Coke–slag–metal samples located near the deadman edge and below the taphole of blast furnace were obtained by core drilling after cooling. The chemical composition, microstructure, phase composition and distribution of samples were studied in detail. In addition, the graphitisation degree of coke in hearth was also investigated. The results showed that coke larger than 60 mm still existed (more than 1%). Pores in coke are filled with molten slag and a small part of liquid iron. The pores in hearth coke are not completely filled, but there is still plenty of micropore, with a volume of less than 1 mm3. There are also a little alkali metals (K and Na) in ash, which causes the deterioration of coke. The iron–carbon interface is covered by a slag layer. The coke remained in deadman long enough to undergo the graphitisation process.
KanbaraKHagiwaraTShigemiAet al.Dissection of blast furnaces and their inside state. Tetsu-to-Hagané. 1976;62(5):535–546.
3.
JiaoKZhangJLiuZet al.Dissection investigation of Ti(C,N) behavior in blast furnace hearth during vanadium Titano-magnetite smelting. ISIJ Int. 2017;57(1):48–54.
4.
LiKZhangJBaratiMet al.Influence of alkaline (Na, K) vapors on carbon and mineral behavior in blast furnace cokes. Fuel. 2015;145:202–213.
5.
ShimizuHSatoKIKojimaMet al.Investigation of coke degradation behavior in blast furnace. Tetsu-to-Hagané. 1986;72(2):195–202.
6.
OmoriY. (ed.). Blast furnace phenomena and modelling. London: Elsevier; 1987.
7.
PuszSKrzesińskaMMajewskaJet al.Changes in a coke structure due to reaction with carbon dioxide. Int J Coal Geol. 2010;81(4):287–292.
8.
XiongZSyed-HassanSSAHuXet al.Pyrolysis of the aromatic-poor and aromatic-rich fractions of bio-oil: Characterization of coke structure and elucidation of coke formation mechanism. Appl Energ. 2019;239:981–990.
9.
DonskoiEPoliakovAMahoneyMRet al.Novel optical image analysis coke characterisation and its application to study of the relationships between coke Structure, coke strength and parent coal composition. Fuel. 2017;208:281–295.
10.
NiwaYSumigamaTMakiAet al.Investigation of the behavior of hot metal, slag and coke in the vicinity of raceway and Deadman in a blast furnace. Tetsu-to-Hagané. 1990;76(3):337–344.
11.
KasaiAIwakiriHKamijoTet al.The inflow to a deadman of fine coke generated near the lower part of the shaft in a blast furnace. Tetsu-to-Hagané. 1997;83(9):551–556.
12.
JenkinsDShawDMahoneyM.Fissure formation in coke. 3: coke size distribution and statistical analysis. Fuel. 2010;89(7):1675–1689.
13.
BabichASenkDGudenauH.Effect of coke reactivity and nut coke on blast furnace operation. Ironmak Steelmak. 2009;36(3):222–229.
14.
Gomez FuentesJ.Simulation environment for advanced control development of a multiple hearth furnace [Master dissertation], Aalto University, Finland, 2016.
15.
TorrkullaJSaxenH.Model of the state of the blast furnace hearth.ISIJ Int. 2000;40(5):438–447.
16.
DongSPatersonNKazarianSet al.Characterization of tuyere-level core-drill coke samples from blast furnace operation. Energ Fuel. 2007;21(6):3446–3454.
17.
SunMZhangJLiKet al.Influence of structure and mineral association of tuyere-level coke on gasification process. Metall Mater Trans B. 2018;49(5):2611–2621.
18.
GornostayevSHärkkiJ.Mineral matter crystallization and crack formation in tuyere coke. Fuel. 2006;85(7–8):1047–1051.
19.
GornostayevSHärkkiJ.Spinel crystals in tuyere coke. Metall Mater Trans B. 2005;36(2):303–305.
20.
VångöMFeilmayrCPirkerSet al.Data-assisted CFD modeling of transient blast furnace tapping with a dynamic deadman. Appl Math Model. 2019;73:210–227.
21.
BrännbackaJTorrkullaJSaxénH.Simple simulation model of blast furnace hearth. Ironmak Steelmak. 2005;32(6):479–486.
22.
LiKZhangJSunMet al.Existence state and structures of extracted coke and accompanied samples from tuyere zone of a large-scale blast furnace. Fuel. 2018;225:299–310.
23.
NiuQChengSXuWet al.Changes in microstructure and chemical composition of deadman coke of a 2800 m3 industrial blast furnace. ISIJ Int. 2018;58:667–676.
24.
NiuQChengSXuWet al.Microstructure and phase of carbon brick and protective layer of a 2800 m3 industrial blast furnace hearth. ISIJ Int. 2019;59:1776–1785.
25.
XiaoyueFKexinJJianliangZet al.Coke Microstructure and graphitization across the hearth deadman regions in a commercial blast furnace. ISIJ Int.2019;59:1770–1775.
26.
ZhangLZhangJJiaoKet al.Observation of deadman samples in a dissected blast furnace hearth. ISIJ Int. 2019;59(11):1991–1996.
27.
ZhangLZhangJZuoHet al.temperature field distribution of a dissected blast furnace. ISIJ Int.2019;59:1027–1032.
28.
ZhangXZhangLYangWet al.Characterization of MnS particles in heavy rail steels using different methods. Steel Res Int. 2017;88(1):1600080.
29.
SunMMZhangJLLiKJet al.the interfacial behavior between coke and liquid iron: a comparative study on the influence of coke pore, carbon structure and ash. JOM. 2020;72(6):2174–2183.
30.
LiHZhangHLiKet al.Catalytic graphitization of coke carbon by iron: Understanding the evolution of carbon Structure, morphology and lattice fringes. Fuel. 2020;279:118531.
31.
RaipalaK.On hearth phenomena and hot metal carbon content in blast furnace [Doctoral dissertation], Helsinki University of Technology, Finland, 2003.
32.
GroverAZweigAErmonS.Graphite: iterative generative modeling of graphs). International conference on machine learning; PMLR, 2019:2434–2444.
