The Cu2O/AZO heterojunction solar cells were successfully constructed by synthesising p-Cu2O layer upon AZO using the electrochemical deposition method. The p-Cu2O nanostructures with different grain shape and preferred crystal orientation, including (100), (110) and (111) indicated by SEM and XRD, were obtained by controlling electrodeposition bath pH. The J–V characteristic shows that the performance of the Cu2O/AZO heterojunction solar cells is found to be dependent on the crystal orientation of p-Cu2O. Only the solar cell with Cu2O (111) exhibits well-defined rectifying behaviour and good photoelectric conversion efficiency, which may due to the optimised energy band structure of Cu2O (111)/AZO heterojunction solar cells . Furthermore, VOC and JSC were sharply increased by further optimising energy band structure through inserting the intrinsic ZnO layer between the Cu2O (111) and AZO. Therefore, the results illustrated above may offer a helpful guidance to design and construct the high performance solar cell.
KimTG, OhHB, RyuH, The study of post annealing effect on Cu2O thin-films by electrochemical deposition for photoelectrochemical applications. J Alloy Compd. 2014;612:74–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.158
2.
YantaraN, MathewsN, JineshKB, Modulating the optical and electrical properties of all metal oxide solar cells through nanostructuring and ultrathin interfacial layers. Electrochim Acta. 2012;85:486–491. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.08.015
3.
SmolentsevG, SundstromV.Time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy for the study of molecular systems relevant for artificial photosynthesis. Coordin Chem Rev. 2015;304–305:117–132. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.03.001
4.
HosseinianA, SheybanifardZ, MahjoubAR.Investigation of pH effect on the hydrothermal synthesis of highly efficient ZnO nanostructures as photocatalyst. Inorg Nano-Met Chem. 2017;47(2):302–307. doi: 10.1080/15533174.2016.1186042
5.
HeHY, HeZ, ShenQ.Photocatalysis of novel reduced graphene oxide-CoSe nanocomposites with efficient interface-induced effect. Compos Interface. 2017;24(1):85–97. doi: 10.1080/09276440.2016.1190560
6.
WuYW, ZhengWF, LinLM, Colored solar selective absorbing coatings with metal Ti and dielectric AlN multilayer structure. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2013;115:145–150. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.03.041
7.
Erten-ElaS, Cagatay CakırA. Dye sensitized solar cells for conversion of solar energy into electricity. Energy Source Part A. 2015;37(8):807–816. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2011.572118
8.
JiangTF, XieTF, ChenLP, Carrier concentration-dependent electron transfer in Cu2O/ZnO nanorod arrays and their photocatalytic performance. Nanoscale. 2013;5(7):2938–2944. doi: 10.1039/c3nr34219k
9.
LiJ, LiHB, XueY, Facile electrodeposition of environment-friendly Cu2O/ZnO heterojunction for robust photoelectrochemical biosensing. Sensor Actuat B-Chem. 2014;191:619–624. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.10.060
10.
ChouSM, HonMH, LeuIC, Al-Doped ZnO∕Cu2O heterojunction fabricated on (200) and (111)-orientated Cu2O substrates. J Electrochem Soc. 2008;155(11):H923–H928. doi: 10.1149/1.2980424
11.
LoferskiJJ.Theoretical considerations governing the choice of the optimum semiconductor for photovoltaic solar energy conversion. J Appl Phys. 1956;27(7):777–784. doi: 10.1063/1.1722483
12.
HussainS, CaoCB, NabiG, Effect of electrodeposition and annealing of ZnO on optical and photovoltaic properties of the p-Cu2O/n-ZnO solar cells. Electrochim Acta. 2011;56(24):8342–8346. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.07.017
13.
ChenSJ, LinLM, LiuJY, An electrochemical constructed p-Cu2O/n-ZnO heterojunction for solar cell. J Alloy Compd. 2015;644:378–382. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.230
NishiY, MiyataT, MinamiT.The impact of heterojunction formation temperature on obtainable conversion efficiency in n-ZnO/p-Cu2O solar cells. Thin Solid Films. 2013;528:72–76. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.09.090
16.
NishiY, MiyataT, MinamiT.Effect of inserting a thin buffer layer on the efficiency in n -ZnO/p-Cu2O heterojunction solar cells. J Vac Sci Technol A. 2012;30(4):04D103. doi: 10.1116/1.3698596
17.
MinamiT, MiyataT, NishiY.Cu2O-based heterojunction solar cells with an Al-doped ZnO/oxide semiconductor/thermally oxidized Cu2O sheet structure. Sol Energy. 2014;105:206–217. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2014.03.036
18.
LvPW., LinLM, ZhengWF, Photosensitivity of ZnO/Cu2O thin film heterojunction. Optik. 2013;124(17):2654–2657. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2012.07.040
19.
YuXJ, HuangLZ, WeiYC, Controllable preparation, characterization and performance of Cu2O thin film and photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue using response surface methodology. Mater Res Bull. 2015;64:410–417. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.01.009
20.
MinamiT, NishiY, MiyataT.High-efficiency Cu2O-based heterojunction solar cells fabricated using a Ga2O3 thin film as N-type layer. Appl Phys Express. 2013;6(4):044101. doi: 10.7567/APEX.6.044101
21.
LeeYS, ChuaD, BrandtRE, Atomic layer deposited gallium oxide buffer layer enables 1.2 V open-circuit voltage in cuprous oxide solar cells. Adv Mater. 2014;26(27):4704–+. doi: 10.1002/adma.201401054
22.
AbduYM, BayeroAO.Copper (I) oxide (Cu2O) based solar cells - a review. J Pure Appl Sci. 2009;2(2):8–12.
23.
LiangRM, ChangYM, WuPW, Effect of annealing on the electrodeposited Cu2O films for photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. Thin Solid Films. 2010;518(24):7191–7195. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.04.073
24.
WangLC, de TacconiNR, ChenthamarakshanCR, Electrodeposited copper oxide films: effect of bath pH on grain orientation and orientation-dependent interfacial behavior. Thin Solid Films. 2007;515(5):3090–3095. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.08.041
25.
WangXZ, ChenMJ, HeYR, Shape-controlled preparation of Cu2O crystals and their growth mechanism. J Alloys Compd. 2015;628:50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.11.224
26.
SelmiM, ChaabouniF, AbaabM, Studies on the properties of sputter-deposited Al-doped ZnO films. Superlattice Microstruct. 2008;44(3):268–275. doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2008.06.005
27.
SerponeN, LawlessD, KhairutdinovR.Size effects on the photophysical properties of colloidal anatase TiO2 particles: size quantization versus direct transitions in this indirect semiconductor?J Phys Chem. 1995;99(45):16646–16654. doi: 10.1021/j100045a026
28.
AnuA, KhadarMA.Grain size tuning of nanostructured Cu2O films through vapour phase supersaturation control and their characterization for practical applications. AIP Adv. 2015;5:097176. doi: 10.1063/1.4932087
29.
ShyamalS., HajraP., MandalH., Effect of substrates on the photoelectrochemical reduction of water over cathodically electrodeposited p-type Cu2O thin films. Appl Mater Inter. 2015;7(33):18344–18352. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b04116
30.
YuPY, ShenYR.Resonance Raman studies in Cu2O. I. The phonon-assisted 1s yellow excitonic absorption edge. Phys Rev B. 1975;12(4):1377–1394. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.1377
31.
CompaanA, CumminsHZ.Resonant quadrupole-dipole raman scattering at the 1S yellow exciton in Cu2O. Phys Rev Lett. 1973;31(1):41–44. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.31.41
32.
WeiHM, GongHB, ChenL, Photovoltaic efficiency enhancement of Cu2O solar cells achieved by controlling homojunction orientation and surface microstructure. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116(19):10510–10515. doi: 10.1021/jp301904s
33.
KangZ, YanXQ, WangYF, Electronic structure engineering of Cu2O film/ZnO nanorods array all-oxide p-n heterostructure for enhanced photoelectrochemical property and self-powered biosensing application. Sci Rep – UK. 2015;5;5:7882. doi: 10.1038/srep07882
34.
GershonT, MusselmanKP, MarinA, Thin-film ZnO/Cu2O solar cells incorporating an organic buffer layer. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2012;96(1):148–154. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.09.043
35.
ZhangDK, LiuYC, LiuYL, The electrical properties and the interfaces of Cu2O/ZnO/ITO p–i–n heterojunction. Physica B. 2004;351(1–2):178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2004.06.003
36.
IshizukaS, SuzukiK, OkamotoY, Polycrystallinen-ZnO/p-Cu2O heterojunctions grown by RF-magnetron sputtering. Physica Status Solidi (c). 2004;1(4):1067–1070. doi: 10.1002/pssc.200304245
