Boxing competitions with two rounds between French and Arab students (N = 58) were used to investigate intergroup relations and social identity. Behavioral measures were observed in two rounds of the competition to assess possible changes depending on threat conditions and strength of ethnic identification. Analyses showed that behavioral effort in round 2 was not influenced by the degree of ethnic identification or threat conditions. However, behavioral competitiveness (the number of initiatives and ripostes attempted relative to the opponent's) in round 2 was greater in the higher threat condition for high ethnic identifiers. Behavioral competitiveness decreased slightly from the no-threat to the threat condition for low ethnic identifiers. The results are discussed in terms of the social identity processes that might influence behavioral responses in naturalistic intergroup settings.
Abrams, D., and M.A. Hogg.2001. Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. In Integroup relations: Essential readings, eds. M. A. Hogg and D. Abrams, 232-244. New York: Psychology Press.
2.
Blanz, M., A. Mummendey, R. Mielke, and A. Klink.1998. Responding to negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology28: 697-729.
3.
Branscombe, N.R., N. Ellermers, R. Spears, and B. Doosje.1999. The context and the content of social identity. In Social identity: Context, commitment, content , eds. N. Ellemers, R. Spears, and B. Doosje , 35-58. Oxford : Blackwell Publishers.
4.
Branscombe, N.R., and D.L. Wann.1992. Physiological arousal and reactions to outgroup members during competitions that implicate an important social identity. Aggressive behavior18: 85-93.
5.
Branscombe, N.R., and D.L. Wann.1994. Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity in on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology24: 641-657.
6.
Brewer, M.1979. In-group bias and the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin86: 307-324.
7.
Brewer, M.1999. The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues53: 429-444.
8.
Brewer, M.B., J.G. Weber, and B. Carini.1995. Person memory in intergroup contexts: Categorization versus individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology69: 29-60.
9.
Brown, R.2000. Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology30: 745-778.
10.
Brown, R., P. Maras, B. Masser, J. Vivian, and M. Hewstone.2001. Life on the ocean wave: Testing some intergroup hypotheses in a naturalistic setting. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations4: 81-97.
11.
Corneille, O., V. Yzerbyt, A. Rogier, and G. Buidin.2001. Threat and the group attribution error: When threat elicits judgments of extremity and homogeneity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27: 437-496.
12.
Dru, V.2002. Dogmatism and competitive relationships between soccer teams. International Journal of Group Tensions31(3): 267-284.
13.
Dru, V.2004. Adaptation Française d'une échelle d'identification culturelle. [French adaptation of an ethnic identification scale.] International Review of Social Psychology17: 103-118.
14.
Dru, V., and C. Constanza.2003. Effet de l'identification sociale et du résultat d'une compétition collective sur les jugements d'homogénéité. [Effect of social identification and outcome of a collective competition on homogeneity judgments.]Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale57: 102-108.
15.
Duckitt, J., and T. Mphuting.1998. Group identification and intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal analysis in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74(1): 80-85.
16.
Duckitt, J., C. Wagner, I. Du Plessis, and I. Birum.2002. The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83(1): 75-93.
17.
Lalonde, R.N.1992. The dynamic of group differentiation in the face of defeat . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin18(3): 336-342.
18.
Mackie, D.M., and E.R. Smith.1998. Intergroup relations: Insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psychological Review , 105(3): 499-529.
19.
Martinek, T.J., and J.B. Griffith.1994. Learned helplessness in physical education: A developmental study of causal attributions and task persistence. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education13: 108-122.
20.
Mummendey, A., A. Klink and R. Brown.2001. Nationalism and patriotism: National identification and out-group rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology40: 159-172.
21.
Ouwerkerk, J.W., D. DeGilder, and N. DeVries.2000. When the going gets tough, the tough get going: Social identification and individual effort in intergroup competition . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26(12): 1550-1559.
22.
Phinney, J.S.1992. The multigroup ethnic identity measure. A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research7: 156-176.
23.
Rothgerber, H.1997. External intergroup threat as an antecedent to perceptions of in-group and out-group homogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology73: 1206-1212.
24.
Struch N., and S.H. Schwartz.1989. Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology56: 364-373.
25.
Tajfel, H.1978. Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.
26.
Tajfel, H.1981. Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Tajfel, H.1982. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology33: 1-39.
28.
Tajfel, H., C. Flament, M.G. Billig, and R.P. Bundy.1971. Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of social Psychology1: 149-177.
29.
Tajfel, H., and J.C. Turner.1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The social psychology of intergroup relations , ed. W. G. Austin and S. Worchel, 33-47. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
30.
Tajfel, H., and J.C. Turner.1986. The social identity of intergroup behavior . In Psychology of intergroup relations, eds. S. Worchel and W. G. Austin, 7-24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall .
31.
Turner, J.C., & R.J. Brown.1978. Social status, cognitive alternatives and intergroup relations. In Differentiation between social groups, ed. H. Tajfel, 201-234. London : Academic Press.
32.
Taylor, D.A., and B.F. Moriarty.1987. Ingroup bias as a function of competition and race. Journal of Conflict Resolution31: 192-199.
