The distribution profile of residual stress on the surface layer of shot-peened materials is often in a hook shape. We analysed the distribution characteristics of residual stress by detecting dislocation configurations. The position of maximum compressive residual stress (MCRS) shifts inward with an increase in shot peening strength. It was found that long-term orderly dislocation pile-up groups frequently appeared in the MCRS region. The location of MCRS is not necessarily related to maximum dislocation density. At low strength, both the maximum dislocation density and the MCRS are on the surface region. At high strength, the surface region structures are composed of sub-grains and dislocation cells. The position of maximum dislocation density is between the surface region and the MCRS.
IjiriMShimonishiDNakagawaDEvolution of microstructure from the surface to the interior of Cr-Mo steel by water jet peening. Mater Sci Appl. 2017; 8:708–715. DOI:10.4236/msa.2017.810050.
2.
Al-AlkawiHJFenjanRMAbdul-ZahraaSK.Thermo-mechanical fatigue (TMF) model for (2017-T4) aluminum alloy under variable temperature. Int J Energ Environ. 2017; 20:976–982.
3.
LiKSpartacusGDongJEffect of ultrasonic shot peening on microstructure and properties of 301SS. Mater Manuf Process. 2017; 32:1851–1855. DOI:10.1080/10426914.2017.1364863.
4.
ZhuLGuanYWangYInfluence of process parameters of ultrasonic shot peening on surface nanocrystallization and hardness of pure titanium. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. 2017; 89:1451–1468. DOI:10.1007/s00170-016-9181-4.
5.
LuJZWuLJSunGFMicrostructural response and grain refinement mechanism of commercially pure titanium subjected to multiple laser shock peening impacts. Acta Mater. 2017; 127:252–266. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.01.050.
6.
ShenXShuklaPNathSImprovement in mechanical properties of titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-7Nb) subject to multiple laser shock peening. Surf Coat Tech. 2017; 327:101–109. DOI:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.08.009.
7.
NieXHeWZangSEffect study and application to improve high cycle fatigue resistance of TC11 titanium alloy by laser shock peening with multiple impacts. Surf Coat Tech. 2014; 253:68–75. DOI:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.05.015.
8.
BagherifardSFernandez-ParienteIGhelichiRFatigue behavior of notched steel specimens with nanocrystallized surface obtained by severe shot peening. Mater Design. 2013; 45:497–503. DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.025.
9.
LlanezaVBelzunceFJ.Study of the effects produced by shot peening on the surface of quenched and tempered steels: roughness, residual stresses and work hardening. Appl Surf Sci. 2015; 356:475–485. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.110.
10.
WuLHJiangCH.Effect of shot peening on residual stress and microstructure in the deformed layer of inconel 625. Mater Trans. 2017; 58:164–166. DOI:10.2320/matertrans.M2016298.
11.
LienertFHoffmeisterJRSchulzeV.Residual stress depth distribution after piezo peening of quenched and tempered AISI 4140. Mater Sci Forum. 2013; 768–769:526–534. DOI:10.4028/www.SCIENTIFIC.NET/MSF.768-769.526.
12.
LainéSJKnowlesKMDoorbarPJMicrostructural characterisation of metallic shot peened and laser shock peened Ti–6Al–4 V. Acta Mater. 2017; 123:350–361. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.044.
13.
MatlockBSSnohaDJGrendahlSM.Using XRD elastic and plastic strain data to evaluate the effectiveness of different cold-working techniques in aerospace materials. Powder Diffr. 2009; 24:S51–S58. DOI:10.1154/1.3133148.
14.
WohlfahrtHPeeningSStressesR. Residual stress and stress relaxation, Vol. 28 of Sagamore Army materials research conference proceedings. (E Kula and V Weiss, editors). Springer US; 1982. p. 71–92.
15.
OrtizALTianJWVillegasJCInterrogation of the microstructure and residual stress of a nickel-base alloy subjected to surface severe plastic deformation. Acta Mater. 2007; 56:413–426. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.003.
16.
RoyAKBandyopadhyaySSureshSBRelationship of residual stress to dislocation density in cold-worked martensitic alloy. Mat Sci Eng A. 2005; 416:134–138. DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2005.09.092.
17.
LiKFuXSChenGQMechanical properties of strengthened surface layer in Ti–6Al–4 V alloy induced by wet peening treatment. T Nonferr Metal Soc. 2016; 26:2868–2873. DOI:10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64415-1.
18.
WangCYLuoKYWangJCarbide-facilitated nanocrystallization of martensitic laths and carbide deformation in AISI 420 stainless steel during laser shock peening. Int J Plast. 2022; 150. DOI:10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2021.103191.
19.
LuHFXueKNXuXEffects of laser shock peening on microstructural evolution and wear property of laser hybrid remanufactured Ni25/Fe104 coating on H13 tool steel. J Mater Process Tech. 2021; 291. DOI:10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2021.103191.
20.
LuJZLuHFXuXHigh-performance integrated additive manufacturing with laser shock peening –induced microstructural evolution and improvement in mechanical properties of Ti6Al4 V alloy components. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2020; 148. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.103475.
21.
TurskiMClitheroeSEvansADEngineering the residual stress state and microstructure of stainless steel with mechanical surface treatments. Appl Phys A. 2010; 99:549–556. DOI:10.1007/s00339-010-5672-6.
22.
XingYMLuJ.An experimental study of residual stress induced by ultrasonic shot peening. J Mater Process Tech. 2004; 152:56–61. DOI:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.02.057.
23.
EdwardsDJGarnerFASimonenEPCharacterization of neutron-irradiated 300-series stainless steels to assess mechanisms of irradiation-assisted stress corrosion cracking. 1st ed. (CA): EPRI; California, 2001.
24.
LuKLuJ.Nanostructured surface layer on metallic materials induced by surface mechanical attrition treatment. Mat Sci Eng A. 2004; 375-377:38–45. DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.261.
