Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The aim of this work was to improve the surface properties of cp-Ti Grade 2 and β-Ti alloy TNTZ (Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr) for biomedical applications. A hybrid surface treatment consisting of shot peening and chemical etching was conducted. Subsequently, the physicochemical properties and topography of the modified surfaces were analysed. Microhardness measurements of the shot-peened samples revealed a great increase in the surface hardness to the similar level as can be achieved for the ultrafine-grained and nanostructured materials. Roughness tests and microscopic observations showed significant topographical differences, depending on the material and modification process involved. Moreover, in this paper we demonstrate the influence of the substrate and treatments on the wettability. Obtained results confirmed that designed hybrid modification of Ti Grade 2 and TNTZ has significant potential for biomedical applications.

Keywords

Titanium titanium alloy surface treatments biomaterials shot peening acid etching mechanical properties surface roughness wettability

Introduction

Biomedical materials must meet specific requirements that vary with how they are applied. Some of those requirements can only be met by metallic materials. This is due to their properties such as good corrosion resistance, high static and fatigue strength, and fracture toughness [1–4]. However, there are other requirements, as well, including biocompatibility, bioactivity, and non-toxicity [2,3]. Only a few groups of metals, therefore, can be used in biomedicine. One of them is titanium and its alloys, which are characterised by a relatively low density and an excellent strength-to-weight ratio [1–3,5,6]. In biomedicine, they are used to manufacture orthopaedic and dental implants, artificial heart stents, and bone fixation materials [2–5,7,8]. The most widely used titanium material is two-phase (α+β) titanium alloy: Ti-6Al-4V [2–4,7,8]. Unfortunately, the presence of aluminium and vanadium in it can adversely impact human health. These chemical elements are potentially toxic and, when released in the body, can lead to diseases of the nervous system [7,9–12]. So, the search is ongoing for biomaterials that would meet the requirements without being detrimental to human health. Alternatives to Ti-6Al-4 V alloy include commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti) and β-titanium alloys, which contain only non-toxic chemical elements and demonstrate satisfactory biocompatibility [4,8,13–15]. Moreover, β-alloys are characterised by a lower Young's modulus, more similar to that of human bone, which prevents bone atrophy and the loosening of the implant associated with it [11,13,14,16,17]. Among these alloys, Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr, also called TNTZ alloy, is of particular interest. This novel β-alloy has been widely investigated in the literature due to its great promise for biomedicine, a result of its very low Young's modulus, good corrosion resistance, biocompatibility, and relatively high phase stability during further manufacturing processes [18–20]. However, for both commercially pure titanium and TNTZ β-alloy, there is still a need to improve their mechanical properties, and surface condition [8,21].

The surface of biomaterials plays an essential role in implant acceptance and integration [5,8,22–30]. This is the region of first contact between an implant and the environment of the human body, and so the surface of the biomaterial should encourage osteoblast cell adhesion and proliferation, inhibit infections through an antibacterial effect, and prevent abrasive wear of the implant [15,30,31]. These properties and interactions depend on the surface topography and physicochemical conditions. Two of the most important factors are roughness and wettability [8,30,32–34]. These should be optimised to both favour osteoblast cell attachment and prevent adhesion by bacteria. Studies indicate that roughness, not only on the micro-scale but also on the nano-scale, can be crucial for implant acceptance and integration [35–39]. Modifications of the roughness, then, should be carried out on both these scales to improve osteointegration. For wettability, two ranges should be considered: hydrophilic and hydrophobic. So far, no optimum value of the wettability of biomaterials has been determined [8,40,41], and different studies [30,40–46] present a more favourable influence of one or the other range. Therefore, there is still a need to characterise wettability in terms of biomedical application.

Currently, different surface treatments are being investigated in order to achieve optimal topography of biomedical titanium. Among them are mechanical, chemical, and electrochemical treatments or their combinations. Some of them are already commercially applied, such as treatment based on Micro-Arc Oxidation (TiUnite^TM) or SLA (sandblasting with large grit and acid-etching) treatment (Nanoblast^TM) [47,48]. While both methods provide good biological response [49,50], recent in vivo studies revealed enhanced bone integration of the SLA-modified titanium surface compared with the oxidised samples [47]. The SLA method is one of the hybrid surface modification composed of two steps: (i) mechanical treatment, and (ii) chemical treatment [8,22,24–26,30,33,34,51,52]. These methods are useful for modifying surface features and properties, and both can be easily carried out due to their simplicity and low cost. Additionally, combination of these techniques results from the need to clean off particles remaining from the mechanical treatment [53]. Two-step mechanical–chemical treatment that includes shot peening followed by chemical etching, is an effective method for modifying roughness at the micro- and nano-scales, which can promote osteointegration and biological response [8,21,30,35,54]. Moreover, due to the mechanical stress it introduces, shot peening also has the potential to improve hardness in the surface region and increase a biomaterial's wear resistance [55]. As mentioned, the hybrid surface treatment (e.g. SLA) of commercially pure titanium has frequently been investigated and applied, but there is a lack of study on the hybrid modification of β-titanium TNTZ alloy. The literature discusses mechanical surface treatments, such as ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification (UNSM) [56,57], or the magnetorheological fluid magnetic abrasive finishing process [58,59]. However, according to our knowledge, no study reports on a combination of mechanical and chemical modifications for this alloy, which could be advantageous in biomedical applications. The impact of hybrid treatment on the properties of TNTZ alloy is still unknown, then, as is the effect of different modification conditions. As mentioned, TNTZ alloy has great potential in biomedicine, especially due to its low Young modulus, close to the human bone. As a novel alloy, it is constantly investigated and there is still a need for its further characterisation and also surface optimisation in order to enhance its biomedical properties.

Hence, the main aim of this research was to investigate the influence of a hybrid surface modification that includes shot peening followed by chemical etching on the surface properties of β-phase titanium alloy Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr (TNTZ). The additional aim of this study was to compare the effect of the surface treatments obtained for the TNTZ alloy with the results received for commercially pure titanium (Ti Grade 2), a common material used in implantology.

Materials and methods

The modified materials were commercially pure titanium α-Ti Grade 2 (average grain size d₂ = 32.4 µm ± 14.5, CV = 0.45) and titanium β-alloy Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr (TNTZ) (d₂ = 89.6 µm ± 42.8, CV = 0.48), cut in the shape of rectangular plates with a thickness of 1 mm. Before the surface treatments, samples were ground on #600 grit abrasive paper to obtain the same initial surface topography for every sample. The samples were shot-peened with spherical SiO₂ shot of various diameter ranges: 90–150, 150–250 µm, and at pressures of: 0.4 and 0.5 MPa. Additionally, for TNTZ alloy shot peening was performed with 0.2 and 0.3 MPa and SiO₂ shot with 90–150 μm diameter. Performing shot peening with lower pressures allowed to mitigate surface cracking. In the next step, the shot-peened materials were chemically etched using 3% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 3 min. The surface modifications and sample designations are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Surface modifications and samples designations.

Surface state	Conditions of surface modifications	Sample designation
Grinded	#600	G
Shot peened	90–150 µm, 0.2 MPa	S_1.2
90–150 µm, 0.3 MPa	S_1.3
90–150 µm, 0.4 MPa	S_1.4
90–150 µm, 0.5 MPa	S_1.5
150–250 µm, 0.4 MPa	S_2.4
150–250 µm, 0.5 MPa	S_2.5
Shot peened and etched	90–150 µm, 0.2 MPa 3% HF, 3 min	SE_1.2
90–150 µm, 0.3 MPa 3% HF, 3 min	SE_1.3
90–150 µm, 0.4 MPa 3% HF, 3 min	SE_1.4
90–150 µm, 0.5 MPa 3% HF, 3 min	SE_1.5
150–250 µm, 0.4 MPa 3% HF, 3 min	SE_2.4
150–250 µm, 0.5 MPa 3% HF, 3 min	SE_2.5

Hardness tests of the shot-peened and reference samples were conducted using a Falcon 500 hardness tester with a Vickers indenter at a load of 1.96 N (HV0.2). The hardness was measured on the modified surfaces. The roughness of the tested samples was qualitatively analysed by microscopic observations using Hitachi SU8000 and Hitachi SU70 Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEM) and quantitatively tested using a Wyko NT9300 optical profilometer for various scan areas. The Ra parameter, which determines the arithmetic mean deviation from the roughness profile, was selected to characterise the samples’ roughness. Surface wettability was measured with the sessile drop method, using a DataPhysics OCA 25 goniometer, and distilled water as a standard liquid.

Results and discussion

Microhardness after shot peening

The effect of shot peening on the microhardness value of both Ti Grade 2 and TNTZ alloy is presented in Figure 1 and Table 2, respectively. For both materials, Ti Grade 2 and TNTZ alloy, there was a significant improvement in hardness after the shot peening. The results obtained for various peening conditions do not differ considerably from each other within a given material. Therefore, the changes in the tested modification parameters did not significantly alter the hardness of the peened materials, which confirmed limited possibility to alter surface mechanical performance of α and β Ti-based materials by adjusting shot peening parameters. Therefore, the parameters of the shot peening should be selected mainly considering their effect on the surface morphology and physicochemical properties. An increase in the hardness of the surface region can be associated with work hardening and grain boundary strengthening processes. During the shot peening process, the ceramic balls striking the surface can introduce a grain refinement and increase the density of dislocations [60]. This leads to an improvement in the mechanical properties of the surface region [55,61]. To characterise the ability to increase strength for the modified surface region of Ti Grade 2 and TNTZ alloy, the hardness obtained can be compared with the results for the same materials after the cold-rolling process, reported elsewhere [62,63]. It turns out that the values measured for the TNTZ alloy surfaces after shot peening are very close to those presented for the ultra-fine-grained state after a large plastic deformation process, and are even higher in the case of Ti Grade 2 (Table 2). This confirms significant dislocation strengthening induced by shot peening and demonstrates its effectiveness in obtaining a nanostructure in the surface region [61]. Consequently, this study revealed that shot peening is a simple and low-cost technique of grain refinement, which makes it promising method for industrial application. TNTZ alloy, whose microhardness in the initial state is lower than that of Ti Grade 2, also shows a smaller increase in hardness after shot peening (Table 2). This may be associated with the higher degree of strengthening in Ti Grade 2 than in TNTZ alloy. Similar results were obtained for these materials in their entire volume after large plastic deformation through a cold-rolling process [64]. These differences in the strengthening rate were explained by the various lattice structures of α and β titanium phases (hcp and bcc, respectively) [64]. As in the bcc structure, close-packed directions lie in multiple slip planes, and the possibility of cross-slip increases, which facilitates dislocation motion and does not favour dislocation strengthening or grain refinement. In the case of the hcp structure, intersections of dislocations and the formation of grain boundaries are enhanced due to the presence of fewer slip systems [64]. Due to that, dislocation movement is inhibited and results in greater strengthening, which may be the reason for the higher hardness of Ti Grade 2. Still, the achieved hardness increase for both Ti Grade 2 and TNTZ alloy should be advantageous in terms of improved wear resistance and therefore greater longevity of the biomaterial. Future studies should considered the effect of proposed mechanical treatment on the tribological properties of both materials.

Figure 1

Influence of shot peening on the microhardness of Ti Grade 2 and TNTZ alloy.

Table 2

Percent microhardness increase in materials after shot peening and large plastic deformation [62,63,65–67].

	Percent microhardness increase
Sample	S_1.2	S_1.3	S_1.4	S_1.5	S_2.4	S_2.5	Ultra-fine grained structure	Nano-structure
Ti Grade 2	–	–	49.4%	55.6%	54.8%	51.5%	40% [62,65]	58–77% [66]
TNTZ	33.3%	34.3%	29.0%	33.5%	34.3%	32.2%	32% [63]	58% [67]

Topography of the modified materials

Shot-peened TNTZ alloy and Ti Grade 2 surfaces are shown in SEM images in Figures 2 and 3. Roughness results, represented by the parameter R_a (the arithmetical mean deviation from the roughness profile), are shown in Figure 4. The results are given for a sampling area of 94.9 × 126.5 µm. Topography profiles of the shot-peened surfaces are presented in Figure 5. It can be observed that, regardless of the treatment conditions, shot peening results in significant changes in morphology. Under the impact of the ceramic shot, craters and delamination formed on the surface. Based on both the SEM images and the measured R_a parameter, it results that the shot peening affects TNTZ surface morphology to a greater extent. The intensity of peeling off as well as the size and number of craters increased with shot size and applied pressure, as did the roughness of the peened TNTZ surfaces (Figure 5). For higher pressures also unfavourable cracks and larger delamination were formed on the surface (Figure 3b). This may have been the result of the lower hardness of this β-alloy and its easier deformability [64]. For the TNTZ alloy, a correlation between the shot peening conditions and roughness was observed, as the Ra parameter increases with both: shot size and process pressure (Figure 4). In the case of Ti Grade 2, there was no such correlation; the results obtained were close to each other and only for the S_2.5 sample was there a significant increase in roughness. From the topography results and microscopic observations, it can be noticed that for the TNTZ-peened with higher pressures (above 0.3 MPa), the deformation level introduced resulted in an undesirable peeling of the surface and a large increase in roughness. This may have been caused by the material's lower hardness and higher deformability. As already mentioned, surface condition is crucial in biomedical applications. For example, it is important when the modified surface acts as a substrate for further coating deposition. As in the case of the adhesion of coatings to the substrate, the detachment of material flakes can have a number of adverse effects on the human body and can contribute to implant failure [68,69]. Moreover, excessive roughness can also adversely affect osteointegration and the prevention of bacterial adhesion [8,28,70,71]. Decreasing peening pressure to 0.2 MPa allowed to limit unfavourable cracking and cavities, which indicates on the high potential of transferring this treatment to the industry.

Figure 2

SEM images of shot-peened (a, b) TNTZ alloy S_1.2 sample and (c, d) Ti Grade 2 S_1.4 sample.

Figure 3

SEM images of shot-peened (a, b) TNTZ alloy and (c, d) Ti Grade 2 S_2.5 samples.

Figure 4

Results of the Ra parameter (scanning area: 94.9 × 126.5 µm) for shot-peened TNTZ alloy and Ti Grade 2.

Figure 5

Topography profiles of shot peened (a, b) TNTZ alloy and (c, d) Ti Grade 2.

In implantology, further modifications of mechanically treated surfaces frequently involve chemical etching [8,52,54,72]. This method not only permits further changes in a material's surface topography; it also results in the removal of contaminations and residues after shot peening [53,72]. The results obtained for the Ti Grade 2 and TNTZ alloy surfaces after shot peening and chemical etching are shown in Figures 6–9. It can be observed that the roughness of the TNTZ alloy significantly increased after etching (Figure 8), while for Ti Grade 2 it remained in a similar range, differing significantly only for the 2.4 and 2.5 samples. Moreover, chemical etching allowed to develop surface topography at the micro- and nanoscales. While for Ti Grade 2 more sharp-edged cavitates with a plate-like morphology were visible (Figure 6d, 7d, 9c, d), the surfaces of the TNTZ consisted of more rounded and oblate craters (Figure 6b, 7b, 9a, b). In case of both materials, etching allowed to eliminate surface peeling. However, this process was more effective for Ti Grade 2. Differences between the two materials may arise from their different topographies in the shot-peened state (Figure 5), as well as from their chemical compositions with different oxides on the surface [19,63].

Figure 6

SEM images of shot-peened and etched (a, b) TNTZ alloy SE_1.2 sample and (c, d) Ti Grade 2 SE_1.4 sample.

Figure 7

SEM images of shot-peened and etched (a, b) TNTZ alloy and (c, d) Ti Grade 2 SE_2.5 samples.

Figure 8

Results of the Ra parameter (scanning area: 94.9 × 126.5 µm) for shot-peened and etched TNTZ alloy and Ti Grade 2.

Figure 9

Topography profiles of shot-peened and etched (a, b) TNTZ alloy and (c, d) Ti Grade 2.

When analysing the obtained roughness results, the SEM images of the modified surfaces and topographic profiles presented, it can be observed, that in the case of the TNTZ alloy, the optimum conditions among the hybrid modifications performed were a smaller shot size and lower pressure, corresponding to the SE_1.2 sample, due to the limitation of unfavourable defects and uniform distribution of surface irregularities (Figure 9a). In the case of Ti Grade 2, all the samples showed a similar roughness and surface morphology, apart from the SE_2.5 sample, which had a significantly higher Ra value and whose topographic profile exhibited large craters on the surface (Figure 9d).

Wettability

The results of the wettability tests are presented by wetting angle, in the form of graphs, in Figures 10–11. Regardless of the modification condition, the wettability of both peened materials, Ti Grade 2 and TNTZ alloy, remained in the hydrophilic range (Figure 10). The etching of the peened surfaces substantially increased the contact angle values of both materials, and to a greater extent for the TNTZ alloy (Figure 11). This may have been the result of not only the topographical modification, but – more likely – of chemical changes that occurred during contact with hydrofluoric acid e.g. due to the changes in the content of oxides with different stoichiometry [19,63]. Despite the decrease in wettability for the hybrid-modified samples compared to the peened states, the Ti Grade 2 surface remained within the hydrophilic range, while TNTZ proved more hydrophobic, except for samples SE_1.2 and SE_1.3, which also show more hydrophilic character. Although no optimal wettability range has yet been established, literature data can be found [41,45,63] that confirm good biological response and favourable osseointegration for the surfaces with similar level of wettability to those presented in this study. However, future cell culture studies are needed to confirm the biological performance of the newly-developed hybrid-modified surfaces of TNTZ alloy.

Figure 10

Wettability of shot-peened TNTZ alloy and Ti Grade 2.

Figure 11

Wettability of shot-peened and etched TNTZ alloy and Ti Grade 2.

Conclusions

A hybrid surface modification consisting shot peening and chemical etching was successfully carried out for Ti Grade 2 (α-phase) and TNTZ (β-phase) alloy. Investigations of the treated surfaces indicated significant differences in the mechanical properties and topography of the substrate materials. Based on the presented research, the following conclusions can be drawn:

Shot peening of Ti Grade 2 and TNTZ alloy resulted in a strengthening of the surface region and made it possible to obtain hardness at a level corresponding to the ultrafine-grained structure. The increase in hardness was significantly higher for Ti Grade 2, reaching as much as 55%, which indicates a greater strengthening of the commercially pure titanium than was the case with the TNTZ alloy, for which the percent hardness increase was about 30%. Moreover, for both materials mechanical properties were independent from shot-peening parameters, and maximum hardness value was achieved already at the lowest applied pressures.

Chemical etching significantly increased the wetting angle (decreased the wettability) of the shot-peened surfaces of Ti Grade 2 and TNTZ alloy, and the increase was greater for the TNTZ alloy. Along with the differences in the topography of the modified surfaces, this could indicate different etching mechanisms for both materials.

For Ti Grade 2, shot peening conducted with the pressure of 0.5 MPa, with the shots of diameter: 150–250 μm and further acid etching, resulted in the greatest surface roughness and the highest level of wettability amongst all of the tested hybrid treatments. However, this sample is also characterised by non-uniform topography with the appearance of larger craters. Considering all factors (hardness of surface region, roughness, wettability, topography profile, and morphology), sample treated with the following parameters: (i) pressure: 0.5 MPa, (ii) shot diameter: 90–150 μm showed the highest potential in the enhancement of biological response of Ti Grade 2.

For TNTZ alloy, shot peening with the pressure of 0.2 MPa and with the shots of diameter: 90–150 μm allows to obtain crack-free surface with the level of surface hardness similar to those as can be obtained after bulk large plastic deformation treatments. Moreover, further acid etching allows to obtain the highest level of wettability compared to the etched TNTZ surfaces that were shot-peened with higher pressures. This indicates on the necessity of performing TNTZ surface mechanical treatments with lower pressures compared to Ti Grade 2.

Footnotes

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

Liu

, Chu

, Ding

Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng R. 2004;47(3–4):49–121. doi:10.1016/j.mser.2004.11.001

Chen

, Thouas

GA.

Metallic implant biomaterials. Mater Sci Eng R. 2015;87:1–57. doi:10.1016/j.mser.2014.10.001

Geetha

, Singh

, Asokamani

, . Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review. Prog Mater Sci. 2009;54(3):397–425. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004

Saha

, Roy

Metallic dental implants wear mechanisms, materials, and manufacturing processes: a literature review. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(1):161–193. doi:10.3390/ma16010161

Sasikumar

, Indira

, Rajendran

Surface modification methods for titanium and its alloys and their corrosion behavior in biological environment: A review. J Bio Tribo-Corros. 2019;5; doi:10.1007/s40735-019-0229-5

Long

, Rack

HJ.

Titanium alloys in total joint replacement—a materials science perspective. Biomaterials. 1998;19(18):1621–1639. doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00146-4

Annur

, Kartika

, Supriadi

, . Titanium and titanium based alloy prepared by spark plasma sintering method for biomedical implant applications—a review. Mater Res Express. 2021;8; doi:10.1088/2053-1591/abd969

Hasan

, Bright

, Hayles

, . Preventing peri-implantitis: the quest for a next generation of titanium dental implants. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8(11):4697–4737. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00540

Domingo

Vanadium and tungsten derivatives as antidiabetic agents. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2002;88(2):97–112. doi:10.1385/bter:88:2:097

10.

Klotz

, Weistenhöfer

, Neff

, . The health effects of aluminum exposure. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114:653–659. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2017.0653

11.

Huang

, Li

, Guo

ZX.

Biomechanical and biochemical compatibility in innovative biomaterials. Biocompat Perform Med Dev. 2019: 23–46. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102643-4.00004-5

12.

Okazaki

, Gotoh

Comparison of metal release from various metallic biomaterials in vitro. Biomaterials. 2005;26(1):11–21. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.005

13.

Pereira

, Koga-Ito

, Rovetta

, . Bone tissue engineering: production of TNTZ alloy by powder metallurgy. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2022;12(2):1526–1546. doi:10.33263/BRIAC122.15261546

14.

Niinomi

, Nakai

Titanium-Based biomaterials for preventing stress shielding between implant devices and bone. Int J Biomater. 2011: 1–10. doi:10.1155/2011/836587

15.

Annunziata

, Guida

The effect of titanium surface modifications on dental implant osseointegration. Front Oral Biol. 2015;17:62–77. doi:10.1159/000381694

16.

Weng

, Biesiekierski

, Li

, . Effects of selected metallic and interstitial elements on the microstructure and mechanical properties of beta titanium alloys for orthopedic applications. Materialia. 2019;6; doi:10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100323

17.

Niinomi

Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 1998;243(1-2):231–236. doi:10.1016/s0921-5093(97)00806-x

18.

Kuroda

, Niinomi

, Morinaga

, . Design and mechanical properties of new b type titanium alloys for implant materials. Mater Sci Eng A. 1998;243(1-2):244–249. doi:10.1016/s0921-5093(97)00808-3

19.

Sotniczuk

, Kuczyńska-Zemła

, Kwaśniak

, . Corrosion behavior of Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr and commercially pure Ti under simulated inflammatory conditions - comparative effect of grain refinement and non-toxic β phase stabilizers. Electrochim Acta. 2019;312(3):369–379. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.138

20.

Raducanu

, Cojocaru

, Nocivin

, . β-Phase stability of Two biomedical β-titanium alloys during severe plastic deformation. JOM. 2020;72:2937–2948. doi:10.1007/s11837-020-04235-z

21.

Sotniczuk

, Garbacz

Nanostructured bulk titanium with enhanced properties—strategies and prospects for dental applications. Adv Eng Mater. 2021;23(4). doi:10.1002/adem.202000909

22.

Gil

, Espinar

, Llamas

, . Fatigue life of bioactive titanium dental implants treated by means of grit-blasting and thermo-chemical treatment. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(2):273–281. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00468.x

23.

Aparicio

, . Acceleration of apatite nucleation on microrough bioactive titanium for bone-replacing implants. Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2007;82(3):521–529. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31164

24.

Klokkevold

, Nishimura

, Adachi

, . Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 1997;8(6):442–447. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080601.x

25.

Escobar Claros

, Contri Campanelli

, Moreira Jorge

, . Corrosion behaviour of biomedical β-titanium alloys with the surface-modified by chemical etching and electrochemical methods. Corros Sci. 2021;188; doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109544

26.

Zahran

, Rosales Leal

, Rodríguez Valverde

, . Effect of hydrofluoric acid etching time on titanium topography, chemistry, wettability, and cell adhesion. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(11). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165296

27.

Ercan

, Taylor

, Alpaslan

, . Diameter of titanium nanotubes influences anti-bacterial efficacy. Nanotechnology. 2011;22(29). doi:10.1088/0957-4484/22/29/295102

28.

Zhong

, Li

, Yao

, . Effect of acid-alkali treatment on serum protein adsorption and bacterial adhesion to porous titanium. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2022;33(20). doi:10.1007/s10856-022-06646-7

29.

Celesti

, Gervasi

, Cicero

, . Titanium surface modification for implantable medical devices with anti-bacterial adhesion properties. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(9):3283. doi:10.3390/ma15093283

30.

Stich

, Alagboso

, Křenek

, . Implant-bone-interface: reviewing the impact of titanium surface modifications on osteogenic processes in vitro and in vivo. Bioeng Transl Med. 2021;7; doi:10.1002/btm2.10239

31.

Kieswetter

, Schwartz

, Dean

, . The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1996;7(4):329–345. doi:10.1177/10454411960070040301

32.

Ramazanoglu

, Oshi

Osseointegration and bioscience of implant surfaces—current concepts at bone-implant interface. Implant Dent – Rapidly Evolv Pract. 2011. doi:10.5772/16936

33.

Liao

P-B

, Cheng

H-C

, Huang

C-F

, . The cell culture of titanium alloy surface modifications by micro-powder blasting and co-blast techniques. Surf Eng. 2019;35(7):643–651. doi:10.1080/02670844.2019.1587570

34.

Elias

, Lima

JHC

, da Silva

, . Titanium dental implants WITH different morphologies. Surf Eng. 2002;18(1):46–49. doi:10.1179/026708401225001200

35.

Smeets

, Stadlinger

, Schwarz

, . Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration. BioMed Res Int. 2016: 1–16. doi:10.1155/2016/6285620

36.

Webster

, Ejiofor

JU.

Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophasemetals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials. 2004;25(19):4731–4739. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.002

37.

Coelho

, Zavanelli

, Salles

, . Enhanced bone bonding to nanotextured implant surfaces at a short healing period: a biomechanical tensile testing in the rat femur. Implant Dent. 2016;25(3):322–327. doi:10.1097/id.0000000000000436

38.

K-L

, Hsu

H-J

, Yang

T-S

, . Osseointegration of titanium implants with SLAffinity treatment: a histological and biomechanical study in miniature pigs. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(7):1515–1524. doi:10.1007/s00784-015-1629-7

39.

Hori

, Iwasa

, Ueno

, . Selective cell affinity of biomimetic micro-nano-hybrid structured TiO2 overcomes the biological dilemma of osteoblasts. Dent Mater. 2010;26(4):275–287. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.077

40.

Harvey

, Hill

, Bayat

Designing implant surface topography for improved biocompatibility. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013;10(2):257–267. doi:10.1586/erd.12.82

41.

Kennedy

, Washburn

, Simon

Jr. , . Combinatorial screen of the effect of surface energy on fibronectin-mediated osteoblast adhesion, spreading and proliferation. Biomaterials. 2006;27(20):3817–3824. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.044

42.

Wang

, Caetano

, Ambler

, . Enhancing the hydrophilicity and cell attachment of 3D printed PCL/graphene scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials (Basel). 2016;9(12):992. doi:10.3390/ma9120992

43.

Zhou

, Li

, Liu

, . Early osseointegration of implants with cortex-like TiO2 coatings formed by micro-arc oxidation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci. 2017;37(1):122–130. doi:10.1007/s11596-017-1705-0

44.

Pelegrine

, Moy

, Moshaverinia

, . Development of a novel nanotextured titanium implant. An experimental study in rats. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7):954. doi:10.3390/jcm8070954

45.

Sartoretto

, Alves

ATNN

, Zarranz

, . Hydrophilic surface of Ti6Al4V-ELI alloy improves the early bone apposition of sheep tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(8):893–901. doi:10.1111/clr.12894

46.

Wennerberg

, Jimbo

, Stübinger

, . Nanostructures and hydrophilicity influence osseointegration: a biomechanical study in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(9):1041–1050. doi:10.1111/clr.12213

47.

Velasco-Ortega

, Ortiz-García

, Jiménez-Guerra

, . Comparison between sandblasted acid-etched and oxidized titanium dental implants: In vivo study. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3267. doi:10.3390/ijms20133267

48.

Kaluđerović

, Schreckenbach

, Graf

H-L.

Titanium dental implant surfaces obtained by anodic spark deposition—from the past to the future. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;69:1429–1441. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.068

49.

Kim

, Choi

, Ryu

, . The biocompatibility of SLA-treated titanium implants. Biomed Mater. 2008;3(2):02501. doi:10.1088/1748-6041/3/2/025011

50.

Young

, Johansson

, Wennerberg

, . Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20(3):349–359.

51.

Nazarov

, Zemtsova

, Solokhin

, . Modification of the surface topography and composition of ultrafine and coarse grained titanium by chemical etching. Nanomaterials. 2017;7(1). doi:10.3390/nano7010015

52.

Lubas

, Jasinski

, Zawada

, . Influence of sandblasting and chemical etching on titanium 99.2–dental porcelain bond strength. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(1):116. doi:10.3390/ma15010116

53.

Xie

, Zuo

, Zhou

, . Sandblast-free double-etched titanium for dental implants application. Mater Lett. 2016;176:74–77. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.076

54.

Souza

JCM

, Sordi

, Kanazawa

, . Nano-scale modification of titanium implant surfaces to enhance osseointegration. Acta Biomater. 2019;94:112–131. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.045

55.

Ganesh

BKC

, Sha

, Ramanaiah

, . Effect of shotpeening on sliding wear and tensile behavior of titanium implant alloys. Mater Des. 2014;56:480–486. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.052

56.

Kheradmandfard

, Kashani-Bozorg

, Kim

, . Nanostructured β-type titanium alloy fabricated by ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification. Ultrason – Sonochem. 2017;39:698–706. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.03.061

57.

Kheradmandfard

, Kashani-Bozorg

, Lee

, . Significant improvement in cell adhesion and wear resistance of biomedical β-type titanium alloy through ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification. J Alloys Compd. 2018;762:941–949. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.088

58.

Prakash

, Singh

, Pramanik

, . Experimental investigation into nano-finishing of β-TNTZ alloy using magnetorheological fluid magnetic abrasive finishing process for orthopedic applications. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;11:600–617. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.046

59.

Singh

, Prakash

Effect of cryogenic treatment on the microstructure, mechanical properties and finishability of β-TNTZ alloy for orthopedic applications. Mater Lett. 2020;278; doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128461

60.

Kuczyńska-Zemła

, Kwasniak

, Sotniczuk

, . Microstructure and mechanical properties of titanium subjected to direct laser interference lithography. Surf Coat Technol. 2019;364; doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.02.026

61.

Zhang

, Fu

, Chen

, . Microstructure evolution of surface gradient nanocrystalline by shot peening of TA17 titanium alloy. Metall Mater Transact A. 2021;52(5):1790–1798. doi:10.1007/s11661-021-06189-6

62.

Sotniczuk

, Kuczyńska-Zemła

, Majchrowicz

, . Tailoring mechanical and surface properties of UFG CP-Ti by the low-temperature annealing. Appl Surf Sci. 2023;607; doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155038

63.

Kuczyńska-Zemła

, Kijeńska-Gawrońska

, Chlanda

, . Biological properties of a novel β-Ti alloy with a low young's modulus subjected to cold rolling. Appl Surf Sci. 2020;511; doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145523

64.

Sotniczuk

, Majchrowicz

, Kuczyńska-Zemła

, . Surface properties and mechanical performance of Ti-based dental materials: comparative effect of valve alloying elements and structural defects. Metall Mater Transact A. 2022;53(1):225–239. doi:10.1007/s11661-021-06515-y

65.

Sotniczuk

, Kuczyńska-Zemła

, Królikowski

, . Enhancement of the corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of nanocrystalline titanium by low-temperature annealing. Corros Sci. 2018;147:342–349. doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2018.11.016

66.

Sun

, Xu

, Shan

Effects of annealing on microstructure and mechanical properties of nano-grained Ni-based alloy produced by severe cold rolling. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;641:181–188. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.043

67.

Yilmazer

, Niinomi

, Akahori

, . Effect of high-pressure torsion processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of a novel biomedical β-type Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr after cold rolling. Int J Microstruct Mater Prop. 2012;7:168–186. doi:10.1504/ijmmp.2012.047498

68.

Zhu

, Wang

, Li

JJ.

Advances in implant surface modifications to improve osseointegration. Mater Adv. 2021;2:6901–6927. doi:10.1039/D1MA00675D

69.

Cordova

, Stresing

, Gobin

, . Orthopaedic implant failure: aseptic implant loosening – the contribution and future challenges of mouse models in translational research. Clin Sci. 2014;127(5):277–293. doi:10.1042/cs20130338

70.

Lorenzetti

, Dogša

, Stošicki

, . The influence of surface modification on bacterial adhesion to titanium-based substrates. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(3):1644–1651. doi:10.1021/am507148n

71.

Pier-Francesco

, Adams

, Waters

MGJ

, . Titanium surface modification and its effect on the adherence of porphyromonas gingivalis:an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(6):633–637. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01274.x

72.

Chauhan

, Koul

, Bhatnagar

Critical role of etching parameters in the evolution of nano micro SLA surface on the Ti6Al4V alloy dental implants. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(21). doi:10.3390/ma14216344

Tailoring Ti Grade 2 and TNTZ alloy surfaces in a two-step mechanical–chemical modification

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results and discussion

Microhardness after shot peening

Topography of the modified materials

Wettability

Conclusions

Footnotes

Disclosure statement

References