Indentation Size Effect (ISE) in steels having a wide spectrum of carbon (C) concentrations (wt-%) 0.002 (interstitial-free), 0.07 (microalloyed), 0.19 (low carbon), 0.32 (medium carbon), and 0.7 (high carbon), and microstructures were investigated using Vickers micro-hardness tester. A decrease in micro-hardness with increasing load, i.e. ISE, is observed in all the samples except microalloyed steel. The empirical relations, such as the Nix and Gao model, Minimum Resistance model, and Proportional Specimen Resistance (PSR) model, were used to determine the load-independent or true hardness values. Nix and Gao model was adopted to determine the plastically deformed zone (PDZ) size under the indenter and subsequently correlated with ISE in the materials. It is observed that ISE is absent when the PDZ size becomes comparable to or larger than the grain size of the material.
MiyaharaKMatsuokaSHayashiT.Nanoindentation as a strength probe – a study on the hardness dependence of indent size for fine-grained and coarse-grained ferritic steel. Metall Mater Trans A. 2001;32 (13):761–768.
2.
OliverWCPharrGM.An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res1992;7 (6):1564–1583.
3.
HuJSunWJiangZIndentation size effect on hardness in the body-centered cubic coarse-grained and nanocrystalline tantalum. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017;686:19–25.
4.
VlassakJJNixWD.Measuring the elastic properties of anisotropic materials by means of indentation experiments. J Mech Phys Solids. 1994;42 (8):1223–1245.
5.
SongMLiuYHeXNanoindentation creep of ultrafine-grained Al2O3 particle reinforced copper composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;560:80–85.
6.
BlauPJ.Microindentation techniques in materials science and engineering: a symposium sponsored by ASTM Committee E-4 on Metallography and by the International Metallographic Society, Philadelphia, PA, 15–18 July 1984. Astm International; 1986.
7.
GongJWuJGuanZ.Examination of the indentation size effect in low-load Vickers hardness testing of ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc. 1999;19 (15):2625–2631.
8.
NixWDGaoH.Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids. 1998;46 (3):411–425.
9.
SangwalKSurowskaBBłaziakP.Analysis of the indentation size effect in the microhardness measurement of some cobalt-based alloys. Mater Chem Phys. 2003;77 (2):511–520.
10.
GongJWuJGuanZ.Examination of the indentation size effect in low-load Vickers hardness testing of ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc. 1999;19 (15):2625–2631.
11.
GolanGRabinovichEAxelevitchAThin films indentation size effect in microhardness measurements. Optoelectron Adv Mater. 2000;2:317–325.
12.
XuRGSongHLengYA molecular dynamics simulations study of the influence of prestrain on the pop-in behavior and indentation size effect in Cu single crystals. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(18):5520.
13.
PetríkJBlaškoPMarkulíkŠThe indentation size effect (ISE) of metals. Crystals (Basel). 2022;12(6):795.
14.
LavakumarASarangiSSChillaVA ‘new’ empirical equation to describe the strain hardening behavior of steels and other metallic materials. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;802:140641.
15.
TaborD.The hardness of metals. Oxford: Oxford university press; 2000.
16.
BückleH.Progress in micro-indentation hardness testing. Metall Rev1959;4:49–100.
17.
SahinOUzunOKolemenUVickers microindentation hardness studies of β-Sn single crystals. Mater Charact2007;58 (2):197–204.
18.
HaysCKendallEG.An analysis of Knoop microhardness. Metallography. 1973;6:275–282.
19.
LiHBradtRC.Knoop microhardness anisotropy of single-crystal LaB6. Mater Sci Eng A. 1991;142 (1):51–61.
20.
LiHGhoshAHanYHThe frictional component of the indentation size effect in low load microhardness testing. J Mater Res. 1993;8:1028–1032.
AcharyaABassaniJL.Lattice incompatibility and a gradient theory of crystal plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids. 2000;48 (8):1565–1595.
23.
FleckNAMullerGMAshbyMFStrain gradient plasticity: theory and experiment. Acta Metall Mater. 1994;42 (2):475–487.
24.
DurstKBackesBGökenM.Indentation size effect in metallic materials: correcting for the size of the plastic zone. Scr Mater. 2005;52 (11):1093–1097.
25.
DurstKBackesBFrankeOIndentation size effect in metallic materials: modeling strength from pop-in to macroscopic hardness using geometrically necessary dislocations. Acta Mater. 2006;54(9):2547–2555.
26.
YangBVehoffH.Dependence of nanohardness upon indentation size and grain size – a local examination of the interaction between dislocations and grain boundaries. Acta Mater. 2007;55 (3):849–856.
27.
QiaoXGStarinkMJGaoN.The influence of indenter tip rounding on the indentation size effect. Acta Mater. 2010;58 (10):3690–3700.
28.
LiuGNiSSongM.Effect of indentation size and grain/sub-grain size on microhardness of high purity tungsten. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2015;25 (10):3240–3246.
29.
MukhopadhyayNKPauflerP.Micro- and nanoindentation techniques for mechanical characterisation of materials. Int Mater Rev. 2006;51 (4):209–245.
30.
LiXLiHLiuLThe formation mechanism of complex carbides in Nb-V microalloyed steel. Mater Let. 2022;311:131544.
