Materials engineers have increasing control over nanoscale chemical composition and nanostructures. The latter can be easily analysed by the scanning electron microscope (SEM) yet nanoscale chemical analysis in the SEM poses challenges. Nevertheless, nanoscale chemical analysis capabilities have been developed in the LV-SEM by secondary electron hyperspectral imaging (SEHI). In this article, the insights that SEHI has provided into well characterised semiconductor, photovoltaic, polymer and hard carbon materials are reviewed. Instrument and experimental considerations for the obtainment of secondary electron hyper-spectra are discussed and recommendations for future analyses in the LV-SEM by SEHI are made.
GoldsteinJINewburyDEMichaelJRScanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. 4th ed.New York ( NY): Springer; 2018. p. 550.
2.
MüllerováIKonvalinaI.Collection of secondary electrons in scanning electron microscopes. J Microsc. 12 2009; 236(3):203–210.
3.
ZhuYInadaHNakamuraKImaging single atoms using secondary electrons with an aberration-corrected electron microscope. Nat Mater. 2009; 8(10):808–812.
4.
GriffinBJ.A comparison of conventional Everhart-Thornley style and in-lens secondary electron detectors-a further variable in scanning electron microscopy. Scanning. 5 2011; 33(3):162–173.
5.
AsahinaSTogashiTTerasakiOHigh-resolution low-voltage scanning electron microscope study of nanostructured materials. Microsc Anal. 2012; 26(7):12–14.
6.
MastersRCPearsonAJGlenTSSub-nanometre resolution imaging of polymer-fullerene photovoltaic blends using energy-filtered scanning electron microscopy. Nat Commun. 4 2015; 6(22).
7.
JoyDCJoyCS.Low voltage scanning electron microscopy. Micron. 6 1996; 27(3–4):247–263.
8.
JoyDC.Scanning electron microscopy: second best no more. Nat Mater. 2009; 8(10):776–777.
9.
EgertonRFLiPMalacM.Radiation damage in the TEM and SEM. Micron. 2004.
10.
StehlingNMastersRZhouYNew perspectives on nano-engineering by secondary electron spectroscopy in the helium ion and scanning electron microscope. MRS Commun. 2362018; 8(02):226–240.
11.
JoyDCKhannaNBraskiD.Secondary electron spectroscopy for microanalysis and defect review. Metrol, Insp, Process Control Microlithogr XIII. 1999.
12.
SalimMHurstJMontgomeryMAirborne contamination of graphite as analyzed by ultra-violet photoelectron spectroscopy. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena. 1 8 2019; 235:8–15.
13.
MastersRCStehlingNAbramsKJMapping polymer molecular order in the SEM with secondary electron hyperspectral imaging. Adv Sci. 6 3 2019; 6(5).
14.
LorussoGFOhashiTYamaguchiA “Enabling CD SEM metrology for 5 nm technology node and beyond,” in Metrology, inspection, and process control for microlithography XXXI. San Jose ( CA); 2017.
15.
LabbéS., FaouziT., BelissardJ. and HazartJ., Limits of model-based CD-SEM metrology. 34th European Mask and Lithography Conference. Grenoble; 2018.
16.
CunninghamK.Inline SEM electron beam review accelerates LTPS display yield ramps. Nanochip Fab Solutions. 2016; 11(1):32–35.
17.
SchönjahnCHumphreysCJGlickM.Energy-filtered imaging in a field-emission scanning electron microscope for dopant mapping in semiconductors. J Appl Phys. 2002; 92(12):7667–7671.
18.
SchönjahnCBroomRFHumphreysCJOptimizing and quantifying dopant mapping using a scanning electron microscope with a through-the-lens detector. Appl Phys Lett. 14 7 2003; 83(2):293–295.
19.
KazemianPMentinkSAMRodenburgCQuantitative secondary electron energy filtering in a scanning electron microscope and its applications. Ultramicroscopy. 2 2007; 107(2–3):140–150.
20.
RodenburgCJepsonMAInksonBJEnergy filtered scanning electron microscopy: applications to characterisation of semiconductors. J Phy: Conference Series. 2010.
21.
OrjiNGBadarogluMBarnesBMMetrology for the next generation of semiconductor devices. Nat Electron. 2018; 1:532–547.
22.
Garrat-ReedA. J. and BellD. C., Energy dispersive X-ray analysis in the electron microscope, 1st ed.,RainforthM., editor, London: Garland Science; 2003.
23.
ReimerL.Scanning electron microscopy: physics of image formation and microanalysis. 2nd ed.,Berlin: Springer; 1998. p. 527.
24.
FrielJJLymanCE.X-ray mapping in electron-beam instruments. Microsc Microanal. 2006; 12:2–25.
25.
WillichPBethkeR. “Practical aspects and applications of EPMA at low electron energies,” in Microbeam and nanobeam analysis. Vienna: Springer; 1996. p. 631–638.
26.
BoyesED.Analytical potential of EDS at low voltages. Mikrochim Acta. 2002; 138:225–234.
27.
BelhajMJbaraOOdofSAn anomalous contrast in scanning electron microscopy of insulators: the pseudo-mirror effect. Scanning. 1 1 2000; 22(6):352–356.
28.
CastaingR.Application of electron probes to local chemical and crystalographic analysis [PhD Thesis]. Paris: University of Paris; 1951.
NewburyDE.Castaing's electron microprobe and its impact on materials science. Microsc Microanal. 2001; 7(2):178–192.
31.
BurgessSLiXHollandJ.“High spatial resolution energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry in the SEM and the detection of light elements including lithium,” 2013.
32.
JanyBRJanasAKrokF.Retrieving the quantitative chemical information at nanoscale from scanning electron microscope energy dispersive X-ray measurements by machine learning. Nano Lett. 2017; 17(11):6520–6525.
RinaldiRLlovetX.Electron probe microanalysis: a review of the past, present, and future. Microsc Microanal. 2015; 21:1053–1069.
35.
TerauchiMKoshiyaSSatohFChemical state information of bulk specimens obtained by SEM-based soft-X-ray emission spectrometry. Microsc Microanal. 2014; 20:692–697.
36.
CazauxJ.Auger microscopy and electron probe microanalysis. In: BoekesteinAPavićevićMK, editors. Electron microbeam analysis. Mikrochimica Acta. vol. 12, Vienna: Springer; 1992. p. 37–52.
37.
MeitnerL.Uber den Zusammenhang zwischen β- und γ-Strahlen. L. Z. Physik. 1922; 9(1):145–152.
38.
AugerP.Sur les rayons β secondaires produits dans un gaz par des rayons X. C.R.A.S.1923; 177:169–171.
PalmbergPW.Optimisation of Auger electron spectroscopy in LEED systems. Appl Phys Lett. 1968; 13:183.
41.
ChangCC.Auger electron spectroscopy. Surf Sci. 3 1971; 25(1):53–79.
42.
BargeronCB.High vacuum scanning electron microscopy as a tool in surface analysis. Laurel ( MD); 1980.
43.
RadesSHodoroabaVDSalgeTHigh-resolution imaging with SEM/T-SEM, EDX and SAM as a combined methodical approach for morphological and elemental analyses of single engineered nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2014; 4(91):49577–49587.
44.
TaylorNJ.Auger electron spectrometer as a tool for surface analysis (contamination monitor). Citation: J Vac Sci Technol. 1969; 6(241).
45.
WillisRFFittonBSkinnerDK.Study of carbon-fiber surfaces using Auger and secondary electron emission spectroscopy. J Appl Phys. 1972; 43(11):4412–4419.
46.
BaerDREngelhardMHJohnsonGESurface characterization of nanomaterials and nanoparticles: important needs and challenging opportunities. J Vac Sci Technol A: Vac Surf Films. 9 2013; 31(5):050820.
47.
PowellCJ.Growth and trends in Auger-electron spectroscopy and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for surface analysis. Citation: J Vac Sci Technol A. 2003; 21:42.
48.
CresseyD.Tiny traits cause big headaches. vol. 467, Nature Publishing Group; 2010. pp. 264–265.
49.
StefaniakABHackleyVARoebbenGNanoscale reference materials for environmental, health and safety measurements: needs, gaps and opportunities. Nanotoxicology. 7 12 2013; 7(8):1325–1337.
50.
TurnerNHSchreifelsJA.Surface analysis: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Auger electron spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 1992; 64(12):302–320.
51.
WebbLJMichalakDJBiteenJSHigh-resolution soft X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic studies and scanning Auger microscopy studies of the air oxidation of alkylated silicon (111) surfaces, 2006.
52.
MacdonaldNCWaldropJR.Auger electron spectroscopy in the scanning electron microscope: Auger electron images. Appl Phys Lett. 1971; 19:315.
53.
El GomatiMMPruttonM.Monte Carlo calculations of the spatial resolution in a scanning Auger electron microscope. Surf Sci. 1 4 1978; 72(3):485–494.
54.
HolmRReinfandtB.Auger microanalysis in a conventional scanning electron microscope. Scanning. 1978; 1(1):42–57.
55.
JackaM.Scanning Auger microscopy: recent progress in data analysis and instrumentation. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena. 2001; 114-116:277–282.
56.
HofmannS. In: ErtlG, LüthH, MillsDL, editors. Auger- and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy in materials science: a user-oriented guide,. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p. 528.
57.
SchwarzerRAHjelenJ.Backscattered electron imaging with an EBSD detector. Micros Today. 1 2015; 23(1):12–17.
58.
JoyDCNewburyDEDavidsonDL.Electron channeling patterns in the scanning electron microscope. J Appl Phys. 1982; 53(8):81–122.
59.
HeniniM.Scanning electron microscopy: an introduction. III-Vs Rev. 2000; 13(4):40–44.
60.
VenablesJAHarlandCJ.Electron back-scattering patterns – a new technique for obtaining crystallographic information in the scanning electron microscope. Philos Mag. 1973; 27(5):1193–1200.
61.
SugaMAsahinaSSakudaYRecent progress in scanning electron microscopy for the characterization of fine structural details of nano materials. Prog Solid State Chem. 1 5 2014; 42(1–2):1–21.
62.
JoyDC.Contrast in high-resolution scanning electron microscope images. J Microsc. 2 1991; 161(2):343–355.
63.
MckayKG.Secondary electron emission. Adv Electron Electron Phys. 1948; 1(C):65–130.
64.
SeilerH.Secondary electron emission in the scanning electron microscope. J Appl Phys. 1983; 54(11):R1–R18.
65.
KanayaKKawakatsuH.Secondary electron emission due to primary and backscattered electrons. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 1972; 5:1727–1742.
66.
JoensMSHuynhCKasuboskiJMHelium Ion microscopy (HIM) for the imaging of biological samples at sub-nanometer resolution. Sci Rep. 17 12 2013; 3:3514.
67.
EverhartTEWellsOOOatleyCW.Factors affecting contrast and resolution in the scanning electron microscope. J Electron Control. 1 8 1959; 7(2):97–111.
68.
EverhartTEThornleyRFM.Wide-band detector for micro-microampere low-energy electron currents. J Sci Instrum. 1960; 37(7):246–248.
69.
RodenburgCJepsonMABoschEGEnergy selective scanning electron microscopy to reduce the effect of contamination layers on scanning electron microscope dopant mapping. Ultramicroscopy. 8 2010; 110(9):1185–1191.
70.
HaworthLJ.The energy distribution of secondary electrons from molybdenum. Phys Rev. 1 7 1935; 48(1):88–95.
71.
KollathR.Zur Energieverteilung der Sekundärelektronen II. Meßergebnisse und Diskussion. Ann Phys. 1947; 436(7-8):357–380.
72.
RöderA.Secondary electron microanalysis. Mikrochim Acta. 1992; 107:105–116.
73.
JoyDCPrasadMSMeyerHM.Experimental secondary electron spectra under SEM conditions. J Microsc. 7 2004; 215(1):77–85.
74.
Mil'shteinandSJoyDC.Microanalysis using secondary electrons in scanning electron microscopy. Scanning. 7 12 2006; 23(5):295–297.
75.
BellissimoAPierantozziGMRuoccoASecondary electron generation mechanisms in carbon allotropes at low impact electron energies. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena. 2019.
76.
UenoNSugitaKSekiK“Low-energy electron transmission and secondary-electron emission experiments on crystalline and molten long-chain alkanes,” 1986.
HoffmanAPrawerSKalishR.Structural transformation of diamond induced by 1-keV Ar-ion irradiation as studied by Auger and secondary-electron spectroscopies and total-secondary-electron-yield measurements. Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1992; 45(22):12736–12745.
79.
AbramsKJDaporMStehlingNMaking sense of complex carbon and metal/carbon systems by secondary electron hyperspectral imaging. Adv Sci. 7 10 2019; 6(19):1900719.
80.
KumarVSchmidtWLSchileoGSupplementary information: nano-scale mapping of bromide segregation on cross-sections of complex hybrid Perovskite photovoltaic films using secondary electron hyperspectral imaging in the Scanning Electron Microscope,” 2017.
81.
FerrónJVidalRABajalesNRole of HOPG density of empty electronic states above vacuum on electron emission spectra induced by ions and UV photons. Surf Sci. 1 7 2014; 622:83–86.
82.
FarrNPashneh-TalaSClaeyssensFCharacterising cross-linking within polymeric biomaterials in the SEM by secondary electron hyperspectral imaging. (tbc) ACCEPTED. 2019;20.
83.
KumarVSchmidtWLSchileoGNanoscale mapping of bromide segregation on the cross sections of complex hybrid perovskite photovoltaic films using secondary electron hyperspectral imaging in a scanning electron microscope. ACS Omega. 31 5 2017; 2(5):2126–2133.
84.
DaporM.Monte Carlo simulation of secondary electron emission from dielectric targets. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2012.
85.
RidzelOYAstašauskasVWernerWS.Low energy (1–100 eV) electron inelastic mean free path (IMFP) values determined from analysis of secondary electron yields (SEY) in the incident energy range of 0.1–10 keV. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena. 2 2019; 12.
86.
DemersHPoirier-DemersNCoutureARThree-dimensional electron microscopy simulation with the CASINO Monte Carlo software. Scanning. 5 2011; 33(3):135–146.
87.
DrouinDCoutureARJolyDCASINO v2.42 – a fast and easy-to-use modeling tool for scanning electron microscopy and microanalysis users. Scanning. 5 2007; 29(3):92–101.
88.
AzzoliniMMorresiTAbramsKAnisotropic approach for simulating electron transport in layered materials: computational and experimental study of highly oriented pyrolitic graphite. J Phys Chem. 2018; 122:10159–10166.
89.
DaporMMastersRCRossISecondary electron spectra of semi-crystalline polymers – a novel polymer characterisation tool?J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena. 1 1 2018; 222:95–105.
90.
OnoSKanayaK.The energy dependence of secondary emission based on the range-energy retardation power formula. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 1979; 12:619–632.
91.
ShiraishiMAtaM.Work function of carbon nanotubes. Carbon N Y. 2001; 39(12):1913–1917.
92.
JoyDC.Resolution in low voltage scanning electron microscopy. J Microsc. 12 1985; 140(3):283–292.
93.
DrouinDHovingtonPGauvinR.CASINO: a new monte carlo code in C language for electron beam interactions-part II: tabulated values of the mott cross section. Scanning. 7 12 1997; 19(1):20–28.
94.
MullejansHBlelochALHowieASecondary electron coincidence detection and time of flight spectroscopy. Ultramicroscopy. 1993; 52(3-4):360–368.
95.
KnollM.Aufladepotentiel und sekundäremission elektronenbestrahlter körper. Zeitschrift für Technische Physik. 1935; 16:467–475.
96.
JoyDC.Control of charging in low-voltage SEM. Scanning. 1989; 11(1):1–4.
97.
WalkerCGEl-GomatiMMAssa'dAMThe secondary electron emission yield for 24 solid elements excited by primary electrons in the range 250-5000 ev: a theory/experiment comparison. Scanning. 9 2008; 30(5):365–380.
98.
GomatiMMELWalkerCGHAssa'dAMDTheory experiment comparison of the electron backscattering factor from solids at low electron energy (250–5,000 eV). Scanning. 1 2008; 30(1):2–15.
99.
SmaragdisPFevotteCMysoreGJStatic and dynamic source separation using nonnegative factorizations: a unified view. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2014; 31(3):66–75.
100.
GowenAAMariniFEsquerreCTime series hyperspectral chemical imaging data: challenges, solutions and applications. Anal Chim Acta. 2011; 705:272–282.
101.
DobigeonNBrunN.Spectral mixture analysis of EELS spectrum-images. Ultramicroscopy. 9 2012; 120:25–34.
102.
BonnetNBrunNColliexC.Extracting information from sequences of spatially resolved EELS spectra using multivariate statistical analysis. Ultramicroscopy. 7 1999; 77(3-4):97–112.
103.
MutoSYoshidaTTatsumiK.Diagnostic nano-analysis of materials properties by multivariate curve resolution applied to spectrum images by S/TEM-EELS. Mater Trans. 2009; 50(5):964–969.
104.
ShigaMTatsumiKMutoSSparse modeling of EELS and EDX spectral imaging data by nonnegative matrix factorization. Ultramicroscopy. 1 11 2016; 170:43–59.
105.
WanQAbramsKJMastersRCMapping nanostructural variations in silk by secondary electron hyperspectral imaging. Adv Mater. 2017; 29:1703510.
106.
RodenburgCJepsonMAEInksonBJEnergy filtered scanning electron microscopy: applications to dopant contrast. J Phys Conf Ser. 2010; 209:012053.
107.
KonvalinaIMikaFKrátkýSIn-lens band-pass filter for secondary electrons in ultrahigh resolution SEM. Mater (Basel). 19 7 2019; 12(14):2307.
108.
StehlingNAbramsKJHollandCRevealing spider silk's 3D nanostructure through low temperature plasma etching and advanced low-voltage SEM. Frontiers Mater. 1 2019; 5(25).
109.
KhursheedA.Scanning electron microscope optics and spectrometers. World Scientific Publishing; 2011. p. 402.
110.
El-GomatiMZaggoutFJayacodyHWhy is it possible to detect doped regions of semiconductors in low voltage SEM: a review and update. Surf Interface Anal. 1 11 2005; 37(11):901–911.
111.
HashimotoYTakeuchiSSunaoshiTVoltage contrast imaging with energy filtered signal in a field-emission scanning electron microscope. Ultramicroscopy. 2 2020; 209(1).
112.
HerzingAARichterLJAndersonIM.3D nanoscale characterization of thin-Film organic photovoltaic device structures via spectroscopic contrast in the TEM. J Phys Chemistry C. 21 10 2010; 114(41):17501–17508.
113.
AbramsKJWanQStehlingNANanoscale mapping of semi-crystalline polypropylene. Phys Status Solidi (C) Current Topics Solid State Phys. 1 12 2017; 14(12).
114.
ZhouYFoxDSMaguirePQuantitative secondary electron imaging for work function extraction at atomic level and layer identification of graphene. Sci Rep. 2 2016; 6(16).
