Reliability of Form 90D: An Instrument for Quantifying Drug Use

Abstract

Clients just entering treatment for nonalcohol primary drug use were asked to report on their frequency of drug use at two times 2 days apart. Test‐retest correlations for the lifetime use of drugs were fair to excellent, and those for drug use in the last 90 days, although variable, were generally very good. For lifetime use, correlations were highest for opiates and stimulants and lowest for inhalants, whereas for the recent period correlations were highest for opiates and lowest for stimulants. Correlations were uniformly high for measures of general life functioning. Initial validity assessments with urine drug screen results as criterion were good, with no false negative errors in four of six drug use categories. Overall Form 90D appears to be a reasonably reliable and valid interview instrument for measuring drug use occurrence and frequency for both lifetime and recent use. Care is warranted in assessing classes of drugs that are used less frequently.

Keywords

drug use reliability treatment outcome assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Miller

and Del Boca

. 1994. Measurement of drinking behavior using the Form‐90 family of instruments. J Stud Alcohol Suppl, 12: 112–118.

Tonigan

, Miller

and Brown

. 1997. The reliability of Form 90: An instrument for assessing alcohol treatment outcome. J Stud Alcohol, 58: 358–364.

Sobell

and Sobell

. 1996. Timeline FollowBack: A Calendar Method for Assessing Alcohol and Drug Use, Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.

Raistrick

, Bradshaw

, Tober

, Weiner

, Allison

and Healey

. 1994. Development of the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ): A questionnaire to measure alcohol and opiate dependence in the context of a treatment evaluation package. Addiction, 80: 563–572.

Saunders

, Wilkinson

and Philips

. 1995. The impact of a brief motivational intervention with opiate users attending a methadone program. Addiction, 90: 415–424.

Ehrman

and Robbins

. 1994. Reliability and validity of 6‐month timeline reports of cocaine and heroin use in a methadone population. J Consult Clin Psychol, 62: 843–850.

Miller

. 1996. Manual for Form 90: A Structured Assessment Interview for Drinking and Related Behaviors, Project MATCH Monograph Series Vol 5, Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

Babor

, de la Fuente JR , Saunders

and Grant

. 1992. AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Guidelines for Use in Primary Health Care, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

Miller

, Tonigan

and Longabaugh

. 1995. The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC). An Instrument for Assessing Consequences of Alcohol Abuse (Vol 4, Project MATCH Monograph Series), Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

10.

Shrout

and Fleiss

. 1979. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull, 86: 420–427.

11.

Cicchetti

. 1994. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess, 6: 284–290.

12.

Cohen

. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measure, 20: 37–46.

13.

Sobell

, Kwan

and Sobell

. 1995. Reliability of a drug history questionnaire (DHQ). Addict Behav, 20: 233–241.

14.

Pompi

and Shreiner

. 1979. The reliability of biographical information obtained from court stipulated clients newly admitted to treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse, 6: 79–95.