In this paper, high-strength steel is prepared by different heat-treatment processes. Through split Hopkinson pressure bar experiment, optical microscope, scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffractometer, the microstructure evolution and mechanical behaviour under high strain rate were studied. The results show that the samples prepared by the two-step isothermal method have the highest compressive strength under the same strain rate, especially at 5000 s−1, the highest can reach 2097 MPa. The retained austenite undergoes transformation under high strain rate conditions, which improves the plastic deformation ability of the material. Compared with the one-step isothermal heat-treatment process, the two-step isothermal heat-treatment process can better control the strength and plasticity under high strain rate deformation conditions.
CaballeroFGBhadeshiaHMawellaKDesign of novel high strength bainitic steels: part 2. Mater Sci Technol. 2001; 17:517–522.
2.
CaballeroFGBhadeshiaHMawellaKDesign of novel high strength bainitic steels: part 1. Mater Sci Technol. 2001; 17:512–516.
3.
JoMCKimSSuhDWRole of retained austenite on adiabatic shear band formation during high strain rate loading in high-strength bainitic steels. Mater Sci Eng A. 2020; 778:139–118.
4.
LuTLiYZhaoHDynamic constitutive behavior investigation of a novel low alloy ultra-high strength steel. Mater Res Express. 2021; 8:016508.
Garcia-MateoCCaballeroFG.The role of retained austenite on tensile properties of steels with bainitic microstructures. Mater Trans. 2005; 46:1839–1846.
7.
KimSJoMCSuhDWSuppression of adiabatic shear band formation by martensitic transformation of retained austenite during split Hopkinson pressure bar test for a high-strength bainitic steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021; 814:141–127.
8.
TsaiSPTsaiSNTsaiYTThe application of convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED) analysis on transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) steels. Microsc Res Tech. 2019; 82(1):4–11.
SlyckenJVVerleysenPDegrieckJThe effect of silicon, aluminium and phosphor on the dynamic behavior and phenomenological modelling of multiphase TRIP steels. Metals Mater Int. 2007; 13:93–101.
19.
G M StoutPFollansbeeSStrain rate sensitivity, strain hardening, and yield behavior of 304L stainless steel. J Eng Mater Technol. 1986; 108:344–353.
20.
WeiXFuRLinL.Tensile deformation behavior of cold-rolled TRIP-aided steels over large range of strain rates. Mater Sci Eng A. 2007; 465:260–266.
21.
TsaiYTLinCRLeeWSMechanical behavior and microstructural evolution of nanostructured bainite under high-strain rate deformation by Hopkinson bar. Scr Mater. 2016; 115:46–51.
22.
LiQZmudzkiPAlameeriSMorphology of adiabatic shear bands in cylindrical specimens of AISI 4340 steel impacted by Hopkinson pressure bar. Met Sci J. 2013; 20:676–678.
23.
WangWMengLHeCExperimental study on high strain rate behavior of high strength 600–1000 MPa dual phase steels and 1200 MPa fully martensitic steels. Mater Des. 2013; 47:510–521.
24.
SalisburyCPWorswickMJMayerR.High rate constitutive modeling of aluminium alloy tube. J Phys IV. 2006; 134:43–48.
25.
CollaVSanctisMDDimatteoAStrain hardening behavior of dual-phase steels. Metall Mater Trans A. 2009; 40:2557–2567.
26.
HaoQQinSLiuYEffect of retained austenite on the dynamic tensile behavior of a novel quenching-partitioning-tempering martensitic steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016; 662:16–25.
27.
MeyersMANesterenkoVFLasalviaJCShear localization in dynamic deformation of materials: microstructural evolution and self-organization. Mater Sci Eng A. 2001; 317:204–225.
