We investigated the role of high-voltage pulse bias (HVPB) on the structure, morphology and residual stress of TiN coatings produced with cathodic arc physical vapour deposition and compared them with the ones produced with DC bias. Annealing heat treatment was also performed for surveying stress-relieving behaviour within the coatings. The preferred orientation of the coatings changed from (111) to (220) by the application of HVPB. Coatings produced with DC bias exhibited Zone T structure, while the growth morphologies of the coatings produced with HVPB were very similar to the structures in the beginning of Zone II. The presence of Ar in the deposition environment increased the residual stress of all coatings. Intra-grain stresses of the coatings produced with DC bias were almost totally annihilated by annealing. However, for coatings produced with HVPB, stress relief magnitudes were very low, indicating that intra-grain defects could not be totally annihilated.
AbadiasG.Stress and preferred orientation in nitride-based PVD coatings. Surf Coat Technol. 2008;202:2223–2235. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.08.029
2.
HernándezLC, PonceL, FundoraA, Nanohardness and residual stress in TiN coatings. Materials (Basel). 2011;4:929–940. doi: 10.3390/ma4050929
3.
TkadletzM, SchalkN, DanielR, Advanced characterization methods for wear resistant hard coatings: a review on recent progress. Surf Coat Technol. 2016;285:31–46. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.11.016
4.
MayrhoferPH, MittererC, HultmanL, Microstructural design of hard coatings. Prog Mater Sci. 2006;51:1032–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.002
5.
MukherjeeS, ProkertF, RichterE, Comparison of TiN and Ti1-xAlxN coatings deposited on Al using plasma immersion ion implantation assisted deposition. Surf Coat Technol. 2005;200:2459–2464. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.11.028
6.
AkkayaSS, VasylievVV, ReshetnyakEN, Structure and properties of TiN coatings produced with PIII&D technique using high efficiency rectilinear filter cathodic arc plasma. Surf Coat Technol. 2013;236:332–340. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.10.009
7.
VasylievVV, KalinichenkoAI, ReshetnyakEN, Experimental and modeling study on the role of Ar addition to the working gas on the development of intrinsic stress in TiN coatings produced by filtered vacuum-arc plasma. Thin Solid Films. 2017;642:207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.08.033
8.
AkkayaS, YıldızB, ÜrgenM.Orientation dependent tribological behavior of TiN coatings. J Phys: Condens Matter. 2016;28:134009–134016.
9.
PetrovI, BarnaPB, HultmanL, Microstructural evolution during film growth. J Vac Sci Technol A. 2003;21:S117–S128. doi: 10.1116/1.1601610
MachunzeR, EhiasarianAP, TichelaarFD, Stress and texture in HIPIMS TiN thin films. Thin Solid Films. 2009;518:1561–1565. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.09.069
12.
ChawlaaV, JayaganthanaR, ChandraR.Structural characterizations of magnetron sputtered nanocrystalline TiN thin films. Mater Charact. 2008;59:1015–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2007.08.017
13.
MukherjeeS, ProkertF, RichterE, Intrinsic stress and preferred orientation in TiN coatings deposited on Al using plasma immersion ion implantation assisted deposition. Thin Solid Films. 2003;445:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2003.08.065
14.
GuduruPR, ChasonE, FreundLB.Mechanics of compressive stress evolution during thin film growth. J Mech Phys Solids2003;51:2127–2148. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2003.09.013
15.
ChasonE.A kinetic analysis of residual stress evolution in polycrystalline thin films. Thin Solid Films. 2012;526:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.11.001
16.
ChasonE, GuduruPR.Tutorial: understanding residual stress in polycrystalline thin films through real-time measurements and physical models. J Appl Phys. 2016;119:191101-1-21.
17.
KoutsokerasLE, AbadiasG.Intrinsic stress in ZrN thin films: evaluation of grain boundary contribution from in situ wafer curvature and ex situ x-ray diffraction techniques. J Appl Phys. 2012;111:1–8. doi: 10.1063/1.4710530
18.
MagnfältD, AbadiasG, SarakinosK.Atom insertion into grain boundaries and stress generation in physically vapor deposited films. Appl Phys Lett. 2013;103:051910-1-4. doi: 10.1063/1.4817669
19.
WelzelU, LigotJ, LamparterP, Stress analysis of polycrystalline thin films and surface regions by X-ray diffraction. J Appl Crystallogr. 2005;38:1–29. doi: 10.1107/S0021889804029516
20.
NoyanIC, CohenJB.Residual stress. New York
: Springer-Verlag Inc.; 1987.
21.
PerryAJ.The state of residual stress in TiN films made by physical vapor deposition methods; the state of the art. J Vac Sci Technol. A. 1990;8:1351–1358. doi: 10.1116/1.576881
22.
SchneiderCA, RasbandWS, EliceiriKW.NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089
23.
KhojierK, SavaloniH, ShokraiE, Influence of argon gas flow on mechanical and electrical properties of sputtered titanium nitride thin films. J Theor Appl Phys. 2013;7:37–43. doi: 10.1186/2251-7235-7-37
24.
AndersA.A structure zone diagram including plasma-based deposition and ion etching. Thin Solid Films. 31 May 2010;518(15):4087–4090. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.10.145
25.
OhUC, JeJH.Effects of strain energy on the preferred orientation of TiN thin films. J Appl Phys. 1993;74:1692–1696. doi: 10.1063/1.355297
26.
PellegJ, ZervinLZ, LungoS, Reactive-sputter-deposited TiN films on glass substrates. Thin Solid Films. 1991;197:117–128. doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(91)90225-M
27.
ZhaoJP, WangX, ChenZY, Overall energy model for preferred growth of TiN films during filtered arc deposition. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 1997;30:5–12. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/30/1/002
28.
YujuanZ, PengxunY, ZhiguoW, Influences of deposition parameters on the microstructure and properties of nanostructural TiN films synthesized by filtered cathodic arc plasma. Rare Met. 2005;24:370–375.
29.
BarnaPB, AdamikM.Fundamental structure forming phenomena of polycrystalline films and the structure zone models. Thin Solid Films. 1998;317:27–33. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00503-8
30.
PatsalasP, GravalidisC, LogothetidisS.Surface kinetics and subplantation phenomena affecting the texture, morphology, stress, and growth evolution of titanium nitride films. J Appl Phys. 2004;96:6234–6246. doi: 10.1063/1.1811389
31.
AndersA.Cathodic arcs: from fractal spots to energetic condensation. New York
: Springer; 2010.
32.
DanielR, MartinschitzKJ, KeckesJ, The origin of stresses in magnetron-sputtered thin films with zone T structures. Acta Mater. 2010;58:2621–2633. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.048
33.
DanielR, KeckesJ, MatkoI, Origins of microstructure and stress gradients in nanocrystalline thin films: the role of growth parameters and self-organization. Acta Mater. 2013;61:6255–6266. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.009
34.
KammingaJ-D, de KeijserTH, DelhezR, On the origin of stress in magnetron sputtered TiN layers. J Appl Phys. 2000;88:6332–6345. doi: 10.1063/1.1319973
35.
MagnfältD, FillonA, BoydRD, Compressive intrinsic stress originates in the grain boundaries of dense refractory polycrystalline thin films. J Appl Phys. 2016;119:055305-1–7. doi: 10.1063/1.4941271
36.
UrgenM, CakirAF.The effect of heating on corrosion behavior of TiN- and CrN-coated steels. Surf Coat Technol1997;96:236–244. doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00123-0
