sci. 2020;166:108425), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2019.108425.
138.
KulkarniA. Additive Manufacturing of Nickel Based Superalloy. ArXiv:180511664 [Physics] 2018.
139.
XuJGruberHBoydROn the strengthening and embrittlement mechanisms of an additively manufactured nickel-base superalloy. Materialia. 2020;10:100657, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100657.
140.
SeifiMSalemABeuthJOverview of materials qualification needs for metal additive manufacturing. JOM. 2016;68:747–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1810-0.
141.
GorsseSHutchinsonCGounéMAdditive manufacturing of metals: a brief review of the characteristic microstructures and properties of steels, Ti-6Al-4V and high-entropy alloys. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017;18:584–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2017.1361305.
Norsk Titanium completes TRL 8 Certification: 3D Printed RPD Components Pass Stringent Testing. 3DPrintCom | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing 2015. [cited 2020 August 7]. https://3dprint.com/112084/norsk-titanium-trl8/.
SilversteinREliezerD.Hydrogen trapping in 3D-printed (additive manufactured) Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Charact. 2018;144:297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.07.029.
147.
HongYZhouCZhengYFormation of strain-induced martensite in selective laser melting austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;740–741:420–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.10.121.
148.
ZhengLSchmitzGMengYMechanism of intermediate temperature embrittlement of Ni and Ni-based superalloys. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci. 2012;37:181–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2011.613492.
149.
VarelaAdVde DeusHDde SiqueiraMCOxidation assisted intergranular cracking in 718 nickel superalloy: on the mechanism of dynamic embrittlement. J Mater Res Technol. 2018;7:319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.02.008.
150.
SaarimäkiJ. Cracks in superalloys. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3384/diss.diva-144397.
151.
ChanK.A grain boundary fracture model for predicting dynamic embrittlement and oxidation-induced cracking in superalloys. Metall Mater Trans A. 2015;46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-015-2860-1.
152.
NémethAANCruddenDJArmstrongDEJEnvironmentally-assisted grain boundary attack as a mechanism of embrittlement in a nickel-based superalloy. Acta Mater. 2017;126:361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.039.
153.
DengDPengRLMoverareJ.On the dwell-fatigue crack propagation behavior of a high strength superalloy manufactured by electron beam melting. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;760:448–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.06.013.
154.
GoldmeerDJ. GEA33861 Electrify Europe Whitepaper 2018. /paper/GEA33861-Electrify-Europe-Whitepaper-Goldmeer/ae2b78ad10651c1061918b9030951ac02c1256b5 (accessed July 27, 2020).
GokMGGollerG. State of the art of Gadolinium Zirconate based Thermal Barrier coatings: design, processing and characterization. Methods for Film Synthesis and Coating Procedures 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85451.
