Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2022-2
Understanding the fundamentals of TiO 2 surfaces. Part I. The influence of defect states on the correlation between crystallographic structure,electronic structure and physical properties of single-crystal surfaces
TiO2 is an important material for reasons that are related to fundamental research, as well as to existing and potential technological applications. There is no aspect of the chemistry and physics of TiO2, which is not decisively affected by the presence of defects. An increase in the present state of understanding of the science of TiO2-based material interfaces is essential for progress in this area; such progress is possible thanks to high purity TiO2 single crystals which are ideal for basic investigation of and on titanium dioxide surfaces under carefully controlled laboratory conditions. Surface functionalization through precise control of the nature of the defects, their concentration and arrangement, allows the modification and optimization of the material, or even the generation of completely new targeted properties of the surfaces independent from the bulk. A new generation of TiO2 surfaces with enhanced functionality and performance limits has been successfully created by the use of surface engineering. In Part I of this review, a brief description of the results is given of the experimental and theoretical investigations on the influence of the defect states on the correlation between crystallographic, electronic and atomic geometrical structures of the most technically important single low Miller index titania surfaces and their physical properties. In addition, the formation and detection techniques for surface oxygen vacancies are also considered. Special attention in this area is given to the behaviour of the electrons remaining in the system upon vacancy formation and the ability of current quantum-mechanical modelling methods to provide a precise description of the electronic structure of non-stoichiometric TiO2. These fundamental studies allow scientists to create real functional TiO2 surfaces, such as the targeted nanostructured thin films with predefined structure and properties required for the development of high-performance devices in the fields of energy, environment and health.
WaldnerP, ErikssonG.Thermodynamic modelling of the system titanium-oxygen. Calphad. 1999;23(2):189–218.
6.
CancarevicM, ZinkevichM, AldingerF.Thermodynamic description of the Ti–O system using the associate model for the liquid phase. Calphad. 2007;31:330–342.
7.
PajunenM, KivilahtiJ.Thermodynamic analysis of the titanium-oxygen system. Z Metallkd. 1992;83(1):17–20.
8.
AnderssonS, CollénB, KuylenstiernaU, Phase analysis studies on the titanium-oxygen system. Acta Chem Scand. 1957;11:1641–1652.
9.
KofstadP.High-temperature oxidation of titanium. J Less-Common Met. 1967;12:449–464.
10.
MattheissLF.Electronic structure of rhombohedral Ti2O3. J Phys Condens Matter. 1996;8:5987.
11.
CattiM, SandroneG, DovesiR.Periodic unrestricted Hartree-Fock study of corundumlike Ti2O3 and V2O3. Phys Rev B. 1997;55:16122.
12.
BergerL-M. Titanium oxide – new opportunities for an established coating material. In: Thermal Spray 2004, Advances in Technology and Application. Proceedings of the International Thermal Spray Conference & Exhibition ITSC 2004; 2004 May 10-12. Osaka, Japan. Materials Park/Ohio: ASM International, p. 934–945.
13.
JoostWJ, AnkemS, KukljaMM.A modified embedded atom methodpotential for the titanium–oxygen system. Modelling Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2015;23:015006(18).
14.
GracianiJ, MárquezA, SanzJF.Role of vacancies in the structural stability of α−TiO: a first-principles study based on density-functional calculations. Phys Rev B. 2005;72:054117.
15.
JiangB, ZhouG, HuangK, Structural stability of β-TiO with disordered vacancies: a first-principles calculation. Physica B. 2013;421:110–116.
16.
BarmanSR, SarnaDD.Electronic structure of TiOx (0.8 < x < 1.3) with disordered and ordered vacancies. Phys Rev B. 1994;49:16141.
17.
GoodenoughJB.Metallic oxides. Progr Solid State Chem. 1971;5:145–399.
18.
CoxPA.Transition metal oxides – an introduction to their electronic structure, properties. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1992.
19.
PaxtonAT, Thien-NgaL.Electronic structure of reduced titanium dioxide. Phys Rev B. 1998;57:1579.
20.
ChangCF, KoetheTC, HuZ, C-Axis dimer and its electronic breakup: the insulator-to-metal transition in Ti2O3. Phys Rev. 2018;8:021004.
21.
OnodaM.Phase transitions of Ti3O5. J. Solid State Chem. 1998;136:67–73.
DumasJ, SchlenkerC.Magnetic properties of (Ti1–x
V
x
)2O3 (0 < x < 1): spin glass and metallic antiferromagnetism. J Phys C: Solid State Phys. 1979;12:2381–2399.
24.
RaoCNR, RamdasS, LoehmanRE, Semiconductor-metal transition in Ti3O5. J Solid State Chem. 1971;3:83–88.
25.
ReedTB.Arc techniques for materials research. Mater Res Bull. 1967;2:349–367.
26.
ReedTB, FaheyRE, HonigJM.Growth of single Ti2O3 crystals from the melt. Mater Res Bull. 1967;2:561–569.
27.
GrantFA.Properties of rutile (titanium dioxide). Rev Mod Phys. 1959;31(3):646–674.
28.
CromerDT, HerringtonK.The structures of anatase and rutile. J Am Chem Soc. 1955;77:4708–4709.
29.
SimonsPY, DachilleF.The structure of TiO2 II, a high-pressure phase of TiO2. Acta Crystallogr. 1967;23:334–336.
30.
MarchandR, BrohanL, TournouxM.TiO2(B) a new form of titanium dioxide and the potassium octatitanate K2Ti8O17. Mater Res Bull. 1980;15:1129–1133.
31.
LatrocheM, BrohanL, MarchandR, New hollandite oxides: TiO2(H) and K0.06TiO2. J Solid State Chem. 1989;81:78–82.
32.
FeistTP, DaviesPK.The soft chemical synthesis of TiO2 (B) from layered titanates. J Solid State Chem. 1992;101:275–295.
33.
AkimotoJ, GotohY, OosawaY, Topotactic oxidation of ramsdellite-type Li0.5TiO2, a new polymorph of titanium dioxide: TiO2(R). J Solid State Chem. 1994;113:27–36.
34.
TompsettGA, BowmakerGA, ConneyRP, The Raman spectrum of brookite, TiO2 (Pbca, Z = 8). J Raman Spectrosc. 1995;26:57–62.
35.
PennRL, BanfieldJF.Oriented attachment and growth, twinning, polytypism, and formation of metastable phases: insights from nanocrystalline TiO2. Am Mineral. 1998;83:1077–1082.
36.
PennRL, BanfieldJF.Formation of rutile nuclei at anatase {112} twin interfaces and the phase transformation mechanism in nanocrystalline titania. Am Mineral. 1999;84:871–876.
37.
TakahashiY, KijimaN, AkimotoJ.Synthesis, structural change upon heating, and electronic structure of ramsdellite-type TiO2. Chem Mater. 2006;18:748–752.
38.
BakardjievaS, StenglV, SzatmaryL, Transformation of brookite-type TiO2 nanocrystals to rutile: correlation between microstructure and photoactivity. J Mater Chem. 2006;16:1709–1716.
39.
LiaoY, QueW, JiaQ, Controllable synthesis of brookite/anatase/rutile TiO2 nanocomposites and single-crystalline rutile nanorods array. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:7937–7944.
40.
HornM, SchwerdtfegerCF, MeagherEP.Refinement of the structure of anatase at several temperatures. Z Kristallogr. 1972;136:273–281.
41.
DubrovinskyLS, DubrovinskaiaNA, SwamyV, The hardest known oxide. Nature. 2001;410:653–654.
42.
AbrahamsSC, BernsteinJL.Rutile: normal probability plot analysis and accurate measurement of crystal structure. J Chem Phys. 1971;55:3206.
43.
HanaorDAH, SorrellCC.Review of the anatase to rutile phase transformation. J Mater Sci. 2011;46:855–874.
44.
LandmannM, RaulsE, SchmidtWG.The electronic structure and optical response of rutile, anatase and brookite TiO2. J Phys Condens Matter. 2012;24:195503.
45.
RamamoorthyM, VanderbiltD, King-SmithRD.First-principles calculations of the energetics of stoichiometric TiO2 surfaces. Phys Rev B. 1994;49(23):16721–16727.
46.
WulffG.Zur Frage der Geschwindigkeit des Wachsthums und der Auflösung der Krystallflächen [On the question of the growth velocity and the dissolution of crystal surfaces]. Z Kristallogr Mineral. 1901;34(1-6):449.
47.
LazzeriM, VittadiniA, SelloniA.Structure and energetics of stoichiometric TiO2 anatase surfaces. Phys Rev B. 2001;63:155409/1-9.
48.
LazzeriM, VittadiniA, SelloniA.Erratum: structure and energetics of stoichiometric TiO2 anatase surfaces. Phys Rev B. 2002;65:119901/1.
49.
HenrichVE, KurtzRL.Surface electronic structure of TiO2: atomic geometry, ligand coordination, and the effect of adsorbed hydrogen. Phys Rev B. 1981;23:6280–6287.
50.
TaitRH, KasowskiRV.Ultraviolet photoemission and low-energy-electron diffraction studies of Ti (rutile) (001) and (110) surfaces. Phys Rev B. 1979;20:5178.
51.
GöpelW, AndersonJA, FrankelD, Surface defects of TiO2 (110): a combined XPS, XAES and ELS study. Surf Sci. 1984;139:333–346.
52.
HenrichVE, DresselhausG, ZeigerHJ.Observation of two-dimensional phases associated with defect states on the surface of TiO2. Phys Rev Lett. 1976;36:1335–1339.
53.
KurtzRL, StockbauerR, MadeyTE, Synchrotron radiation studies of H2O adsorption on TiO2(110). Surf Sci. 1989;218:178–200.
54.
WangLQ, BaerDR, EngelhardMH, The adsorption of liquid and vapor water on TiO2 (110) surfaces: the role of defects. Surf Sci. 1995;344:237–250.
55.
KrischokS, GünsterJ, GoodmanDW, MIES and UPS(HeI) studies on reduced TiO2 (110). Surf Interface Anal. 2005;37(1):77–82.
56.
ThomasAG, FlavellWR, KumarasingheAR, Resonant photoemission of anatase TiO2 (101) and (001) single crystals. Phys Rev B. 2003;67:035110(7).
57.
ThomasAG, FlavellWR, MallickAK, Comparison of the electronic structure of anatase and rutile TiO2 single-crystal surfaces using resonant photoemission and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Phys Rev B. 2007;75:035105(12).
58.
WendtS, SprungerPT, LiraE, The role of interstitial sites in the Ti 3d defect state in the band gap of titania. Science. 2008;320:1755–1759.
59.
GöpelW, RockerG, FeierabendR.Intrinsic defects of TiO2 (110): interaction with chemisorbed O2, H2O, CO, and CO2. Phys Rev B. 1983;28:3427–3438.
60.
PanJM, MaschhoffBL, DieboldU, Interaction of water, oxygen, and hydrogen with TiO2 (110) surfaces having different defect densities. J Vac Sci Technol A. 1992;10:2470–2476.
61.
WangLQ, BaerDR, EngelhardMH.Creation of variable concentrations of defects on TiO2 (110) using low-density electron beams. Surf Sci. 1994;320:295–306.
62.
PétignyS, Mostéfa-SbaH, DomenichiniB, Superficial defects induced by argon and oxygen bombardments on (110) TiO2 surfaces. Surf Sci. 1998;410:250–257.
63.
WoicikJC, NelsonEJ, KronikL, Hybridization and bond-orbital components in site-specific X-Ray photoelectron spectra of rutile TiO2. Phys Rev Lett. 2002;89:077401(4).
KnotekML, FeibelmanPJ.Ion desorption by core-hole Auger decay. Phys Rev Lett. 1978;40:964.
66.
FischerDW.X-Ray band spectra and molecular-orbital structure of rutile TiO2. Phys Rev B. 1972;5(11):4219–4226.
67.
de GrootFMF, GrioniM, FuggleJC, Oxygen 1s X-ray-absorption edges of transition-metal oxides. Phys Rev B. 1989;40:5715.
68.
van der LaanG.Polaronic satellites in X-ray-absorption spectra. Phys Rev B. 1990;41:12366.
69.
GrunesLA.Study of the K edges of 3d transition metals in pure and oxide form by X-ray-absorption spectroscopy. Phys Rev B. 1983;27:2111.
70.
BrydsonR, SauerH, EngelW, Electron energy loss and X-ray absorption spectroscopy of rutile and anatase: a test of structural sensitivity. J Phys Condens Matter. 1989;1:797.
71.
MohamedMH, SadeghiHR, HenrichVE.Electron-energy-loss study of the TiO2 (110) surface. Phys Rev B. 1988;37:8417.
72.
RockerG, SchäferJA, GöpelW.Localized and delocalized vibrations on TiO2 (110) studied by high-resolution electron-energy-loss spectroscopy. Phys Rev B. 1984;30:3704–3708.
73.
EriksenS, EgdellRG.Electronic excitations at oxygen deficient TiO2 (110) surfaces: a study by EELS. Surf Sci. 1987;180:263–278.
74.
EplingWS, PedenCHF, HendersonMA, Evidence for oxygen adatoms on TiO2 (110) resulting from O2 dissociation at vacancy sites. Surf Sci. 1998;412/413:333–343.
75.
ZhangZ, JengSP, HenrichVE.Cation-ligand hybridization for stoichiometric and reduced TiO2 (110) surfaces determined by resonant photoemission. Phys Rev B. 1991;43:12004–12011.
76.
HeiseR, CourthsR, WitzelS.Valence band densities-of-states of TiO2 (110) from resonat photoemission and photoelectron diffraction. Solid State Commun. 1992;84:599–602.
77.
NerlovJ, GelQ, MøllerPJ.Resonant photoemission from TiO2 (110) surfaces: implications on surface bonding and hybridization. Surf Sci. 1996;348:28–38.
78.
YimCM, PangCL, ThorntonG.Oxygen vacancy origin of the surface band-gap state of TiO2 (110). Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104:0368061-4.
79.
GlassfordKM, ChelikowskyJR.Structural and electronic properties of titanium dioxide. Phys Rev B. 1992;46:1284.
80.
MunnixS, SchmeitsM.Origin of defect states on the surface of TiO2. Phys Rev B. 1983;31:3369.
81.
WangCR, XuYS.Theoretical study of TiO2 surfaces. Surf Sci. 1989;219:L537–L542.
82.
SeeAK, BartynskiRA.Inverse photoemission study of the defective TiO2 (110) surface. J Vac Sci Technol A. 1992;10:2591.
83.
SeeAK, ThayerM, BartynskiRA.Angle-resolved inverse-photoemission study of the nearly perfect TiO2 (110) surface. Phys Rev B. 1993;47:13722.
84.
BurdettJK, HughbanksT, MillerJG, Structural-electronic relationships in inorganic solids: powder neutron diffraction studies of the rutile and anatase polymorphs of titanium dioxide at 15 and 295 K. J Am Chem Sot. 1987;109:3639.
85.
FahmiA, MinotC, SilviB, Theoretical analysis of the structures of titanium dioxide crystals. Phys Rev B. 1993;47:11717.
86.
BouzoubaaA, MarkovitsA, CalatayudM, Comparison of the reduction of metal oxide surfaces: TiO2-anatase, TiO2-rutile and SnO2-rutile. Surf Sci. 2005;583:107.
87.
AsahiR, TagaY, MannstadtW, Electronic and optical properties of anatase TiO2. Phys Rev B. 2000;61(11):7459–7465.
88.
HollandD, TalebA, WiameF.Comparison of the electronic structure of anatase and rutile TiO2 single-crystal surfaces using resonant photoemission and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Phys Rev B. 2007;75:035105(12).
89.
HenrichVE, CoxPA.The surface science of metal oxides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
90.
KavanL, GrätzelM, GilbertSE, Electrochemical and photoelectrochemical investigation of single-crystal anatase. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:6716–6723.
91.
SarkarA, KhanGG.The formation and detection techniques of oxygen vacancies in titanium oxide-based nanostructures. Nanoscale. 2019;11:3414–3444.
92.
DieboldU, LiM, DulubO, The relationship between bulk and surface properties of rutile TiO2 (110). Surf Rev Lett. 2000;7(5-6):613–617.
93.
DieboldU.The surface science of titanium dioxide. Surf Sci Rep. 2003;48:53–229.
94.
LiM, HebenstreitW, DieboldU, The influence of the bulk reduction state on the surface structure and morphology of rutile TiO2(110) single crystals. J Phys Chem B. 2000;104:4944–4950.
95.
IddirH, ÖğütS, ZapolP, Diffusion mechanisms of native point defects in rutile TiO2: Ab initio total-energy calculations. Phys Rev B. 2007;75(7):073203.
96.
JanottiA, VarleyJB, RinkeP, Hybrid functional studies of the oxygen vacancy in TiO2. Phys Rev B. 2010;81:085212-6.
97.
MorganBJ, WatsonGW.Intrinsic n-type defect formation in TiO2: a comparison of rutile and anatase from GGA+ U calculations. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114:2321–2328.
98.
LeeHY, ClarkSJ, RobertsonJ.Calculation of point defects in rutile TiO2 by the screened-exchange hybrid functional. Phys Rev B. 2012;86:075209.
99.
DeákP, AradiB, FrauenheimT.Oxygen deficiency in TiO2: similarities and differences between the Ti self-interstitial and the O vacancy in bulk rutile and anatase. Phys Rev B. 2015;92:045204.
100.
NowotnyJ, AlimMA, BakT, Defect chemistry and defect engineering of TiO2-based semiconductors for solar energy conversion. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44(23):8424–8442.
101.
Pangan-OkimotoKM, GoraiP, HollisterAG, Model for oxygen interstitial injection from the rutile TiO2(110) surface into the bulk. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:9955–9965.
102.
SetvinM, WagnerM, SchmidM, Surface point defects on bulk oxides: atomically-resolved scanning probe microscopy. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46:1772–1784.
103.
BakT, NowotnyJ, NowotnyMK.Defect disorder of titanium dioxide. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:21560–21567.
104.
NowotnyMK, SheppardLR, BakT, Defect chemistry of titanium dioxide. Application of defect engineering in processing of TiO2-based photocatalysts. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:5275–5300.
105.
TullerH, BishopSR.Point defects in oxides: tailoring materials through defect engineering. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2011;41(1):369–398.
BennettRA, PoulstonS, StoneP, STM and LEED observations of the surface structure of TiO2 (110) following crystallographic shear plane formation. Phys Rev B. 1999;59(15):10341–10346.
111.
SayleC, CatlowCRA, PerrinMA, Computer simulation study of the defect chemistry of rutile TiO2. J Phys Chem Solids. 1995;56:799–805.
112.
LinsebiglerAL, LuGJr, YJ. Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results. Chem Rev. 1995;95:735–758.
113.
MeisC, FlecheJL.Study of the solubility limit of oxygen vacancies in TiO2−x
using molecular dynamics. Solid State Ion. 1997;101–103:333.
114.
BonhôteP, GogniatE, GrätzelM, Novel electrochromic devices based on complementary nanocrystalline TiO2 and WO3 thin films. TSF. 1999;350:269–275.
115.
CampbellSA, KimHS, GilmerDC, Titanium dioxide (TiO2)-based gate insulators. IBM J Res Develop. 1999;43:383–392.
116.
ManessPC, SmolinskiS, JacobyWA.Bactericidal activity of photocatalytic TiO2 reaction: toward an understanding of its killing mechanism. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:4094–4098.
117.
PouliosI, SpathisP, TsoumparisP.Protection of marbles against corrosion and microbial corrosion with TiO2 coatings. J Environ Sci Health. 1999;34:1455–1471.
118.
ChambersSA, ThevuthasanS, FarrowRFC, Epitaxial growth and properties of ferromagnetic Co-doped TiO2 anatase. Appl Phys Lett. 2001;79:3467.
ScheiberP, FidlerM, DulubO, (Sub)Surface mobility of oxygen vacancies at the anatase (101) surface. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;109:136103.
121.
LiraE, HansenJØ, HuoP, Dissociative and molecular oxygen chemisorption channels on reduced rutile TiO2(110): An STM and TPD study. Surf Sci. 2010;604:1945–1960.
122.
SantaraB, GiriPK, ImakitaK, Evidence for Ti interstitial induced extended visible absorption and near infrared photoluminescence from undoped TiO2 nanoribbons: an in situ photoluminescence study. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:23402–23411.
123.
WangS, PanL, SongJ-J, Titanium-defected undoped anatase TiO2 with p-type conductivity, room-temperature ferromagnetism, and remarkable photocatalytic performance. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:2975–2983.
124.
HendersonMA.A surface perspective on self-diffusion in rutile TiO2. Surf Sci. 1999;419:174–187.
125.
ParkKT, PanM, MeunierV, Reoxidation of TiO2 (110) via Ti interstitials and line defects. Phys Rev B. 2007;75:245415.
126.
OnishiH, IwasawaY.Dynamic visualization of a metal-oxide-surface/gas-phase reaction: time-resolved observation by scanning tunneling microscopy at 800 K. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;76:791.
127.
ValdenM, LaiX, GoodmanDW.Onset of catalytic activity of gold clusters on titania with the appearance of nonmetallic properties. Science. 1998;281:1647–1650.
128.
LiM, HebenstreitW, GrossL, Oxygen-induced restructuring of the TiO2 (110) surface: a comprehensive study. Surf Sci. 1999;437:173–190.
129.
BennettRA, StoneP, PriceNJ, Two (1×2) reconstructions of TiO2 (110): surface rearrangement and reactivity studied using elevated temperature scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys Rev Lett. 1999;82:3831.
130.
HendersonMA.Mechanism for the bulk-assisted reoxidation of ion sputtered TiO2 surfaces: diffusion of oxygen to the surface or titanium to the bulk?Surf Sci. 1995;343:L1156–L11.
131.
DohnálekZ, LyubinetskyI, RousseauR.Thermally-driven processes on rutile TiO2 (110)-(1 × 1): a direct view at the atomic scale. Progr Surf Sci. 2010;85:161–205.
132.
ZhangZ, LeeJ, YatesJT.Unraveling the diffusion of bulk Ti interstitials in rutile TiO2 (110) by monitoring their reaction with O adatoms. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114(7):3059–3062.
133.
NowotnyMK, BakT, NowotnyJ.Electrical properties and defect chemistry of TiO2 single crystal. IV. Prolonged oxidation kinetics and chemical diffusion. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:16302–16308.
134.
NowotnyJ, BakT, BurgT.Electrical properties of polycrystalline TiO2. Prolonged Oxidation Kinetics Int J Ionics. 2007;13:79–82.
135.
CronemeyerDC.Infrared absorption of reduced rutile TiO2 single crystals. Phys Rev. 1959;113:1222–1226.
136.
GhoshAK, WakimFG, AddissRR.Photoelectronic processes in rutile. Phys Rev. 1969;184:979–988.
137.
KrogerFA.The chemistry of imperfect crystals. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company; 1974.
138.
NowotnyMK, BakT, NowotnyJ, Titanium vacancies in nonstoichiometric TiO2 single crystal. Phys Stat Solidi. 2005;242(11):R88–R90.
139.
NowotnyMK, BakT, NowotnyJ.Electrical properties and defect chemistry of TiO2 single crystal. I. Electrical conductivity. J Phys Chem. 2006;110:16270–16282.
140.
NowotnyMK, BakT, NowotnyJ.Electrical properties and defect chemistry of TiO2 single crystal. II. Thermoelectric power. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:16283–16291.
141.
CronemeyerDC, GilleoMA.Electrical and optical properties of rutile titanium dioxide single crystals. Phys Rev. 1951;82:975.
142.
MillotF, BlanchinM, TetotR, High temperature nonstoichiometric rutile TiO2–x. Prog Solid State Chem. 1987;17:263–293.
143.
OokuboA, KanezakiE, OoiK.ESR, XRD, and DRS studies of paramagnetic Ti3+ ions in a colloidal solid of titanium oxide prepared by the hydrolysis of TiCl3. Langmuir. 1990;6(1):206–209.
144.
ChenJ, LinLB, JingFQ.Theoretical study of F-type color center in rutile TiO2. J Phys Chem Solids. 2001;62(7):1257–1262.
145.
HuntingtonHB, SullivanGA.Interstitial diffusion mechanism in rutile. Phys Rev Lett. 1965;14:177.
146.
OnishiH, IwasawaY.Reconstruction of TiO2(110) surface: STM study with atomic-scale resolution. Surf Sci. 1994;313:L783–L789.
147.
PangCL, HaycockSA, RazaH, Added row model of TiO2 (110)1×2. Phys Rev B. 1998;58:1586.
148.
PangCL, RazaH, HaycockSA, Imaging reconstructed TiO2 surfaces with non-contact atomic force microscopy. Appl Surf Sci. 2000;157:233.
149.
ParkKT, PanMH, MeunierV, Surface reconstructions of TiO2 (110) driven by suboxides. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;96:226105.
150.
Blanco-ReyM, AbadJ, RogeroC, Structure of rutile TiO2 (110)−(1×2): formation of Ti2O3 quasi-1D metallic chains. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;96:055502.
151.
Blanco-ReyM, AbadJ, RogeroC, LEED-IV study of the rutile TiO2 (110)−1×2 surface with a Ti-interstitial added-row reconstruction. Phys Rev B. 2007;75:081402(R).
152.
GuoQ, CocksI, WilliamsEM.Surface structure of (1×2) reconstructed TiO2 (110) studied using electron stimulated desorption ion angular distribution. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;77:3851.
153.
AsariE, SoudaR.Atomic structure of TiO2 (110)−p(1×2) and p(1×3) surfaces studied by impact collision ion-scattering spectroscopy. Phys Rev B. 1999;60:10719.
154.
ElliotSD, BatesSP.Assigning the (1×2) surface reconstruction on reduced rutile by first-principles energetics. Phys Rev B. 2002;65:245415.
155.
ElliotSD, BatesSP.Assignment of the (1×2) surface of rutile TiO2(110) from first principles. Phys Rev B. 2003;67:035421.
156.
SantaraB, GiriPK, ImakitaK.Evidence of oxygen vacancy induced room temperature ferromagnetism in solvothermally synthesized undoped TiO2 nanoribbons. Nanoscale. 2013;5:5476–5488.
157.
SerponeN.Is the band gap of pristine TiO2 narrowed by anion- and cation-doping of titanium dioxide in second-generation photocatalysts?J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:24287–24293.
158.
ZhangH, ZhouM, FuQ, Observation of defect state in highly ordered titanium dioxide nanotube arrays. Nanotechnology. 2014;25:275603.
159.
SafeenK, MicheliV, BartaliR, Low temperature growth study of nano-crystalline TiO2 thin films deposited by RF sputtering. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2015;48:295201.
160.
KimS, KoKC, LeeJY, Single oxygen vacancies of (TiO2)35 as a prototype reduced nanoparticle: implication for photocatalytic activity. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016;18:23755–23762.
161.
ChenS, XiaoY, WangY, A facile approach to prepare black TiO2 with oxygen vacancy for enhancing photocatalytic activity. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:245.
162.
KalbJ, DormanJA, FolgerA, Influence of substrates and rutile seed layers on the assembly of hydrothermally grown rutile TiO2 nanorod arrays. J Cryst Growth. 2018;494:26–35.
163.
PawarSA, PatilDS, PawarUT, Photoelectrochemical solar cell based on surfactant mediated rutile TiO2 nanorods. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2015;26:2595–2604.
164.
VásquezGC, MaestreD, CremadesA, Understanding the effects of Cr doping in rutile TiO2 by DFT calculations and X-ray spectroscopy. Sci Rep. 2018;8:8740.
165.
ÜnalH, GuncelerD, GülserenO, Anatase TiO2 nanowires functionalized by organic sensitizers for solar cells: A screened Coulomb hybrid density functional study. J Appl Phys. 2015;118:194301.
166.
ChoD, KoKC, Lamiel-GarcíaO, Effect of size and structure on the ground-state and excited-state electronic structure of TiO2 nanoparticles. J Chem Theory Comput. 2016;12:3751–3763.
167.
RamamoorthyM, King-SmithRD, VanderbiltD.Defects on TiO2(110) surfaces. Phys Rev B. 1994;49:7709.
168.
MackrodtWC, SimsonEA, HarrisonNM.An ab initio Hartree–Fock study of the electron-excess gap states in oxygen-deficient rutile TiO2. Surf Sci. 1997;384:192.
169.
LindanPJD, HarrisonNM, GillanMJ, First-principles spin-polarized calculations on the reduced and reconstructed TiO2 (110) surface. Phys Rev B. 1997;55(15):919.
170.
ChoE, HanS, AhnHS, First principle study of defects in rutile TiO2−x. Phys Rev B. 2006;73:193202.
171.
ValentinCD, PacchioniG, SelloniA.Theory of carbon doping of titanium dioxide. Chem Mater. 2005;17:6656.
172.
BrownGEJr, HenrichVE, CaseyWH, Metal oxide surfaces and their interactions with aqueous solutions and microbial organisms. Chem Rev. 1999;99:77–174.
173.
ChoudhuryB, ChoudhuryA.Oxygen defect dependent variation of band gap, Urbach energy and luminescence property of anatase, anatase–rutile mixed phase and of rutile phases of TiO2 nanoparticles. Physica E. 2014;56:364–371.
174.
ChoudhuryB, BayanS, ChoudhuryA, Narrowing of band gap and effective charge carrier separation in oxygen deficient TiO2 nanotubes with improved visible light photocatalytic activity. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;465:1–10.
175.
QiuM, TianY, ChenZ, Synthesis of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 nanocrystals based on Le Chatelier's principle and their application in solar light photocatalysis. RSC Adv. 2016;6:74376–74383.
176.
ZhangY, WangX, DongP, A green synthetic approach for self-doped TiO2 with exposed highly reactive facets showing efficient CO2 photoreduction under simulated solar light. Green Chem. 2018;20:2084–2090.
177.
FangW, XingM, ZhangJ.A new approach to prepare Ti3+self-doped TiO2 via NaBH4 reduction and hydrochloric acid treatment. Appl Catal B. 2014;160–161:240–246.
178.
MacakJ, GongB, HueppeM, Filling of TiO2 nanotubes by self-doping and electrodeposition. Adv Mater. 2007;19:3027–3031.
179.
KangQ, CaoJ, ZhangY, Reduced TiO2 nanotube arrays for photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Mater Chem A. 2013;1:5766–5774.
180.
ZhangXQ, ChenJB, WangCW, Low-temperature liquid phase reduced TiO2 nanotube arrays: synergy of morphology manipulation and oxygen vacancy doping for enhancement of field emission. Nanotechnology. 2015;26:175705.
181.
ChengX, ChengQ, DengX, A facile and novel strategy to synthesize reduced TiO2 nanotubes photoelectrode for photoelectrocatalytic degradation of diclofenac. Chemosphere. 2016;144:888–894.
182.
LiuX, XuH, GrabstanowiczLR, Ti3+ self-doped TiO2−x
anatase nanoparticles via oxidation of TiH2 in H2O2. Catal Today. 2014;225:80–89.
183.
XinX, XuT, YinJ, Management on the location and concentration of Ti3+ in anatase TiO2 for defects-induced visible-light photocatalysis. Appl Catal B. 2015;176–177:354–362.
184.
SasanK, ZuoF, WangY, Self-doped Ti3+–TiO2 as a photocatalyst for the reduction of CO2 into a hydrocarbon fuel under visible light irradiation. Nanoscale. 2015;7:13369–13372.
185.
ChenY, LiW, WangJ, Microwave-assisted ionic liquid synthesis of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 hollow nanocrystals with enhanced visible-light photoactivity. Appl Catal B. 2016;191:94–105.
186.
SongJ, ZhengM, YuanX, Electrochemically induced Ti3+ self-doping of TiO2 nanotube arrays for improved photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Mater Sci. 2017;52:6976–6986.
187.
AronneA, FantauzziM, ImparatoC, Electronic properties of TiO2-based materials characterized by high Ti3+ self-doping and low recombination rate of electron–hole pairs. RSC Adv. 2017;7:2373–2381.
188.
XingM, FangW, NasirM, Self-doped Ti3+-enhanced TiO2 nanoparticles with a high-performance photocatalysis. J Catal. 2013;297:236–243.
189.
SantosLM, MachadoWA, FrançaMD, Structural characterization of Ag-doped TiO2 with enhanced photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 2015;5:103752–103759.
190.
MaedaY, IizukaY, KohyamaM.Generation of oxygen vacancies at a Au/TiO2 perimeter interface during CO oxidation detected by in situ electrical conductance measurement. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:906–909.
191.
LiL, ZengXC.Direct simulation evidence of generation of oxygen vacancies at the golden cage Au16 and TiO2 (110) interface for CO oxidation. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:15857–15860.
192.
DhanalakshmiJ, IyyapushpamS, NishanthiST, Investigation of oxygen vacancies in Ce coupled TiO2 nanocomposites by Raman and PL spectra. Adv Nat Sci: Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2017;8:015015.
193.
KaushikA, DalelaB, KumarS, Role of Co doping on structural, optical and magnetic properties of TiO2. J Alloys Compd. 2013;552:274–278.
194.
ZhangL, WangS, LuC.Detection of oxygen vacancies in oxides by defect-dependent cataluminescence. Anal Chem. 2015;87:7313–7320.
195.
ZhangS, ZhouZ, XiongR, The origin of ferromagnetism of Co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles: experiments and theory investigation. Mod Phys Lett B. 2016;30:1650296.
196.
ChoudhuryB, ChoudhuryA.Dopant induced changes in structural and optical properties of Cr3+ doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Mater Chem Phys. 2012;132:1112–1118.
197.
SantaraB, ImakitaK, FujiiM, Mechanism of defect induced ferromagnetism in undoped and Cr doped TiO2 nanorods/nanoribbons. J Alloys Compd. 2016;661:331–344.
198.
DuhaldeS, VignoloMF, GolmarF, Appearance of room-temperature ferromagnetism in Cu-doped films. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter Mater Phys. 2005;72:161313.
199.
YouM, KimTG, SungYM.Synthesis of Cu-doped TiO2 nanorods with various aspect ratios and dopant concentrations. Cryst Growth Des. 2010;10:983–987.
200.
ZhangH, YuX, McLeodJA, First-principles study of Cu-doping and oxygen vacancy effects on TiO2 for water splitting. Phys Lett. 2014;612:106–110.
201.
PaulN, MohantaD.Effective optoelectronic and photocatalytic response of Eu3+-doped TiO2 nanoscale systems synthesized via a rapid condensation technique. J Mater Res. 2013;28:1471–1480.
202.
SantaraB, GiriPK, DharaS, Oxygen vacancy-mediated enhanced ferromagnetism in undoped and Fe-doped TiO2 nanoribbons. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2014;47:235304.
203.
WuQ, ZhengQ, van de KrolR.Creating oxygen vacancies as a novel strategy to form tetrahedrally coordinated Ti4+ in Fe/TiO2 nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:7219–7226.
204.
BhartiB, KumarS, LeeHN, Formation of oxygen vacancies and Ti3+ state in TiO2 thin film and enhanced optical properties by air plasma treatment. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32355.
205.
ZhangJ, ZhaoZ, WangX, Increasing the oxygen vacancy density on the TiO2 surface by La-doping for dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114:18396–18400.
206.
ChaoS, DoganF.Effects of manganese doping on the dielectric properties of titanium dioxide ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc. 2011;94:179–186.
207.
ChoudhuryB, ChoudhuryA.Oxygen vacancy and dopant concentration dependent magnetic properties of Mn doped TiO2 nanoparticle. Curr Appl Phys. 2013;13:1025–1031.
208.
LiJ, XuX, LiuX, Sn doped TiO2 nanotube with oxygen vacancy for highly efficient visible light photocatalysis. J Alloys Compd. 2016;679:454–462.
209.
JingL, XinB, YuanF, Effects of surface oxygen vacancies on photophysical and photochemical processes of Zn-doped TiO2 nanoparticles and their relationships. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:17860–17865.
210.
NairRG, MazumdarS, ModakB, The role of surface O-vacancies in the photocatalytic oxidation of methylene blue by Zn-doped TiO2: a mechanistic approach. J Photochem Photobiol A. 2017;345:36–53.
211.
ZouXX, LiGD, ZhaoJ, Light-driven preparation, microstructure, and visible-light photocatalytic property of porous carbon-doped TiO2. Int J Photoenergy. 2012;2012: 720183.
212.
AndrewsD.Photonics. Volume 2: Nanophotonic structures and materials. New Jersey (US): Wiley; 2015.
213.
SarkarA, KarmakarK, SinghAK, Surface functionalized H2Ti3O7 nanowires engineered for visible-light photoswitching, electrochemical water splitting, and photocatalysis. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016;18:26900–26912.
214.
González-TorresJC, PoulainE, Domínguez-SoriaV, C-, N-, S-, and F-doped anatase TiO2 (101) with oxygen vacancies: photocatalysts active in the visible region. Int J Photoenergy. 2018;2018: 7506151.
215.
LinZ, OrlovA, LambertRM, New insights into the origin of visible light photocatalytic activity of nitrogen-doped and oxygen-deficient anatase TiO2. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:20948–20952.
216.
RumaizAK, WoicikJC, CockayneE, Oxygen vacancies in N doped anatase: experiment and first-principles calculations. Appl Phys Lett. 2009;95:262111.
217.
SzkodaM, SiuzdakK, Lisowska-OleksiakA.Non-metal doped TiO2 nanotube arrays for high efficiency photocatalytic decomposition of organic species in water. Physica E. 2016;84:141–145.
218.
ParkY, KimW, ParkH, Carbon-doped TiO2 photocatalyst synthesized without using an external carbon precursor and the visible light activity. Appl Catal B. 2009;91:355–361.
219.
WuG, NishikawaT, OhtaniB, Synthesis and characterization of carbon-doped TiO2 nanostructures with enhanced visible light response. Chem Mater. 2007;19:4530–4537.
220.
ParkJH, KimS, BardAJ.Novel carbon-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays with high aspect ratios for efficient solar water splitting. Nano Lett. 2006;6:24–28.
221.
TanK, ZhangH, XieC, Visible-light absorption and photocatalytic activity in molybdenum-and nitrogen-codoped TiO2. Catal Commun. 2010;11:331–335.
222.
AkpanU, HameedB.The advancements in sol–gel method of doped-TiO2 photocatalysts. Appl Catal A. 2010;375:1–11.
223.
CarattoV, SettiL, CampodonicoS, Synthesis and characterization of nitrogen-doped TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by sol–gel method. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 2012;63:16–22.
224.
WangJ, TafenDN, LewisJP, Origin of photocatalytic activity of nitrogen-doped TiO2 nanobelts. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:12290–12297.
225.
ViswanathanB, KrishanmurthyKR.Nitrogen incorporation in TiO2: does it make a visible light photo-active material?Int J Photoenergy. 2012;2012: 269654.
AnsariSA, KhanMM, AnsariMO, Nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide (N-doped TiO2) for visible light photocatalysis. New J Chem. 2016;40:3000–3009.
228.
TanH, ZhaoZ, NiuM, A facile and versatile method for preparation of colored TiO2 with enhanced solar-driven photocatalytic activity. Nanoscale. 2014;6:10216–10223.
229.
ShenL, XingZ, ZouJ, Black TiO2 nanobelts/gC3N4 nanosheets laminated heterojunctions with efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic performance. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41978.
230.
SamsudinEM, HamidSBA, JuanJC, Effective role of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) to enhance the photocatalytic activity of F-doped TiO2 prepared by modified sol–gel method. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;365:57–68.
231.
LiW, LiangR, HuA, Generation of oxygen vacancies in visible light activated one-dimensional iodine TiO2 photocatalysts. RSC Adv. 2014;4:36959–36966.
232.
QinDD, WangQH, ChenJ, Phosphorus-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays for visible-light-driven photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Sustain Energy Fuels. 2017;1:248–253.
WangQ, PuntambekarA, ChakrapaniV.Vacancy-induced semiconductor–insulator–metal transitions in nonstoichiometric nickel and tungsten oxides. Nano Lett. 2016;16:7067–7077.
235.
TianH, HuL, ZhangC, Enhanced photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells using a highly crystallized mesoporous TiO2 electrode modified by boron doping. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:863–868.
236.
SzkodaM, SiuzdakK, Lisowska-OleksiakA, Facile preparation of extremely photoactive boron-doped TiO2 nanotubes arrays. Electrochem Commun. 2015;60:212–215.
237.
HoCY, LinJK, WangHW.Characteristics of boron decorated TiO2 nanoparticles for dye-sensitized solar cell photoanode. Int J Photoenergy. 2015;2015:689702.
238.
RaneK, MhalsikerR, YinS, Visible light-sensitive yellow TiO2−xNx and Fe–N co-doped Ti1−yFeyO2−xNx anatase photocatalysts. J Solid State Chem. 2006;179:3033–3044.
239.
LiX, LiuQ, JiangX, Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Ga-N Co-doped anatase TiO2 for water decomposition to hydrogen. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:11519–11527.
240.
LimJ, MuruganP, LakshminarasimhanN, Synergic photocatalytic effects of nitrogen and niobium co-doping in TiO2 for the redox conversion of aquatic pollutants under visible light. J Catal. 2014;310:91–99.
241.
GuanW, JiF, XieZ, Preparation and photocatalytic performance of nano-TiO2 codoped with iron III and lanthanum III. J Nanomater. 2015;2015:869821.
242.
KhanH, SwatiIK, YounasM, Chelated nitrogen-sulphur-codoped TiO2: synthesis, characterization, mechanistic, and UV/visible photocatalytic studies. Int J Photoenergy. 2017;8(5):7268641.
243.
WangP, QiC, WenP, Synthesis of Si, n co-doped nano-sized TiO2 with high thermal stability and photocatalytic activity by mechanochemical method. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:294.
244.
ReissH, McCaldinJO, editors. Progress in solid state chemistry. New York: Pergamon; 1972. P. 177–253.
245.
BursillLA, SmithDJ.Interaction of small and extended defects in nonstoichiometric oxides. Nature. 1984;309:319.
246.
BursillLA, BlanchinMG, SmithDJ.Precipitation phenomena in non-stoichiometric oxides II. {100} Platelet defects in reduced rutiles. Proc R Soc Lond Ser. A. 1984;391:351.
247.
AonoM, HasigutiRR.Interaction and ordering of lattice defects in oxygen-deficient rutile TiO2. Phys Rev B. 1993;48(17):12406–12314.
248.
RaoCNR, RaueauB.Transition metal oxides. New York: VCH; 1995.
249.
SmithDJ, BursillLA, BlanchinMG.Structure of extended defect terminations in rutile. Philisofical Mag A. 1984;50:473.
250.
SmithRD, BennettRA, BowkerM.Measurement of the surface-growth kinetics of reduced TiO2 (110) during reoxidation using time-resolved scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys Rev B. 2002;66:035409.
251.
NolanM, ElliottSD, MulleyJS, Electronic structure of point defects in controlled self-doping of the TiO2 (110) surface: combined photoemission spectroscopy and density functional theory study. Phys Rev B. 2008;77:235424(11).
252.
WalshFC, WillsRGA.The continuing development of Magnéli phase titanium sub-oxides and Ebonex® electrodes. Electrochim Acta. 2010;55:6342–6351.
253.
AndersonJS, HydeBG.On the possible role of dislocations in generating ordered and disordered shear structures. J Phys Chem Solid. 1967;28:1393–1408.
254.
AndersonJS, TilleyRJD.Crystallographic shear in oxygen-deficient rutile: an electron microscope study. J Solid State Chem. 1970;2:472–482.
255.
HaradaS, TanakaK, InuiH.Thermoelectric properties and crystallographic shear structures in titanium oxides of the Magnèli phases. J Appl Phys. 2010;108:083703.
256.
SmithJR, WalshFC, ClarkeRL.Electrodes based on Magnéli phase titanium oxides: the properties and applications of Ebonex materials. J Appl Electrochem. 1998;28:1021–1033.
257.
RohrerGS, HenrichVE, BonnellDA.Structure of the reduced TiO2 (110) surface determined by scanning tunneling microscopy. Science. 1990;250:1239–1241.
258.
MurrayPW, CondonNG, ThorntonG.Effect of stoichiometry on the structure of TiO2 (110). Phys Rev B. 1995;51:10989.
259.
NörenbergN, TannerRE, SchierbaumKD, Visualization of precipitation induced crystallographic shear planes as one-dimensional structures on surfaces: an STM and RHEED study on TiO2 (110). Surf Sci. 1998;396(1-3):52–60.
260.
NörenbergN, BriggsGAD.Surface structure of the most oxygen deficient Magnéli phase – an STM study of Ti4O7. Surf Sci. 1998;402-404:738–741.
261.
MagnéliA, AnderssonG.On the MoO2 structure type. Acta Chem Scand. 1955;9:1378–1381.
262.
MagnéliA.Orthorhombic rhenium dioxide: a representative of hypothetic structure type predicted by Pauling and Sturdivant. Acta Cryst. 1956;9:1038–1039.
263.
MagnéliA.Studies of rhenium oxides. Acta Chem Scand. 1957;11:28–33.
264.
AnderssonS, MagnéliA.Diskrete Titanoxydphasen im Zusammensetzungsbereich TiO1,75-TiO1,90 [Discrete titanium oxide phases in the composition range TiO1,75-TiO1,90]. Sci Nat. 1956;43(21):495–496.
265.
AnderssonS, CollénB, KuylenstiernaU, Phase analysis studies on the titanium Y-oxygen system. Acta Chem Scand. 1957;11:1641–1652.
266.
Le PageY, StrobelP.Structural chemistry of the Magnéli phases TinO2n-1, 4 ≤ n ≤ 9. II. Refinements and structural discussion. J Solid State Chem. 1982;44:273–281.
267.
Le PageY, StrobelP.Structural chemistry of Magnéli phases TinO2n−1
(4 ≤ n ≤ 9). III. Valence ordering of titanium in Ti6O11 at 130 K. J Solid State Chem. 1983;47:6–15.
268.
BursillLA, HydeBG.Crystal structures in the {l/2} CS family of higher titanium oxides TinO2n-1. Acta Crystallogr B. 1971;27:210–215.
269.
JacobKT, HoqueSM, WasedaY.Synergistic use of thermogravimetric and electrochemical techniques for thermodynamic study of TiO
x
(1.67 ≤ x ≤ 2.0) at 1573 K. Mater Trans JIM. 2000;41:681–689.
270.
WaldnerP.Modelling of oxygen solubility in titanium. Scr Mater. 1999;40:969–974.
271.
ErikssonG, PeltonAD.Critical evaluation and optimization of the thermodynamic properties and phase diagrams of the MnO-TiO2, MgO-TiO2, FeO-TiO2, Ti2O3-TiO2, Na2O-TiO2, and K2O-TiO2 systems. Metallurgical Trans B. 1993;24:795–805.
272.
GoodenoughB.Direct cation-cation interactions in several oxides. Phys Rev. 1960;117:1442.
273.
AndersonJS, BurchR.Lattice energies and heats of formation of the TinO2n-1 shear phases. J Phys Chem Solids. 1971;32:923–926.
274.
MarezioM, GauzziA, LicciF, Can the structure of the Ti or V Magnéli binary oxides host superconductivity?Physica C Supercond. 2000;338:1–8.
275.
FujishimaA, ZhangX, TrykDA.TiO2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena. Surf Sci Rep. 2008;63:515–582.
276.
AnderssonJS.The crystal structure of Ti5O9. Acta Chem Scand. 1960;14:1161–1172.
277.
OkKM, OhishiY, MutaH, Effect of point and planar defects on thermal conductivity of TiO2–x. J Am Ceram Soc. 2018;101:334–346.
278.
MagnéliA.Non-stoichiometry and structural disorder in some families of inorganic compounds. Pure Appl Chem. 1978;50:1261–1271.
279.
AritaM, HosoyM, KobayashiM, Depth profile measurement by secondary ion mass spectrometry for determining the tracer diffusivity of oxygen in rutile. J Am Ceram Soc. 1979;62(9-10):443–446.
280.
BagshawAN, HydeBG.Oxygen tracer diffusion in the Magnéli phases Ti
n
O2n–1. J Phys Chem Solids. 1976;37:835–438.
281.
MillotF, PicardC.Oxygen self-diffusion in non-stoichiometric rutile TiO2–x
at high temperature. Solid State Ion. 1988;28-30:1344–1348.
282.
HaulR, DümbgenG.Sauerstoff-Selbstdiffusion in Rutilkristallen [Oxygen self-diffusion in rutile crystals]. J Phys Chem Solids. 1965;26:1–10.
283.
GruenwaldTB, GordonG.Oxygen diffusion in single crystals of titanium dioxide. J Inorg Nucl Chem. 1971;33:1151–1155.
284.
HoshinoK, PetersonNL, WileyCL.Diffusion and point defects in TiO2–x
. Phys Chem Solids. 1985;46(12):1397–1411.
285.
CuiX, WangB, WangZ, Formation and diffusion of oxygen-vacancy pairs on TiO2 (111)–(1 × 1). J Chem Phys. 2008;129:044703.
286.
DangY, WestAR.Oxygen stoichiometry, chemical expansion or contraction, and electrical properties of rutile, TiO2–δ ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc. 2019;102:251–259.
287.
MorganBJ, WatsonGW.A DFT + U description of oxygen vacancies at the TiO2 rutile (110) surface. Surf Sci. 2007;601:5034.
288.
BartholomewRF.Frankl DR electrical properties of some titanium oxides. Phys Rev. 1969;187(3):828–833.
289.
InglisAD, PageYL, StrobelP, Electrical conductance of crystalline Ti
n
O2n-1 for n = 4–9. J Phys C. 1983;16:317.
290.
LiborioL, MalliaG, HarrisonN.Electronic structure of the Ti4O7 Magnéli phase. Phys Rev B. 2009;79:245133.
291.
XuB, SohnHY, MohassabY, Structures, preparation and applications of titanium suboxides. RSC Adv. 2016;6:79706–79722.
292.
MarezioM, McWhanDB, DernierPD, Structural aspects of the metal-insulator transitions in Ti4O7. J Solid State Chem. 1973;6:213–221.
293.
Le PageY, MarezioM.Structural chemistry of Magnéli phases Ti
n
O2n-1, (4 ≤ n ≤ 9) IV. Superstructure in Ti4O7 at 140 K. J Solid State Chem. 1984;53:13–21.
294.
VerweyEJW, HaaymanPW.Electronic conductivity and transition point of magnetite (“Fe3O4”). Physica. 1941;VIII(9):979–987.
BullardJW, CimaMJ.Orientation dependence of the isoelectric point of TiO2 (Rutile) surfaces. Langmuir. 2006;22:10264–10271.
297.
BatesS, KresseG, GillanMJ.A systematic study of the surface energetics and structure of TiO2 (110) by first-principles calculations. Surf Sci. 1997;385:386–394.
298.
CharltonG, HowesPB, NicklinCL, Structural and electronic properties of selected rutile and anatase TiO2 surfaces: an ab initio investigation. J Chem Theory Comput. 2008;4:341–352.
299.
CabailhG, TorrellesX, LindsayR, Geometric structure of TiO2 (110)(1 × 1): achieving experimental consensus. Phys Rev B. 2007;75:241403R.
300.
LindsayR, WanderA, ErnstA, Revisiting the surface structure of TiO2 (110): a quantitative low-energy electron diffraction study. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;94:246102-1-4.
301.
KrögerEA, SayagoDI, AllegrettiF, Photoelectron diffraction investigation of the structure of the clean TiO2 (110)(1 × 1) surface. Phys Rev B. 2007;75:195413-1-10.
302.
HirdB, ArmstrongRA.Surface relaxation of rutile TiO2 (110)-(1×1) from ion shadowing/blocking measurements. Surf Sci. 1999;420:L131–L137.
303.
AsariE, SuzukiT, KawanowaH, TiO2 (110)-p(1 × 1) surface structure analyzed by impact-collision ion-scattering spectroscopy. Phys Rev B. 2000;61:5679–5682.
304.
ParkinsonGS, Muñoz-MárquezMA, QuinnPD, Medium-energy ion-scattering study of the structure of clean TiO2 (110)-(1 × 1). Phys Rev B. 2006;73:245409-1-11.
305.
ReinhardtP, HeBA.Electronic and geometrical structure of rutile surfaces. Phys Rev B. 1994;50:12015–12024.
306.
LindanPJD, HarrisonNM, HolenderJM, The TiO2 (100) (1×3) reconstruction: insights from ab initio calculations. Surf Sci. 1996;364:431–438.
307.
MuscatJ, HarrisonNM, ThorntonG.Effects of exchange, correlation, and numerical approximations on the computed properties of the rutile TiO2 (100) surface. Phys Rev B. 1999;59:2320–2326.
308.
PerronH, DomainC, RoquesJ, Optimisation of accurate rutile TiO2 (110), (100), (101) and (001) surface models from periodic DFT calculations. Theor Chem Acc. 2007;117:565–574.
309.
HowardA, MitchellCEJ, MorrisD, The surface structure of TiO2 (210) studied by atomically resolved STM and atomistic simulation. Surf Sci. 2000;448:131–141.
310.
UetsukaH, SasaharaA, OnishiH.Scanning tunneling microscopy study of surface reconstructions of rutile TiO2 (111). Jpn J Appl Phys. 2000;39:3769–3772.
311.
PoumellecB, DurhamPJ, GuoGY.Electronic structure and X-ray absorption spectrum of rutile TiO2. J Phys: Cond Matter. 1991;3:8195.
312.
MoSD, ChingWY.Electronic and optical properties of three phases of titanium dioxide: rutile, anatase, and brookite. Phys Rev B. 1995;51:13023.
313.
GersonAR, JonesR, SimpsonD, Quantum chemical modelling case studies relevant to metal oxide dissolution and catalysis. Ionics. 2001;7:290.
314.
AmoresJMG, EscribanoVS, BuscaG.Anatase crystal growth and phase transformation to rutile in high area TiO2, MO3-TiO2, and other TiO2-supported oxide catalytic systems. J Mater Chem. 1995;5(8):1245–1249.
315.
HengererR, BolligerB, ErbudakM, Structure and stability of the anatase TiO2 (101) and (001) surfaces. Surf Sci. 2000;460:162–169.
316.
HebenstreitW, RuzyckiN, HermanGS, Scanning tunneling microscopy investigation of the TiO2 anatase (101) surface. Phys Rev B. 2000;62(24):R16334.
317.
PoelmanH, FiermansL.Surface phonon spectra of mineral TiO2 anatase (001) and (100). Surf Sci Spectra. 1998;5:252.
318.
HermanGS, GaoY.Growth of epitaxial anatase (001) and (101) films. TSF. 2001;397:157–161.
319.
HermanGS, DohnálekZ, RuzyckiN, Experimental investigation of the interaction of water and methanol with anatase-TiO2(101). J Phys Chem B. 2003;107:2788–2795.
320.
SilversmitG, PoelmanH, FiermansL, An X-ray photoelectron diffraction study of a TiO2 (001) anatase single crystal mineral. Solid State Commun. 2001;119:101–104.
321.
DieboldU, RuzyckiN, HermanGS, One step towards bridging the materials gap: surface studies of TiO2 anatase. Catal Today. 2003;85:93–100.
322.
RuzyckiN, HermanGS, BoatnerLA, Scanning tunneling microscopy study of the anatase (100) surface. Surf Sci. 2003;529:L239–L244.
323.
LiangY, GanS, ChambersSA, Surface structure of anatase TiO2 (001): reconstruction, atomic steps, and domains. Phys Rev B. 2001;63:235402-1-7.
324.
HermanGS, GaoY, TranTT, X-ray photoelectron diffraction study of an anatase thin film: TiO2 (001). Surf Sci. 1999;447:201–211.
325.
ChambersSA, WangCM, ThevuthasanS, Epitaxial growth and properties of MBE-grown ferromagnetic Co-doped TiO2 anatase films on SrTiO3 (001) and LaAlO3 (001). TSF. 2002;418(2):197–210.
326.
BurnsideSD, ShkloverV, BarbeC, Self-organization of TiO2 nanoparticles in thin films. Chem Mater. 1998;10:2419–2425.
327.
ShkloverV, NazeeruddinMK, ZakeeruddinSM, Structure of nanocrystalline TiO2 powders and precursor to highly efficient photosensitizer. Chem Mater. 1997;9:430–439.
328.
ChenS, MasonMG, GyslingHJ, Ultrahigh vacuum metalorganic chemical vapor deposition growth and in situ characterization of epitaxial TiO2 films. J Vac Sci Technol A. 1993;11:2419.
329.
SugumiraW, YamazakiA, ShigetaniH, Anatase-type TiO2 thin films produced by lattice deformation. Jpn J Appl Phys. 1997;36:7358.
330.
HermanGS, SieversMR, GaoY.Structure determination of the two-domain (1 × 4) anatase TiO2 (001) surface. Phys Rev Lett. 2000;84:3354–3357.
331.
TannerRE, SasaharaA, LiangY, Formic acid adsorption on anatase TiO2 (001)-(1 × 4) thin films studied by NC-AFM and STM. J Phys Chem B. 2002;106:8211–8222.
332.
VörösJ, WielandM, Ruiz-TaylorL, Characterization of titanium surfaces. In: BrunetteDM, TengvallP, TextorM, editor. Titanium in medicine: materials science, surface science, engineering, biological responces and medical applications. Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2001. p. 88–140.
333.
DieboldU.Understanding metal oxide surfaces at the atomic scale: STM investigations of bulk-defect dependent surface processes. MRS Symp Proc. 2001;654:AA 115–AA 119.
334.
NovakD, GarfunkelE, GustafssonT.Scanning-tunneling-microscopy study of the atomic-scale structure of TiO2 (110)-(1×1). Phys Rev B. 1994;50:5000(R).
335.
SzaboA, EngelT.Structural studies of TiO2 (110) using scanning tunneling microscopy. Surf Sci. 1995;329:241–254.
336.
OnishiH, FukuiK, IwasawaY.Atomic scale surface structures of TiO2 (110) determined by scanning tunneling microscopy: a new surface-limited phase of titanium oxide. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1995;68:2447–2458.
337.
FischerS, MunzAW, SchierbaumKD, The geometric structure of intrinsic defects at TiO2 (110) surfaces: an STM study. Surf Sci. 1995;337:17–30.
338.
BerkoA, SolymosiF.Study of clean TiO2 (110) surface by scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy. Langmuir. 1996;12:1257.
339.
ZhangLP, LiM, DieboldU.Characterization of Ca impurity segregation on the TiO2 (110) surface. Surf Sci. 1998;412:242.
340.
NörenbergH, HardingJH.Ordered structures of calcium oxide on TiO2 (110) studied by STM and atomistic simulation. Phys Rev B. 1999;59:9842.
341.
NörenbergH, HardingJH.Ca-induced surface reconstructions on TiO2 (110) studied by scanning tunneling microscopy, reflection high-energy electron diffraction and atomistic simulation. Surf Sci. 2001;473:151.
342.
GanS, LiangY, BaerDR.Atomic control of TiO2 (110) surface by oxygen plasma treatment. Surf Sci. 2000;459:L498.
343.
HendersonMA, Otero-TapiaS, CastroME.Electron-induced decomposition of methanol on the vacuum-annealed surface of TiO2 (110). Surf Sci. 1998;412-413:252–272.
344.
BatzillM, KatsievB, GasparDJ, Variations of the local electronic surface properties of TiO2(110) induced by intrinsic and extrinsic defects. Phys Rev B. 2002;66:235401.
345.
WangQ, SunQ, ChenG, Vacancy-induced magnetism in ZnO thin films and nanowires. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter Mater Phys. 2008;77:205411.
346.
GhoshS, KhanGG, DasB, Vacancy-induced intrinsic d
0 ferromagnetism and photoluminescence in potassium doped ZnO nanowires. J Appl Phys. 2011;109:123927.
347.
KhanGG, GhoshS, SarkarA, Defect engineered d
0 ferromagnetism in tin-doped indium oxide nanostructures and nanocrystalline thin-films. J Appl Phys. 2015;118:074303.
348.
ZhouS, ČižmárE, PotzgerK, Origin of magnetic moments in defective TiO2 single crystals. Phys Rev B. 2009;79:113201.
349.
TangK, MengAC, HuiF, Distinguishing oxygen vacancy electromigration and conductive filament formation in TiO2 resistance switching using liquid electrolyte contacts. Nano Lett. 2017;17:4390–4399.
350.
RaghavanN, DegraeveR, FantiniA, Modeling the impact of reset depth on vacancy-induced filament perturbations in HfO2 RRAM. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013;34:614–616.
351.
NieJC, BadicaP, HiraiM, Electron-doped superconductivity induced by oxygen vacancies in as-grown Sr0.6Ca0.4CuO2−δ infinite-layer films. Supercond Sci Technol. 2002;16:L1.
352.
LiuG, ZhaoY, SunC, Synergistic effects of B/N doping on the visible-light photocatalytic activity of mesoporous TiO2. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:4516–4520.
ZhuJ, SunH, XuY, Preparation of PVDF/TiO2 nanofibers with enhanced piezoelectric properties for geophone applications. Smart Mater Struct. 2019;28:085006.
356.
LeeJ, KimJ, ChoiW.Tio2 photocatalysis for the redox conversion of aquatic pollutants, aquatic redox chemistry. ACS Symp Ser. 2011;1071(10):199–222.
357.
HendersonMA.Structural sensitivity in the dissociation of water on TiO2 single-crystal surfaces. Langmuir. 1996;12:5093–5098.
358.
HendersonMA.The interaction of water with solid surfaces: fundamental aspects revisited. Surf Sci Rep. 2002;46:1–308.
359.
LiuLM, CrawfordP, HuP.The interaction between adsorbed OH and O2 on TiO2 surfaces. Prog Surf Sci. 2009;84:155–176.
360.
BertelE, StockbauerR, MadeyE.Electron emission and ion desorption spectroscopy of clean and oxidized Ti (0001). Surf Sci. 1984;141:355–387.
361.
DieboldU, MadeyTE.Suppression of electron-induced positive ion emission by a molecular overlayer: ion-molecule charge exchange at a surface. Phys Rev Lett. 1994;72(7):1116–1119.
362.
OndaK, LiB, PetekH.Two-photon photoemission spectroscopy of TiO2 (110) surfaces modified by defects and O2 or H2O adsorbates. Phys Rev B. 2004;70:045415(11).
363.
PangCL, BikondoaO, HumphreyDS, Tailored TiO2
(110) surfaces and their reactivity. Nanotechnology. 2006;17:5397–5405.
364.
PanX, YangMQ, FuX, Defective TiO2 with oxygen vacancies: synthesis, properties and photocatalytic applications. Nanoscale. 2013;5:3601–3614.
365.
KimG, KimJ, KimS, Specific contact resistivity reduction through Ar plasma-treated TiO2−x interfacial layer to metal/Ge contact. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2014;35:1076–1078.
366.
SetvinM, SchmidM, DieboldU.Aggregation and electronically induced migration of oxygen vacancies in anatase. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter Mater Phys. 2015;91:195403.
367.
SainiCP, BarmanA, BanerjeeD, Impact of self-trapped excitons on blue photoluminescence in TiO2 nanorods on chemically etched Si pyramids. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121:11448–11454.
368.
BarmanA, SainiCP, SarkarPK, Nanoscale self-recovery of resistive switching in Ar+ irradiated TiO2−x films. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2017;50:475304.
369.
AbdullahS, SahdanM, NafarizalN, Influence of substrate annealing on inducing Ti3+ and oxygen vacancy in TiO2 thin films deposited via RF magnetron sputtering. Appl Surf Sci. 2018;462:575–582.
370.
NakamuraNN, KutsunaS, IharaT, Role of oxygen vacancy in the plasma-treated TiO2 photocatalyst with visible light activity for NO removal. J Mol Catal A: Chem. 2000;162:205–212.
371.
WuH, XuC, XuJ, Enhanced supercapacitance in anodic TiO2 nanotube films by hydrogen plasma treatment. Nanotechnology. 2013;24:455401.
372.
ParkSJ, LeeJP, JangJS, In situ control of oxygen vacancies in TiO2 by atomic layer deposition for resistive switching devices. Nanotechnology. 2013;24:295202.
373.
LuGQ, LinsebiglerAJr, YJ. Ti3+ defect sites on TiO2(110): production and chemical detection of active sites. J Phys Chem. 1994;98:11733–11738.
374.
ThompsonTL, DiwaldO, YatesJT.CO2 as a probe for monitoring the surface defects on TiO2 (110)-temperature-programmed desorption. J Phys Chem B. 2003;107:11700–11704.
375.
ShultzAN, JangW, HetheringtonWM, Comparative second harmonic generation and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of the UV creation and O2 healing of Ti3+ defects on (110) rutile TiO2 surfaces. Surf Sci. 1995;339:114–124.
376.
BergerT, SterrerM, DiwaldO, Light-induced charge separation in anatase TiO2 particles. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:6061–6068.
377.
PacchioniG.Oxygen vacancy: the invisible agent on oxide surfaces. Chem Phys Chem. 2003;4:1041–1047.
378.
DieboldU, LehmanJ, MahmoudT, Intrinsic defects on a TiO2(110) (1×1) surface and their reaction with oxygen: a scanning tunneling microscopy study. Surf Sci. 1998;411:137–153.
379.
FukuiK, OnishiH, IwasawaY.Imaging of individual formate ions adsorbed on TiO2(110) surface by non-contact atomic force microscopy. Chem Phys Lett. 1997;280:296–301.
380.
WendtS, SchaubR, MatthiesenJ, Oxygen vacancies on TiO2(110) and their interaction with H2O and O2: a combined high-resolution STM and DFT study. Surf Sci. 2005;598:226–245.
381.
WendtS, MatthiesenJ, SchaubR, Formation and splitting of paired hydroxyl groups on reduced TiO2(110). Phys Rev Lett. 2006;96:066107.
382.
BinnigG, QuateCF, ChG.Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett. 1986;56(9):930–934.
383.
LauritsenJV, FosterAS, OlesenGH, Chemical identification of point defects and adsorbates on a metal oxide surface by atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology. 2006;17:3436–3441.
384.
LauritsenJV, ReichlingM.Atomic resolution non-contact atomic force microscopy of clean metal oxide surfaces. J Phys: Condens Matter. 2010;22:263001.
385.
EnevoldsenGH, FosterAS, ChristensenMC, Noncontact atomic force microscopy studies of vacancies and hydroxyls of TiO2 (110): experiments and atomistic simulations. Phys Rev B. 2007;76:205415.
386.
BonnellDA.Scanning probe microscopy and spectroscopy: theory, techniques, and applications. New York: Wiley; 2000.
387.
BonnellDA, GarraJ.Scanning probe microscopy of oxide surfaces: atomic structure and properties. Rep Prog Phys. 2008;71:044501.
388.
BechsteinR, GonzálezC, SchütteJ, „All-inclusive” imaging of the rutile TiO2(110) surface using NC-AFM. Nanotechnology. 2009;20:505703.
389.
SetvinM, AschauerU, ScheiberP, Reaction of O2 with subsurface oxygen vacancies on TiO2 anatase (101). Science. 2013;341(6149):988–991.
390.
SetvinM, DanielB, AschauerU, Identification of adsorbed molecules via STM tip manipulation: CO, H2O, and O2 on TiO2 anatase (101). Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014;16:21524–21530.
391.
WiesendangerR.Scanning probe microscopy and spectroscopy: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
392.
NikiforovMP, BonnellDA.Science of microscopy. In: HawkesPW, SpenceJCH, editor. Springer handbook of microscopy. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 929–968.
393.
ChenJ.Scanning tunneling microscopy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.
394.
ZhongQ, VohsJM, BonnellDA.Effect of reduction on the topographic and electronic structure of TiO2 (110) surfaces. Surf Sci. 1992;274:35–43.
395.
GiessiblFJ.Atomic resolution of the silicon (111)-(7 × 7) surface by atomic force microscopy. Science. 1995;267:68–71.
396.
BriggsGAD, FisherAJ.STM experiment and atomistic modelling hand in hand: individual molecules on semiconductor surfaces. Surf Sci Reports. 1999;33:1–81.
397.
BikondoaO, PangCL, IthninR, Direct visualization of defect-mediated dissociation of water on TiO2 (110). Nat Mater. 2006;5:189–192.
398.
ZhaoY, WangZ, CuiXF, What are the adsorption sites for CO on the reduced TiO2 (110)-1×1 surface?J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:7958–7959. -Part II.
399.
MinatoT, SainooY, KimY, The electronic structure of oxygen atom vacancy and hydroxyl impurity defects on titanium dioxide (110) surface. J Chem Phys. 2009;130:124502.
400.
KrügerP, BourgeoisS, DomenichiniB, Defect states at the TiO2 (110) surface probed by resonant photoelectron diffraction. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;100:055501.
401.
BarteauMA.Organic reactions at well-defined oxide surfaces. Chem Rev. 1996;96:1413.
402.
SetvinM, FranchiniC, HaoX, Direct view at excess electrons in TiO2 rutile and anatase. Phys Rev Lett. 2014;113:086402.
403.
SetvinM.The surface science of TiO2: focus on anatase [Habilitation Thesis]. Vienna (Austria): TU Wien; 2017.
MiccioLA, SetvinM, MullerM, Interplay between steps and oxygen vacancies on curved TiO2 (110). Nanoletters. 2016;16:2017–2022.
408.
NamaiY, MatsuokaO.Chain structures of surface hydroxyl groups formed via line oxygen vacancies on TiO2(110) surfaces studied using noncontact atomic force microscopy. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:23948–23954.
409.
SuzukiS, YamaguchiY, OnishiH, STM visualization of site-specific adsorption of pyridine on TiO2 (110). Catal Letters. 1998;50:117–123.
410.
YoshidaK, KawaiT, NambaraT, Direct observation of oxygen atoms in rutile titanium dioxide by spherical aberration corrected high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Nanotechnology. 2006;17:3944.
HeY, DulubO, ChengH, Evidence for the predominance of subsurface defects on reduced anatase TiO2 (101). Phys Rev Lett. 2009;102:106105.
413.
ChengH, SelloniA.Energetics and diffusion of intrinsic surface and subsurface defects on anatase TiO2 (101). J Chem Phys. 2009;131:054703.
414.
ChengH, SelloniA.Surface and subsurface oxygen vacancies in anatase TiO2 and differences with rutile. Phys Rev B. 2009;79:092101.
415.
SelloniA, VittadiniA, GrätzelM.The adsorption of small molecules on the TiO2 anatase (101) surface by first-principles molecular dynamics. Surf Sci. 1998;402-404:219–222.
416.
HendersonMA.Evidence for bicarbonate formation on vacuum annealed TiO2 (110) resulting from a precursor-mediated interaction between CO2 and H2O. Surf Sci. 1998;400:203–219.
417.
ReticcioliM, SokolovicI, SchmidM, Interplay between adsorbates and polarons: CO on rutile TiO2 (110). Phys Rev Lett. 2019;122:016805.
418.
HardmanPJ, WincttPL.X-ray photoelectron diffraction and Auger electron diffraction from TiO2 (100). Phys Rev B. 1999;60:11700.
419.
BarteauMA.Site requirements of reactions on oxide surfaces. J Vac Sci Technol A. 1993;11:2162.
420.
VittadiniA, SelloniA, RotzingerFP, Structure and energetics of water adsorbed at TiO2 anatase (101) and (001) surfaces. Phys Rev Lett. 1998;81:2954–2957.
421.
BeltranA, SambranoJR, CalatayudM, Static simulation of bulk and selected surfaces of anatase TiO2. Surf Sci. 2001;490:116–124.
422.
GongXQ, SelloniA.Reactivity of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles: the role of the minority (001) surface. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:19560–19562.
423.
GongXQ, SelloniA, VittadiniA.Density functional theory study of formic acid adsorption on anatase TiO2 (001): geometries, energetics, and effects of coverage, hydration, and reconstruction. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:2804–2811.
424.
VittadiniA, CasarinM, SelloniA.Chemistry of and on TiO2-anatase surfaces by DFT calculations: a partial review. Theor Chem Acc. 2007;117:663–671.
425.
YangHG, SunCH, QiaoSZ, Anatase TiO2 single crystals with a large percentage of reactive facets. Nature. 2008;453:638–641.
426.
YangHG, LiuG, QiaoSZ, Solvothermal synthesis and photoreactivity of anatase TiO2 nanosheets with dominant {001} facets. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:4078–4083.
427.
EtgarL, ZhangW, GabrielS, High efficiency quantum dot heterojunction solar cell using anatase (001) TiO2 nanosheets. Adv Mater. 2012;24:2202–2206.
428.
JiaL, ShuDJ, WangM.Tuning the area percentage of reactive surface of TiO2 by strain engineering. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;109:156104.
429.
IchimuraAS, MackBM, UsmaniSM, Direct synthesis of anatase films with ∼ 100% (001) facets and [001] preferred orientation. Chem Mater. 2012;24:2324–2329.
430.
OhsawaT, LyubinetskyIV, HendersonMA, Hole-mediated photodecomposition of trimethyl acetate on a TiO2 (001) anatase epitaxial thin film surface. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:20050–20056.
431.
PanJ, LiuG, LuGM, On the true photoreactivity order of {001}, {010}, and {101} facets of anatase TiO2 crystals. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:2133–2137.
432.
TachikawaT, YamashitaS, MajimaT.Evidence for crystal-face-dependent TiO2 photocatalysis from single-molecule imaging and kinetic analysis. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:7197–7204.
433.
LiuG.Titanium dioxide crystals with tailored facets. Chem Rev. 2014;114:9559–9612.
434.
LiSC, DieboldU.Reactivity of TiO2 rutile and anatase surfaces toward nitroaromatics. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:64–66.
435.
LiSC, LosovyjY, DieboldU.Adsorption-site-dependent electronic structure of catechol on the anatase TiO2(101) surface. Langmuir. 2011;27:8600–8604.
436.
GrinterDC, NicotraM, ThorntonG.Acetic acid adsorption on anatase TiO2 (101). J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:11643–11651.
437.
ShiY, SunH, NguyenMC, Structures of defects on anatase TiO2 (001) surfaces. Nanoscale. 2017;9:11553.
438.
WangY, SunH, TanS, Role of point defects on the reactivity of reconstructed anatase titanium dioxide (001) surface. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2214.
439.
XiaYB, ZhuK, KasparTC, Atomic structure of the anatase TiO2 (001) surface. J Phys Chem Lett. 2013;4:2958–2963.
440.
EinsteinA.Über die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt [About a heuristic point of view concerning the generation and transformation of light]. Ann. Physik. 1905;17(1):132–148.
441.
ZangwillA.Physics at surfaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
442.
WoodruffDP, DelcharTA.Modern techniques of surface science. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
443.
ThompsonTLJr, YJ. Surface science studies of the photoactivation of TiO2-new photochemical processes. Chem Rev. 2006;106:4428–4453.
444.
ValentinCD, PacchioniG, SelloniA.Electronic structure of defect states in hydroxylated and reduced rutile TiO2 (110) surfaces. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;97:166803.
445.
Ganduglia-PirovanoMV, HofmannA, SauerJ.Oxygen vacancies in transition metal and rare earth oxides: current state of understanding and remaining challenges. Surf Sci Rep. 2007;62:219–270.
446.
GöpelW, RockerG.Localized and delocalized charge transfer during adsorption on semiconductors: experiments and cluster calculations on the prototype surface ZnO (10-10). J Vacuum Sci Technol. 1982;21(2):389.
447.
HendersonMA, EplingWS, PedenCHF, Insights into photoexcited electron scavenging processes on TiO2 obtained from studies of the reaction of O2 with OH groups adsorbed at electronic defects on TiO2 (110). J Phys Chem B. 2003;107:534–545.
448.
RatnerBD, PorterSC.Surfaces in biology and biomaterials; description and characterization. In: BrashJLW, editor. Interfacial phenomena and bioproducts. New York: Marc Dekker; 1996. p. 57–83.
449.
McIntyreNS.Quantitative surface analysis of materials. Philadelphia (US): ASTM 643; 1977.
450.
AndradeJD.X–ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). In: AndradeJD, editor. Surface and interfacial aspects of biomedical polymers. New York: Plenum Press; 1985. p. 105–195.
451.
FeldmanLC, MayerJW.Fundamentals of surface and thin film analysis. Saint Louis, Missouri (US): Elsevier Science &Technology Books; 1986.
452.
JenkinJG, LeckeyRCG, LiesegangJ.The development of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: 1900–1960. J Electron Spectrosc Rel Phenom. 1977;12(1):1–35.
453.
JenkinJG, RileyJD, LiesegangJ, The development of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (1900–1960): a postscript. J Electron Spectrosc Rel Phenom. 1978;14(6):477–485.
CarlsonTA.Photoelectron and Auger spectroscopy. New York: Plenum Press; 1975.
456.
WattsJF.An introduction to surface analysis by electron spectroscopy. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1990.
457.
SmithGC.Quantative surface analysis for materials science. London (UK): The Institute of Materials; 1991.
458.
BilmesSA, MandelbaumP, AlvarezandF, Surface and electronic structure of titanium dioxide photocatalysts. J Phys Chem B. 2000;104(42):9851–9858.
459.
ZhaoZ, LiZ, ZouZ.Surface properties and electronic structure of low-index stoichiometric anatase TiO2 surfaces. J Phys: Condens Matter. 2010;22:175008.
460.
PerronH, VandenborreJ, DomainC, Combined investigation of water sorption on TiO2 rutile (110) single crystal face: XPS vs. periodic DFT. Surf Sci. 2007;601(2):518–527.
461.
ZhaoH, PanF, LiY.A review on the effects of TiO2 surface point defects on CO2 photoreduction with H2O. J. Materiomics. 2017;3:17–32.
462.
HüfnerS.Photoelectron spectroscopy, principles and applications. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1995.
463.
BarrTL.Modern ESCA. The principles and practice of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Boca Raton, Florida (FL): CRC Press; 1993.
BriggsD, GrantJT.Surface analysis by Auger and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Chichester (UK): IM Publication; 2003.
466.
TurnerNH.X-ray photoelectron and Auger electron spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2000;35(3):203–254.
467.
HüfnerS, SchmidtS, ReinertF.Photoelectron spectroscopy - an overview. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2005;547:8–23.
468.
CardonaM, LeyL.Photoemission in solids I, topics in applied physics. Vol. 26. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 1978.
469.
OswaldS.X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy in analysis of surfaces. Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2013.
470.
ReinertF, HüfnerS.Photoemission spectroscopy—from early days to recent applications. New J. Phys. 2005;7:97.
471.
ZhangZ, YatesJT.JrBand bending in semiconductors: chemical and physical consequences at surfaces and interfaces. Chem Rev. 2012;112:5520–5551.
472.
DieboldU, MadeyTE.Tio2 by XPS. Surf Sci Spectra. 1998;4:227.
473.
MayerJT, DieboldU, MadeyTE, Titanium and reduced titania overlayers on titanium dioxide (110). J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom. 1995;73(1):1–11.
474.
BennettRA, McCavishND.Non-stoichiometric oxide surfaces and ultra-thin films: characterization of TiO2. Top Catal. 2005;36(1-4):11–19.
475.
RigaJ, Tenret-NoëlC, PireauxJJ, Electronic structure of rutile oxides TiO2, RuO2 and IrO2 studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Phys Scr1977;16:351–354.
476.
MunnixS, SchmeitsM.Electronic structure of ideal TiO2(110), TiO2(001), and TiO2(100) surfaces. Phys Rev B. 1984;30:2202.
477.
YinW-J, WenB, ZhouC, Excess electrons in reduced rutile and anatase TiO2. Surf Sci Rep. 2018;73(2):58–82.
478.
JusticiaI, OrdejónP, CantoG, Designed self-doped titanium oxide thin films for efficient visible-light photocatalysis. Adv Mater. 2002;14:1399–1402.
479.
KrügerP, JupilleJ, BourgeoisS, Intrinsic nature of the excess electron distribution at the TiO2 (110) surface. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;108:126803–4.
480.
MitsuharaK, OkumuraH, VisikovskiyA, The source of the Ti 3d defect state in the band gap of rutile titania (110) surfaces. J Chem Phys. 2012;136:124707.
481.
YangS, HalliburtonLE, ManivannanA, Photoinduced electron paramagnetic resonance study of electron traps in TiO2 crystals: oxygen vacancies and Ti3+ ions. Appl Phys Lett. 2009;94:162114.
482.
YangS, BrantAT, GilesNC, Intrinsic small polarons in rutile TiO2. Phys Rev B. 2013;87:125201.
483.
SantomauroFG, LübckeA, RittmannJ, Femtosecond X-ray absorption study of electron localization in photoexcited anatase TiO2. Sci Reports. 2015;5:14834.
484.
LivraghiS, RolandoM, MaurelliS, Nature of reduced states in titanium dioxide as monitored by electron paramagnetic resonance. II: Rutile and brookite cases. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118:22141.
485.
ThevuthasanS, ShutthanandanV, HendersonMA, Valence band photoemission from pure and Sr diffused single crystal anatase TiO2 (001) surfaces. Surf Sci. 1998;401:261–268.
486.
WalleLE, BorgA, UvdalP, Probing the influence from residual Ti interstitials on water adsorption on TiO2 (110). Phys Rev B. 2012;86:205415.
487.
AttwoodAL, MurphyDM, EdwardsJL, An EPR study of thermally and photochemically generated oxygen radicals on hydrated and dehydrated titania surfaces. Res Chem Intermed. 2003;29(5):449–465.
488.
YagiE, HasigutiRR, AonoM.Electronic conduction above 4 K of slightly reduced oxygen-deficient rutile TiO2-x
. Phys Rev B. 1996;54:7945–4956.
RödelTC, FortunaF, BertranF, Engineering two-dimensional electron gases at the (001) and (101) surfaces of TiO2 anatase using light. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92:041106(R).
491.
PetrikNG, KimmelGA.Reaction kinetics of water molecules with oxygen vacancies on rutile TiO2 (110). J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:23059.
492.
ChenX, LiuL, YuPY, Increasing solar absorption for photocatalysis with black hydrogenated titanium dioxide nanocrystals. Science. 2011;331:746.
493.
FukadaK, MatsumotoM, TakeyasuK, Effects of hydrogen on the electronic state and electric conductivity of the rutile TiO2 (110) surface. J Phys Soc Japan. 2015;84:064716.
494.
EnevoldsenGH, PintoHP, FosterAS, Imaging of the hydrogen subsurface site in rutile TiO2. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;102:136103.
495.
YinXL, CalatayudM, QiuH, Diffusion versus desorption: complex behavior of H atoms on an oxide surface. Chem Phys Chem. 2008;9:253.
496.
MaoX, LangX, WangZ, Band-gap states of TiO2 (110): major contribution from surface defects. J Phys Chem Lett. 2013;4:3839.
497.
WangZ-T, GarciaJC, DeskinsNA, Ability of surface to be fully hydroxylated and fully reduced. Phys Rev B. 2015;92:081402(R).
498.
ZhangD, YangM, DongS.Hydroxylation of the rutile TiO2 (110) surface enhancing its reducing power for photocatalysis. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:1451.
499.
SezenH, BuchholzM, NefedovA, Probing electrons in TiO2 polaronic trap states by IR-absorption: evidence for the existence of hydrogenic states. Sci Reports. 2014;4:3808.
500.
HornK.Semiconductor interface studies using core and valence level photoemission. Appl Phys A: Mater Sci Process. 1990;51:289.
501.
HanssonGV, UhrbergRIG.Photoelectron spectroscopy of surface states on semiconductor surfaces. Surf Sci Rep. 1988;9:197–292.
502.
GaoYL.Surface analytical studies of interfaces in organic semiconductor devices. Mater Sci Eng R. 2010;68:39–87.
503.
TisdaleWA, MuntwilerM, NorrisDJ, Electron dynamics at the ZnO (1010) surface. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:14682.
504.
WeineltM, KutscheraM, SchmidtR, Electronic structure and electron dynamics at Si (100). Appl Phys A: Mater Sci Process. 2005;80:995–1003.
505.
GaoYL, DingHJ, WangHB, Electronic structure of interfaces between copper-hexadecafluoro-phthalocyanine and 2,5-bis (4-biphenylyl) bithiophene. Appl Phys Lett. 2007;91:142112.
506.
HuYJ, WagenerTJ, JostMB, Electrovoltaic effects and symmetric band bending: inverse photoemission of epitaxial Bi/GaAs (110) between 60 and 300 K. J Vac Sci Technol B. 1990;8:1001.
507.
RadeckaM, Trenczek-ZajacA, ZakrzewskaK, Effect of oxygen nonstoichiometry on photo-electrochemical properties of TiO2−x. J Power Sources. 2007;173:816–821.
508.
NakamuraI, SugiharaS, TakeuchiK.Mechanism for NO photooxidation over the oxygen-deficient TiO2 powder under visible light irradiation. Chem Lett. 2000;29:1276–1277.
509.
HossainFM, MurchGE, SheppardL, Ab initio electronic structure calculation of oxygen vacancies in rutile titanium dioxide. Solid State Ion. 2007;178:319–325.
510.
IharaT, MiyoshiM, AndoM, Preparation of a visible-light-active TiO2 photocatalyst by RF plasma treatment. J Mater Sci. 2001;36:4201–4207.
511.
KikuchiH, KitanoM, TakeuchiM, Extending the photoresponse of TiO2 to the visible light region: photoelectrochemical behavior of TiO2 thin films prepared by the radio frequency magnetron sputtering deposition method. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:5537–5541.
ZhaoJ, LiY, ZhuY, Enhanced CO2 photoreduction activity of black TiO2 - coated Cu nanoparticles under visible light irradiation: role of metallic Cu. Appl Catal A. 2016;510:34–41.
514.
FischerD.Influence of substrate temperature and silver-doping on the structural and optical properties of TiO2 films. TSF. 2016;598:204–213.
515.
SailorMJ, LeeEJ.Surface chemistry of luminescent silicon nanocrystallites. Adv Mater. 1997;9:783.
516.
NirmalM, BrusL.Luminescence photophysics in semiconductor nanocrystals. Acc Chem Res. 1999;32:407–411.
517.
AnpoM, CheM.Applications of photoluminescence techniques to the characterization of solid surfaces in relation to adsorption, catalysis, and photocatalysis. Adv Catal. 1999;44:119.
518.
GfroererTH.Photoluminescence in analysis of surfaces and interfacse. In: MeyersRA, editor. Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2000 p. 37–92.
519.
FernándezI, CremadesA, PiquerasJ.Cathodoluminescence study of defects in deformed (110) and (100) surfaces of TiO2 single crystals. Semicond Sci Technol. 2005;20:239.
520.
ShiJY, ChenJ, FengZC, Photoluminescence characteristics of TiO2 and their relationship to the photoassisted reaction of water/methanol mixture. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:693.
521.
YamadaY, KanemitsuY.Determination of electron and hole lifetimes of rutile and anatase TiO2 single crystals. Appl Phys Lett. 2012;101:133907.
522.
ChangYM, MishraDK, TingJM.Electronic and luminescence properties of sputter-deposited TiO2 nanostructures. Acta Mater. 2013;61:7511–7519.
523.
SarkarA, SinghAK, KhanGG, TiO2/ZnO core/shell nano-heterostructure arrays as photo-electrodes with enhanced visible light photoelectrochemical performance. RSC Adv. 2014;4:55629–55634.
524.
SarkarA, KhanGG, ChaudhuriA, Multifunctional BiFeO3/TiO2 nano-heterostructure: photo-ferroelectricity, rectifying transport, and nonvolatile resistive switching property. Appl Phys Lett. 2016;108:033112.
525.
SarkarA, KarmakaK, KhanGG.Designing Co-Pi modified one-dimensional n–p TiO2/ZnCo2O4 nanoheterostructure photoanode with reduced electron–hole pair recombination and excellent photoconversion efficiency (>3%). J Phys Chem C. 2017;121:25705–25717.
526.
MettlerK.Photoluminescence as a tool for the study of the electronic surface properties of gallium arsenide. Appl Phys. 1977;12:75.
527.
AnpoM, TomonariM, FoxMA.In situ photoluminescence of titania as a probe of photocatalytic reactions. J Phys Chem. 1989;93:7300.
528.
AnpoM, ChibaK, TomonariM, Photocatalysis on native and platinum-loaded TiO2 and ZnO catalysts-origin of different reactivities on wet and dry metal oxides. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1991;64:543.
529.
HollingsworthRE, SitesJR.Photoluminescence dead layer in p-type InP. J Appl Phys. 1982;53:5357.
530.
MeyerGJ, LisenskyGC, EllisAB.Evidence for adduct formation at the semiconductor-gas interface. Photoluminescent properties of cadmium selenide in the presence of amines. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:4914.
531.
StevanovicA, BüttnerM, ZhangZ, Photoluminescence of TiO2: effect of UV light and adsorbed molecules on surface band structure. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:324.
532.
GeurtsJ.Analysis of band bending at III–V semiconductor interfaces by Raman spectroscopy. Surf Sci Rep. 1993;18:1.
533.
ZhangWF, HeYL, ZhangMS, Raman scattering study on anatase TiO2 nanocrystals. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2000;33:912.
534.
ParkerJC, SiegelRW.Calibration of the Raman spectrum to the oxygen stoichiometry of nanaphase TiO2. Appl Phys Lett. 1990;57:943–945.
535.
TianF, ZhangY, ZhangJ, Raman spectroscopy: a new approach to measure the percentage of anatase TiO2 exposed (001) facets. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:7515–7519.
536.
ChoudhuryB, ChoudhuryA.Defect generation, d-d transition, and band gap reduction in Cu-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Int Nano Lett. 2013;3:25.
537.
ZhangXQ, ChenJB, WangCW, Low-temperature liquid phase reduced TiO2 nanotube arrays: synergy of morphology manipulation and oxygen vacancy doping for enhancement of field emission. Nanotechnology. 2015;26:175705.
538.
ArensM, KinskyJ, RichterW, HREELS analysis of band bending on sulfur-covered GaAs (100) surfaces. Surf Sci. 1996;352-354:740–744.
539.
LorenzP, HaenselT, GuttR, Analysis of polar GaN surfaces with photoelectron and high resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy. Phys Status Solidi B. 2010;247:1658.
540.
NoguchiM, HirakawaK, IkomaT.In situ determination of electronic properties of clean GaAs (100) surfaces by high-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy. Surf Sci. 1992;271:260.
541.
SzeSM, NgKK.Physics of semiconductor devices. 3rd ed.Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
542.
CrowellCR, SzeSM.Current transport in metal-semiconductor barriers. Solid-State Electron. 1966;9:1035.
543.
von WencksternH, KaidashevEM, LorenzM, Lateral homogeneity of Schottky contacts on n-type ZnO. Appl Phys Lett. 2004;84:79.
544.
LeamyHJ.Charge collection scanning electron microscopy. J Appl Phys. 1982;53:R51.
545.
HuangHCW, AliottaCF, HoPS.Schottky barrier height measurement by electron-beam induced voltage. Appl Phys Lett. 1982;41:54.
546.
ZhuSQ, RauEI, YangFH, A novel contactless method for characterization of semiconductors: surface electron beam induced voltage in scanning electron microscopy. Chin Phys Lett. 2002;19:1329.
547.
GustafssonA, BjörkMT, SamuelsonL.Locating nanowire heterostructures by electron beam induced current. Nanotechnology. 2007;18:205306.
548.
AhnY, DunningJ, ParkJ.Scanning photocurrent imaging and electronic band studies in silicon nanowire field effect transistors. Nano Lett. 2005;5:1367.
549.
HiesgenR, MeissnerDJ.Nanoscale photocurrent variations at metal-modified semiconductor surfaces. Phys Chem B. 1998;102:6549.
550.
KukY, BeckerS, SilvermanPJ, Optical interactions in the junction of a scanning tunneling microscope. Phys Rev Lett. 1990;65:456.
551.
LiJ, ZhangM, GuanZ, Synergistic effect of surface and bulk single-electron-trapped oxygen vacancy of TiO2 in the photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Appl Catal B. 2017;206:300–307.
552.
SunY, EgawaT, ShaoC, Quantitative study of F center in high-surface-area anatase titania nanoparticles prepared by MOCVD. J Phys Chem Solids. 2004;65:1793–1797.
553.
ValentinCD, PacchioniG, SelloniA, Characterization of paramagnetic species in N-doped TiO2 powders by EPR spectroscopy and DFT calculations. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:11414–11419.
554.
MehtaM, KodanN, KumarS, Hydrogen treated anatase TiO2: a new experimental approach and further insights from theory. J Mater Chem A. 2016;4:2670–2681.
555.
MisraS, AndronenkoS, TipikinD, Study of paramagnetic defect centers in as-grown and annealed TiO2 anatase and rutile nanoparticles by a variable-temperature X-band and high-frequency (236 GHz) EPR. J Magn Magn Mater. 2016;401:495–505.
556.
SuT, YangY, NaY, An insight into the role of oxygen vacancy in hydrogenated TiO2 nanocrystals in the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:3754–3763.
557.
LiuN, SchneiderC, FreitagD, Black TiO2 nanotubes: cocatalyst-free open-circuit hydrogen generation. Nano Lett. 2014;14:3309–3313.
558.
FinazziCD, PacchioniG.Nature of Ti interstitials in reduced bulk anatase and rutile TiO2. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:3382.
559.
ZuoLW, WuT, ZhangZ, Self-doped Ti3+ enhanced photocatalyst for hydrogen production under visible light. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:11856.
560.
MacdonaldIR, HoweRF, ZhangX, In situ EPR studies of electron trapping in a nanocrystalline rutile. J Photochem Photobiol A Chemistry. 2010;216:238–243.
561.
WangP, QiC, WenP, Synthesis of Si, n co-doped nano-sized TiO2 with high thermal stability and photocatalytic activity by mechanochemical method. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:294.
562.
WenY, DingH, ShanY.Preparation and visible light photocatalytic activity of Ag/TiO2/graphene nanocomposite. Nanoscale. 2011;3:4411–4441.
DasK, SharmaSN, KumarM, Morphology dependent luminescence properties of Co doped TiO2 nanostructures. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:14783–14792.
565.
BenjwalP, KarKK.Removal of methylene blue from wastewater under a low power irradiation source by Zn, Mn co-doped TiO2 photocatalysts. RSC Adv. 2015;5:98166–98176.
566.
JoWK, KimJT.Application of visible-light photocatalysis with nitrogen-doped or unmodified titanium dioxide for control of indoor-level volatile organic compounds. J Hazard Mater. 2009;164:360–366.
567.
EtacheriV, SeeryMK, HinderSJ, Highly visible light active TiO2−x
N
x
heterojunction photocatalysts. Chem Mater. 2010;22:3843–3853.
JiangX, ZhangY, JiangJ, Characterization of oxygen vacancy associates within hydrogenated TiO2: a positron annihilation study. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:22619–22624.
570.
GhoshS, KhanGG, MandalK, Evolution of vacancy-type defects, phase transition, and intrinsic ferromagnetism during annealing of nanocrystalline TiO2 studied by positron annihilation spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:8458–8467.
571.
LuitelH, SarkarA, ChakrabartiM, Positron annihilation lifetime characterization of oxygen ion irradiated rutile TiO2. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2016;379:215–218.
572.
Asoka-KumarP, AlataloM, GhoshVJ, Increased elemental specificity of positron annihilation spectra. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;77:2097–2100.
573.
YamashitaH, IchihashiY, AnpoM, Photocatalytic decomposition of NO at 275 K on titanium oxides included within Y-zeolite cavities: The structure and role of the active sites. J Phys Chem. 1996;100:16041–16044.
574.
YangM, WangJ, WuH, Noble metal-free nanocatalysts with vacancies for electrochemical water splitting. Small. 2018;14:1703323.
575.
YunHJ, LeeDM, YuS, Effect of valence band energy on the photocatalytic performance of N-doped TiO2 for the production of O2 via the oxidation of water by visible light. J Mol Catal A: Chem. 2013;378:221–226.
576.
AustinIG, MottNF.Polarons in crystalline and non-crystalline materials. Adv Phys. 2001;50(7):757–812.
577.
JanottiA, FranchiniC, VarleyJB, Dual behavior of excess electrons in rutile TiO2. Phys Status Solidi. 2013;7:199–203.
578.
FröhlichH.Electrons in lattice fields. Adv Phys. 1954;3:325–361.
579.
DaudeN, GoutC, JouaninC.Electronic band structure of titanium dioxide. Phys Rev B. 1977;15:3229.
580.
VosK, KrusemeyerHJ.Reflectance and electroreflectance of TiO2 single crystals. I. Optical Spectra. J Phys Chem Solids. 1977;10:3893.
581.
VosK.Reflectance and electroreflectance of TiO2 single crystals. II. Assignment to electronic energy levels. J Phys Chem Solids. 1977;10:3917.
582.
HalleyJW, MichalewiczMT, TitN.Electronic structure of multiple vacancies in rutile TiO2 by the equation-of-motion method. Phys Rev B. 1990;41:10165.
583.
HagfeldtA, SiegbahnH, LindquistS, Semiempirical calculations of TiO2 (rutile) clusters. Int J Quant Chem. 1992;44:477.
584.
SorantinPI, SchwarzK.Chemical bonding in rutile-type compounds. Inorg Chem. 1992;31:567.
TitN.Electronic-structure of a single oxygen vacancy in rutile TiO2. Nuov Cim D. 1993;15:1405–1414.
587.
BredowT, JugK.Cluster simulation of bulk properties for stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric rutile. Chem Phys Lett. 1994;223:89.
588.
PurtonJ, BullettDW, OliverPM, electronic-structure and atomistic simulations of the ideal and defective surfaces of rutile. Surf Sci. 1995;336:166.
589.
SchierbaumKD, XuWX.The electronic structure of intrinsic defects at TiO2 (110) surfaces: an ab initio molecular orbital study. Int J Quantum Chem. 1996;57:1121.
590.
EvarestovRA, LekoAV, VeryazovVA.Local characteristics of crystal electronic structure in the Hartree-Fock method. Phys Stat Sol B. 1997;203:R3.
591.
LindanPJD, MuscatJ, BatesS, Ab initio simulation of molecular processes on oxide surfaces. Faraday Discuss. 1997;106:135.
592.
BredowT, PacchioniG.Electronic structure of an isolated oxygen vacancy at the TiO2 (110) surface. Chem Phys Lett. 2002;355:417.
593.
MenetreyM, MarkovitsA, MinotC.Reactivity of a reduced metal oxide surface: hydrogen, water and carbon monoxide adsorption on oxygen defective rutile TiO2 (110). Surf Sci. 2003;524:49.
594.
VijayA, MillsG, MetiuH.Adsorption of gold on stochiometric and reduced rutile TiO2 (110) surfaces. J Chem Phys. 2003;118:6536.
595.
VittadiniA, SelloniA.Small gold clusters on stochiometric and defected TiO2 anatase (101) and their interaction with CO: a density functional study. J Chem Phys. 2002;117:353.
596.
WuX, SelloniA, LazzeriM, Oxygen vacancy mediated adsorption and reactions of molecular oxygen on the TiO2 (110) surface. Phys Rev B. 2003;68:241402(R).
597.
WuXY, SelloniA, NayakSK.First principles study of CO oxidation on TiO2 (110): the role of surface oxygen vacancies. J Chem Phys. 2004;120:4512.
598.
OviedoJ, San MiguelMA, SanzJF.Oxygen vacancies on TiO2 (110) from first-principles calculations. J Chem Phys. 2004;121:7427.
599.
CapronN, BoureauG.Density functional theory study of point defects in the Si–SiO2 system and in substoichiometric titanium dioxide TiO2−x. Int J Quantum Chem. 2004;99:677.
600.
RasmussenMD, MolinaLM, HammerB.Adsorption, diffusion and dissociation of molecular oxygen at defected TiO2 (110). A density functional study. J Chem Phys. 2004;120:988.
601.
WangSG, WenXD, CaoDB, Formation of oxygen vacancies on the TiO2 (110) surfaces. Surf Sci. 2005;577:69.
602.
WangY, DorenDJ.First-principles calculations on TiO2 doped by N, Nd, and vacancy. Solid State Commun. 2005;136:186.
603.
HameeowK, CanteleG, NinnoD, Influence of surface and subsurface defects on the behavior of the rutile TiO2 (110) surface. Phys Status Solidi A. 2006;203:2219.
604.
von OertzenGU, GersonAR.The effects of O deficiency on the electronic structure of rutile TiO2. J Phys Chem Solids. 2007;68:324–330.
605.
De AngelisF, Di ValentinC, FantacciS, Theoretical studies on anatase and less common TiO2 phases: bulk, surfaces, and nanomaterials. Chem Rev. 2014;114:9708–9753.
606.
FinazziE, ValentinCD, PacchioniG, Excess electron states in reduced bulk anatase TiO2: comparison of standard GGA, GGA + U, and hybrid DFT calculations. J Chem Phys. 2008;129:154113(9).
607.
CalzadoCJ, HernandezNC, SanzJF.Effect of on-site Coulomb repulsion term U on the band-gap states of the reduced rutile (110) TiO2 surface. Phys Rev B. 2008;77:045118(10).
608.
StonehamA, GavartinJ, ShlugerA, Trapping, self-trapping and the polaron family. J Phys: Cond Matter. 2007;19:255208.
609.
SpreaficoC, VondeleJV.The nature of excess electrons in anatase and rutile from hybrid DFT and RPA. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014;16:26144.
610.
SetvinM, HaoH, DanielB, Charge trapping at step edges of TiO2 anatase (101). Angew Chem Intl Ed. 2014;53:4714–4716.
611.
DeákP, AradiB, FrauenheimT.Quantitative theory of the oxygen vacancy and carrier self-trapping in bulk TiO2. Phys. Rev. B. 2012;86:195206.
612.
Di ValentinC, SelloniA.Bulk and surface polarons in photoexcited anatase TiO2. J Phys Chem Lett. 2011;2:2223–2228.
613.
MaX, DaiY, GuoM, Relative photooxidation and photoreduction activities of the {100}, {101}, and {001} surfaces of anatase TiO2. Langmuir. 2013;29:13647.
614.
SelcukS, SelloniA.Facet-dependent trapping and dynamics of excess electrons at anatase TiO2 surfaces and aqueous interfaces. Nat Mater. 2016;15:1107.
615.
MoserS, MoreschiniL, JaćimovićJ, Tunable polaronic conduction in anatase TiO2. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;110:196403.
616.
MoserS, FataleS, KrügerP, Electron-phonon coupling in the bulk of anatase TiO2 measured by resonant inelastic X-Ray spectroscopy. Phys Rev Lett. 2015;115:096404.
617.
JaćimovićJ, VajuC, MagrezA, Pressure dependence of the large-polaron transport in anatase TiO2 single crystals. EPL. 2012;99:57005.
618.
LivraghiS, ChiesaM, PaganiniMC, On the nature of reduced states in titanium dioxide as monitored by electron paramagnetic resonance. I: the anatase case. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:25413–25421.
PanayotovDA, BurrowsSP, MorrisJR.Infrared spectroscopic studies of conduction band and trapped electrons in UV-photoexcited, H-atom n-doped, and thermally reduced TiO2. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:4535.
621.
DeskinsNA, DupuisM.Electron transport via polaron hopping in bulk TiO2: a density functional theory characterization. Phys Rev B. 2007;75: 195212 (10).
622.
DeskinsNA, RousseauR, DupuisM.Localized electronic states from surface hydroxyls and polarons in TiO2 (110). J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:14583–14586.
623.
YanL, ElenewskiJE, JiangW, Computational modeling of self-trapped electrons in rutile TiO2. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:29949–29957.
624.
MorganBJ, WatsonGW.Polaronic trapping of electrons and holes by native defects in anatase TiO2. Phys Rev B. 2009;80:233102.
625.
LiH, GuoY, RobertsonJ.Calculation of TiO2 surface and subsurface oxygen vacancy by the screened exchange functional. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119(32):18160.
626.
DeskinsNA, RousseauR, DupuisM.Defining the role of excess electrons in the surface chemistry of TiO2. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114:5891–5897.
627.
PacchioniaG.Modeling doped and defective oxides in catalysis with density functional theory methods: room for improvements. J Chem Phys. 2008;128:182505(10).
628.
Di ValentinC, PacchioniG, SelloniA.Reduced and n-type doped TiO2: nature of Ti3+species. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:20543.
629.
KowalskiPM, CamelloneMF, NairNN, Charge localization dynamics induced by oxygen vacancies on the TiO2 (110) surface. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;105:146405.
630.
Stausholm-MollerJ, KristoffersenHH, HinnemannB, DFT + U study of defects in bulk rutile TiO2. J. Chem. Phys. 2010;133:144708.
631.
MattioliG, FilipponeF, AlippiP, Ab initio study of the electronic states induced by oxygen vacancies in rutile and anatase TiO2. Phys. Rev. B. 2008;78:241201(R).
632.
KerisitS, DeskinsNA, RossoKM, A shell model for atomistic simulation of charge transfer in titania. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:7678–7688.
633.
ShibuyaT, YasuokaK, MirbtS, Bipolaron formation induced by oxygen vacancy at rutile TiO2 (110) surfaces. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118:9429.
634.
SpintronicsSS.A new class of device based on the quantum of electron spin, rather than on charge, may yield the next generation of microelectronics. Am Sci. 2001;89:516–523.
635.
TianYF, HuSJ, YanSS, Oxide magnetic semiconductors: materials, properties, and devices. Chin Phys B. 2013;22(8):088505.
636.
Žutić I, Fabian J, Sarma DS. Spintronics: Fundamentals and applications. Rev Modern Phys. 2004;76:323–409.
637.
MaugerA, GodartC.The magnetic, optical, and transport properties of representatives of a class of magnetic semiconductors: the europium chalcogenides. Phys. Rep. 1986;141(2-3):51–176.
638.
TreitingerL, GöbelH, PinkH.Magnetic semiconducting spinels in the mixed system Co1−x FexCr2S4. Mater Res Bull. 1976;11(11):1375–1379.
639.
StoryT, Gała̧zkaRR, FrankelRB, Carrier-concentration–induced ferromagnetism in PbSnMnTe. Phys Rev Lett. 1986;56:777.
640.
DietlT, OhnoH, MatsukuraF, Zener model description of ferromagnetism in zinc-blende magnetic semiconductors. Science. 2000;287:1019–1022.
641.
UedaK, TabataH, KawaiT.Magnetic and electric properties of transition-metal-doped ZnO films. Appl Phys Lett. 2001;79:988.
642.
SundaresanA.Ferromagnetism as a universal feature of nanoparticles of the otherwise nonmagnetic oxides. Phys Rev B. 2006;74:161306(R).
643.
CoeyJMD, StamenovP, GunningRD, Ferromagnetism in defect-ridden oxides and related materials. New J. Phys. 2010;12:053025–053039.
644.
HongNH, SakaiJ, HuongNT, Role of defects in tuning ferromagnetism in diluted magnetic oxide thin films. Phys Rew B. 2005;72:045336.
645.
PanF, SongC, LiuXJ, Ferromagnetism and possible application in spintronics of transition-metal-doped ZnO films. Mater Sci Eng R. 2008;62:1–35.
646.
TianYF, HuSJ, YanSS, Oxide magnetic semiconductors: materials, properties, and devices. Chin Phys B. 2013;22(8):088505.
647.
FurdynaJK.Diluted magnetic semiconductors. J Appl Phys. 1988;64:R29.
648.
CoeyJMD.High-temperature ferromagnetism in dilute magnetic oxides. J Appl Phys. 2005;97:10D313.
CoeyJMD, VenkatesanM, StamenovP, Magnetism in hafnium dioxide. Phys Rev B. 2005;72:024450.
651.
CoeyJMD, ChambersSA.Oxide dilute magnetic semiconductors—fact or fiction?MRS Bull. 2008;33:1053–1058.
652.
HongNH, PoirotN, SakaiJ.Evidence for magnetism due to oxygen vacancies in Fe-doped thin films. Appl Phys Lett. 2006;89:042503.
653.
XuQ, SchmidtH, ZhouS, Room temperature ferromagnetism in ZnO films due to defects. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;92:082508.
654.
XuQ, SchmidtH, HartmannL.Room temperature ferromagnetism in Mn-doped ZnO films mediated by acceptor defects. Appl Phys Lett. 2007;91:092503.
655.
EsquinaziPD, HergertW, StillerM, Defect-induced magnetism in nonmagnetic oxides: basic principles, experimental evidence, and possible devices with ZnO and TiO2. Phys Status Solidi B. 2020;257(7):1900623.
656.
ZhouS, ĞižmárE, PotzgerK, Origin of magnetic moments in defective TiO2 single crystals. Phys Rev B. 2009;79:113201.
657.
Navarro AMM, BilovolV, CabreraAF, The relationship between magnetic behaviour and local structure around Fe ions in Fe-doped TiO2 rutile. Physica B. 2009;404:2838–2840.
658.
StraumalBB, MazilkinAA, ProtasovaSG, Magnetization study of nanograined pure and Mn-doped ZnO films: formation of a ferromagnetic grain-boundary foam. Phys Rev B. 2009;79:205206.
YoonSD, VittoriaC, SrivastavaYN, Magnetoelectric effects in composite of nanogranular Fe/ TiO2−δ
films. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;92:042508.
661.
OgaleSB.Dilute doping, defects, and ferromagnetism in metal oxide systems. Adv Mater. 2010;22:3125–3155.
662.
StonehamM.The strange magnetism of oxides and carbons. J Phys CondensMatter. 2010;22:074211.
663.
KrügerP, BourgeoisS, DomenichiniB, Defect states at the surface probed by resonant photoelectron diffraction. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;100:05550.
664.
CruzMM, da SilvaRC, FrancoN, Ferromagnetism induced in rutile single crystals by argon and nitrogen implantation. J Phys Condens Matter. 2009;21: 206002 (8pp).
665.
ZhangZ, YanH, RenL, Magnetic conductive outer layer in oxygen-deficient TiO2 single crystals. Phys Status Solidi RRL. 2019;13:1900160.
666.
VinokurovIV, ZonnZN, IoffeVA.Electrical properties of cerium dioxide single crystals. Fiz Tverd Tela. 1967;9(12):3369–3374.
667.
ZhaoQ, WuP, LiBL, Activation of room-temperature ferromagnetism in nonstoichiometric TiO2-x powders by oxygen vacancies. J Appl Phys. 2008;104:073911.
668.
ChoudhuryB, ChoudhuryA.Room temperature ferromagnetism in defective TiO2 nanoparticles: role of surface and grain boundary oxygen vacancies. J Appl Phys. 2013;114:203906.
669.
NowotnyJ, BakT, BurgT, Effect of grain boundaries on semiconducting properties of TiO2 at elevated temperatures. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:9769–9778.
670.
SunS, WuP, XingP.Effect of vacuum-annealing on the d0 ferromagnetism of undoped In2O3 films. J Magn Magn Mater. 2012;324:2932–2935.
671.
BanerjeeS, MandalM, GayathriN, Enhancement of ferromagnetism upon thermal annealing in pure ZnO. Appl Phys Lett. 2007;91:182501–182503.
672.
SinghalRK, KumarS, KumariP, Evidence of defect-induced ferromagnetism and its “switch” action in pristine bulk TiO2. Appl Phys Lett. 2011;98:092510.
673.
XuX, XuC, DaiJ, Size dependence of defect-induced room temperature ferromagnetism in undoped ZnO nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:8813–8818.
674.
YangG, GaoD, ZhangJ, Evidence of vacancy-induced room temperature ferromagnetism in amorphous and crystalline Al2O3 nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:16814–16818.
675.
SunY, EgawaT, ZhangL, Novel method to directly prepare high-surface-area anatase titania nanoparticles with trapped electrons on oxygen vacancies. J Mater Sci Lett. 2003;22:799–802.
NowotnyJ, AtanacioAJ, BakT, Photosensitive oxide semiconductors for solar hydrogen fuel and water disinfection. Int Mater Rev. 2014;59(8):449–478.
678.
NowotnyMK, BogdanoffP, DittrichT, Observations of p-type semiconductivity in titanium dioxide at room temperature. Mater Lett. 2010;64:928–930.
679.
RogersDB, ShannonRD, SleightAW, Crystal chemistry of metal dioxides with rutile-related structures. Inorg Chem. 1969;8(4):841–849.
680.
KofstadP.Defects and transport properties of metal oxides. Oxid Met. 1995;44:3–27.
681.
KofstadP.Nonstoichiometry, electrical conductivity and diffusion in binary metal oxides. New York: Wiley; 1972.
682.
BreckenridgeRG, HoslerWR.Electrical properties of titanium dioxide semiconductors. Phys Rev. 1953;91:793.
683.
CronemeyerDC.Electrical and optical properties of rutile single crystals. Phys Rev. 1952;87:876.
684.
GruberH, KrautzE.Magnetoresistance and conductivity in the binary system titanium-oxygen II. semiconductive titanium oxides. Phys Status Solidi A. 1983;75:511–518.
685.
BlumenthalRN, CoburnJ, BaukusJ, Electrical conductivity of nonstoichiometric rutile single crystals from 1000 to 1500 °C. J Phys Chem Solids. 1966;27:643.
686.
NowotnyJ, BakT, NowotnyMK, Equilibration kinetics of TiO2 single crystal at elevated temperatures. Phys. Stat. Solidi. 2005;242(11):R91–R93.
687.
NowotnyMK, BakT, NowotnyJ.Electrical properties and defect chemistry of TiO2 single crystal. III. Equilibration kinetics and chemical diffusion. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:16292–16301.
BeckA, BednorzJG, GerberC, Reproducible switching effect in thin oxide films for memory applications. Appl Phys Lett. 2000;139:141.
693.
WatanabeY, BednorzJG, BietschA, Current-driven insulator–conductor transition and nonvolatile memory in chromium-doped SrTiO3 single crystals. Appl Phys Lett. 2001;78:3738–3740.
694.
ZhangHW, LiuLF, GaoB, Gd-doping effect on performance of HfO2 based resistive switching memory devices using implantation approach. Appl Phys Lett. 2011;98:042105.
695.
ZhangFF, LiX, GaoB, Complementary metal oxide semiconductor compatible Hf-based resistive random access memory with ultralow switching current/power. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2012;51:04DD08.
696.
JohnsonOW.Field-enhanced conductivity in TiO2 (Rutile). Appl Phys Lett. 1968;13:338–339.
697.
ArgallF.Switching phenomena in titanium oxide thin films. Solid State Electron. 1968;11:535–541.
698.
TaylorG, LalevicB.RF relaxation oscillations in polycrystalline TiO2 thin films. Solid State Electron. 1976;19:669–674.
699.
ChudnovskiiFA, OdynetsLL, PergamentAL, Electroforming and switching in oxides of transition metals: the role of metal–insulator transition in the switching mechanism. J Solid State Chem. 1996;122:95–99.
700.
LiuLF, YuD, ChenB, Improvement of reliability characteristics of TiO2-based resistive switching memory device with an inserted ZnO layer. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2012;51:101101.
701.
BousoulasP, StathopoulosS, TsialoukisD, Low-power and highly uniform 3-b multilevel switching in forming free TiO2-x -based RRAM with embedded Pt nanocrystals. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2016: 874–877.
702.
KimDC, SeoS, AhnSE, Electrical observations of filamentary conductions for the resistive memory switching in NiO films. Appl Phys Lett. 2006;88:202102.
ZhangHW, GaoB, SunB, Ionic doping effect in ZrO2 resistive switching memory. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;96:123502.
705.
SunB, LiuLF, XuN, The effect of current compliance on the resistive switching behaviors in TiN/ZrO2/Pt memory device. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2009;48:04C061.
706.
PrakashA, ParkJ, SongJ, Demonstration of low power 3-bit multilevel cell characteristics in a TaOx-based RRAM by stack engineering. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2015;32:34.
707.
ZhaoYD, HuangP, ChenZ, Modeling and optimization of bilayered TaOx RRAM based on defect evolution and phase transition effects. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2016;63:1524.
708.
XuN, LiuLF, SunX, Characteristics and mechanism of conduction/set process in TiN/ZnO/Pt resistance switching random-access memories. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;92:232112.
709.
TranXA, ZhuW, LiuWJ, A self-rectifying AlOy bipolar RRAM with sub-50-µA set/reset current for cross-bar architecture. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2012;33:1402.
710.
ChenS, HaddadYC, WuT, Erasing characteristics of metalinsulator-metal resistive switching memory. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;92:013503.
PickettMD, Medeiros-RibeiroG, WilliamsRS.A scalable neuristor built with Mott memristors. Nat Mater. 2013;12:1–4.
726.
MünstermannR, YangJJ, StrachanJP, Morphological and electrical changes in TiO2 memristive devices induced by electroforming and switching. Phys Status Solidi (RRL). 2009;4:16.
727.
SawaA, FujiiT, KawasakiM, Interface resistance switching at a few nanometer thick perovskite manganite active layers. Appl Phys Lett. 2006;88:232112.
728.
ChenX, WuN, StrozierJ, Spatially extended nature of resistive switching in perovskite oxide thin films. Appl Phys Lett. 2006;89:063507.
729.
SzotK, SpeierW, BihlmayerG, Switching the electrical resistance of individual dislocations in single-crystalline SrTiO3. Nat Mater. 2006;5:312–320.
730.
JeongDS, SchroederH, WaserR.Mechanism for bipolar switching in a Pt/TiO2/Pt resistive switching cell. Phys Rev B. 2009;79:195317.
731.
DoYH, KwakJS, BaeYC, Hysteretic bipolar resistive switching characteristics in TiO2/TiO2−x multilayer homojunctions. Appl Phys Lett. 2009;95:093507.
732.
ShinYC, LeeMH, KimKM, Bias polarity dependent local electrical conduction in resistive switching TiO2 thin films. Phys. Status Solidi (RRL). 2010;4:112.
733.
BorghettiJ, StrukovDB, PickettMD, Electrical transport and thermometry of electroformed titanium dioxide memristive switches. J Appl Phys. 2009;106:124504.
734.
YangJJ, MiaoF, PickettMD, The mechanism of electroforming of metal oxide memristive switches. Nanotechnology. 2009;20:215201.
735.
StrachanJP, YangJJ, MünstermannR, Structural and chemical characterization of TiO2 memristive devices by spatially-resolved NEXAFS. Nanotechnology. 2009;20:485701.
736.
ParkWY, KimGH, SeokJY, A Pt/TiO2/Ti Schottky-type selection diode for alleviating the sneak current in resistance switching memory arrays. Nanotechnology. 2010;21:195201.
737.
LeeMH, KimKM, KimGH, Study on the electrical conduction mechanism of bipolar resistive switching TiO2 thin films using impedance spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;96:152909.
MiyaokaH, MizutaniG, SanoH, Anomalous electro-migration of oxygen vacancies in reduced TiO2. Solid State Commun. 2002;123:399.
743.
JangMH, AgarwalR, NukalaP, Observing oxygen vacancy driven electroforming in Pt−TiO2−Pt device via strong metal support interaction. Nano Lett. 2016;16:2139–2144.
744.
BonhoteP, GogniatE, GratzelM, Novel electrochromic devices based on complementary nanocrystalline TiO2 and WO3 thin films. TSF. 1999;350:269–275.
745.
CumminsD, BoschlooG, RyanM, Ultrafast electrochromic windows based on redox-chromophore modified nanostructured semiconducting and conducting films. J Phys Chem B. 2000;104(48):11449–11459.
AdlerD, BrooksH.Theory of semiconductor-to-metal transitions. Phys Rev. 1967;155(3):826–840.
748.
AdlerD.Insulating and metallic states in transition metal oxides. Solid State Phys. 1968;21:1–113.
749.
AdlerD.Mechanism for metal-nonmetal transitions in transition-metal oxides and sulfides. Rev Mod Phys. 1968;40(4):714–736.
750.
MarezioM, McWhanDB, DernierPD, Charge localization at metal-insulator transitions in Ti4O7 and V4O7. Phys Rev Lett. 1972;28(21):1390–1393.
751.
MarezioM, TranquiD, LakkisS, Phase transitions in Ti5O9 single crystals: electrical conductivity, magnetic susceptibility, specific heat, electron paramagnetic resonance, and structural aspects. Phys Rev B. 1977;16(6):2811–2820.
752.
UedaH, KitazawaK, TakagiH, Strong carrier concentration dependence of pressure effect on bipolaronic transitions in Magneéli phase TinO2n-1 (n = 4; 5; 6). J Phys Soc Jpn. 2002;71:1506–1510.
753.
AchaC, MonteverdeM, Núunez-RegueiroM, Electrical resistivity of the Ti4O7 Magneli phase under high pressure. Eur Phys J B. 2003;34:421–428.
754.
BaumardJF, PanisD, AnthonyAM.A study of Ti-O system between Ti3O5 and TiO2 at high temperature by means of electrical resistivity. J Solid State Chem. 1977;20:43–51.
755.
AdlerD.Electrical and optical properties of transition-metal oxides. Radiat Eff Defects Solids. 1970;4:123.
756.
ChiTC, SladekRJ.Elastic constants and the electrical transition in Ti2O3. Phys Rev B. 1973;7:5080.
757.
BarrosHL, ChandrashekharGV, ChiTC, Specific heat of single-crystal undoped and V-doped Ti2O3. Phys Rev B. 1973;7:5147.
758.
HoulihanJF, MulayLN.Correlation of magnetic susceptibility, electrical conductivity, and structural parameters of Ti3O5 via EPR spectroscopy. Phys Status Solidi B. 1974;65:513.
759.
ZweynertM, OringHD, GarcheJ, Anwendung von Magnéli phasen des Titandioxids in der elektrochemischen Technologie [Application of Magnéli phases of titanium dioxide in electrochemical technology]. Chem Ing Tech. 1998;7(70):827–841.
760.
Hayfield P. Electrode material, electrode and electrochemical cell, EP 47.595, A1, filed 19.08.1981, published 17.03.1982; US 4,422,917, filed 18.08.1981, published 27.12.1983.
761.
WatanabeM.Raman spectroscopy of charge-ordered states in Magnéli titanium oxides. Phys Status Solidi C. 2009;6:260–263.
762.
EyertV, SchwingenschlöglU, EckernU.Charge order, orbital order, and electron localization in the Magnéli phase Ti4O7. Chem Phys Lett. 2004;390:151–156.
763.
WatanabeM, UenoW.Raman study of order–disorder transition of bipolarons in Ti4O7. Phys Status Solidi C. 2006;3(10):3456–3459.
764.
LakkisS, SchlenkerC, ChakravertyBK, Metal-insulator transitions in Ti4O7 single crystals: crystal characterization, specific heat, and electron paramagnetic resonances. Phys Rev B. 1976;14(4):1429–1440.
765.
MarinderBO, MagnéliA.Metal-metal bonding in some transition metal dioxides. Acta Chem Scand. 1957;11:1635–1640.
766.
MarinderBO, MagnéliA.Rutile-type phases in some systems of mixed transition metal dioxides. Acta Chem Scand. 1958;12:1345–1347.
767.
MarinderBO, DormE, SeleborgM.Studies on rutile-type phases in mixed transition metal dioxides II. Acta Chem Scand. 1962;16:293–296.
GoodenoughJB.Narrow-band electrons in transition-metal oxides. Czech J Phys. 1967;13(17):304–335.
770.
SlipukhinaI, LežaićM.Electronic and magnetic properties of the Ti5O9 Magnéli phase. Phys Rev B. 2014;90:155133.
771.
GoodenoughJB.Magnetism and the chemical bond, interscience monographs on chemistry, inorganic chemistry section. Vol. 1. In: CottonFA, editor. Interscience division. New York, N. Y., and London: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1963. p. 102–154.
772.
MulayLN, DanleyWJ.Cooperative magnetic transitions in the titanium-oxygen system: a new approach. J Appl Phys. 1970;41:877.
773.
PodshivalovaAK, KarpovIK.Thermodynamic analysis of the stability of titanium oxides in the TiO–TiO2 range. Russ J Inorg Chem. 2007;52(7):1147–1150.
774.
LiborioL, HarrisonN.Thermodynamics of oxygen defective Magnéli phases in rutile: A first-principles study. Phys Rev B. 2008;77:104104.
775.
NisanN, SchockenS.The elements of computing systems: building a modern computer from first principles. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press; 2005.
776.
Ben-HurR, KvatinskyS. Memristive Memory Processing Unit (MPU) controller for In-Memory Processing. In: 2016 ICSEE International Conference on the Science of Electrical Engineering, ICSEE 2016; 780645.
777.
KvatinskyS, FriedmanEG, KolodnyA, Memristor-based material implication (IMPLY) logic: design principles and methodologies. IEEE Trans Very Large Scale Integ (VLSI) Syst. 2014;22(10):6617731, p.2054-2066.
778.
LelmimiD.Reliability issues and modeling of flash and post-flash memory. Microelectron Eng. 2009;86:1870.
779.
MeenaJS, SzeSM, ChandU, Overview of emerging non-volatile memory technologies. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9:526.
780.
GallagherWJ, ParkinSSP.Development of the magnetic tunnel junction MRAM at IBM: from first junctions to a 16-Mb MRAM demonstrator chip. IBM J Res Dev. 2006;50:5.
781.
BhattiS, SbiaaR, HirohataA, Spintronics based random access memory: a review. Mater Today. 2017;20:530.
RaouxS, BurrGW, BreitwischMJ, Phase-change random access memory: a scalable technology. IBM J Res Dev. 2008;52:465.
784.
WangL, TuL, WenJ.Application of phase-change materials in memory taxonomy. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017;18:406.
785.
IshiwaraH.Ferroelectric random access memories. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2012;12:7619.
786.
BaeYC, LeeAR, LeeJB, Oxygen ion drift-induced complementary resistive switching in homo TiOx/TiOy/TiOx and hetero TiOx/TiON/TiOx triple multilayer frameworks. Adv Funct Mater. 2012;22:709.
787.
LimDH, KimGY, SongJH, Electric field effect dominated bipolar resistive switchining through interface control in a Pt/TiO2/TiN structure. RSC Adv. 2015;5:221.
788.
DoYH, KwakJS, HongJP, Nonvolatile unipolar and bipolar resistive switching characteristics in Co-doped TiO2 thin films with different compliance currents. J Korean Phys Soc. 2009;55:1009.
789.
HiroseS, NakayamaA, NiimiH, Improvement in resistance switching and retention properties of Pt/TiO2 Schottky junction devices. J Electrochem Soc. 2011;158:H261.
790.
KimG, LeeJH, SeokJY, Improved endurance of resistive switching TiO2 thin film by hourglass shaped Magnéli filaments. Appl Phys Lett. 2011;98:262901.
791.
KimWG, RheeSW.Effect of the top electrode material on the resistive switching of TiO2 thin film. Microelectron Eng. 2010;87:98.
792.
OhS, JungH, LeeH.Effect of the top electrode materials on the resistive switching characteristics of TiO2 thin film. J Appl Phys. 2011;109:124511.
793.
BousoulasP, MichelakakiI, TsoukalasD.Influence of Ti top electrode thickness on the resistive switching properties of forming free and self-rectified TiO2–x
thin films. TSF. 2014;571:23.
794.
ParkSG, YangMK, JuH, A non-linear ReRAM cell with sub-1 μA ultralow operating current for high density vertical resistive memory (VRRAM). IEDM Tech Dig. 2012;501:2081–2084.
795.
SeokJ, SongSJ, YoonJH, A review of three-dimensional resistive switching cross-bar array memories from the integration and materials property points of view. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;24:5316.
796.
SunW, GaoB, ChiM, Understanding memristive switching via in situ characterization and device modeling. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3453.
797.
WangZ, WuH, BurrGW, Resistive switching materials for information processing. Nat Rev Mater. 2020;5:173–195.
798.
JeongDS, ThomasR, KatiyarRS, Overview on the resistive switching in TiO2 solid electrolyte. Integr Ferroelectr. 2011;124(1):87–96.
799.
AcharyyaD, HazraA, BhattacharyyaP.A journey towards reliability improvement of TiO2 based resistive random access memory: a review. Microelectron Reliab. 2014;54:541–560.
800.
PershinYV, Di VentraM.Experimental demonstration of associative memory with memristive neural networks. Neural Netw. 2010;23:881–886.
801.
ZidanMA.The future of electronics based on memristive systems. Nat Electron. 2018;1:22–29.
802.
WangJ, ZhugeF.Memristive synapses for brain-inspired computing. Adv Mater Technol. 2019;4:1800544.
803.
ZhangT, YangK, XuX, Memristive devices and networks for brain-inspired computing. Phys Status Solidi RRL. 2019;13:1900029.
804.
XiaQ, RobinettW, CumbieMW, Memristor-CMOS hybrid integrated circuits for reconfigurable logic. Nano Lett. 2009;9:3640–3645.
805.
PiS, LiC, JiangH, Memristor crossbar arrays with 6-nm half-pitch and 2-nm critical dimension. Nat Nanotechnol. 2019;14:35–39.
806.
YaoP, WuH, GaoB, Face classification using electronic synapses. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15199.
807.
ChiolerioA, ChiappaloneM, ArianoP, Coupling resistive switching devices with neurons: state of the art and perspectives. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:70.
808.
XiaQ, YangJJ.Memristive crossbar arrays for braininspired computing. Nat Mater. 2019;18:309–323.
809.
ZhangY, WangZ, ZhuJ, Brain inspired computing with memristors: challenges in devices, circuits, and systems. Appl Phys Rev. 2020;7:011308.
810.
GoodenoughJB, ParkKS.The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:1167–1176.
811.
YuZ, TetardL, ZhaiL, Supercapacitor electrode materials: nanostructures from 0 to 3 dimensions. Energy Environ Sci. 2015;8:702–730.
812.
SimonP, GogotsiY.Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nature Mat. 2008;7:845.
813.
ZhangY, PuX, YangY, An electrochemical investigation of rutile TiO2 microspheres anchored by nanoneedle clusters for sodium storage. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:15764.
814.
OhSM, HwangJY, YoonCS, High electrochemical performances of microsphere C-TiO2 anode for sodium-ion battery. ACS Appl Mat Int. 2014;6:11295.
815.
PadilhaACM, RaebigerH, RochaAR, Charge storage in oxygen deficient phases of TiO2: defect physics without defects. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28871.
816.
HauffeK.Reaktionen in und an festen Stoffen [Reactions in and on solids]. Berlin: Springer; 1955.
817.
BalachandranU, ErorNG.Electrical conductivity in non-stoichiometric titanium dioxide at elevated temperatures. J Mater Sci. 1988;23:2676.
818.
BaumardJF, TaniE.Thermoelectric power in reduced pure and Nb-doped TiO2 rutile at high temperature. Phys Status Solidi. 1977;39:373.
819.
YahiaJ.Dependence of the electrical conductivity and thermoelectric power of pure and aluminum-doped rutile on equilibrium oxygen pressure and temperature. Phys Rev. 1963;130:1711.
820.
ForroL, ChauvetO, EminD, High mobility n-type charge carriers in large single crystals of anatase (TiO2). J Appl Phys. 1994;75(1):633–635.
821.
TrittTM.Holey and unholey semiconductors. Science. 1999;283:804–805.
822.
EuckenA, BuchnerA.Die Dielektrizitätskonstante schwach polarer Kristalle und ihre Temperatarabhängigkeit [The dielectric constant of weakly polar crystals and their temperature dependence]. Z Phys Chem. 1934;278(5/6):21.
823.
BerberichLJ, BellMK.The dielectric properties of the rutile form of TiO2. J Appl Phys. 1940;11:681.
824.
von HippelA, BreckenridgeRC, ChesleyFG, High dielectric constant ceramics. Ind Eng Chem. 1946;38(11):1097–1109.
825.
RibarskyMW.Handbook of optical constants of solids titanium dioxide (TiO2) (rutile). School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta (Georgia): Academic Press; 1997; Vol. I, 795–804.
826.
TangH, BergerH, SchmidPE, Optical properties of anatase (TiO2). Solid State Commun. 1994;92(3):267–271.
SekiyaT, IchimuraK, IgarashiM, Absorption spectra of anatase TiO2 single crystals heat-treated under oxygen atmosphere. J Phys Chem Solids. 2000;61:1237–1242.
829.
ReddyMK, ManoramaSV, RamachandraRA.Bandgap studies on anatase titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Mater Chem Phys. 2003;78:239–245.
830.
YueX, YiS, WangR, Cobalt phosphide modified titanium oxide nanophotocatalysts with significantly enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water splitting. Small. 2017;13:1603301.
831.
NairRV, GayathriPK, GummaluriVS, Large bandgap narrowing in rutile TiO2 aimed towards visible light applications and its correlation with vacancy-type defects history and transformation. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2018;51:045107.
832.
SainiCP, BarmanA, BanerjeeD, Impact of self-trapped excitons on blue photoluminescence in TiO2 nanorods on chemically etched Si pyramids. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121:11448–11454.
833.
RamsJ, TejedaA, CabreraJM.Refractive indices of rutile as a function of temperature and wavelength. J Appl Phys. 1997;82:994–997.
834.
GoniakowskiJ, HolenderJM, KantorovichLN, Influence of gradient corrections on the bulk and surface properties of TiO2 and SnO2. Phys Rev B. 1996;53:957.
835.
JellisonGE, BoatnerLA, BudaiJD, Spectroscopic ellipsometry of thin film and bulk anatase (TiO2). J Appl Phys. 2003;93:9537.
836.
BergerH, TangH, LévyF.Growth and Raman spectroscopic characterization of TiO2 anatase single crystals. J Cryst Growth. 1993;130:108.
TangH, BergerH, SchmidPE, Photoluminescence in TiO2 anatase single crystals. Solid State Commun. 1977;23:161.
839.
TangH, PrasadK, SanjinésR, Electrical and optical properties of TiO2 anatase thin films. J Appl Phys. 1994;75:2042.
840.
TangH, LévyF, BergerH, Urbach tail of anatase TiO2. Phys Rev B. 1995;52:7771.
841.
TiwaldTE, SchubertM. Measurement of rutile TiO2 dielectric tensor from 0.148 to 33 μm using generalized ellipsometry. Proc. SPIE 4103, Optical Diagnostic Methods for Inorganic Materials II, (11 October 2000); 4103, pp.19-29.
842.
SibilioS, RosatoA, ScorpioM, A review of electrochromic windows for residential applications. IJHT. 2016; 34 (2):S481–S488.
