In the present work, the effect of low-frequency alternating magnetic fields (AMFs) of different strengths on hot tearing susceptibility (HTS) and solidification behaviour of the Mg–4Zn–1.5Ca alloy was investigated. The results revealed that the application of AMFs during the solidification narrowed the solidification temperature range of the Mg–4Zn–1.5Ca alloy, thereby reducing the HTS of the material. In addition, the presence of the AMF-inhibited dendritic growth refined the alloy microstructure and enhanced convection in the melt, which led to a decrease in the HTS. The HTS of the Mg–4Zn–1.5Ca alloy was the smallest when the AMF of 15 A (15 Hz) was applied. However, once the current increased to 20 A, excessive Joule heat was generated in the melt, which coarsened the microstructure and increased the HTS of the alloy.
YangZWangKFuPInfluence of alloying elements on hot tearing susceptibility of Mg–Zn alloys based on thermodynamic calculation and experimental. J Magn Alloys. 2018;6(1):44–51. doi:10.1016/j.jma.2018.01.001.
2.
KainerKU.Magnesium alloys and their applications. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 1999.
3.
SongP.The influence of ECAP deformation and subsequent extrusion on the microstructure and properties of Mg–Zn–Ca–Mn magnesium alloy. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology; 2010.
4.
ChenJXLiLTYuXMMechanical properties of magnesium alloys for medical application: a review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;87:68–79. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.022.
5.
ZhangBPHouYLWangXDMechanical properties, degradation performance and cytotoxicity of Mg–Zn–Ca biomedical alloys with different compositions. Mater Sci Eng C. 2011;31(8):1667–1673. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2011.07.015.
6.
CaoGHaygoodIKouS.Onset of hot tearing in ternary Mg–Al–Sr alloy castings. Metall Mater Trans A. 2010;41(8):2139–2150. doi:10.1007/s11661-010-0248-9.
7.
WeiZQLiuZShengXFEffects of Zn and Y on hot-tearing susceptibility of Mg–xZn–2xY alloys. Mater Sci Technol. 2019;35(15):1667–1673. doi:10.1080/02670836.2019.1652405.
8.
ChenYHWangLPFengYCEffect of Al content on hot tearing behaviour of Mg–xAl–2Ca–2Sm alloys. Mater Sci Technol. 2018;35(2):1–11. doi:10.1080/02670836.2018.1545282.
9.
ShiZKimWJCaoFYStress corrosion cracking of high-strength AZ31 processed by high-ratio differential speed rolling. J Magn Alloys. 2015;3:271–282. doi:10.1016/j.jma.2015.11.006.
10.
CaoGZhangCCaoHHot-tearing susceptibility of ternary Mg–Al–Sr alloy castings. Metall Mater Trans A. 2010;41A:706–716. doi:10.1007/s11661-009-0134-5.
11.
ZhenZHortNHuangYDQuantitative determination on hot tearing in Mg–Al binary alloys. Mater Sci Forum. 2009;618–619:533–540. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.618-619.533.
12.
EskinDGSuyitno, MooneyJF, Contraction of aluminium alloys during and after solidification. Metall Mater Trans A. 2004;35(4):1325–1335. doi:10.1007/s11661-004-0307-1.
13.
SongJFPanFSJiangBA review on hot tearing of magnesium alloys. J Magn Alloys. 2016;4(3):151–172. doi:10.1016/j.jma.2016.08.003.
14.
DanielWChristianHTimsoSSelf-restraint hot cracking test for aluminium alloys using digital image correlation. Procedia CIRP. 2018;74:430–433. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.165.
15.
BaiQLLiuJCLiHXA modified hot tearing criterion for direct chill casting of aluminium alloys. Mater Sci Technol. 2016;32(8):846–854. doi:10.1080/02670836.2015.1104081.
16.
ClyneTWDaviesGJ. A comparison of experimental results and theoretical predictions relating to dependence of solidification cracking on composition. London: Solidification and Casting of Metals; 1979.
17.
ClyneTWWolfMKurzW.The effect of melt composition to continuous casting. Metall Trans B. 1982;13(2):259–266. doi:10.1007/BF02664583.
18.
LiYLiHXKatgermanLRecent advances in hot tearing during casting of aluminium alloys. Prog Mater Sci. 2020;117:100741. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100741.
19.
VinodhGNodooshanHRJLiDEffect of Al content on hot-tearing susceptibility of Mg–10Zn–xAl alloys. Metall Mater Trans A. 2020;51(4):1897–1910. doi:10.1007/s11661-020-05657-9.
20.
FarupIMoA.Two-phase modeling of mushy zone parameters associated with hot tearing. Metall Mater Trans A. 2000;31(5):1461–1472. doi:10.1007/s11661-000-0264-2.
21.
SongJFWangZHuangYD.Hot tearing characteristics of Mg–2Ca–xZn alloys. J Mater Sci. 2016;51(5):2687–2704. doi:10.1007/s10853-015-9583-y.
22.
BaiSWWangFWangZEffect of Ca content on hot tearing susceptibility of Mg–4Zn–xCa–0.3Zr (x = 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2) alloys. Int J Metalcast; 2021;15(4):(1):1298–1308. doi:10.1007/s40962-020-00553-9.
23.
LiuSMWeiZQLiuZEffect of Zn content on hot tearing susceptibility of LPSO enhanced Mg–Znx–Y2–Zr0.06 alloys with different initial mold temperatures. J Alloys Compd. 2022;904:163963. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163963.
24.
JiangBLiuWQiuDGrain refinement of Ca addition in a twin-roll-cast Mg–3Al–1Zn alloy. Mater Chem Phys. 2012;133(2–3):611–616. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.12.087.
25.
HuBLiDWangJHot tearing behavior in double ternary eutectic alloy system: Mg–Ce–Al alloys. Metall Mater Trans A. 2020;51(12):6658–6669. doi:10.1007/s11661-020-06046-y.
26.
ZhangXBZhuPZhengLEffect of adding Ce on the hot-tearing susceptibility of the 5TiB2/Al–5Cu composite. Mater Charact. 2020;168:110552. doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110552.
27.
HuCYanFZhuZEffects on microstructural refinement of mechanical properties in steel copper joints laser welded with alternating magnetic field augmentation. Mater Charact. 2021;175(7):111059. doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111059.
28.
HeSYLiCJZhanTJReduction in microsegregation in Al–Cu alloy by alternating magnetic field. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett). 2019;33:267–274. doi:10.1007/s40195-019-00933-z.
29.
DongJZhaoZCuiJEffect of low-frequency electromagnetic casting on the castability, microstructure, and tensile properties of direct-chill cast Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Metall Mater Trans A. 2004;35(8):2487–2494. doi:10.1007/s11661-006-0228-2.
30.
DuXDWangFWangZHot tearing susceptibility of AXJ530 alloy under low-frequency alternating magnetic field. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett). 2020;33(9):1259–1270. doi:10.1007/s40195-020-01033-z.
31.
ZhouYMaoPLWangZEffect of low frequency alternating magnetic field on hot tearing susceptibility of Mg–7Zn–1Cu–0.6Zr magnesium alloy. J Mater Process Technol. 2020;282:116679. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116679.
32.
LiuZZhangSBMaoPLEffects of Y on hot tearing formation mechanism of Mg–Zn–Y–Zr alloys. Mater Sci Technol. 2013;30(10):1214–1222. doi:10.1179/1743284713Y.0000000437.
33.
EsfahaniMNiroumandB.Study of hot tearing of A206 aluminium alloy using instrumented constrained T-shaped casting method. Mater Charact. 2010;61(3):318–324. doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2009.12.015.
34.
WangZSongJFHuangYDAn investigation on hot tearing of Mg–4.5Zn–(0.5Zr) alloys with Y additions. Metall Mater Trans A. 2015;46(5):2108–2118. doi:10.1007/s11661-015-2755-1.
35.
AbramsH.Grain size measurement by the intercept method. Metallography. 1971;4(1):59–78. doi:10.1016/0026-0800(71)90005-X.
KarunakarDBRaiRNPatraSEffects of grain refinement and residual elements on hot tearing in aluminium castings. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2009;45(9–10):851–858. doi:10.1007/s00170-009-2037-4.
38.
BanCY.Fundamental study on solidification of Al alloys under electromagnetic field. Shenyang: Northeastern University; 2002.
39.
HuBLiDLiZHot tearing behavior in double ternary eutectic alloy system: Al–Mg–Si alloys. Metall Mater Trans A. 2021;52(2):789–805. doi:10.1007/s11661-020-06101-8.
40.
VivesC.Effect of electromagnetic vibrations on micro-structure of continuously cast aluminium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 1993;173(1–2):169–172. doi:10.1016/0921-5093(93)90209-W.
41.
HeYLYangYSHuZQ.Solidification and shaping of molten melts in electromagnetic field. Mater Rev. 2000;7:4–8.
