Ceramic particles reinforced iron matrix composites attract considerable interest in the industrial engineering field due to the ceramic's excellent fatigue and wear resistance. ZTA ceramic particle has been regarded as an ideal reinforcement phase. In this study, three-body abrasive wear behaviours and the mechanism of the ZTA/Fe composites and high chromium white cast iron Cr15 standard samples were investigated. The wear resistance of the ZTA/Fe composite was superior to the Cr15 standard sample under SiO2 abrasives. The extruded ZTA could protect the matrix surrounding ZTA ceramic particles. However, ZTA ceramic particles were cut together with the Cr15 matrix under SiC abrasives. The wear mechanism of the composites was a combination of the cutting and fatigue for SiC abrasives.
JianYXNingHYHuangZFThree-body abrasive wear behaviors and mechanism analysis of Fe-B-C cast alloys with various Mn contents. J Mater Res Technol. 2021; 14:1301–1311.
2.
HuCYWanXLWuKMOn the impacts of grain refinement and strain-induced deformation on three-body abrasive wear responses of 18Cr-8Ni austenitic stainless steel. Wear. 2020; 446–447:203181.
3.
RamadasHSarkarSNathAK.Three-body dry abrasive wear properties of 15-5 precipitation hardening stainless steel produced by laser powder bed fusion process. Wear. 2021; 470–471:203623.
4.
FangLLiuWMDuDSPredicting three-body abrasive wear using Monte Carlo methods. Wear. 2004; 256(7–8):685–694.
5.
PirsoJViljusMJuhaniKThree-body abrasive wear of TiC-NiMo cermets. Tribol Int. 2010; 43(1–2):340–346.
6.
GuilemanyJMMiguelJMVizcainoSRole of three-body abrasion wear in the sliding wear behaviour of WC-Co coatings obtained by thermal spraying. Surf Coat Technol. 2001; 140(2):141–146.
7.
İzcilerMÇelikH.Two- and three-body abrasive wear behaviour of different heat-treated boron alloyed high chromium cast iron grinding balls. J Mater Process Technol. 2000; 105(3):237–245.
8.
AxénNJacobsonSHogmarkS.Influence of hardness of the counterbody in three-body abrasive wear-an overlooked hardness effect. Tribol Int. 1994; 27(4):233–241.
9.
ZhengKHGaoYMLiYFThree-body abrasive wear resistance of iron matrix composites reinforced with ceramic particles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol. 2014; 228(1):3–10.
10.
HuangLDengXTJiaYEffects of using (Ti,Mo)C particles to reduce the three-body abrasive wear of a low alloy steel. Wear. 2018; 410–411:119–126.
11.
ZhouZFShanQJiangYHEffect of nanoscale V2C precipitates on the three-body abrasive wear behavior of high-Mn austenitic steel. Wear. 2019; 436–437:203009.
12.
HuJQYuanFPLiuXMEffect of plasticity on nanoscale wear of third-body particles. Tribol Int. 2021; 155:106739.
13.
FangLZhouQDLiQC.An experimental simulation of cutting wear in three-body abrasion. Wear. 1998; 219(2):188–194.
14.
WenEDSongRBCaiCH.Study of the three-body impact abrasive wear behaviour of a low alloy steel reinforced with niobium. J Manuf Process. 2019; 46:185–193.
15.
DengXLHuangLWangQThree-body abrasion wear resistance of TiC-reinforced low-alloy abrasion-resistant martensitic steel under dry and wet sand conditions. Wear. 2020; 452–453:203310.
16.
GheisariRPolycarpouAA.Three-body abrasive wear of hard coatings: effects of hardness and roughness. Thin Solid Films. 2018; 666:66–75.
17.
TianWWangYYangY.Three body abrasive wear characteristics of plasma sprayed conventional and nanostructured Al2O3-13%TiO2 coatings. Tribol Int. 2010; 43(5–6):876–881.
18.
LiCLiYFShiJInterfacial characteristics and wear performances of iron matrix composites reinforced with zirconia-toughened alumina ceramic particles. Ceram Int. 2022; 48(1):1293–1305.
19.
AvilaJDBandyopadhyayA.Zirconia-toughened alumina coated Ti6Al4V via additive manufacturing. Mater Lett. 2021; 291:129577.
20.
WuSQinYFuDRPreparation and mechanism of active Mo-Mn metallization on ZTA particles surface and interfacial bonding of reinforced iron matrix composite. Ceram Int. 2020; 46(10):15972–15981.
21.
LiPGaoJGongMYEffects of manganese on diffusion and wear behavior of ZTA particles reinforced iron matrix composites in vacuum. Vacuum. 2020; 177:109408.
22.
QiuBXingSMDongQComparison of properties and impact abrasive wear performance of ZrO2-Al2O3/Fe composite prepared by pressure casting and infiltration casting process. Tribol Int. 2020; 142:105979.
23.
LiCLiYFShiJInterfacial characterization and erosive wear performance of zirconia toughened alumina ceramics particles reinforced high chromium white cast irons composites. Tribol Int. 2022; 165:107262.
24.
KuntzMKrügerR.The effect of microstructure and chromia content on the properties of zirconia toughened alumina. Ceram Int. 2018; 44(2):2011–2020.
25.
LouMChenXXuKTemperature-induced wear transition in ceramic-metal composites. Acta Mater. 2021; 205:116545.
26.
ViatABouchetMDBVacherBNanocrystalline glaze layer in ceramic-metallic interface under fretting wear. Surf Coat Technol. 2016; 308:307–315.
27.
JiangDCuiHZChenHWear and corrosion properties of B4C-added CoCrNiMo high-entropy alloy coatings with in-situ coherent ceramic. Mater Des. 2021; 210:110068.
28.
ZhouKXiaoGJXuJYMaterial removal behavior of Cf/SiC ceramic matrix composites as a function of abrasive wear during diamond abrasive belt grinding. Wear. 2021; 486–487:204101.
29.
AttarzadehNMolaeiMBabaeiKNew promising ceramic coatings for corrosion and wear protection of steels: a review. Surf Interfaces. 2021; 23:100997.
30.
LiCGoeiRLiYFFabrication and wear property of NiCo coated ZrO2-Al2O3 ceramic particles reinforced high manganese steel-based composites. Wear. 2022; 492–493:204235.
31.
RuJJHeHJiangYHFabrication and interaction mechanism of Ni-encapsulated ZrO2-toughened Al2O3 powders reinforced high manganese steel composites. Adv Powder Technol. 2019; 30(10):2160–2168.
32.
ZhengBCLiWTuXHEffect of titanium binder addition on the interface structure and three-body abrasive wear behavior of ZTA ceramic particles-reinforced high chromium cast iron. Ceram Int. 2020; 46(9):13798–13806.
33.
QiuBXingSMDongQ.Green preparation and dry sliding wear properties of a macro-ZTA/Fe composite produced by a two-step method. Metals (Basel). 2019; 9(9):986.
34.
ZhouMJJiangYHChongXY.Interface transition layer interaction mechanism for ZTAP/HCCI composites. Sci Eng Compos Mater. 2018; 25(5):881–890.
35.
BoyesJW.Development and use of an abrasion test for cast irons and steels. Iron Steel. 1969; 42(1):57–63.
36.
TuckerJDNajafabadiRAllenTRAb initio-based diffusion theory and tracer diffusion in Ni-Cr and Ni-Fe alloys. J Nucl Mater. 2010; 405(3):216–234.
37.
YangBLiCSiXQJoining ZTA ceramics by using whiskers reinforced borosilicate glasses for high-temperature applications. Mater Lett. 2021; 304:130583.
38.
XueDJiaYWZhangXZEffect of ZTA volume fractions on the microstructure and properties of ZTAp/high manganese steel composites. Mater Res Express. 2019; 6:046535.
39.
YiYLXingJDLuYFEffect of normal load on two-body abrasive wear of an Fe-B-Cr-C based alloy with minor Cu and Ni additions. Wear. 2018; 408–409:160–170.
40.
TozettiKDAlbertinEScandianC.Abrasive size and load effects on the wear of a 19.9% chromium and 2.9% carbon cast iron. Wear. 2017; 376–377:46–53.
41.
RichardsonRCD.The wear of metals by hard abrasives. Wear. 1967; 10(4):291–309.
42.
BorodichFMHarrisSJKeerLMWear and abrasiveness of hard carbon-containing coatings under variation of the load. Surf Coat Technol. 2004; 179(1):78–82.
43.
NeogSPBakshiSDDasS.Effect of normal loading on microstructural evolution and sliding wear behaviour of novel continuously cooled carbide free bainitic steel. Tribol Int. 2021; 157:106846.
44.
ChandNNeogiS.Mechanism of material removal during three-body abrasion of FRP composite. Tribol Lett. 1998; 4:81–85.
45.
LiBGaoYMLiCImproved tribological performance of nickel based high temperature lubricating composites with addition of metallic oxides. Wear. 2021; 480–481:203938.
46.
SrinathGGnanamoorthyR.Two-body abrasive wear characteristics of nylon clay nanocomposites-effect of grit size, load, and sliding velocity. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006; 435–436:181–186.
