The computational metaphor of organisms as phenotypic automata controlled by a genetic programme has been replaced by the cognitive metaphor of organisms as intelligent agents making decisions about how to use their genomic and environmental resources. This metaphor facilitates novel ways of thinking about organisms that defy the assumptions of the old machine metaphor. But like all metaphors, the cognitive metaphor discloses important similarities at the expense of eclipsing significant dissimilarities. I argue that although cognitivism carries with it the crucial insight that living organisms are agents rather than mere automata, this metaphor distorts the nature of biological agency by over-intellectualizing, which risks eliminating the distinction between life and mind. I trace the Cartesian root of these metaphors and argue that it generates a dilemma between mechanism and intellectualism. To capture the middle path that most organisms occupy between these two extremes, I propose an ecological account of natural agency.
AdamsFred.2018. “Cognitive Wars. ” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A 68: 20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.11.007.
2.
Aristotle. 1970. Physics: Books I and II , edited by CharltonW.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BakerM. D., and StockJ. B.. 2007. “Signal Transduction: Networks and Integrated Circuits in Bacterial Cognition. ” Current Biology 17 (23): R1021–R1024. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.011.
4.
BalázsiG., OudenaardenA. V., and CollinsJ. J.. 2011. “Cellular Decision Making and Biological Noise: from Microbes to Mammals. ” Cell 144 (6): 910–925. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.030.
5.
BarandiaranX., Di PaoloE., and RohdeM.. 2009. “Defining Agency: Individuality, Normativity, Asymmetry and Spatio-Temporality in Action. ” Adaptive Behavior 17 (5): 367–386. doi: 10.1177/1059712309343819.
6.
BattermanRobert.2005. “Critical Phenomena and Breaking Drops: Infinite Idealizations in Physics. ” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2): 225–244. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.05.004.
7.
BertanlanffyLudwig.1968. General Systems Theory . New York: Braziller.
BrayDennis.2012. “The Cell as a Thermostat: How Much Does it Know?
” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 736: 193–199. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7210-1_10.
10.
DavidsonDonald.1999. “The Emergence of Thought. ” Erkenntnis 51 (1): 511–521. doi: 10.1023/A:1005564223855.
11.
DescartesRene.1985. The Philosophical Writinsg of Descartes Volume 1 , edited by CottinghamJ., StoothoffR., MurdochD., and KennyA.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3 vols.
12.
DexterJoseph, PrabakaranSudhakaran, and GunawardenaJeremy. 2019. “A Complex Hierarchy of Avoidance Behaviors in a Single-Cell Eukaryote. ” Current Biology 29 (24): 4323–4329. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.059.
13.
FigdorCarrie.2018. Pieces of Mind: The Proper Domain of Psychological Predicates . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
FuldaFermín.2015. “An Ecological Approach to Agency. ” (PhD diss.
).
University of Toronto.
15.
FuldaFermín.2017. “Natural Agency: The Case of Bacterial Cognition. ” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (1): 69–90. doi: 10.1017/apa.2017.5.
16.
GibsonJ. J.1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception . Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17.
GoldenfeldN., and KadanoffL. P.. 1999. “Simple Lessons from Complexity. ” Science 284 (5411): 87–89. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.87.
18.
GreenSara.2017. Philosophy of Systems Biology. Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers . Cham, Switzerland
: Springer International Publishing.
19.
GreneMarjorie, and DepewDavid. 2004. The Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic History . New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GriffithsPaul.2001. “Genetic Information: A Metaphor in Search of a Theory. ” Philosophy of Science 68 (3): 349–412. doi: 10.1086/392891.
21.
HuYonggang, LinzDavid M., ParkerErik S., SchwabDaniel B., CasasaSofia, MacagnoAnna L. M., and MoczekArmin P.. 2020. “Developmental Bias in Horned Dung Beetles and its Contributions to Innovation, Adaptation, and Resilience. ” Evolution & Development 22 (1–2): 165–180. doi: 10.1111/Ede.12310.
22.
KauffmanStuart.2000. Investigations . New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
KellerEvelyn-Fox.2001. The Century of the Gene . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
KellerEvelyn-Fox.2002. Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
KellerEvelyn-Fox.2013. “Genes as Difference Makers. ” In Genetic Explanations: Sense and Nonsense , edited by KrimskyS. and GruberJ., 329–345. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
NicholsonDaniel.2013. “Organisms ≠ Machines. ” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science Part B 44 (4): 669–678. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.05.014.
36.
NobleDenis.2016. Dance to the Tune of Life: Biological Relativity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
PerkinsT. J., and SwainP. S.. 2009. “Strategies for Cellular Decision-Making. ” Molecular Systems Biology 5 (326): 1–15. doi: 10.1038/msb.2009.83.
38.
RosenbluethA., WienerN., and BigelowJ.. 1943. “Behavior, Purpose and Teleology. ” Philosophy of Science 10 (1): 18–24. doi: 10.1086/286788.
39.
Salazar-CiudadI., SoléR. V., and NewmanS. A.. 2001a. “Phenotypic and Dynamical Transitions in Model Genetic Networks. I. Emergence of Patterns and Genotype-Phenotype Relationships. Applications to the Evolution of Segmentation Mechanisms. ” Evolution & Development 3 (2): 84–94. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003002084.x.
40.
Salazar-CiudadI., SoléR. V., and NewmanS. A.. 2001b. “Phenotypic and Dynamical Transitions in Model Genetic Networks. II. Applications to the Evolution of Segmentation Mechanisms. ” Evolution & Development 3 (2): 95–103. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003002095.x.
41.
ShapiroJames.2007. “Bacteria Are Small But Not Stupid: Cognition, Natural Genetic Engineering and Socio-Bacteriology. ” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences 38 (4): 807–819. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.09.010.
42.
SommerhoffGerard.1950. Analytical Biology . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
StroffregenThomas.2003. “Affordances as Properties of the Animal-Environment System. ” Ecological Psychology 15 (2): 115–134. doi: 10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_2.
44.
ThompsonEvan.2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology and the Science of Mind . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
TrewavasAnthony.2003. “Aspects of Plant Intelligence. ” Annals of Botany 92 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch059.
46.
TurnerScott.2017. Purpose and Desire: What Makes Something “Alive” and Why Modern Darwinism Has Failed to Explain It . New York: Harper Collins.
47.
WagnerAndreas.2014. The Arrival of the Fittest: Solving Evolution's Greatest Puzzle . New York: Current Books.
48.
WalshDenis.2008. “Teleology. ” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology , edited by RuseMichael, 113–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
WalshDenis.2012. “Situated Adaptationism. ” In The Environment: Philosophy, Science, Ethics , edited by KabesencheW., O'RourkeM., and SlaterM., 89–116. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50.
WalshDenis.2015. Organisms, Agency, and Evolution . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
WalshDenis.2018. “Objectcy and Agency: Toward a Methodological Vitalism. ” In Everything Flows: Towards a Process Biology , edited by NicholsonD., and DupréJ., 167–185. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
West-EberhardMarry-Jane.2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
