X-ray diffraction patterns demonstrated a significant nanocrystalline body-centred cubic CoFe (110) structure when the thickness was between 60 and 90 nm, and displayed an amorphous status when the thickness was from 18 to 42 nm. The saturation magnetization (Ms) and low-frequency alternate-current magnetic susceptibility (χac) revealed a thickness effect owing to the nano-magneto crystalline anisotropy. The Hc value was smaller than 2 Oe due to the small grain size distribution. The increased surface roughness could induce a greater pinning effect of the domain wall. The 90-mm thickness had the highest χac 0.27 value at an optimal resonance frequency (fres) of 100 Hz. The highest surface energy was 44.72 mJ/mm2 at 42 nm and demonstrated high adhesion. The transmittance decreased from 13.1% to 0.27% because the thicker thickness and interface effects inhibited the transfer of photon signals to the film, resulting in a low transmittance and high absorbance.
OgasawaraT, OoganeM, MahdawiMA, Effect of second-order magnetic anisotropy on nonlinearity of conductance in CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB magnetic tunnel junction for magnetic sensor devices. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–9. 17018.
2.
OtaS, AndoA, SekitaniT, Flexible CoFeB/MgO-based magnetic tunnel junctions annealed at high temperature (≥350°C). Appl Phys Lett. 2019;115:1–4. 202401.
KudoN, OoganeM, TsunodaM, Polycrystalline Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si Heusler alloy thin films with high B2 ordering and small magnetic anisotropy for magnetic tunnel junction based sensors. AIP Adv. 2019;9(12):1–4. 125036.
5.
DevolderT, CouetS, SwertsJ, Effect of tantalum spacer thickness and deposition conditions on the properties of MgO/CoFeB/Ta/CoFeB/MgO free layers. IEEE Mag Lett. 2019;10:1–4. 5505804.
6.
HonjoH, IkedaS, SatoH, Impact of tungsten sputtering condition on magnetic and transport properties of double-MgO magnetic tunneling junction with CoFeB/W/CoFeB free layer. IEEE Trans Mag. 2017;53(11):1–4. 2501604.
7.
ScheikeT, SukegawaH, OhkuboT, Comparative study of spin-dependent transport in Co2FeAl/MgAl2O4/CoFe magnetic tunnel junctions with and without thin CoFe interface insertion: an elastic and inelastic scattering model analysis. J Phys D. 2020;53(4):045001.
8.
RamazanovMA, MaharramovAM, SultanovaCR.Magnetoresistance effect in PP+Fe based nanocomposite system. Integr Ferroelectr. 2018;192(1):141–145.
9.
ManosO, BougiatiotiP, DyckD, Correlation of tunnel magnetoresistance with the magnetic properties in perpendicular CoFeB-based junctions with exchange bias. J Appl Phys. 2019;125(2):1–6. 023905.
10.
SunJZ, TrouilloudPL, LauerGP, Bias dependent conductance in CoFeB-MgO-CoFeB magnetic tunnel junctions as an indicator for electrode magnetic condition at barrier interfaces. AIP Adv. 2019;9(1):1–6. 015002.
11.
LvH, FidalgoJ, SilvaAV, Assessment of conduction mechanisms through MgO ultrathin barriers in CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions. Appl Phys Lett. 2019;114(10):1–5. 102402.
12.
HarmsJMI, JanG, GuisanSS, Ultrathin perpendicular magnetic anisotropy CoFeB free layers for highly efficient, high speed writing in spin-transfer-torque magnetic random access memory. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–7. 19407.
13.
RylkovVV, NikolaevSN, DeminVA, Transport, magnetic, and memristive properties of a nanogranular (CoFeB)
x
(LiNbO
y
)100–x
composite material. J Exp Theor Phys. 2018;126:353–367.
14.
PaiCF, LiuL, LiY, Spin transfer torque devices utilizing the giant spin Hall effect of tungsten. Appl Phys Lett. 2012;101(12):1–4. 122404.
15.
GhaferiZ, SharafiS, BahrololoombME.The role of electrolyte pH on phase evolution and magnetic properties of CoFeW codeposited films. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;375:35–41.
16.
SunJ, LiH, HuangY, Cofew ternary oxides nanoparticles for oxygen evolution reaction. Mat Lett. 2018;223:246–249.
17.
AgarwalS, SinghRP, KhatriMS.Structure, microstructure and magnetic properties of pulse electrodeposited CoFe–Cu granular thin films. Appl Phys A. 2019;125(9):1–7. 594.
18.
Pashen'kinIY, SapozhnikovMV, GusevNS, Tunnel magnetoresistive еlements for magnetic field sensors. Tech Phys. 2019;64:142–145.
19.
NaumovaLI, MilyaevMA, ZavornitsynRS, Magnetoresistive properties of CoFe/Cu/CoFe/Dy pseudo spin valves under conditions of interdiffusion of dysprosium and CoFe ferromagnetic alloy layers. Phys Met Metallogr. 2019;120:429–435.
20.
KimSN, ChoiJW, LimSH.Tailoring of magnetic properties of giant magnetoresistance spin valves via insertion of ultrathin non-magnetic spacers between pinned and pinning layers. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–9. 1617.
21.
KockarH, OzerginE, KaraagacO, Characterisations of CoFeCu films: influence of Fe concentration. J Alloys Compd. 2014;586:326–330.
22.
GhaferiZ, SharafiS, BahrololoomME.Effect of current density and bath composition oncrystalline structure and magnetic properties of electrodeposited FeCoW alloy. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;355:766–773.
23.
NoceRD, BenedettiAV, MagnaniM, Structural, morphological and magnetic characterization of electrodeposited Co–Fe–W alloys. J Alloys Compd. 2014;611:243–248.
24.
MaK, ChungTS, GoodRJ.Surface energy of thermotropic liquid crystalline polyesters and polyesteramide. J Polym Sci. 1998;36(13):2327–2337.
25.
OwensDK, WendtRC.Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci. 1969;13(8):1741–1747.
MaruyamaS, KurashigeT, MatsumotoS, Liquid droplet in contact with a solid surface. Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys Eng. 1998;2(1):49–62.
28.
LiuWJ, ChenYT, ChangYH, Structure and magnetic properties of Co40Fe40V20 thin films. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2019;19(9):5974–5978.
29.
ChenS, ShuX, XieQ, Structure, magnetic and thermal properties of FePt–C–BN granular films for heat assisted magnetic recording. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2020;53:1–7. 135002.
30.
EverhartW, NewkirkJ.Grain size effects in selective laser melted Fe-Co-2 V. Appl Sci. 2019;9(18):1–11. 3701.
31.
GiuntiniD, TorresaniE, ChanKT, Iron oxide-based nanostructured ceramics with tailored magnetic and mechanical properties: development of mechanically robust, bulk superparamagnetic materials. Nanoscale Adv. 2019;1:3139–3150.
32.
YangF, DongGL, SuiYL, Microstructure and magnetic properties of Nd–Fe–B sintered magnets with P addition. Rare Met. 2019;38:770–775.
33.
ChoeG, SteinbackM.Surface roughness effects on magnetoresistive and magnetic properties of NiFe thin films. J Appl Phys. 1999;85(8):5777–5779.
34.
BhatiaG, SrivastavaA, SrivastavaPC.Effect of ion irradiation on magnetic property of exchange coupled interfacial structures of Fe/NiO and NiO/Fe on Si substrates. Radiat Eff Defects Solids. 2014;169(6):529–537.
35.
ChenYT, LinSH, LinYC.Effect of low-frequency alternative-current magnetic susceptibility in Ni80Fe20 thin films. J Nanomater. 2012;2012:1–6. 186138.
36.
YangSY, ChienJJ, WangWC, Magnetic nanoparticles for high-sensitivity detection on nucleic acids via superconducting-quantum-interference-device-based immunomagnetic reduction assay. J Magn Magn Mater. 2011;323(6):681–685.
37.
ChenYT, XieSM, JhengHY.The low-frequency alternative-current magnetic susceptibility and electrical properties of Si(100)/Fe40Pd40B20(X Å)/ZnO(500 Å) and Si(100)/ZnO(500 Å)/Fe40Pd40B20(Y Å) systems. J Appl Phys. 2013;113(17):17B303–3.
38.
KongSH, OkamotoT, NakagawaS.[Ni-Fe/Si] double seedlayer with low surface energy for Fe-Co-B soft magnetic underlayer with high Hk for perpendicular magnetic recording media. IEEE Trans Magn. 2004;40(4):2389–2391.
39.
SiddiquiMAQ, ChenX, IglauerS, A multiscale study on shale wettability: spontaneous imbibition versus contact angle. Water Resour Res. 2019;55(6):5012–5032.
40.
PorterDA, EasterlingKE.Phase transformations in metals and alloy. 2nd ed. London
: CRC Press; 1992.
41.
TavakoliMM, DastjerdiHT, ZhaoJ, Light management in organic photovoltaics processed in ambient conditions using ZnO nanowire and antireflection layer with nanocone array. Small. 2019;15(25):1–8. 1900508.
42.
ErdemT, YangL, XuP, Transparent films made of highly scattering particles. Langmuir. 2020;36(4):911–918.
