Artificial intelligence research is seldom conducted ethnographically. Nevertheless, the field itself has a distinctive culture – an engineering imaginary within which ‘general intelligence’ is considered to be a phenomenon that can be both defined and tested by reference to some universal (probably mathematical) standard. This paper describes a research agenda that sets out to question those assumptions, through a programme of ethnographic field work, collaborating with computer scientists and educators in several countries of sub-Saharan Africa.
AchebeC.1958/2010. Things Fall Apart, Penguin Classics Edition . London: Penguin, 84–86.
2.
AgreP.1997. “
Toward a Critical Technical Practice. ” In Bridging the Great Divide: Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work , edited by BowkerG., GasserL., StarS. L., and TurnerB., 131–158. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
BabbageC.1832. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures . London: Charles Knight.
4.
BidwellN. J.2016. “Moving the Centre to Design Social Media in Rural Africa. ” AI & Society 31 (1): 51–77.
5.
BlackwellA. F.2006. “The Reification of Metaphor as a Design Tool. ” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 13 (4): 490–530.
6.
BlackwellA. F.2010. “When Systemizers Meet Empathizers: Universalism and the Prosthetic Imagination. ” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 35 (3–4): 387–403.
7.
BlackwellA. F.2019a. “
Artificial Intelligence and the Abstraction of Cognitive Labour. ” In Marx200: The Significance of Marxism in the 21st Century , edited by DavisM., 59–68. London: Praxis Press.
8.
BlackwellA. F.2019b. “Objective Functions: (In)Humanity and Inequity in Artificial Intelligence. ” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 9 (1): 137–146.
9.
BlackwellA. F., BlytheM., and KayeJ.. 2017. “Undisciplined Disciples: Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Ethnomethodology but Were Afraid to ask Yoda. ” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 21 (3): 571–592.
10.
CaveS.2020. “The Problem with Intelligence: Its Value-Laden History and the Future of AI.” In
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES’20), 29–35.
11.
CholletF.2019. On the Measure of Intelligence. ArXiv:1911.01547 [Cs].
12.
CollinsH.2018. Artifictional Intelligence: Against Humanity's Surrender to Computers . Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
CoxG., and McLeanC. A.. 2013. Speaking Code: Coding as Aesthetic and Political Expression . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
CrawfordK., and JolerV.. 2018. Anatomy of an AI System-The Amazon Echo as an Anatomical Map of Human Labor, Data and Planetary Resources . New York: AI Now Institute and Share Lab.
15.
DevlinK., and BeltonO.. 2020. “
The Measure of a Woman: Fembots, Fact and Fiction. ” In AI Narratives , edited by CaveS., DihalK., and DillonS., 357–381. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
DourishP.2006. “Implications for design.” In
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (CHI’06)
541–550.
17.
GageJ., and SpiegelhalterD.. 2018. Teaching Probability . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HoltzblattK., and BeyerH.. 1997. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems . San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
19.
IraniL.2015. “The Cultural Work of Microwork. ” New Media & Society 17 (5): 720–739.
20.
IraniL. C., and SilbermanM. Six. 2013. Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk. In
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 611–620.
21.
KurzweilRay.2005. The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology . New York, NY: Viking.
22.
LaurelB.1993. Computers as Theatre . Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23.
LloydG. E. R.2007. Cognitive Variations: Reflections on the Unity and Diversity of the Human Mind . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
MacKayD. M.1956. “Towards an Information-Flow Model of Human Behaviour. ” British Journal of Psychology 47 (1): 30–43.
MacKayD. J. C.2003. Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
MohamedS., PngM. T., and IsaacW.. 2020. “Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence. ” Philosophy & Technology . doi: 10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8
28.
PhilipK., IraniL., and DourishP.. 2012. “Postcolonial Computing: A Tactical Survey. ” Science, Technology, & Human Values 37 (1): 3–29.
29.
PooleS.2019. “Deepfake or Fortune. ” Guardian Review 23 March 2019: 36–37.
30.
SchafferS.1994. “Babbage's Intelligence: Calculating Engines and the Factory System. ” Critical Inquiry 21 (1): 203–227.
31.
SchafferS.1999. “
Enlightened Automata. ” In The Sciences in Enlightened Europe , edited by ClarkWilliam, GolinskiJan, and SchafferSimon, 126–166. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
VerranH.2001. Science and an African Logic . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 36.
33.
VingeV.1993. “Technological Singularity.” In
VISION-2: Symposium sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center and the Ohio Aerospace Institute. 30–31.
34.
ZuboffS.2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power . London: Profile Books.
